Lapsing Into a Comma

Most usage guides are dry. Lapsing Into a Comma by Bill Walsh is not, and that is its whole appeal. Walsh, a copy chief at the Washington Post, wrote an opinionated, funny, frankly curmudgeonly guide to the fine points of grammar, punctuation, and usage in the real world of modern publishing, going beyond the standard stylebooks to argue, with personality, for how the language should actually be handled. For a writer or editor who cares about getting the details right and would rather be entertained than lectured, it is a genuinely enjoyable usage book, which is a rare thing.

The book speaks from the copy desk, the place where the rubber meets the road on usage, and Walsh’s authority is that of a working professional who fixes other people’s prose for a living and has opinions about all of it.

Usage with a voice

What sets the book apart is that Walsh has a genuine, entertaining voice, and he uses it to make usage interesting. Instead of flatly listing rules, he argues, grumbles, mocks common errors, and explains his reasoning, often disagreeing with conventional wisdom and defending his positions with wit. This personality does real work: it makes the fine distinctions memorable in a way a neutral reference cannot, because an opinion delivered with humor sticks where a rule stated blandly slides off. For a reader who finds standard style guides a chore, Walsh’s curmudgeonly charm turns usage study into something close to fun.

The working professional’s perspective

The book’s substance comes from Walsh’s vantage as a real copy editor dealing with contemporary, practical problems, modern terms, evolving usage, the gray areas the older stylebooks do not cover or rule on rigidly. He goes beyond the AP Stylebook to address how language is actually used and should be handled in current writing, making it a useful complement to the standard references instead of a replacement: where they give the rule, Walsh gives the judgment, the why, and the exception. For a writer doing their own copyediting, that professional perspective on the genuinely tricky cases is the practical payoff beneath the entertainment.

The honest caveats

The caveats follow from its nature. It is opinionated, which is the charm but also a limit: Walsh’s positions are his, sometimes idiosyncratic or contrarian, and a reader should take them as one expert’s well-argued views instead of settled law, occasionally he is simply stating a preference. It is also a complement to, not a substitute for, a comprehensive style guide; it roams and entertains instead of covering the field systematically, so a writer still needs a standard reference for thoroughness. And dating from 2000, some of its specific contemporary examples have themselves aged, though the sensibility and most of the judgments hold. These are minor against its pleasures.

Verdict

It is that rare thing, a usage book that is actually a pleasure to read, valuable for making the fine points memorable through a genuine voice and for the working copy editor’s judgment it brings to the tricky cases the stylebooks dodge. It loses a little for being opinionated instead of authoritative, idiosyncratic in places, and a roaming complement instead of a systematic reference. For a writer or editor who cares about usage and wants wit with their rules, it is a delight and a genuinely useful second opinion, best paired with a comprehensive guide for the systematic coverage it does not attempt. Entertaining, sharp, and quietly instructive.

Frequently Asked Questions