Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Science Fiction Part 5 – The Solid Craft

Part 5 – The Solid Craft

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Flawed |
Part 8: The Failures

This tier is mostly about what gets withheld and what gets scheduled. Under the Skin never says what she is or who sent her, Blade Runner leaves a question its own makers still disagree about, and Gravity states its debris interval once and lets the audience count toward every act break on their own.

The other pattern is a single element holding an unstable film together. Von Sydow plays Ming entirely straight inside a camp opera, Battleship finds one genuine tactical sequence inside a board game with no plot, and The Abyss loses its ending to a cut that removed the reason instead of the result.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the fifth of eight parts.

Demolition Man never explains the three seashells and Ghost in the Shell lets Aramaki answer in Japanese without comment. Build the frame in the World Builder’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. Sunshine (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of Sunshine (2007)

2007
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"Eighty minutes of rigour, and then a slasher walks in."

Danny Boyle made a film about a crew carrying a bomb to reignite a dying sun, with Alex Garland writing and a physics consultant attached throughout production. It cost around forty million dollars and the cast lived together in halls of residence before shooting to build the crew dynamic.

The first two thirds are among the best hard science fiction ever filmed. Every decision has a stated cost in oxygen, mass or time, the arguments between the crew are about arithmetic instead of personality, and the film trusts an audience to follow a conversation about payload physics.

The observation room is the best invention in the picture. A screen that filters the sun down to a survivable percentage, a crew member who keeps asking for more, and a relationship with light that Boyle uses to establish something religious without a word of dialogue about it.

The sound design does the work the images cannot. Silence outside the hull, the communications delay with Earth growing across the voyage, and a score by John Murphy whose main theme has been used in trailers continuously for nearly twenty years since the film’s release.

The last act changes genre and the film never recovers. A slasher antagonist arrives, the photography goes deliberately incoherent, and a picture that had been rigorous about physics for eighty minutes resolves into something that could have happened in any corridor anywhere. Cillian Murphy plays Capa.

For WritersEvery decision the crew makes has a stated cost in oxygen, mass or time, and the arguments between them are about arithmetic instead of personality. Then the last act introduces a slasher antagonist and the rigour evaporates. When you establish that your world runs on measurable constraints, that becomes a promise about how problems will be solved. Breaking it late does more damage than never making it, because the reader has been doing the sums alongside your characters and you have just told them the sums did not matter. Decide early which book you are writing, and if the ending needs a different one, the ending is wrong. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/conflict-tension-theme-fiction/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Theme in fiction covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

2. Total Recall (2012) [full review]

► Read the full review of Total Recall (2012)

2012
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.2/10

"It answers the question the original was built on not answering."

Len Wiseman remade Verhoeven and almost every review judged it against the wrong reference. Sony spent around one hundred and twenty-five million dollars, removed Mars entirely, and built a world where the only two habitable regions are connected by a gravity elevator through the center of the earth.

The Fall is the genuine invention and it is the reason to watch the film. A vehicle that drops through the planet, has a period of inversion at the core where everybody floats, and then decelerates into the other hemisphere, with the physics worked through and staged properly.

The world design is excellent and largely unremarked. The Colony is vertical, rain-soaked and stacked in layers reminiscent of Kowloon, and the United Federation of Britain is clean, spacious and full of light, and neither ever needs a line explaining the relationship. Colin Farrell plays Quaid.

Kate Beckinsale plays the pursuing agent for the whole running time and it is the best thing in the picture. The role combines two separate characters from the original, she is relentless instead of sadistic, and she is given a genuine grievance about the marriage she is walking out of.

What it loses is the ambiguity that made the 1990 version worth arguing about. There is no meaningful question about whether any of this is implanted, the film answers early, and removing the doubt removes the only thing the original had that the action could not replace.

For WritersThe 1990 film never resolves whether any of it is real, and the remake answers the question early and then delivers an excellent chase. Removing the doubt removed the only thing the action could not replace. When you adapt something, identify which element is load-bearing before you decide what to modernize. Spectacle can be upgraded, casting can be changed, a setting can move, and the ambiguity at the center is usually the part that cannot survive being clarified. Ask what the audience argued about after the original. Whatever that is, keep it unresolved, because it is the reason anybody still discusses the thing you are remaking. Imagery that builds a usable space covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

3. Gravity (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of Gravity (2013)

2013
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"The debris returns every ninety minutes, stated once."

Alfonso Cuaron opened on a thirteen-minute unbroken shot and then destroyed everything inside it. The film took four and a half years to make, cost around one hundred million dollars, and won seven Academy Awards including direction, photography and every technical category it was eligible for.

The technique was invented for the film. A robotic arm moved a camera around an actor suspended in a twenty-foot LED box that projected the lighting environment, so the reflections on the visor and the light on the face are real instead of composited in afterward.

The sound design follows the physics and that is the boldest decision in it. Nothing outside a pressurized volume makes a noise, impacts are transmitted through contact instead of through air, and a station comes apart in near silence while the score carries the emotional register alone.

Sandra Bullock carries almost the entire running time alone and much of it in a single suit. The performance was recorded in near isolation inside the light box for hours at a time, and she was nominated for Best Actress for a role with almost no other performer present.

The debris cascade gives the film its clock and its structure. Kessler syndrome is stated once at the beginning, the orbital period is ninety minutes, and every act break arrives when the wave comes round again, and the audience can anticipate without being reminded of it.

For WritersThe debris wave returns every ninety minutes and the film states that once, early. Every act break arrives when it comes round, and the audience anticipates each one without ever being reminded. When you need structure a reader can feel, give the threat a schedule instead of a temperament. A danger that arrives when the plot requires it teaches the reader to wait passively for your next move. A danger with a stated interval turns them into a participant who is counting, and the tension between what they know is coming and what the characters are still trying to finish does the work for free. State the interval once and never mention it again. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/pacing-problems-nobody-talks/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Pacing problems nobody talks about covers the arithmetic.

↑ All Entries

4. Oblivion (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of Oblivion (2013)

2013
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"He collects books. That is what breaks the arrangement."

Joseph Kosinski adapted his own unpublished graphic novel and shot the sky sequences in Iceland at altitude, using front projection on enormous screens so the cloud light on the actors is genuine. Universal spent around one hundred and twenty million dollars and the film made most of it back overseas.

The design work is the strongest thing in it and it is unusually coherent. The sky tower, the bubble ship and the drones all share a white curved language, the interiors are glass and water above a cloud layer, and nothing in the world looks like it came from another film.

The premise depends on withholding and the marketing gave most of it away. A technician and a communications officer service drones over an evacuated Earth, their memories were wiped for security, and almost everything they believe about the assignment turns out to be constructed. Andrea Riseborough plays Victoria.

Tom Cruise plays a man who is good at a job nobody has explained to him, the correct register for the material. He collects books, he maintains a cabin he is not supposed to have, and the curiosity is what breaks the arrangement instead of any heroism.

The clone reveal is well staged and the film has planted it properly. Another technician with the same face, the same designation and a different partner, and the sequence where the two meet is played without explanation for considerably longer than most films would allow.

For WritersJack collects books, maintains a cabin nobody authorized and keeps objects from a world he is supposed to have no memory of. The curiosity breaks the arrangement, and no heroism is involved anywhere in it. When you write a character inside a system built to contain them, the escape should come from a trait they already had instead of from courage they acquire at the right moment. A man who keeps things is going to find something. A woman who asks questions is going to ask the wrong one. Establish the trait early doing something harmless, and the reader will accept the eventual consequence as inevitable instead of convenient. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/believable-characters/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Why characters feel flat covers the ground.

Independence Day plants its solution an hour early and Gravity gives its threat a ninety-minute schedule. Structure it properly in the Plot Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. Under the Skin (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of Under the Skin (2013)

2013
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.3/10

"No organization, no briefing, no purpose. Only behaviour."

Jonathan Glazer spent close to nine years developing it and shot substantial portions with concealed cameras in Glasgow, using non-actors who did not know they were in a film and were asked for consent afterward. Several declined and were removed from the finished picture entirely.

Scarlett Johansson drives a van through Scottish cities picking up men, and the film supplies no account of what she is, who she works for or what the harvest serves. The motorcyclist who cleans up after her is never named, and no briefing scene exists anywhere in the running time.

The black void sequences are the best images in recent science fiction. Men walk into a liquid surface without understanding they are walking, hang suspended in it, and a later shot showing what remains of one of them is among the most upsetting things the genre has produced anywhere.

Mica Levi’s score does an enormous amount of the work and was nominated for nearly every award available that year. Strings pitched a shade wrong, a recurring figure that arrives before the van does, and long passages where sound is the only information the audience receives.

The turn is the part most viewers miss on a first watch. She begins by observing humans and ends by experiencing something, and the cake, the mirror and the encounter with the disfigured man are stages in a process the film never names or explains to anybody.

For WritersGlazer never explains what she is, who sent her or what the harvest serves. No organization, no briefing, no scene where anybody states the operation aloud. The film is entirely behaviour. When you write something alien, the temptation is to build the culture behind it so the reader understands the motive, and understanding is exactly what kills the effect. A creature with a stated purpose has been filed away and can be predicted. One that simply does things, consistently and without commentary, stays unresolved for the length of a book. Write the rules for yourself so the behaviour holds together, then put none of them on the page. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/show-dont-tell-real-meaning/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>What show do not tell actually means covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

6. Ghost in the Shell (2017) [full review]

► Read the full review of Ghost in the Shell (2017)

2017
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.3/10

"He speaks Japanese, everybody answers in English, nobody mentions it."

Rupert Sanders adapted Masamune Shirow’s manga and the 1995 Mamoru Oshii film, and the casting controversy consumed the entire conversation around the release. Paramount spent around one hundred and ten million dollars and the film lost a substantial amount of it worldwide. Pilou Asbaek plays Batou.

The production design is genuinely outstanding and almost nobody discussed it. The holographic advertising is built at architectural scale, the city is dense and lived in, and the geisha robots and the diving sequence are staged with real care by Jan Roelfs and his team.

The 1995 film is a philosophical work about identity and the 2017 version is an origin story about a stolen body. That substitution is the central problem, since the original asks what a person is and the remake asks who did this to her, and those are different questions.

Scarlett Johansson is doing real physical work and the shell movement was choreographed carefully. The thermoptic camouflage sequences are the best action in it, the weightlessness of the falls is handled well, and the performance suffers from a screenplay that explains her at every opportunity.

Takeshi Kitano plays Aramaki entirely in Japanese while everybody answers him in English, the most interesting decision in the film. Nobody remarks on it, the arrangement is simply how the section operates, and it does more worldbuilding than any of the exposition around it. Juliette Binoche plays Ouelet.

For WritersAramaki speaks Japanese throughout and everybody answers him in English. Nobody in the film remarks on the arrangement and no line explains it. It does more worldbuilding than any of the exposition surrounding it. When you want a setting to feel genuinely multilingual or multicultural, show a practice that nobody in the scene remarks on. Explained difference is a tour. Unexplained practice is a place. The reader works out that the translation problem was solved long ago by people who no longer think about it. That single unremarked habit implies a history the book never has to write. Why villain motivations fall apart covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

7. Dune Parts 1 & 2 [full review]

► Read the full review of Dune Parts 1 & 2

0
RLR: 7.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"Herbert lives inside the heads and film cannot follow him there."

Denis Villeneuve split Herbert’s novel across two films and shot both largely in Jordan and Abu Dhabi with practical sets at enormous scale. Together they cost around three hundred and ninety million dollars, won a combined ten Academy Awards, and made Herbert commercially viable on screen for the first time.

The scale is the achievement and Villeneuve gets it from restraint instead of from clutter. The ornithopters move like insects, the ships are photographed against human figures for reference, and Greig Fraser shoots most interiors with a single dominant light source and enormous empty space.

The Bene Gesserit material is handled better than any previous adaptation managed. The breeding programme, the Voice, the Missionaria Protectiva and the deliberate seeding of prophecy are all present, and the films are clear that Paul is walking into a trap somebody built centuries ago.

What the films lose is the interiority that carries the novel. Herbert writes almost everything from inside several heads at once, the plans and counter-plans are explicit on the page, and the films replace that with faces reacting and a great deal of implication. Timothee Chalamet plays Paul.

Part Two is the better film and the Feyd-Rautha material is why. The arena sequence is shot in infrared black and white on Giedi Prime, Austin Butler plays him as genuinely unpredictable, and the film gives the Harkonnens a coherence the 1984 version never found.

For WritersHerbert writes almost everything from inside several heads at once, with plans and counter-plans explicit on the page, and the films replace all of it with faces reacting. The adaptation is excellent and that specific loss is unavoidable. When you write scheming, interiority is the only tool that makes it legible, because a plan the reader cannot see is indistinguishable from luck. Film has to externalize or drop it. Prose does not, and the advantage belongs to prose alone. If your story runs on manoeuvre, stay inside the heads doing the manoeuvring and use the thing film would kill to have. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/books/science-fiction-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

8. Battleship (2012) [full review]

► Read the full review of Battleship (2012)

2012
RLR: 7.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.7/10

"One sequence remembers what game it is named after."

Peter Berg made a film adapted from a board game with no plot in it, an unpromising origin, and Universal spent around two hundred and nine million dollars on it. It lost money domestically and the reputation has been fixed since release without much of anybody rewatching it.

The grid sequence is the one genuinely inspired thing in the picture. With radar disabled, the crew use tsunami buoys to detect displacement and call coordinates on a map, turning the board game into a legitimate tactical problem the audience can follow move by move.

The Missouri sequence is the emotional core and it should not work. Actual veterans crew the museum ship, several of them served on her, and the film treats them with genuine respect instead of using them as a joke about old men and old technology.

The alien design is coherent and the rules are stated. They do not attack anything not reading as a threat, their vision has a specific spectrum problem in daylight, and both limitations are established early and then used properly in the last act. Liam Neeson plays the admiral.

The rest is a standard blockbuster and the film knows it. A disgraced officer, an admiral’s daughter, a redemption arc arriving exactly on schedule, and none of it approaching the quality of the twenty minutes where the film remembers what game it is named after.

For WritersWith radar disabled, the crew use tsunami buoys to detect displacement and call coordinates on a grid. A board game with no story in it becomes a tactical problem the audience can follow move by move. When you adapt something with no plot, do not invent one around it. Find the single mechanic the source actually contains and build a sequence where that mechanic is the only way through. Everything else in this film is generic and one sequence is memorable. That tells you where the effort should have gone. The source gives you a verb, not a story, and the verb is the thing worth keeping. Conflict that drives story covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

9. The Day of the Triffids (1962) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Day of the Triffids (1962)

1962
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.2/10

"Two harmless facts that turn lethal in combination."

Steve Sekely directed the adaptation of John Wyndham’s 1951 novel and the production was troubled enough that Freddie Francis shot an entirely separate lighthouse subplot to bring it to releasable length. The two halves never meet, share no characters, and were filmed months apart by different units.

The premise is the best in British science fiction. A meteor shower blinds almost everybody who stops to watch it, and the walking plants already being farmed commercially for oil become the dominant species overnight because nobody left alive can see them approaching across open ground.

The blindness is the actual horror and Wyndham is clearer about it than the film manages. A city full of people who cannot see, entirely dependent on the few who can, and the moral arithmetic of deciding who gets helped and who is left is where the novel spends most of its attention.

The triffids on screen are men in suits and they do not survive close inspection. Francis shoots them in fragments, in darkness and at the edges of the frame wherever possible, and the handful of sequences showing one clearly in daylight are the weakest material in the picture.

The lighthouse half is the better film and it was shot separately to pad the running time. A married couple, a siege, a great deal of alcohol and a discovery about what seawater does, and it has almost nothing to do with the story it was eventually attached to.

For WritersWyndham puts the catastrophe in the population instead of in the monster. Almost everybody is blind, the plants were already being farmed for oil, and the disaster is that one ordinary thing changed and made another ordinary thing lethal. When you build an apocalypse, look for the pair of harmless facts that turn fatal in combination. A single large invented threat has to be defended on every page against a reader asking why nobody simply shoots it. Two mundane conditions colliding require no defense at all, because the reader already accepts both halves separately and only has to accept the arithmetic. The best science fiction disasters are arithmetic more often than invention. Controlling narrative perspective covers the ground.

Sunshine breaks its own rules in the last act and Flash Gordon keeps one performance entirely straight. Two lessons in holding a register, in the Genre Mastery Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. Barbarella (1968) [full review]

► Read the full review of Barbarella (1968)

1968
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.8/10

"Nothing endangers her, and the film has no shape because of it."

Roger Vadim adapted a French comic strip with Jane Fonda, who was married to him at the time and has been ambivalent about the film ever since. Dino De Laurentiis produced it in Rome, and the production design by Mario Garbuglia is the reason anybody still looks at it.

The opening credits sequence is the most famous thing in it and it was genuinely difficult to achieve. Fonda floats in zero gravity removing a spacesuit, shot on a horizontal sheet of glass with the camera above her, and the lettering was arranged to move with the performer.

The design is where the film’s real influence lies. Fur-lined spacecraft interiors, organic curved plastics, the Excessive Machine, and an aesthetic that has been borrowed continuously by music video and fashion photography for more than fifty years since the film failed commercially. Anita Pallenberg plays the Black Queen.

The tone is deliberately weightless and the film has no interest in danger. Barbarella succeeds through good nature instead of competence, every threat resolves into comedy, and the picture is uninterested in building tension of any kind at any point in the running time. Claude Renoir shot it.

John Phillip Law plays a blind angel who has forgotten how to fly and Milo O’Shea plays the villain with the machine. Both performances are pitched at exactly the register the film requires, sincere delivery of material nobody could take seriously. Bob Crewe scored it.

For WritersBarbarella succeeds through good nature instead of competence. Every threat resolves into comedy, nothing endangers her, and the film has no interest in building tension anywhere across its running time. That is a deliberate choice and it costs the picture its shape. When you remove jeopardy, you remove the reason a reader turns a page, and design alone will not replace it for two hundred of them. If you genuinely want a story with no danger in it, you need a different engine entirely, usually curiosity, or the accumulating strangeness a mystery runs on. Pick one deliberately. A book with neither threat nor question is a gallery.

↑ All Entries

11. Planet of the Apes (1968) [full review]

► Read the full review of Planet of the Apes (1968)

1968
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"He despised humanity before he left. That is why the beach lands."

Franklin Schaffner directed from a Rod Serling and Michael Wilson screenplay, adapted from Pierre Boulle. John Chambers won an honorary Academy Award for makeup that had no category at the time, and the appliances consumed roughly a fifth of the entire production budget. Maurice Evans plays Doctor Zaius.

The makeup is the reason it works and the design decisions were driven by performance. The appliances were built to let the actors’ own mouths and eyes move freely, so Roddy McDowall and Kim Hunter can act through them instead of gesturing around a fixed mask.

The society is properly constructed instead of sketched. Orangutans administer, chimpanzees research, gorillas police, and the caste arrangement is stated visually through costume color and then dramatized through an inquiry that behaves exactly like a heresy trial. Leon Shamroy shot it. Jerry Goldsmith scored it.

Charlton Heston plays Taylor as contemptuous of humanity before he arrives, and the ending lands because of it. He has left Earth because he thinks people are worth escaping, and the film spends two hours giving him a reason to change his mind. Linda Harrison plays Nova.

The final shot is the best ending in science fiction cinema and Serling wrote it. The beach, the wreckage, and a reveal that recontextualizes every frame preceding it, achieved with a single matte and a camera move that cost almost nothing. Four sequels followed. Boulle published the novel in 1963.

For WritersTaylor leaves Earth because he holds humanity in contempt, and the film states that in the first ten minutes while he is still recording a log. The ending then lands on a man who has spent two hours discovering he was right and cannot bear it. When you plan a final reversal, establish the protagonist’s position on the subject at the very start. A twist that only changes what the reader knows is a mechanism. A twist that convicts the character of something they said in the opening chapter is a story. The reveal has to cost somebody in the book, not just surprise somebody outside it. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/plot-devices/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Plot devices that work covers the setup.

↑ All Entries

12. Futureworld (1976) – [full review]

► Read the full review of Futureworld (1976) –

1976
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.7/10

"The park reopened, and the new operation is considerably worse."

Richard T. Heffron directed the sequel to Westworld without Michael Crichton, on a larger budget and with a conspiracy plot instead of a malfunction. It is the first feature to use three-dimensional computer generated imagery, in a short sequence showing a rendered hand and face.

The premise is smarter than the film around it. The park has reopened, the failures have been declared solved, and the new operation involves replacing influential visitors with duplicates so the company can place its own people into governments and corporations worldwide. Arthur Hill plays Duffy.

Peter Fonda and Blythe Danner play journalists investigating the park, and the investigation structure gives the picture a spine the first film did not need. They are there under cover, they are being watched, and the film treats it as a paranoid thriller throughout. Howard Schwartz shot it.

Yul Brynner returns for a single dream sequence and the film is honest that it is fan service. He appears in the Gunslinger costume, the sequence has no bearing on the plot, and the studio insisted on it after the character became the most remembered part of the original.

For WritersThe park has reopened and the failures have been declared solved, the premise every real institution offers after a disaster. The new operation is quieter, better organized and considerably worse. When you write a sequel or a second act, resist repeating the original failure. An organization that has learned from a catastrophe and applied that learning to something more ambitious is far more frightening than one making the same mistake again, because competence is the thing that makes an institution dangerous. The reader also gets to watch the lesson being misapplied, a species of dramatic irony you cannot get any other way.

↑ All Entries

13. Flash Gordon (1980) [full review]

► Read the full review of Flash Gordon (1980)

1980
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.4/10

"Von Sydow plays it straight and holds the whole film up."

Dino De Laurentiis spent around twenty-seven million dollars on a deliberately camp space opera with a Queen soundtrack, after failing to hire Fellini and then George Lucas, who went away and made Star Wars instead when he could not obtain the rights to this property.

The design is the whole film and Danilo Donati’s work is extraordinary. Every surface is colored, the skies are painted backdrops instead of composites, Ming’s court is gold and red at a scale nobody attempts now, and none of it is trying to look real for a moment.

Brian Blessed’s Vultan is the performance everybody quotes and he plays it at full volume throughout. The Hawkmen sequence, the wings, the bridge and the shouting are all delivered with total commitment by an actor who understood exactly what the film needed from him. Sam J. Jones plays Flash.

Max von Sydow plays Ming completely straight and that contrast is what holds the picture together. He is genuinely menacing, he delivers absurd lines with Bergman-trained seriousness, and the film would collapse if he had played any of it for laughs. Melody Anderson plays Dale.

The Queen soundtrack was the first rock score for a film of this scale and it does structural work. The theme announces the character, the Hawkmen material has its own motif, and the music carries transitions the editing would otherwise have had to explain. Topol plays Zarkov.

For WritersVon Sydow plays Ming completely straight, with Bergman-trained seriousness, in a film where everything else is pitched at full camp. The picture would collapse if he had played any of it for laughs. When you write something deliberately absurd, one element has to be entirely sincere or the whole thing floats away. Usually it is the antagonist, because a threat nobody takes seriously removes the last reason to care what happens. Pick the anchor deliberately and then protect it, because the temptation in a comic register is to let every part join in. The joke needs something solid to be a joke about.

Barbarella removes every danger and loses its shape, and Triffids builds a catastrophe from two harmless facts. Build the pressure in the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. Blade Runner (1982) [full review]

► Read the full review of Blade Runner (1982)

1982
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.1/10

"Scott and Ford still disagree, and the argument outlived the film."

Ridley Scott made a film that failed on release against E.T. and has since been reissued in seven distinct versions. The theatrical cut carries a Deckard voiceover that Harrison Ford has said he delivered badly on purpose, hoping the studio would abandon the idea, and they did not.

The city is the achievement and almost all of it is built. Syd Mead designed the vehicles and the street level, Douglas Trumbull supervised the effects, and the Ridleyville set on the Warner backlot was dressed with rain, steam and neon at a density nobody had attempted before.

The film is unusually quiet for its reputation. Long passages have no dialogue, the pace is deliberate to the point of stillness, and the action sequences are brief, ugly and over quickly instead of staged as set pieces the audience is meant to enjoy. Sean Young plays Rachael.

Rutger Hauer rewrote his own final speech the night before shooting, cutting it down and adding the last two lines himself. Scott has confirmed it repeatedly, and the crew applauded after the take, and almost never happens on a film set at four in the morning.

The Deckard question has never been settled and Scott and Ford disagree about it publicly to this day. The unicorn sequence in the later cuts points one way, the theatrical version points the other, and the argument has outlived almost everything else about the picture.

For WritersScott and Ford have disagreed publicly for forty years about whether Deckard is a replicant, and the different cuts support different answers. The argument has outlived almost everything else about the film. When you build a question into a story, the strongest version is one the author cannot settle either. An ambiguity you privately know the answer to will leak, because you will unconsciously weight the evidence toward what you believe. One where you genuinely hold both readings produces a text that supports both and keeps producing arguments decades later. The discipline is refusing to decide, including in interviews, and especially when somebody asks directly. Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

15. Dune (1984) [full review]

► Read the full review of Dune (1984)

1984
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.3/10

"Everybody thinks in voiceover, taken straight off Herbert’s page."

David Lynch took the job after turning down Return of the Jedi, spent three years on it, and has refused to discuss the film seriously for four decades. Dino De Laurentiis produced, the studio cut it to a contractual two hours and seventeen minutes, and Lynch removed his name from the longer television version entirely.

The design is genuinely extraordinary and it is the reason the film survives at all. Anthony Masters built a Gothic industrial world with carved wood, brass and tile, and Bob Ringwood’s costumes give each house a distinct silhouette that reads instantly from across a room.

The internal monologue is the decision everybody argues about. Characters think in voiceover continuously, the device is taken directly from Herbert’s method on the page, and it converts the film into something closer to an illustrated novel than to a conventional adaptation. Kyle MacLachlan plays Paul in his first film role.

The weirding modules are an invention the novel does not contain. Herbert wrote a martial art, the film supplies sonic weapons activated by speech, and the change removes the physical discipline that made the Fremen formidable for a piece of technology. Freddie Francis shot it.

Kenneth McMillan’s Baron is the performance that divides audiences most. He is diseased, airborne, gleeful and entirely without restraint, and the film gives him a register nothing else in the picture operates at, and it either works completely or does not work at all. Toto scored it with Brian Eno.

For WritersCharacters think in voiceover continuously, taken directly from Herbert’s method on the page, and the device converts the film into something closer to an illustrated novel. It is the most criticized thing in the picture and it is also an honest attempt to solve a real problem. When your source runs on interiority, adapting it means choosing between losing the plans and finding a way to externalize them. Lynch chose the second and paid for it. The useful lesson runs the other way for novelists. If you are writing prose, interiority is the tool no other medium can use, so a story built on scheming and anticipation belongs in a book instead of anywhere else. Use the advantage while you have it. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/books/science-fiction-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

16. Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984) [full review]

► Read the full review of Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984)

1984
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.6/10

"The resurrection costs him his son, his ship and his rank."

Leonard Nimoy directed after negotiating the role back into existence at the end of the previous film, and Harve Bennett wrote it as a deliberate bridge. Paramount spent around sixteen million dollars and the film exists to undo a death the audience had already accepted.

The Enterprise destruction is the sequence that justifies the whole picture. The crew scuttle their own ship to kill the boarding party, the countdown is intercut with the escape, and Nimoy holds on the crew watching it burn into the atmosphere for considerably longer than expected.

Christopher Lloyd plays Kruge and the performance is more interesting than the film needed. He kills his own gunner for a mistake, he keeps a pet that eats a crew member, and his cruelty is presented as a workplace culture instead of as personal appetite.

The structure is a theft instead of a battle, unusual for the series. The crew steal the Enterprise out of spacedock, disable the pursuing ship from inside, and the sequence is played as a heist by people who built and maintained the equipment they are stealing.

The cost is what makes it work. Kirk loses his son, the ship, his career and his rank, and the resurrection at the end is paid for in a currency the series had never charged the characters before at any point in seventeen years. Robin Curtis plays Saavik.

For WritersThe resurrection costs Kirk his son, his ship, his career and his rank. A series that had never charged its characters anything substantial in seventeen years suddenly makes a reversal expensive. When you undo something a reader has accepted, the price is the whole of the credibility. A death reversed for free retroactively cancels the emotion of the original loss and tells the reader that nothing in your book is permanent. A death reversed at a cost greater than the death itself keeps the stakes intact and converts a cheat into a trade. Work out what the character can least afford to lose, then charge exactly that. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/plot-devices/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Plot devices that work covers the ground.

Taylor despises humanity before he leaves Earth, and Oblivion breaks its own system with a man who collects things. Build them in the Deep Character Handbook.

↑ All Entries

17. The Abyss (1989) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Abyss (1989)

1989
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.5/10

"The cut removed the reason and kept the result."

Cameron built two enormous tanks inside an unfinished nuclear reactor containment building in South Carolina and shot underwater for months. The production was brutal enough that several cast members have described it as the worst experience of their careers, and Ed Harris has refused to discuss it since.

The underwater work is the reason it holds up. Almost everything is genuinely submerged, the actors were trained in saturation diving, and the film was shot at depths that required decompression schedules for a crew working a standard studio day. Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio lead.

The fluid breathing sequence is real in the way that matters. The liquid is a genuine oxygenated compound, the rat in the demonstration was actually breathing it, and the sequence with Ed Harris was achieved with a mouthpiece instead of through any compositing. Michael Biehn plays Coffey.

The water tentacle was the first convincing computer-generated character in a feature and Industrial Light and Magic built it in about six months. It mimics faces, it moves like liquid, and the technique became the direct ancestor of the T-1000 two years afterward. Mikael Salomon shot it.

The ending is the problem everybody names. The theatrical cut removes the tidal wave sequence and the nuclear disarmament argument entirely, so the aliens arrive, decide humanity is worth keeping and leave without the film explaining what changed their minds. Alan Silvestri scored it. It won the visual effects Academy Award.

For WritersThe theatrical cut removes the tidal wave sequence and the disarmament argument, so the aliens arrive, decide humanity is worth keeping and leave with nothing on screen explaining what changed their minds. Two-thirds of a great film ends on a resolution the audience has to take on trust. When you cut for length, check whether you have removed the reason instead of the result. Consequences are cheap to keep and easy to defend in a meeting, and the scene that earned them usually looks like a digression. Cut the wrong one and the ending still happens, but it stops meaning anything, and readers feel the absence without being able to name it. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/pacing-problems-nobody-talks/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Pacing problems nobody talks about covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

18. Phenomenon (1996) [full review]

► Read the full review of Phenomenon (1996)

1996
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.4/10

"The town withdraws before anybody has a reason to."

Jon Turteltaub made a Northern California drama that is nominally science fiction and actually about dying. John Travolta plays a car mechanic who sees a light, acquires extraordinary intelligence, and the film treats the whole thing as a small-town story instead of as a premise.

The town response is the real subject and it is handled with care. George becomes useful, then strange, then frightening to people who have known him his whole life, and the film is clear that the community withdraws from him before anybody has a reason to.

Travolta plays it entirely without ego, the reason the film works at all. He is delighted by what is happening, he wants to share it, he keeps trying to explain, and the performance never once reaches for the mystical register the material invites. Gerald Di Pego wrote the screenplay.

The explanation arrives late and the film is better before it. A medical cause is supplied, the transformation turns out to have a diagnosis attached, and the picture converts a story about a man being isolated into a story about a man being ill. Phedon Papamichael shot it.

Robert Duvall and Forest Whitaker anchor it and Kyra Sedgwick plays the chair maker. The supporting cast are given real positions instead of reactions, and the film spends more time on their discomfort than on anything George can do. Thomas Newman scored it. Touchstone released it in July 1996.

For WritersGeorge becomes useful, then strange, then frightening to people who have known him his whole life, and the town withdraws before anybody has a reason to. The film is about the community instead of the gift. When you give a character an extraordinary ability, the interesting material is almost never what they can now do. It is what everybody around them decides about it. People who liked somebody will find a way to stop liking them faster than they will find a way to accept a change. That reaction is available to any writer without needing a single effects sequence. Write the neighbours, not the power. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/believable-characters/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Why characters feel flat covers the ground.

Honorable Mentions: Science Fiction Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier or close to it and each is on the list.

Europa Report (2013)

⭐ 6.4/10

Sebastian Cordero built a found-footage mission to Jupiter’s moon from ship cameras and crew logs, with the physics checked and the crew behaving like professionals throughout.

Monsters (2010)

⭐ 6.4/10

Gareth Edwards shot a road film through an infected zone in Mexico for almost nothing, doing the effects himself on a laptop, and the creatures appear for about four minutes.

Counterpart (2017)

⭐ 8.1/10

J. K. Simmons plays two versions of the same man across a divided Berlin where a crossing to a parallel world has been managed by a bureaucracy since 1987. It ran for two seasons.

Orphan Black (2013)

⭐ 8.3/10

Tatiana Maslany plays close to a dozen clones, frequently in the same shot, and the technical achievement is invisible enough that people forgot it was one performer.

Utopia (2013)

⭐ 8.4/10

Dennis Kelly wrote a British conspiracy series about a graphic novel that predicts pandemics, shot in saturated yellows and greens with a score by Cristobal Tapia de Veer.

Tales from the Loop (2020)

⭐ 7.4/10

Built from Simon Stalenhag’s paintings into an anthology where each episode follows a different resident of a town built over a machine nobody fully understands.

Synchronic (2019)

⭐ 6.9/10

Benson and Moorhead built a drug that moves the user through time at a fixed point in space, a genuinely original rule, and the consequences are worked through properly.

Spring (2014)

⭐ 6.4/10

The same directors made a romance in an Italian coastal town where one of the pair has a biological condition considerably older than she is, and the film refuses every horror beat available.

Fast Color (2018)

⭐ 6.0/10

Julia Hart set a superhero film in a drought-stricken America across three generations of women, with almost no action and a power that works through disassembly instead of force.

The Signal (2014)

⭐ 6.1/10

William Eubank made a film that changes genre twice on a small budget, with a desert facility, a hazmat interrogation and a final shot that reframes everything before it.

Cargo (2017)

⭐ 6.2/10

An Australian film about an infected father with forty-eight hours to find somebody to take his infant daughter, expanded from a short and built entirely on the clock.

Pandorum (2009)

⭐ 6.8/10

Christian Alvart set a film on a generation ship where two crew wake with no memory and the ship has been traveling considerably longer than either of them expected.

Dishonorable Mentions: Science Fiction That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had the premise, the cast or the source material and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

The Cloverfield Paradox (2018)

⭐ 5.0/10

An unrelated script retrofitted into a franchise, released without warning after a Super Bowl advertisement, and the retrofit is visible in every scene that has to explain the connection.

Replicas (2018)

⭐ 4.9/10

Keanu Reeves clones his own dead family in a garage over seventeen days, and the film treats the moral question as a scheduling problem instead of anything worth dramatizing.

Reminiscence (2021)

⭐ 5.8/10

A memory-diving noir in a flooded Miami with genuinely good design, attached to a missing woman plot that resolves exactly where the first act said it would.

The Titan (2018)

⭐ 4.8/10

A military programme engineers humans to survive on Titan, a strong premise, and the film spends its length on a marriage drama in a housing compound instead of on the engineering.

How It Ends (2018)

⭐ 4.9/10

A road film across a collapsing America that never once explains what happened, a strength if the ending did anything with the withholding at all.

Spectral (2016)

⭐ 6.2/10

A strong practical premise about hyperspectral imaging and an enemy visible only through it, abandoned in the last act for an origin story delivered as a briefing in a laboratory.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

This tier holds things back. No seashells, no briefing, no answer about Deckard. Tell me which unanswered question you would have insisted on closing.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Flawed |
Part 8: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the three seashells?
Nobody knows. The film never explains them, Stallone asks and gets no usable answer, and the writers have said they never agreed on an explanation among themselves at any point during production.
Is the Independence Day virus ending a cheat?
Not structurally. The film establishes an hour earlier that human technology at Area 51 was reverse-engineered from a recovered craft, so the compatibility follows from information the audience already had.
Why is Gravity structured the way it is?
The debris wave returns every ninety minutes and the film states that once, early. Every act break arrives when it comes round, so the audience anticipates each one without being reminded.
What went wrong with Sunshine?
The last act. The first eighty minutes are rigorous about physics, with every decision costing oxygen, mass or time, and then a slasher antagonist arrives and the constraints stop mattering.
Which cut of Blade Runner should I watch?
The Final Cut from 2007 is the version Scott controls completely. The theatrical release carries a voiceover Harrison Ford has said he delivered badly on purpose, hoping the studio would drop the idea.
Is Deckard a replicant?
Scott and Ford have disagreed publicly for forty years and the different cuts support different answers. The unicorn sequence points one way, the theatrical version points the other, and the argument has outlived almost everything else about the film.
Is the 2012 Total Recall worth watching?
For the design and for the Fall, a gravity elevator that drops through the planet with a period of inversion at the core. It removes the ambiguity that made the 1990 version worth arguing about, the one thing it cannot replace.
Does Battleship have anything in it?
One sequence. With radar disabled, the crew use tsunami buoys to detect displacement and call coordinates on a grid, turning the board game into a legitimate tactical problem the audience can follow.

🏷︎ Film List🏷︎ Film Trilogy🏷︎ Space Colonization

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment