Latest
Joel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesThe Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.Getty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends OnWriting Your Worst Moments in a Memoir: Show the Evidence, Skip the VerdictHow to Register a Copyright for Your Book (and What Doesn’t Count)Your AI Chats Aren’t Private: Deleted ChatGPT Logs in CourtI Joined the Science Fiction Book Club 30 TimesThe Board Seat Scam: A 419 Letter in a Business SuitCitations in a Memoir: Endnotes, Footnotes and Fair UseThe Stores That Still Care: Publix, Walmart, Aldi, Best Buy and the RestThe Grocery Store Plan: Why Every Store Starts With Flowers

The Book a Professor Adopted

TL;DR: I wrote a book on consulting for people doing the work: how to find clients, price, run an engagement, and handle what goes wrong. Professor Richard Makadok adopted it at Purdue University’s Krannert School of Management. I didn’t pitch it; he found it. It traveled because it was specific, written for one kind of reader with no attempt to cover everyone. Across 113+ books under my own name, the ones written for one reader I could picture sometimes traveled. The ones written for everyone never did.

I wrote a book for working consultants. No academic framing, no literature review. How to find clients, how to price, how to run an engagement, what goes wrong and what to do about it, written the way I’d explain it to someone starting out. Then a business school adopted it.

Professor Richard Makadok put it on his course at Purdue University’s Krannert School of Management. I didn’t pitch it. He found it, because it explained the work better than the alternatives he had. The classroom was the reward for having a target. A well-made tool does that: you build it for one job, and a stranger picks it up for a job you never imagined, because it works.

Why does a specific book travel further than a general one?

Because a specific book is useful, and useful things get passed along. A book about one thing, for one kind of reader, answers that reader’s questions completely. When someone outside the intended audience picks it up, they find the same completeness, and completeness is rare enough that they tell someone. A general book about business answers everyone’s questions partially, and nobody passes along a partial answer.

Both audiences would have ignored the consulting book if I’d written it for both. Practitioners would have found it too abstract. The professor would have found it too thin. Written for practitioners alone, it was concrete enough that a professor could teach from it.

Book written for one reader vs a book written for everyone
Factor Written for one reader Written for everyone
Answers One reader’s questions, completely Everyone’s questions, partially
What readers do Pass it along, because completeness is rare Nobody passes along a partial answer
Edge Aimed precisely and finished for its reader The wider book has no edge
The consulting book Concrete enough that a professor taught from it Too abstract for practitioners, too thin for the professor
Across 113+ books Some traveled: adopted, cited, recommended None traveled
As a memoir Written for a daughter or successor; strangers stay with it Written for posterity; puts everyone to sleep

What did the adoption change?

It put the book in a record I didn’t create.

A general book about business answers everyone’s questions partially, and nobody passes along a partial answer.

A syllabus. A university bookstore. A cohort of students who read it as assigned work and cite it later in their own careers. Each of those is a stranger vouching for the book, in a place the author doesn’t control, and that’s the kind of record that makes an author’s name checkable.

I write about entity records elsewhere on this site, and the adoption is a clean example of one appearing without being engineered.

I didn’t ask for it, and I couldn’t have. It arrived because the book was worth adopting. That’s the only reliable way to get that kind of record, and it starts with writing for one reader.

What is the lesson for an executive writing a book?

Write for the reader in front of you. The others find it.

Most people widen the audience to reach more readers and end up reaching none, because the wider book has no edge and nothing in it is complete. The book that travels is the one that was aimed precisely and was worth passing along, and it travels to places the author never aimed at.

It frustrates me because the people who make this mistake are usually capable, busy executives who’ll only write one book. They spend a year on it, aim it at a whole industry, and end up with a book nobody in that industry feels was written for them.

When a client tells me the book should appeal to everyone in their industry, I ask them to name the one person they most want to read it and describe that person’s week.

Then we write the book for that person. It’s the same move the consulting book made by accident, and it works on purpose too. The case studies include books that traveled the same way.

How the pattern held across 113+ books

Most of my books were written for one reader I could picture.

Some of them traveled: adopted, cited, recommended, handed to someone the author never met. None of the ones written for everyone did. I didn’t plan the experiment, but 113+ books is enough of a sample to see the pattern, and it’s the pattern I use when I write a book for a client.

I didn’t plan the experiment, but 113+ books is enough of a sample to see the pattern, and it’s the pattern I use when I write a book for a client.
Share on X

It holds for memoirs too. A life story written for one reader, a daughter, a successor, the person who has to make the same decision next year, is the one strangers stay with. A life story written for posterity puts everyone to sleep, including posterity.

What does a university adopting your book not mean?

It’s not a marketing outcome you can buy. Nobody sells syllabus placement, and if they did, a professor would see through it.

It’s a judgment by someone with no stake in the author, made because the book did the job. That’s why it counts. A record you paid for says you paid. A record a stranger created says the work held up.

The same is true of every record that matters: reviews from readers, citations by other authors, recommendations from engines that checked. The book earns them or it doesn’t, and the earning happens in the writing, when the author decides who the book is for and refuses to widen it.

My take

Books written for everyone reach nobody. The consulting book got adopted at Purdue because it was aimed at one kind of reader and finished the job for him. Executives widen the audience because they’ll only write one book, and the wide book has no edge. Name the one person you most want reading it. Describe that person’s week. Write for them, and the strangers will find it on their own.

The tool

I keep the tool metaphor because it’s how the consulting book behaved. I built it for a consultant sitting alone with a pricing decision, and a professor picked it up to teach a room of students how consulting works, because the tool did the job cleanly enough to show with. Nobody designs a hammer hoping a sculptor will use it. The sculptor uses it because it’s a good hammer.

Aim the book. Make it complete for the reader in front of you. Then let it go where it goes.

Name the one reader you most want, describe their week, and write for them. The Book Discovery Intensive settles that reader, so the book is specific enough to travel: one engagement that turns an audience into a person and a person into a plan. The guide to ghostwriting covers what happens next. Send me a message on LinkedIn if you want to talk it through. Part of The Publishing and Marketing Hub.

The advice that tells authors to write for everyone so the book reaches more people is wrong. It’s the fastest way I know to write a book nobody passes along, and the authors who follow it end up blaming the market for a problem they built into the manuscript.

From the author
Build a Profitable Consulting Practice by Richard Lowe

Build a Profitable Consulting Practice
Build a Profitable Consulting Practice covers the part of consulting nobody teaches. Expertise does not pay the bills, contracts do, and the book draws on forty years of doing the work.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do specific books reach more readers than general ones?
A specific book answers one kind of reader’s questions completely, and completeness gets passed along. A general book answers everyone partially, and nobody recommends a partial answer.
Has one of Richard Lowe’s books been used in a university course?
Yes. Professor Richard Makadok adopted his consulting book at Purdue University’s Krannert School of Management.
What does it mean for a book to be adopted for a course?
A professor assigns it as course reading. It puts the book on a syllabus and in a university bookstore, records the author didn’t create and can’t buy. That’s what makes them valuable.
Who should an executive write their book for?
The one reader they most want, described in enough detail to picture that person’s week. Books written for one reader travel to others. Books written for everyone reach no one.
Should a memoir be written for one specific reader?
Yes. A life story written for one reader, a daughter or a successor or the person facing the same decision next year, holds strangers. A memoir written for posterity doesn’t.

Sources

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment