The Fear Thesaurus

The problem this book solves is one I hit constantly in manuscripts. A character will not change. The writer knows they will not change, has some sense of why, and cannot get it onto the page in a way a reader can feel. So the resistance reads as stubbornness, or worse, as the author holding the plot back.

The Fear Thesaurus names what is happening. The character is avoiding something, the avoidance has a shape, and that shape is describable in the same systematic way the earlier volumes describe an emotion or a setting.

What it catalogs

Over eighty fears, sorted into five categories: Survival, Stability and Control, Relationship, Identity, and Moral and Existential. The categories matter more than they look, because they map onto what a character needs, and a fear that threatens a need is a fear that will bend a plot.

Each entry works through the same set of questions. What situations trigger this fear. How it shows up in the character’s behavior and their decisions. What internal conflict it generates. Which emotional wounds it could have grown from. How it will hinder and disrupt them over the course of a story. And what it would take for them to minimize or overcome it.

That last one is the piece most craft books skip. Plenty of references will tell you what a frightened person looks like. This one asks what has to happen for them to stop being that person, which is the actual work of a character arc.

Where did The Fear Thesaurus earn its keep?

The front matter, which almost nobody reads and which is the most valuable part of these books.

The sections on the fatal flaw and on weaving fear into story structure changed how I approach an outline. The argument is that a character’s central fear is not a trait you assign, it is the thing that determines which turning points land and which ones fall flat. Put the wrong fear under a character and the midpoint has nothing to break.

I used it on a manuscript where the protagonist kept refusing an obvious opportunity, and the refusals were starting to read as authorial delay. Working through the profile turned up a fear of being seen as a fraud that the author had implied in backstory and never converted into behavior. Once the avoidance had a name, the specific choices followed, and the character stopped looking obstinate and started looking afraid.

It is also useful in the opposite direction. If a character is too agreeable, too available, too willing, they usually have no fear operating, and that is why they are boring.

Is The Fear Thesaurus worth reading?

This one stands closer to essential than most of the series. The Emotion Thesaurus is still the book to buy first, because showing a feeling is the more basic skill. But Fear does something the others do not, which is connect a single character element to arc, structure, and the fatal flaw all at once, and it does it without turning into a theory book.

The complaint, and it applies to the whole series, is that a reference like this can produce mechanical writing if you use it as a menu. The entries are starting points for a character you already understand. Pick a fear because it sounds interesting and you get a character assembled from parts.

Buying direct from the publisher gets a companion hub with a workshop, a genre handout, and a greatest-fear worksheet. Worth doing, since the worksheet is the part you will use repeatedly.

Frequently Asked Questions