7 / 10
Barbarella is the late-1960s French-Italian science fiction sex comedy that became a cult artifact more for its visual identity than for its plot. Roger Vadim directed. Jane Fonda plays Barbarella, a forty-first-century astronaut sent to recover the scientist Durand-Durand, whose Positronic Ray weapon could threaten peaceful interstellar civilization. The film is based on Jean-Claude Forest’s French comic series of the same name. John Phillip Law plays Pygar, a blind angel. Anita Pallenberg plays the Great Tyrant. Milo O’Shea plays Durand-Durand. David Hemmings plays Dildano. Marcel Marceau plays Professor Ping.
The film made approximately three million dollars on a nine million dollar budget and was a commercial failure. The cult following developed across the subsequent decades.
The film is a specific 1968 artifact. The sexual politics are aggressively of their period. The visual design is psychedelic. The plot is structurally a picaresque, with Barbarella moving between distinct adventures held loosely together by the search for Durand-Durand. The film’s reputation as a sex symbol vehicle for Jane Fonda is the dominant cultural memory. The reputation is partly accurate and partly the result of decades of selective marketing.
The Visual Identity
The production design by Mario Garbuglia is the film’s most distinctive element. Each set is a fully realized fantasy environment with its own visual logic. The fur-lined spaceship. The labyrinth of mutant biology. The Sogo nightclub. The orgasmatron. The crystal mountain. None of the sets look like anything else in mainstream science fiction of the period. The film commits to its aesthetic with the kind of resources Hollywood was rarely committing to genre work in 1968.
The costumes by Jacques Fonteray and Paco Rabanne are part of the film’s enduring image. Barbarella’s various outfits across the runtime are individually memorable enough that some have become iconic on their own. The film’s costume design has influenced fashion shoots, music videos, and subsequent science fiction productions for over fifty years.
For Writers
A specific visual identity can outlast a film’s plot, performances, and politics. Barbarella has been a cultural reference for decades despite the script being uneven and the politics being dated. The reason is that the production design is unforgettable. The lesson is that visual specificity has unusual durability in cultural memory. People remember images more vividly than dialogue. Films that commit to distinctive visuals can survive aging on every other dimension.
The Sexual Politics
The film is structured around Barbarella having sexual encounters with various beings in various environments. The encounters are presented as comedy, adventure, and occasionally drama. The film argues that future humanity has evolved beyond the need for guilt or restraint around sex. The argument is delivered through Barbarella’s specific willingness to engage with any partner who offers and her general lack of distress regardless of circumstances.
The sexual politics are aggressively 1968 in ways that have aged poorly and in ways that have aged interestingly. The film is exploitative in its presentation of Jane Fonda’s body. The film also argues for a kind of sexual openness that was radical for the period. Both readings are defensible. The film isn’t a feminist text by modern standards. It’s also not a simply misogynistic one, in ways that complicate easy contemporary dismissal.
For Writers
Politics in fiction usually ages worse than craft. Barbarella’s specific sexual politics are visibly 1968 in ways that subsequent viewers find dated. The visual design and production craft aren’t dated in the same way. The lesson is that taking strong positions on contemporary controversies guarantees the work will date. Taking strong positions on craft will let the work outlast its politics. The political dimensions of any work are usually the part that needs the most retranslation across decades.
Jane Fonda
Jane Fonda was thirty during filming. She had been a major star since the early 1960s. The role required her to be physically uninhibited in ways that would have damaged most American actresses’ careers in 1968. The fact that Fonda took the role and continued to have one of the most respected careers of her generation is partly a function of her specific cultural moment and partly her own creative choices.
The performance is mostly committed. Fonda plays Barbarella as innocent instead of as a sexual sophisticate. The character isn’t seducing her partners. She’s responding to their interest with the polite friendliness she’d offer anyone. The reading is more interesting than the film’s marketing suggested. Fonda has spoken in interviews about her ambivalence about the film and her late-career discomfort with its objectification of her body. The discomfort is reasonable. The performance is still valuable.
For Writers
A performer who commits to a problematic role can transcend the role’s limitations in ways the script alone couldn’t. Jane Fonda’s Barbarella is more interesting than the script’s Barbarella because Fonda plays the character with genuine innocence instead of calculated provocation. The lesson is that performance is part of the writing. A weak script with a strong performer can produce material the script alone wouldn’t have generated. The performer’s choices are creative decisions equal in importance to the writer’s.
Craft Note
The zero-gravity opening title sequence is the film’s strongest individual passage. Jane Fonda strips out of her spacesuit while floating against an abstract psychedelic background, the camera tracking her with sustained interest. The sequence runs about three minutes and establishes the film’s pop-art register before any dialogue arrives. The opening is a textbook case of how to set tonal expectations through a single confidently staged sequence. Audiences know exactly what kind of film they’re about to watch.
Does Barbarella still hold up?
7/10. A flawed but specific 1968 artifact that’s outlasted its commercial failure through cult longevity. The visual design is the principal achievement. Jane Fonda’s performance is more committed than the marketing suggested. The sexual politics are dated and complex. Watch it as a historical document of late-1960s European-American science fiction collaboration and as the cultural reference point a hundred subsequent works have borrowed from.
Frequently Asked Questions
Writing in This Genre
This film appears on one of my film lists