The Conflict Thesaurus-A Writer’s Guide to Obstacles, Adversaries, and Inner Struggles Volume 2

This is the second half of a reference too large to fit in one book. The Conflict Thesaurus, Volume 2 picks up where the first left off and extends the catalog of obstacles, adversaries, and inner struggles into scenarios the first did not reach. If you found Volume 1 useful and started running out of fresh ways to make a character’s life harder, this is the refill, and a prolific writer will exhaust the first volume faster than they expect.

The format matches its predecessor exactly. Each entry covers the nature of the conflict, how it plays out, the emotions and decisions it forces, the possible outcomes, and how it escalates. Between the two volumes, the series assembles one of the most complete catalogs of story friction a writer can keep on the shelf, spanning relationship ruptures, power struggles, moral dilemmas, failures, betrayals, and the slow internal erosions that wreck a character from inside.

What the second volume adds

The value here is range. A writer working on their fifth novel, or a prolific short-story writer, burns through the obvious conflicts quickly, and a draft starts reaching for the same handful of problems, the argument, the deadline, the secret about to come out. Volume 2 widens the menu enough that you can keep finding pressure that feels fresh instead of recycled.

I use it exactly as I use Volume 1, as a prompt when a scene needs friction and the obvious options are spent, and having both on the shelf means I rarely run dry on credible ways to make a character’s situation worse, which is most of a novelist’s job.

Where the second volume tends to earn its place is in the subtler and more specific conflicts, the ones a writer would not generate on their own. The first volume covers the big, recognizable categories. The second gets into the granular scenarios, the conflicts of circumstance and timing and competing loyalties that do not announce themselves as conflict but quietly wreck a character’s plans.

Those are the entries I find myself reaching for in the middle of a book, when the obvious dramatic confrontations are spent and the story needs friction that feels like life instead of like plot machinery. A betrayal is easy to think of. The slow erosion of trust between two people who both believe they are in the right is harder, and that is the kind of thing the second volume is good at surfacing.

It also helps with the problem of escalation across a long manuscript. A novel cannot run on one kind of conflict for four hundred pages; the reader numbs to it. Having a wide catalog at hand makes it easier to vary the pressure, to follow an external disaster with an internal reckoning and then a conflict of competing loyalties, so the tension keeps changing shape instead of repeating. For a writer managing a full-length book, that variety is worth more than any single brilliant scenario.

Worth it, but only after Volume 1

On its own this is the less essential book, simply because you would naturally start with the first volume, and a writer who is not yet straining against the limits of Volume 1 does not need this one. As the completing half of the set, though, it earns its place for anyone who wore out the first and wants the full range at hand. The honest guidance is sequence: buy Volume 1, use it hard, and when you find yourself wishing for more scenarios, this is the next purchase instead of the first.

Is The Conflict Thesaurus worth reading?

A solid extension of a strong reference. It does not break new conceptual ground, it does not need to, it simply gives a working writer more of the thing that made the first volume valuable. For the prolific, that is reason enough to own it.

Frequently Asked Questions