A tool that does one job badly is not a bad tool. A tool built for a job nobody had is a different problem, and no amount of sharpening helps.
Most of my books I would write again. A few I would not, and they were not the ones that sold worst or reviewed worst. They were the ones where the reason for making them was wrong from the beginning.
The useful part is that the reasons come in recognisable shapes.
The book written because the topic was available
I knew a subject well, it was adjacent to work I was already doing, and writing it required no new research. So I wrote it.
Nothing about that is a reason. Knowing a subject is a prerequisite and not a motivation, and the book that resulted was competent and had nothing driving it. I could not tell you now what argument it was making, and I wrote it.
The test I use now is whether I would be annoyed if somebody else wrote the same book badly. If I would shrug, I have no stake, and a book without a stake is a long document.
The book on this: Don’t Live in Fear is one I would write again, because the annoyance came first and the argument came out of it.
The book written to complete a set
A series had a gap in it. There was an obvious slot, the neighbouring books were doing well, and filling it seemed like the natural next move.
The problem is that the slot was a gap in my taxonomy instead of a gap in anybody’s life. Nobody was standing in a situation the existing books did not cover. I had built a shape and then written to the shape.
That book is fine. It also has no reader who needed it, and it shows in the way nobody ever mentions it. A series should grow because readers keep asking a question, and mine grew that way except for this one.
The book on this: Behind the Wire is the clearest case of a book with a reader who needed it, which is the test the other three failed.
The book written while I was still angry
This is the one I feel most strongly about and it is the hardest to see from inside.
Anger is a legitimate reason to write and I have used it deliberately. What does not work is writing while the anger is still moving, before you know what you think, because the argument ends up shaped by the feeling instead of supported by it.
The result reads as settling something instead of explaining something, and readers who agree with you enjoy it while readers who might have been persuaded stop early. That is the opposite of what the book was for.
The fix is time, not temperature. Write the angry draft, because it contains the energy. Then wait until you can state the other side fairly and rewrite from there.
What do the three have in common?
All of them served me instead of a reader.
Convenience, tidiness, and catharsis are real motivations and none of them produces a book anybody needed. A well-written book that exists for the author’s benefit is a well-written book nobody has a reason to finish.
The books of mine that work all began with somebody else’s problem, even when the material was entirely personal.
The book on this: The ADHD Marketer came out of burning out repeatedly on advice written for a different brain, which is a stake and not a convenience.
What questions would have caught them?
Three, and they take about five minutes.
Who is standing in a specific situation that this book resolves? If the answer is a category of person instead of a situation, the book has no reader yet.
What would I be annoyed to see somebody else get wrong? That locates the stake. No annoyance means no stake.
Could I state the strongest opposing view fairly today? If not, the thinking is not finished, whatever the word count says.
Should you write the mistakes anyway?
Sometimes, and I say that having got value from all three.
The convenient book taught me that expertise is not a reason. The tidy book taught me the difference between a taxonomy and a market. The angry book taught me to wait, which has improved everything since.
What I would not do is write them now. Learning a lesson from a book that took four months is an expensive way to learn it when the three questions above would have got there in an afternoon.
The rest of this series is about the work as it happens: the project I said yes to, why most business books do not work, and the problem with writing about what you are good at. The Ghostwriting Hub has the rest, and my ghostwriting service begins with these questions before anybody signs anything.
The Guides That Get Your Book Written, Published, and Sold
Four short, practical guides on writing, publishing, and selling your book, plus the occasional note when there's something worth your time. No fluff, no daily inbox clutter. Drop your email and they're yours.
We use MailerLite to manage our list and send these emails. Your address is used only to send you what you signed up for. We will not sell it, share it, or use it for anything else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.
Frequently Asked Questions