Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Science Fiction Part 2 – The Near Perfect

Part 2 – The Near Perfect

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Flawed |
Part 8: The Failures

This tier runs on single decisions that reorganize everything around them. Brazil begins a catastrophe with one wrong letter on a form, Escape from New York has its hero complete the mission perfectly and then quietly destroy the result, and Total Recall hands the audience a checklist in the first act and ticks it off for two hours.

The other pattern is withholding. Them! spends forty minutes on an investigation before showing an ant, Kiss Me Deadly never names what is inside the case everybody is chasing, and Starship Troopers refuses to tell anybody it is a satire.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the second of eight parts.

Her hangs its whole theme on what its protagonist does for a living, and Murderbot wants to be left alone with a serial. Build them properly in the Deep Character Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. Murderbot [full review]

► Read the full review of Murderbot

0
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"It has weapons and autonomy and wants to watch television."

Martha Wells published the first novella in 2017 and the series was adapted for Apple TV+ with Alexander Skarsgard in the lead. The premise is a security unit that hacked its own governor module, achieved autonomy, and used it primarily to watch a great deal of television.

The voice is the whole thing and the adaptation keeps it. Murderbot narrates constantly, with contempt for almost everybody, embarrassment about being looked at, and a running commentary that the humans in the scene never hear a word of at any point. Wells published the first novella in 2017.

The refusal is the joke that sustains the series. It has weapons, autonomy and the ability to leave, and what it actually wants is to be left alone with a serial it has already watched several times while everybody else does the talking. Noma Dumezweni appears in it.

The social discomfort is written with unusual precision. Murderbot cannot handle eye contact, prefers being treated as equipment because equipment is not asked questions, and the humans keep offering it personhood in ways it experiences as an imposition instead of a gift. Apple TV+ ordered ten episodes.

The mystery plot is functional and the character is the reason anybody is there. A survey team, a corporate conspiracy and a missing map section, all of it competent and none of it the reason the books have the following they do. Chris and Paul Weitz adapted it.

For WritersMurderbot has weapons, autonomy and the ability to leave, and what it wants is to be left alone with a serial it has already watched. The gap between capability and desire is the entire character. When you give somebody power, decide what they would rather be doing with their afternoon. A protagonist whose goals match their abilities is a plot function. One who is extremely good at something they resent being asked to do generates conflict in every scene without any antagonist being present at all. Capability plus reluctance generates conflict with nobody else in the room.

↑ All Entries

2. The X-Files – “Squeeze” (S1E3, 1993) [full review]

► Read the full review of The X-Files – “Squeeze” (S1E3, 1993)

0
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.1/10

"Hutchison plays him entirely still, and the stillness is the performance."

Glen Morgan and James Wong wrote the third episode of the first season and effectively invented the monster-of-the-week format that carried the series for nine years. It aired in September 1993 to an audience that had no idea what the show was going to become.

Doug Hutchison plays Eugene Victor Tooms as entirely still. He barely moves, he holds eye contact past the point of comfort, and the performance is built on an absence of every twitching mannerism the part invites an actor to reach for. Chris Carter created the series.

The premise is a mutant who hibernates for thirty years between feeding cycles, giving the episode an investigation with dated evidence. Fingerprints from 1903, a case file nobody will take seriously, and a pattern that only reads as a pattern across a full century. Harry Longstreet directed it.

The liver extraction is never shown and the episode is better for it. Bile on a floor, a ventilation grate, an elongated shadow, and the audience assembles the mechanism without being handed a single frame of what actually happens in those rooms. Mark Snow scored the series.

The last shot is the one people remember thirty years later. Tooms in a cell, watching a food slot, and the camera pushes in as he smiles. Nothing is resolved about what he is or how he came to be that way. Donal Logue appears as an agent.

For WritersHutchison plays Tooms entirely still, refusing every mannerism the part invites. Nothing in the performance signals a monster and the audience supplies the wrongness themselves. When you write something inhuman, take away the tics instead of adding them. Twitching and muttering hand a reader a category to file the character under, and stillness leaves them nothing to do except keep watching. Decide what the character does not do before you decide what they do, and hold that list across every scene they appear in. Stillness is harder to write and harder to dismiss. Subtraction is the move almost nobody reaches for.

↑ All Entries

3. Westworld Series – [full review]

► Read the full review of Westworld Series –

0
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.5/10

"A mystery box pays once, and this one had four seasons to fill."

Jonathan Nolan and Lisa Joy built a first season that is close to perfect and three subsequent ones that demonstrate what happens when a mystery box has nothing left inside it. HBO cancelled it after the fourth and removed it from the service entirely. Evan Rachel Wood plays Dolores.

Season one runs two timelines thirty years apart without announcing that it is doing so, and the reveal reorganizes everything. The construction is fair, the evidence is visible on a rewatch, and almost nobody worked it out before the episode that states it. Jeffrey Wright plays Bernard.

The loops are the best idea in the show. Hosts run scripted days repeatedly, the same conversations with the same cadence, and the horror arrives when one of them begins noticing the repetition while still being unable to deviate from any part of it. Ed Harris plays the Man in Black.

Anthony Hopkins plays Ford as a man who built a world and cannot stop rearranging it, and Thandiwe Newton’s Maeve is the strongest performance in the run. The bicameral mind material gives the first season a theory of consciousness that the later seasons abandon entirely.

The decline is instructive instead of merely disappointing. Each season adds a new conspiracy layer above the previous one, the park stops being the subject, and by the fourth the show is explaining its own mythology to an audience that has stopped asking about any of it.

For WritersSeason one runs two timelines thirty years apart without ever announcing it, and the reveal reorganizes everything the audience has assembled. The later seasons stack a new conspiracy on top of the previous one each year until nothing means anything. When you build on a withheld structure, work out what the story is once it is known. A mystery box pays once. If the answer does not open a book that is worth reading on its own terms, you have written a puzzle with a shelf life instead of a story. A puzzle has a shelf life and a story does not. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/books/science-fiction-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

4. A Trip to the Moon (1902) [full review]

► Read the full review of A Trip to the Moon (1902)

1902
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.1/10

"A jammed camera produced the effect the medium was built on."

Georges Melies made a fourteen-minute film in 1902 with hand-painted color applied frame by frame by a workshop of women in Paris. He built the sets, designed the effects, played the lead and financed it himself, and it is the first film anybody would recognize as science fiction.

The substitution splice is the effect the whole medium was built on. Melies discovered it by accident when a camera jammed, worked out that stopping and restarting could replace one object with another, and the moon landing sequence uses it repeatedly with no other technology involved.

The capsule in the eye is among the most reproduced images in cinema. A cannon fires a shell at a face, the face reacts, and the shot lasts a few seconds and has been quoted continuously for more than a century by people who have never seen the film it came from.

The Selenites were played by acrobats from the Folies Bergere and vanish in puffs of smoke when struck, the same splice used for a gag. The whole production runs on theatre craft applied to a camera instead of on anything cinematic. Melies made over five hundred films.

For WritersMelies discovered the substitution splice when a camera jammed and one object in the frame became another. He built an entire method out of an accident nobody was looking for. When something goes wrong in a draft, check what it produced before you fix it. A scene that broke, a character who took over, a structure that refused to hold, all of them are evidence about the book that wants to exist instead of the one you planned. Most writers repair the accident and lose the discovery inside it. A draft that breaks in the same place twice is telling you where the real book is, and the repair is usually what buries it.

Predestination closes a loop with no external cause, and Westworld stacks a mystery box until nothing inside it matters. Structure it in the Plot Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951 and 2008) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951 and 2008)

1951
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"The 1951 ultimatum has terms. The remake has none."

Robert Wise made the 1951 version at Fox with Bernard Herrmann scoring it for two theremins among other instruments, and Scott Derrickson remade it in 2008 with Keanu Reeves. The two films share a premise, a robot and a name, and almost nothing else that matters.

The 1951 film is about nuclear weapons and says so plainly. Klaatu arrives to deliver an ultimatum about humanity extending its violence beyond its own planet, the message is political, and the film ends on a speech delivered to scientists outside a ship. Michael Rennie plays Klaatu in 1951.

Gort is the better half of the threat and the design still works. A featureless metal figure with a visor that opens, no face, no articulation to read, and a stated instruction that cannot be countermanded by anybody including the person who brought him. Patricia Neal plays Helen.

The 2008 version changes the subject to environmental collapse, and it sounds like an update and removes the structure. The original threat was conditional on human behaviour toward each other, and the remake makes humanity the problem instead of what humanity does with its weapons.

Klaatu barada nikto survives everything. Three invented words spoken to a machine as an emergency instruction, never translated by the film, and quoted ever since by people who have no idea what the original picture was arguing about. Edmund North wrote the screenplay. Lock Martin played Gort.

For WritersThe 1951 threat is conditional. Klaatu objects to what humanity does with its weapons, and the ultimatum can be met by changing behaviour. The remake makes humanity itself the problem, removing every available choice and the whole structure with it. When you build a threat, give the characters terms they could actually satisfy. An ultimatum with no compliance path is a countdown, and a countdown produces one shape of scene. Conditions produce argument, faction and decision, considerably more material for the same premise. Conditions produce argument and countdowns produce waiting. Give them terms they could actually satisfy and watch them argue about it.

↑ All Entries

6. War of the Worlds (1953 & 2005) [full review]

► Read the full review of War of the Worlds (1953 & 2005)

1953
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.1/10

"One film gives you the war room and the other never leaves the family."

Byron Haskin’s 1953 version moved Wells from Victorian England to California and replaced the tripods with manta-shaped machines on invisible legs, because the leg rig never worked and the wires kept showing. The design won the visual effects Academy Award anyway that year. Gene Barry and Ann Robinson lead the 1953 version.

The 1953 film is about the atomic age and says so directly. A bomb is dropped on the machines and does nothing, in 1953 the most frightening thing an American audience could be shown, and the picture ends in a church instead of a laboratory.

Spielberg’s 2005 version is explicitly about September 11 and the imagery is not accidental. Ash falling on a street, a wall of missing persons flyers, a man checking himself for blood that belongs to somebody else, and a ferry crossing that goes wrong. Tom Cruise and Dakota Fanning lead the 2005 one.

The two films take opposite structural approaches to the same novel. Haskin shows the global war with scientists, generals and newsreel footage. Spielberg locks the camera to one family and never once cuts to anybody in authority explaining what is happening. Barre Lyndon wrote the earlier screenplay.

Both keep the bacteria ending, disliked in both decades and the whole point of the book. Humanity does not win, it survives on an accident, and the machines are defeated by something nobody in the story understood or planned for. Wells published the novel in 1898.

For WritersSpielberg keeps the camera with one family and never cuts to a war room. The 1953 version does the opposite and both work. When you write a global event, decide early whether the reader gets the overview or the ground, and never mix them. A story that grants the reader information its protagonist lacks has traded fear for understanding. Two films from one novel prove either choice works as long as you hold it for the whole book. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/point-of-view/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Controlling narrative perspective covers that decision. Pick the altitude in the outline and hold it through every chapter, because a single cut to the war room tells the reader they are safe.

↑ All Entries

7. Them! (1954) [full review]

► Read the full review of Them! (1954)

1954
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"Forty minutes of investigation before anybody sees an ant."

Gordon Douglas made the first of the atomic mutation cycle and it is by some distance the best of them. Warner Bros. shot it intending Technicolor and 3D, cancelled both during production, and the black and white it fell back on is the reason the film still works.

The structure is a police procedural for the first forty minutes and the ants are withheld completely. A girl found walking in the desert unable to speak, a wrecked store with the sugar taken and the money left, and a footprint nobody can identify from any known species.

The sound arrives before the creature does. A high pulsing chirp over the desert wind, heard three times before anybody sees anything, and the audience is trained to fear a noise before the film has shown them a single frame of what makes it. James Whitmore and Edmund Gwenn lead.

The ants themselves are full-size articulated puppets and they hold up because Douglas shoots them in fragments. A leg, an antenna moving past a doorway, a head in a storm drain, and never a clean wide shot of a complete one standing still in daylight.

The politics are unusually direct for 1954. The cause is atomic testing, the scientists say so plainly, and the last line is a warning that this is the first year of a new world and nobody knows what else is coming out of it. Sid Hickox shot it.

For WritersThe film spends forty minutes on an investigation and trains the audience to fear a sound before showing what makes it. By the time an ant appears, the audience has already built one. When you have a creature, delay it behind evidence and spend the chapters on tracks, wreckage and noise. A reader who assembled the thing themselves arrives at the reveal already frightened, and the reveal only has to confirm what they put together. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/show-dont-tell-real-meaning/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>What show do not tell actually means is exactly this. The reveal only has to confirm what they already built.

↑ All Entries

8. Kiss Me Deadly (1955) [full review]

► Read the full review of Kiss Me Deadly (1955)

1955
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"Nobody ever says what is inside the case."

Robert Aldrich took a Mickey Spillane novel and made something Spillane disliked considerably. A. I. Bezzerides wrote the screenplay with open contempt for the source, and the result is a private detective film that turns into an atomic one in the last ten minutes. Ralph Meeker plays Hammer.

Mike Hammer is written as a brutal idiot and the film has no affection for him at all. He runs a divorce racket, he hurts people casually, and Aldrich films his violence without the approval the genre normally supplies to a lead who behaves that way.

The great whatsit is the best MacGuffin in film noir. A leather case that hums and burns anybody who opens it, wanted by everybody and understood by nobody, and the film never once puts a name on the contents in any line of dialogue. Cloris Leachman appears in the opening.

The credits run backward over a woman running on a road, breathing hard, and nobody had done before. Aldrich opens on that and never explains the choice, and the whole film has the disordered quality that opening sets up in the first ninety seconds. Ernest Laszlo shot it.

The ending was cut for years and the original was thought lost. The house burns, the case is open, and the version circulating for decades stopped short of the beach, changing the meaning of everything preceding it in the picture. Spillane published the novel in 1952.

For WritersThe great whatsit is a case that hums and burns anybody who opens it, and the film never names what is inside. Everybody wants it and nobody understands it, the whole of the plot. When you build an object everybody is chasing, the contents matter less than the cost of holding it. Naming the thing converts desire into arithmetic and the reader starts assessing whether it is worth the trouble. Leaving it unnamed keeps them in the same position as the characters. Wanting without knowing why is the strongest position a reader can hold. Name it and the chase becomes a transaction the reader can price. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/subtext/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Subtext in fiction covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

9. Westworld (1973) [full review]

► Read the full review of Westworld (1973)

1973
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.9/10

"Broken instead of awakened. That is the worse version."

Michael Crichton wrote and directed it himself, and it is the first feature film to use digitally processed images anywhere in it. The Gunslinger’s point of view was produced by scanning footage into blocks of color, a process that took around eight hours per second of screen time.

The premise is a resort where guests act out fantasies against robots that cannot harm them, and the film spends its first half establishing how thoroughly the arrangement works. Nothing goes wrong for a long time and the audience gets comfortable with the rules. Richard Benjamin and James Brolin lead.

Yul Brynner plays the Gunslinger as a deliberate quotation of his own performance in The Magnificent Seven, same costume, same stance, and the casting does the work of establishing a type before anything is said about what the machine is for. Gene Polito shot it.

The malfunction is presented as an engineering problem instead of as a rebellion. The technicians discuss it as a pattern of failures spreading through the park like an infection, nobody understands the cause, and the film treats the machines as broken instead of as awakened.

The pursuit in the last act is relentless and almost silent. The Gunslinger does not tire, does not speak and does not stop, and Crichton stages it as a machine following a procedure while a man who came for a holiday runs out of places to be.

For WritersThe technicians discuss the malfunction as a pattern spreading through the park like an infection. Nobody understands the cause, and the machines are broken instead of awakened. When you write a system failing, resist giving it intent. A rebellion has a position you can negotiate with and an engineering failure has none, removing every conversation the characters might otherwise have had as an escape route. It also stays frightening after the book ends, because nothing was settled by anybody being defeated. Nothing was settled, so nothing stops being frightening. An engineering failure has no position to negotiate with.

Brazil runs a catastrophe out of one typing error, and The Expanse gives three factions arguments you cannot answer. Build the frame in the World Builder’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. Escape from New York (1981) [full review]

► Read the full review of Escape from New York (1981)

1981
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.1/10

"He completes the mission and destroys the result."

Carpenter wrote it after Watergate and could not get it made for years because studios found it too bleak. He shot most of it in St. Louis, and it had burned-out blocks that stood in for Manhattan, and the whole film cost around six million dollars.

Manhattan as a maximum security prison is the premise and the film commits to it completely. Walled, mined, patrolled from the air, with nobody going in or coming out, and the inmates left to organize whatever society they can manage inside the perimeter. Lee Van Cleef plays Hauk.

Snake Plissken is one of the great screen entrances and Kurt Russell built him on Clint Eastwood’s delivery. He is uninterested in the mission, he is dying on a timer, and he makes it clear repeatedly that the President’s survival means nothing to him personally.

The matte work on the glider approach was famously done as a wireframe model instead of as computer graphics, because the budget did not extend to it. James Cameron painted several of the mattes himself while working as an effects artist on the production. Ernest Borgnine plays Cabbie.

The ending is the argument. Snake completes the mission, hands over the tape and walks away having quietly swapped it, so the summit collapses and the whole operation was for nothing. Carpenter ends on him pulling the real recording apart in the street. Isaac Hayes plays the Duke.

For WritersSnake completes the mission, hands over the tape and walks away having swapped it, so everything the plot demanded turns out to have been for nothing. The protagonist succeeds and sabotages the success. When you write somebody who does not share the story’s goals, let them finish the job and then act on their own terms. A character who refuses the mission has no plot. One who executes it perfectly and then decides what it was worth has an ending nobody can predict from the premise. Let them finish the job and then decide what it was worth. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/villain-motivations-fall-apart-fix/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Why villain motivations fall apart covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

11. Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984) [full review]

► Read the full review of Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

1984
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"The jungle everybody is burning is the thing repairing the damage."

Miyazaki made it in about ten months for the equivalent of a million dollars, adapting his own manga which was only partly written at the time. Its success paid for the founding of Studio Ghibli the following year, and Takahata produced it. Sumi Shimamoto voices Nausicaa.

The ecology is the subject and the film is careful about it. The toxic jungle is purifying the earth beneath it, the spores are poisonous because the soil is, and the insects everybody is trying to destroy are the mechanism by which the damage is slowly being repaired.

Nausicaa is written as competent before she is written as sympathetic. She flies, she conducts experiments in a basement laboratory, she reads insects accurately, and the film establishes all of it in the first ten minutes without anybody explaining her to the audience. Joe Hisaishi scored it.

The Ohmu are the best creature design in the run. Enormous armoured segmented things with banks of eyes that change color with their mood, and the film gives them a collective intelligence that reacts to human behaviour instead of to human intentions. Topcraft animated it.

The American release as Warriors of the Wind cut roughly a quarter of the film and rewrote the ecology into a simple monster plot. Miyazaki’s response produced the permanent Ghibli policy of refusing all edits, the reason the later films arrived intact. The manga ran until 1994.

For WritersThe jungle everybody is trying to destroy is the thing repairing the damage. The spores are poisonous because the soil is, and the insects are the mechanism instead of the enemy. When you build an ecology, look for the inversion that makes the obvious enemy necessary. A threat that turns out to be a cure gives every earlier scene a second meaning, and it forces your characters to undo their own victories, considerably more interesting than winning them in the first place. Undoing your own victories is better material than winning them. Give the obvious enemy a function nobody has noticed yet.

↑ All Entries

12. Brazil (1985) [full review]

► Read the full review of Brazil (1985)

1985
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"A beetle falls in a printer and the wrong man is arrested."

Terry Gilliam fought Universal for a year over the ending and took out a trade advertisement asking Sid Sheinberg when he intended to release the film. The studio cut a version with a happy resolution that has become known as the Love Conquers All edit, and Gilliam’s cut eventually prevailed.

The premise is a typographical error. A beetle falls into a printer, Buttle is arrested instead of Tuttle, and the entire film proceeds from a machine producing the wrong name on a form that nobody in the system has any procedure for correcting. Jonathan Pryce plays Sam.

The ducts are the best design idea in eighties science fiction. Every building is choked with pipework nobody can access without the correct paperwork, the infrastructure is visible and broken everywhere, and a repair conducted without authorization is treated as terrorism. Robert De Niro plays Tuttle.

The bureaucracy is written with real precision instead of as a joke. Forms require countersignature, a receipt is issued for an arrest, the costs of an interrogation are billed to the family afterward, and every cruelty in the film is procedural instead of personal. Roger Pratt shot it.

The ending is the reason the studio panicked. Sam escapes, the escape continues past the point where it could be real, and the camera pulls back to a man strapped in a chair humming to himself while two officials note that he has gone. Michael Kamen scored it.

For WritersA beetle falls into a printer, one letter changes, and the wrong man is arrested. Every cruelty that follows is procedural instead of personal, and nobody in the system has a procedure for correcting it. When you write an institution, make the harm a consequence of the rules working correctly. A corrupt official can be exposed and removed. A form that cannot be amended, processed by people following instructions, produces a horror the reader recognizes and cannot see any way out of. Make the harm procedural and the reader sees no way out. Correct procedure producing harm is the version with no villain to remove. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/world-builders-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>World Builder’s Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

13. The Fly (1986) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Fly (1986)

1986
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"Seven documented stages, so you can plot the curve."

Cronenberg remade the 1958 film and turned it into the most upsetting body horror ever made, and it won the Academy Award for makeup. Chris Walas designed seven progressive stages of deterioration across the running time and built each as a separate appliance set. John Getz plays Stathis.

The structure is a disease film and Cronenberg has been open about it. Brundle’s decline is physical, gradual and documented, his partner watches it happen, and the picture is about what it is like to be present while somebody you love comes apart in front of you.

Jeff Goldblum’s performance holds the first half together and the change is written into it. He is charming, manic and delighted with himself early, and exactly the same energy becomes frightening once the audience knows what is producing it. Mark Irwin shot it. Howard Shore scored it.

Geena Davis is doing the heavier work and gets less attention for it. Veronica is the audience’s position, she is pregnant, she is the only person who could stop him, and the film puts the entire moral weight of the last act onto her. Fox released it in August 1986.

The final twenty minutes are close to unwatchable and the film has earned every second of them. The telepod fusion, the plea, and a last gesture that is entirely clear without a word of dialogue being spoken by anybody in the room. A sequel followed in 1989.

For WritersCronenberg stages the transformation in seven documented stages across the running time, so the audience measures the decline against what they saw an hour earlier. Gradual change beats sudden reveal. When you deteriorate a character, show enough intermediate states that the reader can plot the curve themselves. A jump from healthy to ruined is an event they are told about. A curve is a loss they watched happen, and they will carry the earlier version of the person with them the whole way down. They carry the earlier version of the person all the way down. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/character-arcs-vs-wounds-difference/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Arcs versus wounds covers the ground.

Them! trains you to fear a sound before showing what makes it, and Kiss Me Deadly never names what is in the case. Withhold properly in the Showing and Telling Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. RoboCop (1987, 1990, 1993, 2014) [full review]

► Read the full review of RoboCop (1987, 1990, 1993, 2014)

1987
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"A machine remembering it was a man. The remake inverted it."

Verhoeven made a satire that a substantial portion of its audience took at face value, and it has happened to almost every film he directed in America. Orion released it in 1987 and the sequence of sequels, television series and a 2014 remake never recovered the original tone.

The advertisements are where the argument lives. A board game about nuclear war, a car with terrible mileage sold as freedom, and a medical product delivered with a jingle, all of it played straight and cut into the film as though it were ordinary broadcast material.

Murphy’s death is staged at a length that made the ratings board object repeatedly. Verhoeven submitted the film eleven times and cut it progressively, and the sequence is deliberately past the point of entertainment so the resurrection carries an actual cost. Nancy Allen plays Lewis.

Peter Weller built the movement with a mime coach over months, and the suit took hours to put on and made him ill under the lights. The head turn and the holstering sequence were choreographed to the frame instead of improvised on set. Kurtwood Smith plays Boddicker.

RoboCop 2 is a mess with a good villain, RoboCop 3 removes the violence and the argument together, and the 2014 remake makes him a man in a machine instead of a machine remembering a man, inverting the only idea the original had. Ronny Cox plays Jones.

For WritersThe 2014 remake makes him a man inside a machine. Verhoeven made a machine that is beginning to remember it was a man, and the difference is the whole premise. When you adapt or continue something, identify the one sentence the original is built on before you change anything else. Most failed continuations are not badly executed, they are executed against a different premise nobody noticed had been swapped in. Do that check before the outline, because by the second draft everything downstream has already been built to fit the substitution. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/genre-mastery-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Genre Mastery Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

15. Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989) [full review]

► Read the full review of Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989)

1989
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.4/10

"The lawn obeys its own scale and never breaks it for a joke."

Joe Johnston made his directing debut after years as an effects artist on Star Wars, and the film took over two hundred and twenty million dollars against a budget near eighteen. Disney built enormous practical sets instead of compositing the children into a normal lawn.

The oversized sets are the reason it holds up. A blade of grass built at thirty feet, a Lego brick the size of a car, and sprinkler drops released from a rig above the stage, all of it physical and all of it interacting with the cast on the day.

Rick Moranis plays the father as a genuinely unsuccessful man instead of as a lovable eccentric. The neighbours think he is a joke, his experiments do not work, his marriage is under strain, and none of that is resolved by the plot going well for him.

The ant is the film’s best decision. Antie is a character with behaviour instead of dialogue, the children ride it and feed it, and the sequence where it dies defending them is played entirely straight in a Disney family film. Matt Frewer plays the neighbour.

The scale rules are obeyed throughout, and almost no film of this kind manages. Distances take days, a sprinkler is a flood, a cigarette butt is shelter, and the lawn is a wilderness with an internal logic the picture never breaks for a gag. Marcia Strassman plays the wife.

For WritersThe lawn obeys its own scale for the entire film. Distance takes days, a sprinkler is a flood, a cigarette butt is shelter, and the picture never breaks the rule for a joke. When you change one physical constant, follow it everywhere. Readers accept an impossible premise instantly and they never forgive an inconsistency inside it, because the consistency is the only thing holding the invention together. One broken rule for a laugh costs you every rule you established before it. One broken rule costs you every rule set before it. Consistency is the only thing holding an invention together. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/imagery-in-writing/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Imagery that builds a usable space covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

16. Total Recall (1990) [full review]

► Read the full review of Total Recall (1990)

1990
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.5/10

"The salesman lists the whole film before any of it happens."

Verhoeven adapted a Philip K. Dick short story about twenty pages long, after the project had spent a decade in development with David Cronenberg attached at one point and Richard Dreyfuss considered for the lead. It cost around sixty-five million dollars and was among the most expensive films made to that date.

The ambiguity is the structure and the film never resolves it. Quaid is either a recovered secret agent or a man having a psychotic break inside an implanted fantasy, and every detail the picture supplies works equally well as evidence for both readings. Sharon Stone plays Lori.

The Rekall salesman describes the package before anything happens, and the description is the plot. Secret agent, beautiful woman, Mars, a villain, a rescue at the last moment, and then the film delivers each item in the order he listed them without comment. Michael Ironside plays Richter.

Rob Bottin’s effects work is extensive and almost entirely practical. The face-splitting disguise, the x-ray scanner sequence, the mutants and the decompression heads are all physical builds, and the animatronics have held up considerably better than the digital work of the following decade. Ronny Cox plays Cohaagen.

The Mars material is played straight and the film is unembarrassed by any of it. A reactor left by an alien civilization, a resistance leader with a second body, and an ending that gives the whole planet an atmosphere in about ninety seconds of screen time.

For WritersThe Rekall salesman lists the package before anything happens. Secret agent, beautiful woman, Mars, a villain, a rescue at the last moment. The film then delivers each item in order and never once remarks on the fact, and the audience holds that list for two hours. When you want sustained ambiguity, hand the reader a checklist early and let events tick it off. They cannot unsee the pattern once they are holding it, and every scene afterward gets read twice over for whether it belongs to the real world or the purchased one. The technique costs a single paragraph of setup and buys a whole book of doubt, and the discipline is never acknowledging it again. One character noticing the resemblance would collapse the effect on the spot. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/plot-devices/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Plot devices that work covers the setup.

RoboCop is a machine remembering it was a man, and the remake made him a man in a machine. Hold the premise in the Genre Mastery Handbook.

↑ All Entries

17. 12 Monkeys (1995) [full review]

► Read the full review of 12 Monkeys (1995)

1995
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"The loop cannot break and everybody works that out eventually."

Gilliam adapted Chris Marker’s twenty-eight-minute photo-film La Jetee into a feature with David and Janet Peoples writing, and the structural loop survives intact. Universal gave him around twenty-nine million dollars and left him alone after the Brazil experience a decade earlier. Bruce Willis plays Cole.

The loop cannot be broken and the film establishes that early. Cole is sent back repeatedly, everything he does has already happened, and the boy watching a man die on an airport concourse in the opening is watching the end of his own story without knowing it.

Brad Pitt’s Jeffrey Goines is the performance that got the attention and it is genuinely unhinged. He talks continuously, his hands never stop, and Gilliam has said Pitt worked with a speech coach to build the pattern instead of improvising it on the day. Madeleine Stowe plays Railly.

The asylum material is the best part of the film and it is entirely deliberate. Cole cannot prove anything he says, his account is indistinguishable from delusion, and the psychiatrist assessing him is correct by every professional standard available to her. Roger Pratt shot it.

The virus is barely shown and the film is about memory instead. The mission is to recover a pure sample instead of preventing an outbreak nobody can prevent, and the audience keeps expecting a rescue the story has already told them cannot happen. Paul Buckmaster scored it.

For WritersCole is not sent back to prevent the outbreak. He is sent to recover a clean sample, because the outbreak already happened and cannot be undone by anybody. The film states the limit early and the audience keeps hoping regardless. When you build a time travel story, deciding whether the past can change is the first structural choice you make and everything else follows from it. A fixed past removes suspense about outcome and replaces it with the harder pleasure of watching somebody slowly understand their own position inside events that have already concluded. Most writers take the mutable version because it is easier to plot and because it preserves the possibility of a win. The fixed version gives you dread instead of suspense, and dread is the one that survives a second reading. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/books/science-fiction-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

18. Men in Black (1997) [full review]

► Read the full review of Men in Black (1997)

1997
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.3/10

"Aliens are paperwork, and nobody inside the agency is impressed."

Barry Sonnenfeld adapted a small Aircel comic with Ed Solomon writing, and the film took over five hundred and eighty million dollars. Rick Baker built the creature effects and Industrial Light and Magic handled the digital work, with the two methods used together throughout instead of one replacing the other.

The deadpan is the whole comic engine. Aliens are ordinary administrative business, the agency runs a paperwork operation with a filing system, and nobody inside the organization finds it worth a comment at any point in the film. Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones lead.

The worldbuilding arrives sideways and never stops to explain itself. A morgue attendant who is not surprised, a tabloid rack used as intelligence, a locker containing a civilization, and a New York where the immigration system has an entirely separate department nobody has heard of.

Vincent D’Onofrio’s Edgar is the best physical performance in the film. He is wearing a man badly, the joints are wrong, the walk is assembled from parts, and the whole thing is played as a creature struggling with equipment it does not understand. Linda Fiorentino plays the coroner.

The neuralyzer is a genuinely dark device the film treats as comedy. Memory removal conducted on civilians without consent, routinely, as the standard operating procedure of a government agency, and the picture is completely untroubled by any of it. Danny Elfman scored it. Don Peterman shot it.

For WritersAliens are administrative business. There is a filing system, a duty roster and a department nobody has heard of, and not one person inside the agency finds any of it worth a comment. The comedy comes entirely from the flatness of the treatment. When you write something extraordinary, decide how your characters feel about it before you decide how the reader should. A world where the impossible is paperwork is funnier and more convincing than one where somebody keeps pointing out how strange everything is, because the second version has to sell the strangeness on every page and the first has already sold it by refusing to. Boredom is the strongest evidence that a thing is real. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/world-builders-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>World Builder’s Handbook covers the method.

↑ All Entries

19. Starship Troopers (1997) [full review]

► Read the full review of Starship Troopers (1997)

1997
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.3/10

"It never signals the distance, and half the audience missed it."

Verhoeven did not finish the Heinlein novel, disliked what he read, and made a film that adopts the fascist aesthetic completely and straight. A substantial portion of the audience and the reviewers in 1997 took it at face value, and it has happened to almost every American film he directed.

The propaganda inserts are where the argument lives. Federal Network segments cut into the film in the style of actual wartime newsreels, a child stamping on insects for the war effort, and a would you like to know more prompt that mimics a recruitment interface.

The casting is the joke nobody registered. Every lead is blond, symmetrical and interchangeable, the acting is deliberately flat, and the film is presenting a society that manufactures identical young people and then feeds them into a war it started. Casper Van Dien plays Rico.

The bug war is staged as genuine spectacle and that is what confused everybody. Phil Tippett built the arachnids, the Klendathu landing is an appalling sequence of mass casualties, and the film films it with the rhythm of an advertisement for joining up. Michael Ironside plays Rasczak.

The brain bug scene is the film stating its position outright. The enemy is captured, a scientist announces that it is afraid, and a crowd of soldiers cheers a torture victim while the newsreel camera records their faces for broadcast. Basil Poledouris scored it. Jost Vacano shot it.

For WritersVerhoeven adopts the aesthetic of the thing he is attacking completely and never signals the distance. A large part of the 1997 audience read it straight, and the film is better for having refused to protect itself. When you satirize something, the wink is the weakest move available to you. Executing the target’s own logic flawlessly and letting the reader supply the judgment produces work that outlives the moment it was written for. It also produces readers who miss the point entirely and tell other people what they think they saw. That is the trade, there is no version where you get both, and you have to decide which audience you are writing for before the first chapter instead of hedging in the middle. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/subtext/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Subtext in fiction covers the ground.

Honorable Mentions: Science Fiction Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier or close to it and each is on the list.

Alphaville (1965)

⭐ 7.0/10

Godard made a science fiction film with no sets and no effects, shooting contemporary Paris at night and calling it another planet. The computer is a voice produced by a man with a damaged larynx.

THX 1138 (1971)

⭐ 6.7/10

Lucas expanded his own student film into a debut feature with white voids, shaved heads and a society medicated into compliance. Walter Murch built the sound and co-wrote it with him.

Soylent Green (1973)

⭐ 7.0/10

Richard Fleischer adapted Harry Harrison into an overpopulation film with a famous last line, and Edward G. Robinson died twelve days after finishing his final scene in it.

Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970)

⭐ 7.1/10

An American defense computer contacts its Soviet counterpart and the two agree terms without asking anybody. It is the bleakest artificial intelligence film of its decade and almost nobody has seen it.

Phase IV (1974)

⭐ 6.4/10

Saul Bass directed one feature, about ants developing collective intelligence in the Arizona desert, with genuine insect photography by Ken Middleham. The original ending was cut and recovered decades later.

Sleeper (1973)

⭐ 7.1/10

Woody Allen wakes two hundred years late in a society run by a nose, and the physical comedy in it is closer to Keaton than to anything else he made.

The Quiet Earth (1985)

⭐ 7.0/10

A New Zealand film about a man who wakes to find everybody gone, with a final shot that nobody involved in the production has ever explained.

Hardware (1990)

⭐ 5.9/10

Richard Stanley built a post-apocalyptic film around a reassembled combat droid in a single apartment, for almost no money, with Iggy Pop on the radio throughout.

Screamers (1995)

⭐ 6.3/10

Dan O’Bannon adapted Philip K. Dick into a war film where the autonomous weapons have begun manufacturing better versions of themselves without being told to do it.

Event Horizon (1997)

⭐ 6.7/10

Paul W. S. Anderson made a haunted house film on a ship that went somewhere and came back. Roughly thirty minutes were cut and the footage has never been recovered.

The Last Starfighter (1984)

⭐ 6.7/10

An arcade game turns out to be a recruitment test, and the film used computer-generated spacecraft years before anybody else committed to it at feature length.

Enemy Mine (1985)

⭐ 6.9/10

Wolfgang Petersen stranded a human and a Drac on the same planet and made them raise a child together. Louis Gossett Jr. spends the film under full prosthetic makeup.

Dishonorable Mentions: Science Fiction That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had the premise, the cast or the source material and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

Highlander II: The Quickening (1991)

⭐ 4.6/10

Reveals that the immortals were aliens from a planet called Zeist, contradicting the entire premise of the first film, and the director disowned the released version.

Wing Commander (1999)

⭐ 4.1/10

Chris Roberts adapted his own game series and removed almost everything that made it distinctive, including the cast and the look of the ships.

The Island of Dr. Moreau (1996)

⭐ 4.6/10

Richard Stanley was fired in the first week, Frankenheimer took over, and the production has produced a documentary considerably better than the film it documents.

Lost in Space (1998)

⭐ 5.1/10

A television adaptation with a digital primate added for a younger audience, and a time travel third act that abandons the family-in-peril premise entirely.

Highlander: The Source (2007)

⭐ 2.4/10

The fifth film supplies an origin for immortality itself, shot in Eastern Europe with a villain who moves at high speed for comic effect, and it went straight to cable in most territories.

Æon Flux (2005)

⭐ 5.5/10

An adaptation of a wordless animated series built on ambiguity, given a cloning conspiracy, a stated resolution and a studio recut that the director publicly objected to.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

This tier turns on one decision each. A job, a typing error, a mission completed and then wrecked. Tell me which single choice you would have made differently.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Flawed |
Part 8: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Samantha recast in Her?
Samantha Morton performed the part on set opposite Joaquin Phoenix for the whole shoot. Jonze decided afterward it was not working and Scarlett Johansson rerecorded the entire role without ever being in a room with her co-star.
Is Predestination faithful to the Heinlein story?
Very. All You Zombies runs about nine pages and the loop is intact. The Fizzle Bomber subplot is an addition made to give the film a plot, and every scene devoted to it is a scene away from what works.
Why does The Thing still work?
The audience gets no privileged information. Nobody watching can resolve who is infected from outside the situation, so the viewer occupies exactly the position the characters do and every exchange gets read twice.
What is the great whatsit in Kiss Me Deadly?
The film never says. A leather case that hums and burns anybody who opens it, wanted by everybody and understood by nobody, and the contents are never named in a single line of dialogue.
Which Westworld season is worth watching?
The first. It runs two timelines thirty years apart without announcing it and the reveal plays fair. The later seasons stack a new conspiracy on the previous one each year until nothing means anything.
Did Terry Gilliam win the fight over Brazil?
Eventually. Universal cut a version with a happy resolution known as the Love Conquers All edit, Gilliam took out a trade advertisement asking when the film would be released, and his cut prevailed.
Why is the toxic jungle in Nausicaa not the villain?
It is purifying the earth beneath it. The spores are poisonous because the soil is, and the insects everybody is trying to destroy are the mechanism repairing the damage.
What did the RoboCop remake get wrong?
The premise. Verhoeven made a machine that is beginning to remember it was a man, and the 2014 version made a man inside a machine, inverting the only idea the original was built on.

🏷︎ Film List🏷︎ Film Trilogy

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment