Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

Science Fiction Part 7 – The Flawed

Part 7 – The Flawed

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Flawed |
Part 8: The Failures

This tier is full of films with one idea they decline to use. Leviathan builds a creature wearing the faces of the dead and asks nothing about it, Fortress invents a punishment device that replaces an entire prison staff and then abandons it for corridors, and New Rose Hotel spends its last act replaying its first.

The other pattern is an ending that undoes the argument. Minority Report demonstrates that its system works and then blames one official, the Matrix sequels replace a mystery with a specification, and I Am Legend swaps the reversal its own title depends on for a sacrifice.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the seventh of eight parts.

Logan’s Run builds a ceremony people walk into willingly and Fortress replaces a prison staff with one swallowed device. Build the system in the World Builder’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. Gattaca (1997) [full review]

► Read the full review of Gattaca (1997)

1997
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"He never saved anything for the swim back."

Andrew Niccol wrote and directed his first feature on around thirty-six million dollars and it took under thirteen. The title comes from the four DNA bases, the Marin County Civic Center stands in for the facility, and the film has been used in genetics teaching for nearly thirty years.

The design is the strongest element and it is deliberately retro. Everybody wears mid-century tailoring, the cars are electric conversions of sixties bodies, and the future is presented as clean, formal and orderly instead of as anything visibly advanced or unfamiliar. Ethan Hawke plays Vincent.

The premise is a genetic caste system with no laws enforcing it. Discrimination is illegal and universal, employers test saliva from a handshake, and the film is precise that nobody needs a policy when the information is available and everybody quietly acts on it anyway.

The swimming contests are the whole argument compressed. Two brothers race out to sea, the loser is whoever turns back first, and Vincent wins because he never saved anything for the swim back, and he explains in a single line at the end. Jude Law plays Jerome.

The film is slower than its reputation suggests and that is the main criticism. The investigation plot is thin, the romance is underwritten, and the picture is considerably better as an argument and a design exercise than as a story with any momentum in it.

For WritersVincent wins the swimming contests because he never saved anything for the way back. The whole argument of the film is compressed into one line delivered at the end, and the contests were established twice before it lands. When you have a thesis, look for the physical contest that embodies it and then stage it early without comment. The reader files it as character detail. The explanation arriving much later converts a remembered image into an argument they have already accepted without noticing. A thesis stated first and demonstrated afterward is a lecture. Demonstrated first and stated afterward is a revelation. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/show-dont-tell-real-meaning/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>What show do not tell actually means covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

2. Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001) [full review]

► Read the full review of Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001)

2001
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.7/10

"Levels in sequence. That is a game’s logic, not a film’s."

Simon West made the film that turned Angelina Jolie into a global star, on around eighty million dollars, and it took over two hundred and seventy. Jolie trained for months, did most of her own stunts, and her father appears as the dead father in the flashback material.

The action is genuinely well staged and mostly practical. The bungee ballet in the atrium, the Cambodian temple sequence and the raid on the manor are choreographed clearly, shot with legible geography, and executed with wire work instead of with digital substitution. Jon Voight plays her father.

The Illuminati plot is where the film loses interest in itself. A secret society, a planetary alignment, two halves of a triangle and a fixed deadline, and none of it generates a single decision the protagonist has to think about before acting on it. Daniel Craig plays Alex West.

Jolie plays Lara as genuinely amused by everything, the correct choice for the material. She is wealthy, bored, competent and uninterested in being explained to anybody, and the performance is the reason the film is remembered while the plot is not. Peter Menzies Jr. shot it.

The video game adaptation problem is visible throughout. Levels arrive in sequence, obstacles are solved with timed mechanisms, and the structure follows a game’s logic of discrete challenges instead of a film’s logic of escalating pressure on a person. Graeme Revell scored it. Iain Glen plays Powell.

For WritersLevels arrive in sequence, obstacles are solved by timed mechanisms, and the structure follows a game’s logic of discrete challenges. A film runs on escalating pressure applied to a person, and a game runs on separable problems with solutions. When you adapt something episodic, the sequence of challenges is the thing that has to go. Readers do not experience a series of solved puzzles as a story. They experience it as a list. Find what accumulates across the challenges, whether it is cost, doubt or debt, and make that the spine. If nothing accumulates, you have a structure that cannot become a novel.

↑ All Entries

3. Minority Report (2002) [full review]

► Read the full review of Minority Report (2002)

2002
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"It works, and the film blames one man anyway."

Spielberg convened a think tank of futurists for three days to design the world, and the gesture interface, the personalized advertising and the autonomous vehicles all came out of that process. It cost around one hundred and two million dollars and took over three hundred and fifty.

The bleach bypass photography is the visual signature and Janusz Kaminski pushed it further than anybody had in a studio film. Highlights blow out, skin tones go cold, and the whole picture carries a washed silver quality that dates it precisely to its own moment.

The premise is genuinely interesting and the film argues with itself about it. Precrime works, the murder rate is zero, and the objection is not that it fails but that a system punishing people for a future they have not yet chosen removes the choice it claims to be protecting.

The eye replacement sequence is the most uncomfortable thing Spielberg has filmed. A back street surgeon, a bath, an infection risk, and the spider drones searching an apartment building room by room while Anderton lies in iced water trying not to breathe. Colin Farrell plays Witwer.

The ending undermines the argument and the film would be stronger without the last ten minutes. Precrime is dismantled, the prisoners are released, and a picture that spent two hours demonstrating that the system worked resolves it with a conspiracy by one individual instead. Samantha Morton plays Agatha.

For WritersPrecrime works. The murder rate is zero and the objection is not that the system fails but that punishing a future choice removes the choice. Then the ending supplies a conspiracy by one man, turning a structural argument into a personal crime. When your story attacks an institution, resist the individual villain. A corrupt official can be removed and the system continues, so the ending accidentally endorses the thing you spent the book criticizing. If the argument is that an arrangement is wrong even when it works, the antagonist has to be the arrangement, and nobody in it can be acting in bad faith. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/villain-motivations-fall-apart-fix/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Why villain motivations fall apart covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

4. I Am Legend (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of I Am Legend (2007)

2007
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"The book ends on him being the monster. The film does not."

Francis Lawrence adapted Richard Matheson’s 1954 novel and produced the most expensive of four attempts at it. Will Smith carries close to an hour alone with a dog, the empty Manhattan work is genuinely impressive, and the film cost around one hundred and fifty million dollars.

The first half is the best material and almost nothing happens in it. Neville’s routine, the mannequins he has arranged and speaks to, the video store conversations, and a man maintaining a schedule that exists entirely to stop him noticing how long he has been alone.

Sam is the film’s real subject and the sequence with the dog is the most affecting thing Smith has done. The infection, the decision and the grip on the collar are staged without music, at length, and the picture never returns to that register afterward at any point.

The Darkseekers are the failure and the digital work has aged badly. They were built as computer-generated figures after practical makeup tests were abandoned, they move in a way nothing physical could, and the film loses the credibility the empty city had established. Alice Braga appears late in the film.

The title means the opposite of what the film delivers. Matheson’s novel ends with Neville realizing he is the monster in the new society’s mythology, and the theatrical version replaces that with a sacrifice and a cure while an alternate ending closer to the book exists on the disc.

For WritersMatheson’s novel ends with Neville understanding that he is the monster in somebody else’s mythology, and the theatrical cut replaces that with a sacrifice and a cure. When you adapt something, check whether the ending is the argument or just the finish. A book whose last page reverses everything preceding it cannot have that page swapped for a conventional one without becoming a different work carrying the same name. The test is simple and nobody applies it. If the title stops making sense after your change, you have cut the wrong thing. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/books/science-fiction-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

Minority Report blames one man for a structural problem and the Matrix sequels replace a mystery with a specification. Structure the argument in the Plot Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. Tenet (2020) [full review]

► Read the full review of Tenet (2020)

2020
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.3/10

"He is called the Protagonist. That is all he is."

Nolan bought a real 747 to crash because it cost less than building the model, and then made a film considerably harder to follow than the stunt required. Warner Bros. spent around two hundred million dollars and released it into cinemas during a pandemic with predictable results.

The inversion premise is original and the staging of it is superb. Objects and people can be reversed through entropy, forward and backward participants occupy the same space, and the Oslo airport and Tallinn motorway sequences are choreographed in both directions at once. John David Washington plays the lead.

The sound mix is the criticism everybody raised and Nolan has defended it repeatedly. Dialogue is buried under Ludwig Goransson’s score and under ambient noise, exposition is delivered through masks and radio, and a plot this dense becomes close to unfollowable in a cinema. Elizabeth Debicki plays Kat.

The characters are functions instead of people and the film is open about it. The lead is called the Protagonist, he has no history, no private life and no relationships outside the mission, and Robert Pattinson’s Neil is the only figure given anything resembling an interior.

Kenneth Branagh’s Sator is the weakest element and the film needs him to work. A dying oligarch who intends to take the world with him, played at full volume, and the domestic abuse material occupies a great deal of a film that has no room for it.

For WritersThe lead is called the Protagonist. He has no history, no private life and no relationships outside the mission, and the film is entirely open about treating him as a function. The inversion premise is brilliant and there is nobody inside it to care about. When your concept is the strongest thing you have, the temptation is to build everything around servicing it. That produces a book readers admire and do not finish. Complexity raises the price of admission, so the emotional payment has to rise with it. A difficult structure with a thin character is work without wages. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/believable-characters/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Why characters feel flat covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

6. WandaVision (2021) [full review]

► Read the full review of WandaVision (2021)

2021
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"Three episodes of invention, then two beams in the sky."

Jac Schaeffer created the first Marvel streaming series and the first three episodes are genuinely inventive television. Each recreates a different sitcom decade completely, shot on period equipment in the correct aspect ratio, with a studio audience present for the earliest of them. Elizabeth Olsen and Paul Bettany lead.

The sitcom pastiche is the whole idea and it is executed with real precision. The fifties episode is shot on a soundstage in black and white, the seventies episode uses the correct lenses and zooms, and the credit sequences are written and performed as genuine period themes.

The grief premise underneath is the strongest thing Marvel has attempted. Wanda has constructed a town-sized fantasy around a dead partner, the whole population is being held inside it, and the series is honest that what she is doing to those people is unforgivable. Kathryn Hahn plays Agatha.

The middle episodes lose the form and the series never recovers it. The investigation outside the anomaly is conventional in every respect, the agency material is procedural, and every minute spent there is a minute away from the thing that made the show distinctive. Teyonah Parris plays Monica.

The finale is two energy beams in the sky, where almost every one of these series ends up. A formally adventurous show about mourning resolves into a conventional superhero confrontation, and the one line that lands is delivered quietly in a kitchen instead. Disney released it in early 2021.

For WritersThree episodes of genuine formal invention, three of increasingly conventional plot, and a finale of two energy beams in the sky. The series abandons the thing that made it distinctive so it can end the way the franchise ends. When you start with an unusual form, the pressure to converge on a familiar shape will arrive somewhere around the midpoint and it will feel like responsibility instead of cowardice. Resist it. A reader who came for the strange thing will forgive an ending that fails on its own terms and will not forgive one that abandons the terms entirely. Finish in the form you started in.

↑ All Entries

7. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) [full review]

► Read the full review of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

1968
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.3/10

"HAL is the only character who wants anything."

Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke developed the film and the novel at the same time, with neither finished before the other. It cost around ten and a half million dollars, took four years, and Kubrick won his only competitive Academy Award for the visual effects on it.

The technical achievement is genuine and almost nothing about it has dated. Front projection, the rotating centrifuge built at Shepperton, slit-scan photography for the Stargate, and every effect achieved in camera at a standard nobody matched for another decade. Keir Dullea plays Bowman. Douglas Rain voices HAL.

The pacing is the argument against it and the film is deliberately glacial. Docking sequences run several minutes, the Blue Danube passage is unhurried, and Kubrick asks for a patience most viewers are unwilling to supply more than once in a lifetime. Geoffrey Unsworth shot it.

HAL is the only character in the film with an interior and that is the central problem. The humans are deliberately flat, Bowman and Poole speak in procedural exchanges, and the audience ends up on the side of the machine because it is the one thing capable of wanting something.

The last act is genuinely unreadable without the novel. Clarke’s book explains the monolith, the transformation and the Star Child directly, and the film supplies images with no interpretive apparatus at all, either the achievement or the failure depending on the viewer. MGM released it in April 1968.

For WritersHAL is the only character in the film with an interior. The humans speak in procedural exchanges, and the audience ends up siding with the machine because it is the one thing capable of wanting something. That is a technical failure producing an accidental effect. When you deliberately flatten your people to serve a larger idea, whatever retains a want becomes the protagonist regardless of your intentions. Readers attach to desire, not to importance. If you are writing a story about vastness and everybody in it is flat, the reader will find the one figure who needs something and follow that instead of the theme. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/character-arcs-vs-wounds-difference/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Arcs versus wounds covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

8. Leviathan (1989) [full review]

► Read the full review of Leviathan (1989)

1989
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.8/10

"The creature wears the faces of the crew and nobody asks why."

George Cosmatos made one of three underwater creature films released within months of each other in 1989, alongside The Abyss and DeepStar Six, and it is the most nakedly derivative of the group. Stan Winston built the creature and the effects are the best thing in the picture.

The Alien structure is followed beat for beat and the film makes no attempt to conceal it. A commercial crew, a corporate employer who knew, a discovery on a wreck, an infection, a mounting body count and a survivor sequence that lands almost exactly where the 1979 film placed its own.

Peter Weller leads a cast that is genuinely overqualified. Ernie Hudson, Richard Crenna, Daniel Stern and Amanda Pays are all doing professional work, and the film gives each of them a single characteristic to play and no room at all to develop any of it further than that.

The creature design is where Winston made something original. The thing assimilates its victims and keeps them recognizable, so the final form carries the faces of crew members the audience has spent an hour with, and the rest of the film has no interest in pursuing.

The corporate material is stated and then dropped, the film’s clearest failure. The company knew what was on the wreck, a manager says as much on a video call, and the picture treats the betrayal as a plot beat instead of as the subject it plainly wanted to be.

For WritersWinston’s creature assimilates its victims and keeps them recognizable, so the final form carries the faces of crew the audience has spent an hour with. The film has no interest in the idea and uses it once. When a design or a rule implies something your story could be about, follow it. A monster made of the dead raises a question about what is left of them, and asking it costs one scene. Most derivative work fails not because the structure is borrowed but because the one original element in it goes unexamined by the person who invented it.

↑ All Entries

9. Fortress (1992) [full review]

► Read the full review of Fortress (1992)

1992
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.9/10

"One swallowed device replaces every guard in the building."

Stuart Gordon followed Re-Animator with a science fiction prison film made largely in Australia, and the commitment is considerably higher than the premise deserves. It cost around eight million dollars and Christopher Lambert plays a man imprisoned for a second pregnancy in a one-child society.

The intestinator is the idea everybody remembers. A swallowed device that punishes infractions from inside the body, escalating from pain to detonation, and the film uses it as the entire security system so no guard ever has to be present in any part of the facility.

The prison design is properly worked out. Cells stacked around a vertical shaft, a dream-monitoring system that reports on inmates while they sleep, and an administrative intelligence that manages the population without needing more than a handful of human staff anywhere. Loryn Locklin plays the wife.

Kurtwood Smith plays the warden as a corporate manager instead of a sadist, the smartest casting decision in it. He is polite, he is running a facility to a budget, and the cruelty is procedural and documented instead of personal in any way. David Eggby shot it.

The last act becomes a standard escape film and the invention stops. Everything distinctive about the premise is abandoned for corridors, gunfire and a vehicle chase, and the picture ends as something that could have been set anywhere with any premise at all. Frederic Talgorn scored it.

For WritersThe intestinator punishes infractions from inside the prisoner’s body, escalating from pain to detonation, so the facility needs almost no guards. One device replaces an entire institution. When you design a system of control, look for the mechanism that removes the need for enforcers. Guards can be bribed, overpowered, reasoned with or made sympathetic, and every one of them is a potential ally your protagonist might find. A device inside the body offers none of that, and it relocates the conflict from the corridor to the person, a considerably harder and more interesting place to set it.

The Running Man finds its best villain by casting a real game show host, and Gattaca stages its thesis as a swimming race. Work the form in the Genre Mastery Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. The Postman (1997) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Postman (1997)

1997
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.1/10

"The novel is about a liar. The film is about a believer."

Kevin Costner turned David Brin’s satirical novel about a con man into a three-hour sincere epic about American institutions. Warner Bros. spent around eighty million dollars, it took under eighteen, and it won every Razzie available in the year it was released. Olivia Williams plays Abby.

The premise is genuinely strong and the novel is about a lie. A drifter finds a dead postman’s uniform, invents a restored United States government to get a meal, and the lie spreads because people need it to be true considerably more than they need it to be verified.

Costner plays it entirely without irony, the central decision and the central error. Brin’s protagonist knows he is a fraud throughout, and the film’s version becomes sincere within about twenty minutes and stays that way for the remaining two and a half hours. Stephen F. Windon shot it.

The Holnists are a functional antagonist and Will Patton does real work as Bethlehem. A self-improvement obsessive running a militia on borrowed philosophy, he is specific, coherent and considerably more interesting than the film around him has any use for. James Newton Howard scored it.

The length is the practical problem. Three hours is a long time for a premise that is one idea, the Bridge City material stops the picture entirely, and the final statue sequence commits to a register nobody in 1997 was prepared to accept from anybody.

For WritersBrin’s novel is about a man who knows he is a fraud and keeps going. The film makes him sincere within twenty minutes and spends two and a half hours on a man who believes his own invention. The irony was the load-bearing element and it was removed first. When you adapt, find the single ingredient the source cannot survive losing, and the test is whether the premise still generates conflict without it. A liar sustaining a lie has tension in every scene. A believer delivering a truth has only opposition, a considerably weaker engine and runs out somewhere in the second hour.

↑ All Entries

11. New Rose Hotel (1998) [full review]

► Read the full review of New Rose Hotel (1998)

1998
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.0/10

"The last twenty minutes are the first ninety, recut."

Abel Ferrara adapted a William Gibson short story with Christopher Walken and Willem Dafoe as corporate headhunters, and the result is closer to an art film than to anything cyberpunk. It was shot fast, cost almost nothing, and disappeared without a theatrical release in most territories.

The premise is corporate espionage conducted as seduction. Two men are hired to extract a scientist from one conglomerate to another, they use a woman to do it, and the entire operation is negotiated in hotel rooms and bars without a single scene of technology anywhere.

Walken and Dafoe are improvising heavily and the film is built around letting them. Long takes, overlapping dialogue, drinks being poured, and conversations that circle the deal without ever stating the terms of it directly to each other or to the audience. Asia Argento plays Sandii.

The last twenty minutes are the most divisive thing Ferrara has filmed. The entire final act is repeated footage from earlier in the picture, recut and replayed as Dafoe’s character reconstructs what happened, and almost no new material appears at all. Ken Kelsch shot it.

For WritersThe final twenty minutes are repeated footage from earlier in the film, recut as one character reconstructs what happened, with almost no new material at all. It is the most divisive thing Ferrara filmed and it is also a legitimate technique. When a story ends on somebody understanding what already occurred, the material is all behind them and the question is how much to replay. Prose has the advantage here, because a remembered scene can be shortened, reweighted and read differently on the second pass. Use the second telling to show what the character now notices, not to remind the reader what happened.

↑ All Entries

12. The Time Machine (2002) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Time Machine (2002)

2002
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.9/10

"Curiosity replaced with a goal, and every door closes."

Simon Wells directed his own great-grandfather’s novel, collapsed from exhaustion eighteen weeks into production, and Gore Verbinski completed the final stretch uncredited. It cost around eighty million dollars and took just over one hundred and twenty. Guy Pearce plays Alexander. Samantha Mumba plays Mara. Donald McAlpine shot it.

The added motivation is the central change and it damages the structure. Wells’s traveller goes forward out of curiosity, and the film gives him a murdered fiancee and a wish to prevent her death, converting an exploration into a grief plot with a stated objective.

The time-lapse sequences are the best material in it. Glaciers advancing over Manhattan, the moon fragmenting, buildings rising and collapsing around a stationary machine, and the geological passage of time is handled considerably better than the human one. Klaus Badelt scored it. Alan Young appears in a cameo.

Jeremy Irons plays the Uber-Morlock for one sequence and explains the entire premise in dialogue. A telepathic overseer who articulates the ecology, the caste arrangement and the protagonist’s own paradox aloud, removing every question the film had accumulated up to that point. Orlando Jones appears as a hologram.

The Eloi are rewritten into a functioning society with language and architecture, a defensible change and removes Wells’s argument entirely. His Eloi are the end point of leisure, and making them capable turns a thesis about class into a plain rescue narrative. Phyllida Law appears in it.

For WritersThe traveller is given a murdered fiancee and a wish to prevent her death, turning an exploration into a grief plot with a stated objective. Wells sent him forward out of curiosity. When you supply a motivation to a character who did not have one, check what the absence was doing. Curiosity is an open engine that will follow anything interesting, and a specific goal closes every door that does not lead toward it. Studios ask for the goal because it is easier to summarize. The cost is every discovery your protagonist would have made on the way to somewhere else.

↑ All Entries

13. The Matrix Reloaded (2003) and The Matrix Revolutions (2003) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Matrix Reloaded (2003) and The Matrix Revolutions (2003)

2003
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.7/10

"A mystery replaced with a specification nobody asked for."

Shot back to back and released six months apart, the two sequels answer questions the first film was stronger for leaving open. Warner Bros. spent around three hundred million dollars on the pair, and together they took over a billion while satisfying almost nobody who loved the original.

The Architect scene is the moment the trilogy loses the audience. A lengthy explanation delivered in deliberately opaque vocabulary, establishing that Neo is the sixth iteration of a designed system, replacing a mystery with a specification nobody had asked for. Bill Pope shot both films.

The freeway chase in Reloaded is genuinely extraordinary and worth the whole production. A mile and a half of highway built at a decommissioned naval base, fourteen minutes of continuous action, and practical vehicle work that holds up against anything made since. Don Davis scored them.

The Zion material is where the films lose their subject. The first picture was about a man discovering the nature of his reality, and the sequels become a siege story about a physical city with a council, a dock and a defensive infrastructure to explain.

The Burly Brawl is where the digital work fails visibly. A hundred Agent Smiths in a courtyard, rendered instead of photographed, and the sequence arrives at exactly the moment the trilogy most needs the audience to still believe what it is being shown. Jada Pinkett Smith plays Niobe.

For WritersThe Architect explains that Neo is the sixth iteration of a designed system, in deliberately opaque vocabulary, replacing a mystery with a specification. The first film’s power came from a question that had not been answered. When a sequel arrives, the pressure is to explain the thing everybody wondered about, and explanation is almost always a downgrade. A reader holding a question is participating. A reader holding an answer has been handed an object. If you must expand a world, expand sideways into consequences instead of downward into mechanism, because consequences generate story and mechanism closes it. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/plot-devices/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Plot devices that work covers the ground.

Tenet calls its lead the Protagonist and gives him nothing, while 2001 hands the only interior in the film to a machine. Two failures worth studying, in the Deep Character Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. The Day After Tomorrow (2004) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Day After Tomorrow (2004)

2004
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.5/10

"The best scene is an argument about which books to burn."

Roland Emmerich froze the northern hemisphere in about a week of screen time, and none of that is how any of it works, and the film is considerably better than its physics. Fox spent around one hundred and twenty-five million dollars and it took over five hundred and fifty.

The set pieces are the reason to watch it and they are staged with real scale. The Los Angeles tornado sequence, the New York storm surge arriving up the avenues, and the cargo ship drifting through Manhattan streets are all built and composited with genuine care.

The library sequence is the best material in it. A group sheltering in the New York Public Library burning books for warmth, an argument about which volumes are worth saving, and the film treats that debate seriously for several minutes without resolving it. Dennis Quaid plays Jack.

The father and son structure is functional and the walk from Philadelphia to New York is the film’s spine. It is a simple walk with a stated destination and a deadline, and the picture never complicates it with anything the audience has to track. Jake Gyllenhaal plays Sam.

The wolves are the sequence everybody names and they are the one genuine mistake. Escaped zoo animals pursuing characters through a frozen ship, rendered digitally and poorly, in a film that has otherwise been careful to keep its threats meteorological. Ueli Steiger shot it. Harald Kloser scored it.

For WritersA group shelters in the New York Public Library and burns books for warmth, and the film stops for several minutes on an argument about which volumes are worth saving. Nothing is resolved. It is the best scene in a picture otherwise made of spectacle. When you write a disaster, the moment readers remember will be a small ethical argument conducted by cold people with no authority over anything. Spectacle establishes scale and cannot establish value. Put your characters in a room with a limited resource and let them disagree about priorities, and the catastrophe outside acquires a weight no amount of destruction footage supplies. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/conflict-in-writing/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Conflict that drives story covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

15. Southland Tales (2006) [full review]

► Read the full review of Southland Tales (2006)

2006
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.4/10

"It starts at chapter four. Chapters one to three were sold separately."

Richard Kelly took an unfinished cut to Cannes because nobody turns down a competition slot, and the reception was the worst of the decade. He then cut roughly twenty minutes and the shorter version is harder to follow, since the removed material contained most of the connective explanation.

The film requires three graphic novels to be comprehensible. Kelly wrote them as chapters one through three, the film is chapters four through six, and the picture opens partway into a story the audience has no access to unless they bought separate books. Steven Poster shot it.

The cast is assembled from people nobody would put together. Dwayne Johnson, Seann William Scott, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Justin Timberlake, Mandy Moore and a substantial number of Saturday Night Live alumni, all playing against the register they were known for. Moby scored it. Wallace Shawn appears in it.

The Timberlake musical sequence is the one passage that works completely. A scarred veteran lip-syncing a Killers song in an arcade while nurses move around him, and it is beautiful, coherent and entirely disconnected from everything surrounding it. Kevin Smith is unrecognizable in makeup. Cannes screened it in competition.

The ambition is real and that is what makes it painful. Kelly is attempting a satire about surveillance, energy policy, celebrity and apocalypse at once, and the picture has something to say about all four while being unable to finish a sentence about any of them.

For WritersThe film is chapters four through six of a six-part story, with chapters one through three published separately as graphic novels. An audience who did not buy those books is starting halfway into something. When you build a work that depends on external material, you have written two things and shipped one. Readers will not go and find the supplement, and the ones who do will resent having needed it. Every piece of a story has to work for somebody arriving cold at page one. If the backstory is genuinely necessary, it belongs inside the book, and if it is not necessary, the supplement was never the problem. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/plot-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Plot Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

16. Blade Runner 2049 (2017) [full review]

► Read the full review of Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

2017
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"Two hours of investment, and he turns out not to be the child."

Denis Villeneuve made one of the most beautiful films of the century and one of the least propulsive. Roger Deakins finally won an Academy Award for it after thirteen nominations, and the picture cost around one hundred and fifty million dollars and lost a substantial amount of it.

The photography is the achievement and it is not in dispute. The orange Las Vegas sequence, the seawall, the rain on the Los Angeles streets and the interrogation rooms are as controlled as anything ever shot, and Deakins works almost entirely with single practical sources.

The pacing is the problem and the film is close to three hours. Scenes are held long past their information, characters walk through spaces at length, and the deliberate slowness is a stylistic position the film commits to without earning the patience it asks for.

The central reveal deflates what it is built on. K spends two hours believing he might be the child, the audience invests in that, and the answer is that he is not and the actual child is somebody encountered in passing, thematically defensible and dramatically inert.

Jared Leto’s Wallace is the weakest element and the film keeps returning to him. He speaks in pronouncements, he appears in three scenes that stop the picture entirely, and every one of them exists to explain a philosophy nobody in the story needed explained. Ryan Gosling plays K.

For WritersK spends two hours believing he might be the child, the audience invests in that, and the answer is that he is not. The reveal is thematically defensible and dramatically inert, because the thing everybody was following turns out to have been about somebody else. When you deflate an expectation on purpose, the replacement has to be larger than what you removed. Refusing a payoff is a legitimate move, and it only works if the reader gets something they wanted more in exchange. Otherwise you have spent two hundred pages building an investment and then explained to the reader that they invested in the wrong thing. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/pacing-problems-nobody-talks/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Pacing problems nobody talks about covers the ground.

The Day After Tomorrow gets its best scene from an argument about which books to burn. Put people in a room with one resource, using the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Entries

17. Star Wars: The Phantom Menace (1999) [full review]

► Read the full review of Star Wars: The Phantom Menace (1999)

1999
RLR: 4 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.5/10

"It gave the Force a blood count."

Lucas had not directed in twenty-two years, owned the company outright and answered to nobody, and the result demonstrates what happens when a filmmaker has no colleague able to say the word no. It cost around one hundred and fifteen million dollars and took over a billion.

The trade dispute is the opening and it is the wrong subject. A taxation disagreement over shipping routes, a blockade, a senate procedural vote, and the film opens a mythological sequence with an administrative argument no child and few adults could be made to care about.

The podrace is the best sequence and it works because the geography is clear. A stated circuit, three laps, established hazards, a rival with a visible method, and the audience can follow every position change without anybody explaining what is happening. Liam Neeson plays Qui-Gon.

The midichlorians are the most damaging single decision. The Force was three lines and unmeasurable in 1977, and giving it a blood count converts a mystery into a diagnosable quantity that can be tested for, ranked and optimized by anybody with a laboratory. Ewan McGregor plays Obi-Wan.

Duel of the Fates is the one element nobody argues about. Ray Park’s fight choreography, Ian McDiarmid’s expanding role and John Williams’s choral piece combine into a final sequence that belongs to a considerably better film than the one containing it. David Tattersall shot it.

For WritersThe Force was three lines and unmeasurable in 1977, and this film gives it a blood count. A mystery becomes a diagnosable quantity that can be tested for, ranked and optimized. When you return to something you invented, the strongest instinct and the worst one is to explain it further. Whatever made the original work was probably the part you never specified, because a reader supplied their own version and it fit them exactly. Quantifying it replaces every private version with one public number. Before adding any detail to an established mystery, ask whether a single reader has ever complained about not having it. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/world-builders-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>World Builder’s Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

18. A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001) [full review]

► Read the full review of A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001)

2001
RLR: 4 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"A permanent condition set by a checkbox in a kitchen."

Kubrick developed the project for years, decided Spielberg was better suited to it, and died before either made it. Spielberg wrote the screenplay himself from Kubrick’s materials, the only time he has taken sole writing credit on a film since Close Encounters. Frances O’Connor plays Monica.

The first two thirds are genuinely excellent and get forgotten in the argument about the ending. The Swinton household, the imprinting protocol, the return of the biological son, and the abandonment in the woods are among the cruellest things in Spielberg’s whole filmography. Janusz Kaminski shot it.

Haley Joel Osment plays David without blinking for most of the running time, and he trained to do, and the performance is the reason the early material works. He is unsettling before he is sympathetic, and the film never lets the audience settle on which one he is.

Rouge City and the Flesh Fair are Kubrick’s sensibility intact. A carnival where obsolete machines are destroyed for a paying crowd, presented as family entertainment, and Jude Law’s Gigolo Joe carries the section with a stylized mechanical charm nothing else matches. John Williams scored it.

The last twenty minutes are the argument everybody has. The advanced beings arrive, David gets one day with a reconstructed mother and the film supplies a resolution that reads as sentiment and is, on inspection, considerably bleaker than that. Brian Aldiss wrote the source story.

For WritersDavid is imprinted to love, permanently and irreversibly, by a protocol a parent activates in a single scene. Everything cruel in the film follows from a decision made in about thirty seconds by somebody who did not read the documentation. When you give a character an unbreakable condition, put the moment it was set on the page and make it small. A curse delivered by a wizard is mythology. A checkbox ticked by a tired woman in a kitchen is horror, because the reader recognizes the scale of the decision and the scale of the consequence and cannot make them match. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/character-arcs-vs-wounds-difference/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Arcs versus wounds covers the ground.

Honorable Mentions: Science Fiction Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier or close to it and each is on the list.

Dark Matter (2024)

⭐ 7.7/10

Blake Crouch adapted his own novel about a man abducted by another version of himself, and the series takes the multiplication of selves considerably further than the book had room for.

The Peripheral (2022)

⭐ 7.4/10

William Gibson’s novel became a series about telepresence across seventy years, where the future can reach back into a past it has already lost and change nothing about its own.

Raised by Wolves (2020)

⭐ 7.0/10

Ridley Scott produced and directed episodes of a series about two androids raising human children on a colony world, with a theology argument running under every decision anybody makes.

Colony (2016)

⭐ 7.4/10

An occupation series set in a walled Los Angeles where the collaborators are the protagonists, and the aliens are almost never seen because the administration is entirely human.

Continuum (2012)

⭐ 7.7/10

A Canadian series about a police officer from 2077 stranded in the present alongside the terrorists she was pursuing, and the show is honest that her side is the corporate one.

Altered Carbon (2018)

⭐ 7.9/10

Richard Morgan’s novel became a series where consciousness is stored on a cortical stack and bodies are rented, and the production design works it through at considerable expense.

The 100 (2014)

⭐ 7.6/10

Ninety-seven years after a nuclear war, a hundred juvenile prisoners are sent down to test whether the ground is survivable, and the series is consistently harder on its characters than the premise suggested.

Sense8 (2015)

⭐ 8.2/10

The Wachowskis built a series about eight people sharing senses and skills across continents, shot on location in every one of them, with a structure that makes each episode a relay.

Kin (2018)

⭐ 5.9/10

A crime film that turns out to have a science fiction premise attached, with a weapon of unexplained origin and two figures pursuing it who are never fully accounted for.

Occupation (2018)

⭐ 4.7/10

An Australian invasion film made on a small budget that spends its length on a resistance cell instead of the arrival, and the country setting does most of the work.

Project Power (2020)

⭐ 5.9/10

A pill grants five minutes of a randomly assigned ability, a strong rule, and the New Orleans setting and the practical powers are better than the plot around them.

IO (2019)

⭐ 4.5/10

A young scientist stays behind on a poisoned Earth working on adaptation while the last shuttle prepares to leave, and almost the entire film is two people and a hillside.

Dishonorable Mentions: Science Fiction That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had the premise, the cast or the source material and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

Total Recall 2070 (1999)

⭐ 7.3/10

A Canadian series borrowing from Dick and from Blade Runner, with a decent android partner premise, cancelled after one season with most of its arcs left open.

The Island (2005)

⭐ 6.9/10

Michael Bay built a genuinely good first act about clones who do not know what they are, and then abandons the facility entirely for an hour of vehicle chases through Los Angeles.

Surrogates (2009)

⭐ 6.3/10

Everybody lives through an idealized remote body, a premise with a hundred possible scenes in it, and the film uses it for a conventional murder investigation and a shutdown.

In Time (2011)

⭐ 6.7/10

Niccol built a world where time is currency and stops working out the consequences after the first twenty minutes, resolving a systemic argument with a bank robbery.

Elysium (2013)

⭐ 6.6/10

Blomkamp built a superb orbital habitat and an equally superb Johannesburg, and then resolved a question about universal healthcare by having one man push a button.

Upside Down (2012)

⭐ 6.4/10

Twin worlds with opposing gravity is one of the best visual premises anybody has had, attached to a romance that uses the rule for obstacles instead of for anything about the people.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

This tier keeps finding one good idea and walking away from it. A creature made of the dead, a device that replaces a prison, a consultant with a mandate. Tell me which one you would have built the whole film around.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Flawed |
Part 8: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Logan’s Run still work as a premise?
Because the society built a ceremony around the killing. Most people walk into Carousel voluntarily believing they are being renewed, so the population defends the thing that is killing them and the runner becomes the problem.
Which Body Snatchers is the best version?
The 1978 Kaufman film. Moving it to San Francisco changes the mechanism, because anonymity was already normal there and the duplicates need almost no effort to blend in anywhere at all.
What is wrong with the ending of Minority Report?
It demonstrates for two hours that Precrime works and that the objection is structural, then resolves everything with a conspiracy by one official. A corrupt man can be removed and the system survives, so the ending accidentally endorses it.
Is 2001 overrated?
The technical achievement is genuine and almost nothing about it has dated. The problem is that HAL is the only character with an interior, so the audience ends up siding with the machine because it is the one thing capable of wanting something.
What went wrong with the Matrix sequels?
Explanation. The Architect scene establishes that Neo is the sixth iteration of a designed system, replacing the first film’s open question with a specification nobody had asked anybody for.
How faithful is The Postman to the novel?
Not at all in register. Brin’s protagonist knows he is a fraud throughout, and Costner’s version becomes sincere inside twenty minutes, removing the tension the premise was built to generate.
Why is Tenet hard to follow?
Partly the inversion premise and partly the sound mix. Dialogue is buried under the score and delivered through masks and radio, and the lead is called the Protagonist because he has no history or private life to explain.
Is there anything good in The Day After Tomorrow?
The library sequence. A group burns books for warmth and argues about which volumes are worth saving, and the film stops for several minutes without resolving the disagreement.

🏷︎ Film List

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment