Latest
What an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionResurrection as a Narrative StructureBooks to Give a WriterThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Show Don’t Tell

The Emotion Thesaurus

The Emotion Thesaurus

A Writer's Guide to Character Expression

Publisher:JADD Publishing
Published:February 14, 2019
Pages:306
ISBN:978-0999296349
Language:English
Share:

Buy Now

Description:

TL;DR

10/10. The gold-standard fix for the writer stuck describing the same clenched jaw for the fortieth time. 130-plus emotions, each with body language, internal sensations, thoughts, and the cues for a character hiding the feeling. A tool you open mid-draft and dog-ear, not a book you finish.

Every writer hits the same wall sooner or later. A character is furious, or heartbroken, or terrified, and what lands on the page is that they clenched their jaw and their heart pounded, for the fortieth time. The cues go stale because you keep reaching for the first one that comes to mind, and the first one is always the obvious one. The Emotion Thesaurus exists to get you over that wall, and it does the job better than anything else in print.

It was the first book in what became the Writers Helping Writers series, and it remains the one most writers own. Angela Ackerman and Becca Puglisi built it around a single, narrow, maddening problem: how do you show what a character feels without simply naming the feeling? Telling the reader someone is angry is flat and lazy. Showing the anger through the body, the gut, and the racing mind is what pulls a reader into a scene, and it’s exactly the place writers stall out.

How an entry is actually built

Open the book to any emotion and the structure is the same. Take anger. The entry gives you physical signals, the jaw, the flushed neck, the jabbing finger. It gives you internal sensations, the heat climbing the chest, the pulse in the ears. It gives you mental responses, the narrowing of thought down to the target.

Then it does the thing that makes the book worth owning: it lists cues for the suppressed version, the character holding the anger in, because a clenched smile over fury is far more useful on the page than a shout.

The current edition runs to more than 130 emotions, ordered loosely from mild to severe, and they cross-reference each other so you can trace a character escalating from annoyance to anger to rage, or sliding back down toward weary resignation. That escalation map is quietly one of the best features. Emotions in real scenes are rarely static. They move, and the book is built to help you move them.

Keep reading

Showing and telling: why “show don’t tell” is bad advice: the principle this book serves, with the nuance the slogan always loses.

The craft chapters earn their place

Newcomers treat the entries as the entire book and skip the front matter. That’s a mistake. The opening chapters are a genuine short course on writing emotion. The authors break down the specific failures, the overused cues that turn an entire cast into nodding, smiling, jaw-clenching blurs, the tendency to name a feeling and move on, the trap of melodrama where every emotion gets dialed to eleven.

They explain how to surface a hidden feeling through subtext, how to vary intensity so a quiet scene reads differently from a crisis, and what to settle about a character before drafting so their reactions stay consistent. That material teaches the principle. The 130 entries just help you execute it on a given afternoon.

The right way to use it, and the wrong

Used well, it’s a brainstorming prompt. A character’s reaction has gone generic, you open the entry, and it knocks you out of the three tired gestures you default to and toward the specific thing this particular person would do in this particular moment. A grieving soldier and a grieving grandmother don’t grieve the same way, and the book’s range helps you find the cue that belongs to the character instead of to grief in general.

Used badly, it becomes a copy-paste menu, and then every character reacts from the same list and the prose flattens in a new direction. The authors warn about this directly. The fix is to treat the entry as a spark, not a script: read three or four cues, close the book, and write the one your character would actually show, often a variation the list only suggested.

I’ve kept a copy on the shelf for years and reach for it mid-draft more than almost any other reference, never to lift a cue whole, always to break a logjam when a scene’s emotion has gone stiff.

Keep reading

Emotional writing: 8 techniques for deeper connections: how to make a reader feel what your character feels, once the right cues are down.

Is The Emotion Thesaurus worth reading?

People call it the gold standard, and after years of use I agree without reservation. Nothing else solves the problem of showing emotion as directly or as deeply. It won’t teach you plot, structure, or voice, and it never pretends to. It does one job, the hardest small job in fiction, and it does it better than anything on the shelf. For most fiction writers it earns a permanent spot in the toolbox, opened often and dog-eared.

Explore the hub

The Psychology of Writing Hub: emotion is psychology on the page. The whole mental side of the craft lives here.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Emotion Thesaurus?
I think of it as the reference I open when a character’s reaction has gone stale on the page. Angela Ackerman and Becca Puglisi built it around one narrow problem, how to show what a character feels without naming the feeling outright. The current edition covers more than 130 emotions, each broken into physical signals, internal sensations, and mental responses, plus cues for a character trying to hide what they feel. I don’t read it start to finish, I keep it on the shelf and open it mid draft to break a logjam.
Should you read The Emotion Thesaurus cover to cover?
No. It’s a reference you open mid-draft when a reaction goes generic. The opening craft chapters reward a straight read, but the 130-plus entries are built for the moment of need.
Should you read The Emotion Thesaurus cover to cover?
No, I never use it that way. The opening craft chapters are worth reading straight through because they’re a genuine short course on writing emotion, covering overused cues, melodrama, and how to surface a hidden feeling through subtext. The 130-plus entries that follow are built for a different purpose, they’re there for the moment when a scene’s emotion has gone stiff and I need a fresh cue fast. I treat it as a tool I dog-ear and return to, not a book I finish in one sitting.
Will copying from The Emotion Thesaurus make your writing formulaic?
It can if you lift cues verbatim, which the authors warn against. Used as a prompt to escape the obvious gestures, it pushes you toward fresher, character-specific reactions instead. Read a few cues, close the book, and write the one your character would actually show.
How does The Emotion Thesaurus help with show, don’t tell?
It gives me concrete physical and internal cues for a given emotion so I can show fear or anger through the body instead of simply telling the reader a character feels that way. Each entry breaks an emotion into physical signals, internal sensations, and mental responses. That’s exactly the material that turns a flat line into a scene. It also lists cues for a character suppressing the emotion, which I find more useful than the obvious version because a clenched smile over fury reads better than a shout. This is the exact spot where I used to stall as a writer, reaching for the same clenched jaw for the fortieth time, and the book gets me past it.
Will copying from The Emotion Thesaurus make your writing formulaic?
It can, and the authors warn against exactly that. If I lifted cues word for word for every character, the prose would flatten in a new direction because everyone would react from the same list. I use it instead as a spark, reading three or four cues, closing the book, and writing the reaction my character would actually show, which is often a variation the list only hints at. A grieving soldier and a grieving grandmother shouldn’t grieve the same way, and using the book as a prompt instead of a script keeps that distinction alive.
What do the cross-references in The Emotion Thesaurus do?
They let me trace an emotion as it shifts in intensity, so I can follow a character escalating from annoyance to anger to rage, or sliding back down toward weary resignation. Emotions in real scenes rarely sit still, and the cross-references are built to help me move them the same way. I find this one of the quietly best features of the book, because it keeps a scene’s emotional arc from feeling static.

About the author

Angela Ackerman

Angela Ackerman

Angela Ackerman is a Canadian writing coach, international speaker, and co-author with Becca Puglisi of the Writers Helping Writers thesaurus series. Their books treat the craft of fiction as a problem-solving discipline, with reference volumes organized so a writer can look up what they need in the middle of a draft. The Emotion Thesaurus, first published in 2012 and expanded…

More about Angela Ackerman
Becca Puglisi

Becca Puglisi

Becca Puglisi is the co-author, with Angela Ackerman, of the bestselling Writers Helping Writers thesaurus series, including The Emotion Thesaurus and its many sequels. She is based in Jupiter, Florida, and works as an international speaker, writing coach, and craft instructor for fiction writers. Before turning to writing full time, Puglisi was an elementary school teacher, a background that shaped…

More about Becca Puglisi

Back