Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Science Fiction Part 3 – The Excellent

Part 3 – The Excellent

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Flawed |
Part 8: The Failures

This tier runs on rules the audience can hold. The Matrix gives away its entire mechanism in the first act and spends the rest on consequences, The One builds its escalation curve into the killing itself, and John Carter spends a sequence on a man failing to jump before the ability becomes useful.

The other pattern is refusing to explain. Fury Road never accounts for the Citadel or the water economy, A New Hope gives the Force about three lines, and The Blob takes away every tool a protagonist would normally reach for.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the third of eight parts.

Total Recall hands you a checklist in the first act and 12 Monkeys states its limit early and holds it. Structure it properly in the Plot Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. The Matrix (1999) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Matrix (1999)

1999
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.7/10

"The whole mechanism is handed over in six minutes."

The Wachowskis pitched a philosophy film disguised as an action picture and Warner Bros. funded it after Bound. The cast trained in wire work for four months before shooting, unheard of on an American production, and Yuen Woo-ping choreographed every fight in the film. Keanu Reeves plays Neo.

Bullet time is the technique everybody copied and it was built from still cameras. A ring of them fired in sequence around a subject, the frames assembled into a move through a frozen moment, and the effect had been impossible at that scale before the film attempted it.

The premise arrives through Morpheus explaining it directly, and it should not work. The construct sequence hands the audience the entire mechanism in about six minutes, and the rest of the film is spent on consequences instead of on further revelation. Laurence Fishburne plays Morpheus.

The rules are stated and obeyed. Agents can occupy anybody still connected, a death inside kills the body outside, the jump is a test of belief, and every action sequence depends on limits the audience learned before it mattered. Carrie-Anne Moss plays Trinity. Bill Pope shot it.

Hugo Weaving plays Smith with a cadence nobody else has managed to imitate. The pauses in the middle of words, the disgust about the smell, and a program expressing something no program should have, and the sequels then spent two films explaining away. Don Davis scored it.

For WritersMorpheus explains the entire premise in one sequence about six minutes long, and the film spends the rest of its length on consequences instead of on further revelation. The mechanism is given away deliberately and early. When your idea is strong, the instinct is to ration it across the whole book, and the stronger move is usually to hand it over in the first act. A reader who understands the rules can appreciate every clever use of them afterward. A reader still working out the basics is not yet able to be impressed by anything you do. Withholding a premise protects it from the reader and from the writer both, and the protection costs you every scene that could have been built on top of it. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/show-dont-tell-real-meaning/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>What show do not tell actually means covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

2. The One (2001) [full review]

► Read the full review of The One (2001)

2001
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.9/10

"Each kill makes both of them stronger, from opposite directions."

James Wong made a multiverse action film with Jet Li playing both leads, five years before the concept became standard studio material. It cost around forty-nine million dollars and was originally developed with Dwayne Johnson attached to the role. Carla Gugino plays the wife. Delroy Lindo plays the agent.

The mechanism is stated plainly and obeyed throughout. There are one hundred and twenty-four parallel universes, killing your own counterpart redistributes their strength among the survivors, and the last remaining version would become something the film calls the One. Trevor Rabin scored it. Robert McLachlan shot it.

The escalation is built into the rule and the film uses it properly. Yulaw gets faster and stronger with each kill, and Gabe gets the same increase without understanding why, so the two versions of the same man converge on identical capability from opposite directions.

The fighting styles distinguish the two leads, the smartest decision in the picture. Yulaw uses hard external forms and Gabe uses soft internal ones, so the final fight reads as a genuine argument between two approaches instead of a man hitting himself. Jason Statham plays Funsch.

For WritersKilling your counterpart redistributes their strength among everybody left, so the hunter and the hunted grow stronger together from opposite directions. One rule generates the entire escalation curve without anybody having to invent a bigger threat. When you design a power system, build the escalation into the mechanism instead of into the plot. A rule that automatically raises the stakes each time it is used means the threat compounds on its own, and the reader can calculate roughly where it ends. That produces a form of dread surprise never manages. It also solves the sequel problem before you reach it, because the ceiling was stated in the first chapter and everybody can see it coming. Controlling narrative perspective covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

3. Serenity (2005) [full review]

► Read the full review of Serenity (2005)

2005
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.8/10

"The Reavers were an administrative decision that went wrong."

Whedon made a feature to finish a television series Fox had cancelled after eleven aired episodes, and almost never happens. Universal gave him around thirty-nine million dollars on the strength of DVD sales, and the film did not recoup theatrically. Nathan Fillion plays Mal. Summer Glau plays River.

The opening is a structural problem solved elegantly. A flashback inside a classroom becomes a recording being watched by an operative, and the sequence delivers the setting, the war, the antagonist and River’s history inside a single continuous move. Jack Green shot it. David Newman scored it.

Chiwetel Ejiofor’s Operative is the best antagonist Whedon wrote. He is polite, he apologizes before killing, he believes in a better world and knows he has no place in it, and every position he states is coherent from inside his own argument. It ran one hundred and nineteen minutes.

The Reavers are explained and the explanation is the film’s actual subject. They were made by a government chemical intended to suppress aggression, the failure killed a planet, and the horror is an administrative decision instead of anything from outside. Adam Baldwin plays Jayne. Gina Torres plays Zoe.

The deaths are the reason the film has the reputation it does. Whedon kills two crew members without ceremony, one in the middle of a line, and the picture refuses the protection a television audience had come to expect from him. Alan Tudyk plays Wash.

For WritersThe Reavers were produced by a government chemical intended to suppress aggression, and the failure killed a planet. The horror at the edge of the setting turns out to be an administrative decision that went wrong. When you have a monster on the frontier of your world, consider making it a consequence of something ordinary instead of something alien. A threat manufactured by policy implicates every institution in the story and turns a survival plot into an argument about who signed what. Nobody can be blamed in the satisfying way a villain can be blamed, and nobody can be beaten, only exposed. That is a harder ending to write and a considerably longer one to shake off afterward.

↑ All Entries

4. District 9 (2009) [full review]

► Read the full review of District 9 (2009)

2009
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"Wikus never quite becomes a hero, and it works anyway."

Neill Blomkamp expanded his own six-minute short into a feature for around thirty million dollars, shot in an actual Soweto township with residents appearing in it, after a cancelled Halo adaptation left him and Peter Jackson with a production window and no project. Peter Jackson produced it.

The documentary framing is used and then abandoned deliberately. The first act is interviews, security footage and news segments, and as Wikus loses his position in the world the film quietly drops the device and becomes conventional coverage. Trent Opaloch shot it. Clinton Shorter scored it.

The apartheid material is direct instead of allegorical. Forced relocation with signed consent forms, segregated services, a private military contractor administering a township, and language from actual South African policy used in the dialogue without alteration. Terri Tatchell co-wrote it. Sony released it in August 2009.

Sharlto Copley improvised most of his dialogue and had never acted before. Wikus is a bureaucrat who is cheerful about evictions, cowardly under pressure and selfish for almost the entire film, and he never quite becomes a hero at any point in it. Jason Cope plays Christopher.

The prawns are computer generated and they work because the film treats them as poor instead of as alien. They scavenge, they are addicted to cat food, they are exploited by a Nigerian gang, and the design gives them faces the audience can read. It was nominated for four Academy Awards.

For WritersWikus is cheerful about evictions, cowardly under pressure and selfish for almost the whole film. He never quite becomes a hero, and the story works anyway. When you write a protagonist who has to change, resist completing the arc. A character who improves incrementally, under duress, for reasons that remain partly self-interested, and who stops well short of redemption, is closer to how people actually behave and considerably harder for a reader to dismiss as a construction. Full transformation is the ending readers expect and the one they believe least of all. Stop the arc short, leave the last step unclimbed, and trust them to notice that you did it deliberately. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/character-arcs-vs-wounds-difference/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Arcs versus wounds covers the ground.

Fury Road explains an entire world without a briefing and Snowpiercer arranges its class system as architecture. Build the frame in the World Builder’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. Cowboys and Aliens (2011) [full review]

► Read the full review of Cowboys and Aliens (2011)

2011
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.0/10

"The aliens are prospectors. Same story, bigger scale."

Jon Favreau made a genuine western with a science fiction intrusion, from a graphic novel concept that existed before the comic did. Five writers share the credit, it cost around one hundred and sixty-three million dollars, and it lost money against a summer that punished anything unfamiliar.

The western is played entirely straight, the decision the title works against. The town, the cattle operation, the preacher and the dispossessed Apache are all constructed as a real frontier film before anything descends out of the sky at all. Olivia Wilde plays Ella. Sam Rockwell plays Doc.

Daniel Craig plays Lonergan as a man with no memory and a device on his wrist, and the amnesia structure does genuine work. He does not know what he has done, the audience does not either, and the film withholds it until the information costs him something.

Harrison Ford’s Dolarhyde is the best thing in the picture. A cattleman who is cruel to everybody including his own son, who has bought the town, and whom the film declines to soften until he has actually earned the change. Matthew Libatique shot it. Harry Gregson-Williams scored it.

The aliens are treated as prospectors instead of as conquerors, the smartest idea in it. They are extracting gold, the abductions are labour and experimentation, and the film maps the invasion directly onto the frontier economy it has spent an hour establishing. Steven Spielberg produced.

For WritersThe aliens are prospectors. They are extracting gold, the abductions are labour and experiment, and the invasion maps directly onto the frontier economy the film spent an hour carefully building. When you combine two genres, look for the point where their logic already overlaps before you look for contrast. A western is about extraction and displacement, so an invasion that extracts and displaces is the same book told at a larger scale instead of a second premise bolted onto the first. Mashups fail when the second genre is decoration, and they work when one premise turns out to restate the other in different terms. Find the restatement first and the plot assembles itself.

↑ All Entries

6. The Adjustment Bureau (2011) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Adjustment Bureau (2011)

2011
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"The antagonists have a case you would struggle to answer."

George Nolfi adapted another short Philip K. Dick story and made a romance with a bureaucratic conspiracy attached. Matt Damon and Emily Blunt carry it, and the film cost around fifty million dollars against a premise that most studios would have turned into a chase.

The bureau are caseworkers instead of villains and the film holds that position. They wear hats, they carry notebooks, they discuss workload and jurisdiction, and they are genuinely apologetic about the interventions they are required to perform on people’s lives. John Slattery plays Richardson. Anthony Mackie plays Harry.

The doors are the best device in it and the rules are stated once. Certain doors connect to other places when opened by somebody wearing a hat, the geography of Manhattan becomes a network, and every chase in the film runs on a rule the audience can follow.

The argument underneath is about whether a plan is worth more than a choice, and the film gives both sides a real case. The bureau have evidence that free will produced two world wars, and the film does not pretend that position is stupid. John Toll shot it.

Terence Stamp arrives late as the enforcement escalation and the film needed him. He explains what the couple will cost each other in specific professional terms, and the scene is the only genuinely frightening thing in an otherwise gentle picture. Thomas Newman scored it. Universal released it in March 2011.

For WritersThe bureau have evidence. Free will produced two world wars, they say, and the film declines to treat that position as stupid. The antagonists are caseworkers with a defensible argument, a jurisdiction and a workload they discuss between interventions. When you write opposition, give them the strongest version of their case and then let a character the reader likes struggle to answer it on the page. A conflict where one side is obviously correct has no tension in it, only delay, and readers detect the difference inside a chapter and start skimming. Write the case you cannot answer yourself, and make somebody try anyway. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/conflict-in-writing/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Conflict that drives story covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

7. John Carter (2012) [full review]

► Read the full review of John Carter (2012)

2012
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.6/10

"He fails at the jumping first, so it lands later."

Andrew Stanton moved from Pixar to live action with a budget around two hundred and fifty million dollars, and Disney’s marketing removed both Mars and Princess from the title. It became one of the largest write-downs in studio history and the film is considerably better than that record suggests.

The Burroughs material is a century old and everything has already borrowed from it. A Princess of Mars was published in 1912, and the dying planet, the airships, the four-armed warriors and the human who gains strength in lower gravity have been taken by everybody since.

The Tharks are the best work in the film. Motion captured, four-armed, with a tusked design that reads as expressive, and a culture built on cruelty as a civic virtue that the film establishes through behaviour instead of through explanation. Taylor Kitsch plays Carter. Lynn Collins plays Dejah Thoris.

The frame story is the element that confused audiences and it is faithful to the book. Burroughs appears as a character inheriting his uncle’s journal, and the device is doing real structural work that the marketing never attempted to explain to anybody. Willem Dafoe voices Tars Tarkas.

The Barsoom gravity is used properly instead of as a gag. Carter jumps enormous distances because the planet is smaller, the film establishes it with a sequence of failures first, and every action scene afterward depends on a rule the audience watched him learn. Michael Giacchino scored it.

For WritersCarter cannot jump at first. The film spends a sequence on him overshooting, landing badly and being laughed at before the ability turns useful to anybody. The rule is established through incompetence instead of explanation. When you give a character a new capability, show them handling it wrong before you show them handling it well. A reader who watched somebody learn will accept every later use without question, and the failures are the only chance you get to make the mechanism funny before it becomes a tool. Competence arriving fully formed reads as a cheat even when it is not one, because the reader has no memory of it costing anything.

↑ All Entries

8. Snowpiercer (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of Snowpiercer (2013)

2013
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.1/10

"The rebellion was part of the system all along."

Bong Joon-ho adapted a French graphic novel into his first English-language film, and the Weinstein Company demanded twenty minutes of cuts and an explanatory voiceover. Bong refused, the film was released in limited form intact, and the version everybody has seen is his. Chris Evans plays Curtis.

The train is the argument stated as architecture. A class system arranged linearly with the poor at the back and the engine at the front, and the entire plot is people moving forward through carriages that get more comfortable as they advance. Song Kang-ho plays Namgoong.

The protein bar sequence is the film’s method in miniature. The tail section is fed black blocks nobody can identify, the revelation about the contents arrives without ceremony, and the horror is followed immediately by everybody continuing to eat them. Hong Kyung-pyo shot it. Marco Beltrami scored it.

Tilda Swinton’s Mason is an administrator with a regional accent and false teeth, delivering a speech about shoes and their proper place. The performance is comic and the content is a functioning defense of a caste system. Ed Harris appears at the front. Jamie Bell and Octavia Spencer appear.

The ending refuses the revolution the structure promises. Reaching the engine reveals that the rebellion was planned by the people running it as a population control measure, and the only real escape is destroying the train entirely. Jacques Lob wrote the original comic. John Hurt plays Gilliam.

For WritersReaching the engine reveals that the rebellion itself was planned by the people running the train, as a population control measure. The revolt was a moving part of the system instead of a threat to it. When you build a structure your characters are fighting, consider whether the fight is one of its components. A system that absorbs opposition and uses it is considerably more frightening than one that merely suppresses opposition, because there is no position outside it left to occupy. It also forces your protagonist into the harder ending, where the only real option is destroying the thing instead of taking control of it. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/imagery-in-writing/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Imagery that builds a usable space covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

9. The World’s End (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of The World’s End (2013)

2013
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"A comedy built on a man nobody in the story wants to see."

Wright closed the Cornetto trilogy with the least liked and most serious of the three. A man in his forties assembles four friends who have moved on without him to finish a pub crawl they failed at as teenagers, and the film is about somebody nobody wants to see.

Gary King is an alcoholic and the film is direct about it. He is lying continuously, he is wearing the same coat he wore at eighteen, he has come from a treatment facility, and the comedy is built on a man everybody in the story is trying to get away from.

The science fiction turn arrives at the midpoint and is the least interesting thing in the picture. Blanks, blue blood, a network and a Network, and the invasion material is largely a mechanism for keeping five men in a town together after they would otherwise have left.

Simon Pegg is doing the best work of his career and it was not what the audience wanted. The bathroom scene where he pushes up a sleeve is played without any joke at all and reframes the entire first hour retroactively. Martin Freeman and Paddy Considine complete the five.

The fights are choreographed by Brad Allan and are genuinely good. Nick Frost’s shift from reluctance into fury is staged physically instead of written, and the bar sequence with the stools is the best action Wright has directed anywhere. Rosamund Pike plays the sister. Steven Price scored it.

For WritersThe film’s protagonist is an alcoholic in the same coat he wore at eighteen, and the comedy is built on somebody nobody in the story wants to see arrive. That is considerably harder to sustain than a likeable lead, and the film sustains it for two hours. When you write a character the others avoid, give the reader one piece of information the group is withholding from each other. It buys patience for behaviour a reader would otherwise refuse to sit with, and the reveal pays back every page you spent keeping them all in the room together. Without that one fact, the same character is simply unpleasant.

Starship Troopers executes the logic it is attacking without signalling, and Cowboys and Aliens finds where two genres already overlap. Work the form in the Genre Mastery Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) [full review]

► Read the full review of Mad Max: Fury Road (2015)

2015
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.1/10

"No briefing, no exposition, and you understand the whole world."

George Miller spent close to two decades getting it made and shot most of it in Namibia after the Australian desert flooded. The vehicles were built and destroyed for real, the editing ran to around twenty-seven hundred cuts, and the film won six Academy Awards.

The worldbuilding arrives entirely through behaviour. Nobody explains the Citadel, the water economy, the War Boys or the half-life mythology, and the audience assembles all of it from what people do, wear and shout across a two-hour chase. Charlize Theron plays Furiosa. Tom Hardy plays Max.

Furiosa is the protagonist and Max is the passenger, and the marketing never mentioned. She has the goal, the history and the decision to make, and the film gives him the supporting role in somebody else’s story without commenting on it. John Seale shot it.

The chase structure is out and back, the simplest possible shape. They drive away from the Citadel, they turn around, and they drive back to it, and the entire second half is the first half reversed with everything the characters have learned applied to it.

Immortan Joe is built as an economic argument instead of as a tyrant. He controls water, he rations it deliberately, he owns the people who produce milk and the people who fight, and every part of the society follows from a resource held by one man.

For WritersNobody explains the Citadel, the water economy or the War Boys. The audience assembles the entire world from what people do, wear and shout during a two-hour chase. When you build a setting, the exposition scene is the first thing to cut and the last thing most writers give up. Behaviour under pressure carries more worldbuilding than any briefing can, because a reader trusts what they deduced for themselves and merely tolerates what they were told by a character standing still. Write the scene where somebody uses the system wrong and pays for it in front of everybody, and the rules arrive without a word of instruction. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/world-builders-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>World Builder’s Handbook covers the method.

↑ All Entries

11. The Martian (2015) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Martian (2015)

2015
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"He narrates because he is logging it, so nothing reads as a device."

Ridley Scott adapted Andy Weir’s self-published novel with Drew Goddard writing, and the film treats its science as the actual content instead of as a backdrop. It took over six hundred and thirty million dollars and was nominated for seven Academy Awards. Jessica Chastain plays Lewis.

The structure is a sequence of problems with stated solutions. Calories, water, communication, transit, and each one is worked through on screen with the arithmetic visible, and almost no mainstream film has the confidence to attempt for two hours. Chiwetel Ejiofor plays Kapoor. Dariusz Wolski shot it.

Matt Damon narrates to a camera and that device solves the isolation problem. Watney explains what he is doing because he is logging it, the exposition has an in-world reason to exist, and the humour comes from a man performing competence for a future audience.

The potato sequence is the film in miniature. A stated problem, available materials, a method involving human waste and hydrazine, an explosion caused by a mistake he explains afterward, and a result that buys a specific number of additional days. Harry Gregson-Williams scored it. Fox released it in October 2015.

The ending is the part that departs from the novel and the film needed it. Weir’s book ends on the rescue and the film adds a coda about teaching, giving the picture a thesis about problem solving that the source leaves implicit. Weir self-published it in 2011.

For WritersWatney narrates to a camera because he is logging his work for a record somebody may eventually read. The exposition has a reason to exist inside the story, so a man alone on a planet can explain chemistry for two hours without any of it reading as a device. When you need a character to think aloud, build the justification into their situation before you write a word of the explanation. A log, a letter, a deposition or a lesson all license material that would otherwise feel imposed on the scene, and the format you pick becomes characterization while it is doing the work. The man who logs everything is telling you something about himself.

↑ All Entries

12. Upgrade (2018) [full review]

► Read the full review of Upgrade (2018)

2018
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.5/10

"He grants permission one action at a time, right up until he cannot."

Leigh Whannell made it for around five million dollars in Melbourne and it looks considerably more expensive than that. The camera is rigged to move with the actor during fight sequences, so the frame stays locked to his body while he is thrown around inside it.

The premise is a paralysed man given an implant that can operate his body for him, with his consent, one action at a time. He asks permission, the chip answers, and the film keeps the arrangement conversational throughout. Betty Gabriel plays the detective. Harrison Gilbertson plays Eron.

Logan Marshall-Green plays two things at once and the physical work is the film. When STEM is driving, his face registers horror while his body performs precise violence, and the disconnect between the two is the best effect in the picture. Stefan Duscio shot it.

The violence is brief and genuinely shocking because the film rations it. STEM does not fight, it solves, and every confrontation ends in two or three movements with an outcome the audience was not braced for. Jed Palmer scored it. Blumhouse released it. Whannell had co-created Saw.

The ending is bleaker than anything the budget suggested. STEM was never assisting, the entire situation was engineered to acquire a host, and the last scene leaves a man locked inside a body somebody else is now operating full time. Simon Maiden voices STEM. Melanie Vallejo plays the wife.

For WritersSTEM asks permission before acting and Grey grants it, one action at a time, out loud. The arrangement stays conversational and consensual right up to the point where it is neither of those things any more. When you write a loss of control, build it out of agreements the character made freely and could have refused. Possession taken by force is an event that happens to somebody and generates sympathy. Control handed over in small reasonable increments is a process the reader can see coming and cannot stop, and it implicates the protagonist in their own capture, and no forced version manages that at any length. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/villain-motivations-fall-apart-fix/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Why villain motivations fall apart covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

13. Star Wars: A New Hope (1977) [full review]

► Read the full review of Star Wars: A New Hope (1977)

1977
RLR: 8.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.6/10

"The Force gets three lines and carries six films."

Lucas made a film almost nobody at Fox expected to work, on around eleven million dollars, with an editing rescue by Marcia Lucas, Paul Hirsch and Richard Chew that restructured the whole picture. The first assembly was close to unwatchable. Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher lead.

The used universe is the design decision everybody copied. Ships are dented, droids are filthy, equipment fails, and nothing in the world looks manufactured for the film. No science fiction production had committed to that at scale before. Gilbert Taylor shot it. John Williams scored it.

The exposition is handled almost entirely by ignorance. Luke does not know anything, the droids are new to the situation, and every explanation the audience needs arrives because somebody in the scene genuinely requires it instead of because the plot does. Alec Guinness plays Obi-Wan.

The Force is left deliberately vague in this film. It is described in about three lines total, no midichlorians, no rules, no measurement, and the withholding is what let it carry the weight the later films kept trying to specify. It won six Academy Awards.

The trench run works because the geography was established twice before it happens. A briefing with a schematic, a rehearsal in dialogue, and then the sequence itself, so the audience knows exactly what a success or a failure would look like. Ben Burtt built the sound.

For WritersThe Force gets about three lines in the entire film. No rules, no measurement, no mechanism. The vagueness is what let it carry the weight of six further films before somebody decided to specify it. When you invent something numinous, describe its effects and refuse to explain its operation for as long as you can hold out. A mystery with a stated mechanism becomes a technology, and a technology can be optimized, countered, priced and exhausted by any reader paying attention. The moment somebody can calculate with your magic, it has stopped being magic and started being equipment. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/believable-characters/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Why characters feel flat covers the ground.

Wikus never quite becomes a hero and Gary King is somebody nobody wants to see. Two difficult protagonists, in the Deep Character Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. Predator (1987) [full review]

► Read the full review of Predator (1987)

1987
RLR: 8.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.8/10

"Several hundred rounds into a treeline, and nothing is hit."

John McTiernan made a film that spends forty minutes as a Central American action picture before revealing what it is. The original creature design by Boss Films was scrapped entirely after shooting began and Stan Winston rebuilt it from nothing during a production shutdown. Carl Weathers and Bill Duke fill out the squad.

The structure is a monster film where the monster is hunting the most dangerous men available, the reason the reversal works. The squad are established as genuinely capable, they win their first engagement decisively, and then the film takes them apart one at a time.

The thermal vision is the best point of view device in the genre. The audience sees what the creature sees, understands its limits, and the mud sequence pays off a rule established forty minutes earlier without anybody in the film explaining it aloud. Jim and John Thomas wrote it.

The minigun sequence is the moment the film states its own premise. Several hundred rounds into a treeline, everything destroyed, nothing hit, and a squad of professionals standing in silence realizing that their entire method does not apply here. Alan Silvestri scored it. Shane Black appears as Hawkins.

Kevin Peter Hall was seven feet two and performed the creature effectively blind for most of the shoot, since the helmet had no usable sightlines. Jean-Claude Van Damme was originally cast and left during the first design. Fox released it in June 1987. Joel Silver produced it.

For WritersMcTiernan establishes the squad as genuinely capable and lets them win an engagement decisively before anything happens to them. The minigun sequence then destroys an entire treeline and hits nothing at all. When you want a threat to register, spend the first act proving your protagonists are good at their jobs and let the reader watch them succeed. A competent team taken apart is frightening because the reader has already agreed they know what they are doing. An incompetent one was always going to lose, readers work that out immediately, and they hold the cheat against you for the rest of the book.

↑ All Entries

15. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (BBC TV Series, 1981) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (BBC TV Series, 1981)

0
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"Everybody plays it straight. That is why it is funny."

The BBC adapted Douglas Adams after the radio series and before the novels had finished arriving, with Adams himself supervising. Six episodes were made on a budget that shows in every frame, and the production is considerably better for having no money to waste on anything except the writing.

Peter Jones voices the Book and the casting is the whole production. The delivery is unhurried, faintly weary and completely certain, and the entries themselves are the funniest material in any version of the property including the novels Adams wrote afterward. Alan J. W. Bell directed it.

The Guide graphics were animated by hand at Pearce Studios, frame by frame, because computer graphics of that quality did not exist in 1981. They look like a computer display and none of it is one, and the effect has aged considerably better than anything real would have.

The cast are played completely straight against material that invites mugging. Simon Jones is genuinely distressed about his house, Martin Benson delivers planning permission as bureaucratic fact, and nobody in the production ever signals that any of it is meant to be funny. David Dixon plays Ford Prefect.

The Vogons are the best design in it and they are men in suits. Latex, bad posture and a poetry reading conducted as an administrative punishment, and the whole sequence works because the performers treat the situation as tedious instead of as absurd. Sandra Dickinson plays Trillian.

For WritersThe cast play material designed to be ridiculous completely straight. Arthur is genuinely distressed about his house, the demolition officer treats planning permission as fact, and nobody signals that any of it is a joke. When you write comedy, the characters cannot be in on it. A person who finds their own situation absurd has stopped experiencing it and started commenting on it, and the reader follows them out of the scene. Everybody inside an absurd premise should be treating it as a Tuesday, complaining about the parts that are inconvenient and missing the parts that are extraordinary. The distance between how they feel and how the reader feels is where all the comedy lives, and the moment a character closes that gap you have given it away.

↑ All Entries

16. When Worlds Collide (1951) [full review]

► Read the full review of When Worlds Collide (1951)

1951
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.6/10

"The people who lose the lottery keep working on the ark."

George Pal produced the early Cold War apocalypse film that set the template everything since has used. A rogue star is on approach, the world has months, and an ark gets built privately because no government in the film can organize a response in time.

The selection lottery is the part that still works. Places on the ark are limited and the names are drawn publicly, and the film spends real time on the people who lose and have to keep working on the project they will not be leaving on.

The financing is handled with unusual honesty for 1951. A dying industrialist pays for the ark and expects a seat in return, the scientists accept the arrangement because nobody else will fund it, and the film never pretends the compromise is anything else. Rudolph Mate directed it.

The effects won the Academy Award and the matte work by Chesley Bonestell is the reason. The approach of Bellus, the flooding of New York and the launch ramp are painted instead of built, and the paintings have a stillness models never achieved. Richard Derr and Barbara Rush lead.

The ending is the weakest part and the budget is why. The new world is a single painted backdrop revealed in the final shot, completed in a hurry, and the film stops on it abruptly with no sense of what the survivors are walking into.

For WritersPlaces on the ark are limited and the names are drawn publicly. The film spends real time on the people who lose and then keep working on a project they will not be leaving on. When you write a disaster, the interesting position is rarely the one being rescued. Everybody outside the lifeboat has to decide what to do with the time remaining, and a character who continues doing their job after learning they are not saved tells a reader more about the world than any survivor can. The lottery also removes the merit question entirely. Nothing becomes an argument about who deserves a place, and the story stays about how people behave once the decision is out of their hands.

Predator proves its squad is capable before taking them apart, and The Adjustment Bureau gives its opposition a case you cannot answer. Build it in the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Entries

17. Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956, 1978, 1993, 2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956, 1978, 1993, 2007)

1956
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"Both readings hold, and neither is contradicted anywhere."

Four major versions exist across five decades and the premise has survived all of them. Don Siegel made the 1956 original in nineteen days, Philip Kaufman remade it in 1978, Abel Ferrara moved it to a military base in 1993, and the 2007 version is the failure.

The 1956 film has been claimed by both political readings for seventy years. It is either about communist infiltration or about McCarthyite conformity, and Siegel and Mainwaring both declined to settle it, the reason it still works on an audience today. Jack Finney published the novel in 1955.

Kaufman’s 1978 version moves it to San Francisco and that relocation is the smartest decision in the sequence. Paranoia functions in a city because anonymity was already normal, and nobody notices a person behaving strangely among several hundred thousand others. Kevin McCarthy leads the 1956 version.

The 1993 Abel Ferrara version sets it on a military base, the best premise of the four. Conformity is already mandatory, the uniforms are identical, and the invasion has almost nothing left to change about how anybody behaves. Donald Sutherland leads the 1978 one. Meg Tilly leads the 1993 version.

The Invasion in 2007 is the instructive failure. The Wachowskis rewrote it, the studio reshot substantially, and the pods became a virus with a cure, turning a film about identity into a medical thriller with a solution. Nicole Kidman leads the 2007 one. Daniel Mainwaring wrote the 1956 screenplay.

For WritersThe 1956 film has been claimed by both political readings for seventy years because its makers refused to settle it. Neither reading is contradicted anywhere in the picture. That refusal is why it still works on audiences who have no memory of the politics it was made inside. When your story carries a political charge, resist the line that fixes it in place. An allegory with one correct interpretation expires alongside the thing it was written about, and one that supports two readings outlives both of them. Write the readings out separately and check that no line in the book closes either off, because a single confirming detail retires the version you did not intend to kill. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/subtext/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Subtext in fiction covers the discipline.

↑ All Entries

18. The Blob (1958 and 1988) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Blob (1958 and 1988)

1958
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.7/10

"It cannot be shot, stabbed, reasoned with or outrun."

Irvin Yeaworth’s 1958 film was made in Pennsylvania by a company that mostly produced religious shorts, with a twenty-seven-year-old Steve McQueen playing a teenager in his first leading role. He took a flat fee over a percentage and regretted it for decades afterward. Kate Phillips co-wrote the 1958 screenplay.

The creature is the best idea in fifties horror and almost nobody credits it. It cannot be shot, stabbed, reasoned with or outrun, it grows with every person it absorbs, and the only thing that works on it is discovered by accident instead of by anybody’s plan.

The 1958 effects were achieved with colored silicone on a miniature set tilted to make the mass move, and the cinema sequence with the audience running into the street still holds up as a piece of practical staging done for almost no money. Burt Bacharach co-wrote the title song.

Chuck Russell’s 1988 remake is considerably nastier and the better film. It kills a child, the phone box sequence is genuinely upsetting, and the reveal that the thing is an American biological weapon instead of a meteorite gives the remake an actual subject. Kevin Dillon leads the 1988 version.

Both versions understand that the horror is dissolution instead of attack. The victims are absorbed while conscious, the effects show faces still recognizable inside the mass, and nothing about the process is quick enough to be merciful. Frank Darabont co-wrote the remake. Aneta Corsaut plays Jane.

For WritersThe creature cannot be shot, stabbed, reasoned with or outrun, removing every tool a protagonist would normally reach for. The solution has to be discovered instead of applied, and it arrives by accident. When you design a threat, list what your characters would ordinarily do about it and take all of it away before you write the first confrontation. The gap left behind is where the plot comes from, because your people now have to invent something instead of executing something. A monster that can be fought with a weapon has already told the reader how the book ends, and every scene between that realization and the ending is a delay they can feel. <a href=”https://thewritingking.com/books/science-fiction-handbook/” style=”color:#1565C0;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;”>Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

Honorable Mentions: Science Fiction Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier or close to it and each is on the list.

Pitch Black (2000)

⭐ 7.0/10

David Twohy stranded a transport crew on a planet with three suns and a long eclipse, and built the whole picture on the moment the light goes. Vin Diesel was unknown when it was cast.

Robot & Frank (2012)

⭐ 7.1/10

A retired burglar with early dementia is given a care robot and trains it to assist with a job. Frank Langella plays it entirely straight and the ending is considerably sadder than the premise suggests.

Attack the Block (2011)

⭐ 6.5/10

Joe Cornish put an alien invasion on a South London estate and cast unknowns, including John Boyega in his first role. The creature design is pure black fur with luminous teeth and nothing else.

Triangle (2009)

⭐ 6.9/10

Christopher Smith built a loop on a drifting liner where the protagonist keeps meeting earlier versions of herself. The structure is rigorous and the ending closes it exactly.

The Endless (2017)

⭐ 6.5/10

Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead directed and starred, returning to a cult they escaped and finding the loops it runs on. It shares a world with their earlier film Resolution.

The Vast of Night (2019)

⭐ 6.6/10

Andrew Patterson made a fifties New Mexico film about a switchboard operator and a radio signal, for almost nothing, with two extraordinary long takes and a lot of people simply talking.

Sound of My Voice (2011)

⭐ 6.6/10

Brit Marling plays a woman claiming to be from 2054, leading a basement cult, and the film refuses to confirm or deny her until a final shot that settles nothing.

Safety Not Guaranteed (2012)

⭐ 6.9/10

Built from a real classified advertisement seeking a time travel companion, and the film spends its length on whether the man placing it is delusional or telling the truth.

Midnight Special (2016)

⭐ 6.6/10

Jeff Nichols made a chase film about a father, a son with abilities and two organizations pursuing them, and explains almost nothing about what the boy is until the last reel.

Prospect (2018)

⭐ 6.3/10

A father and daughter harvest organic gems on a toxic moon in a film built almost entirely from practical suits and a forest. Pedro Pascal plays the man they run into.

Devs (2020)

⭐ 7.3/10

Alex Garland built an eight-episode series around a quantum computer that can render any moment in history, and a determinism argument that the show takes entirely seriously.

Ad Astra (2019)

⭐ 6.5/10

James Gray sent Brad Pitt to Neptune to find a father who left, with a lunar rover chase and a commercial flight to the moon that treats space travel as infrastructure.

Dishonorable Mentions: Science Fiction That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had the premise, the cast or the source material and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

Anon (2018)

⭐ 6.0/10

Andrew Niccol built a world where everything anybody sees is recorded, and attached it to a routine detective plot that uses almost none of what the premise makes possible.

The Matrix Resurrections (2021)

⭐ 5.7/10

Opens by restaging its own first film inside a video game studio being told to make a sequel, a real argument, and then makes the sequel anyway for another two hours.

Independence Day: Resurgence (2016)

⭐ 5.2/10

Twenty years later with most of the original cast absent, a queen with a shield, and a closing scene that pitches a further sequel nobody had asked anybody for.

Chappie (2015)

⭐ 6.8/10

Blomkamp followed District 9 and Elysium with a film about a police droid raised by criminals, and the tonal control that made the first one work is entirely absent.

Extinction (2018)

⭐ 5.8/10

An invasion film with a genuine reversal at the midpoint, undercut by a first hour of dream sequences and a trailer that gave the reversal away before release.

Voyagers (2021)

⭐ 5.2/10

A generation ship crewed by adolescents on suppressants, a workable premise, executed as a plain Lord of the Flies with none of the specificity that would have made it its own thing.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

This tier is about rules. Total Recall gives you the list, The One builds escalation into the mechanism, and Fury Road refuses to state anything at all. Tell me which approach you trust more as a reader.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Flawed |
Part 8: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Quaid dreaming in Total Recall?
The film never resolves it. Every detail works equally well as evidence for a recovered agent or a psychotic break inside an implanted fantasy, and the Rekall salesman lists the entire plot before any of it happens.
Can the loop be broken in 12 Monkeys?
No, and the film states that early. Cole is sent to recover a pure sample instead of preventing an outbreak nobody can prevent, and the boy watching a man die in the opening is watching the end of his own story.
Is Starship Troopers a satire?
Yes, and it refuses to signal the fact. Verhoeven adopts the fascist aesthetic completely and straight, and a substantial part of the 1997 audience and several reviewers took it at face value.
How does Mad Max: Fury Road explain its world?
It does not. Nobody accounts for the Citadel, the water economy or the War Boys, and the audience assembles all of it from what people do, wear and shout across a two-hour chase.
What are the rules in The One?
There are one hundred and twenty-four parallel universes, and killing your own counterpart redistributes their strength among everybody left. The escalation is built into the mechanism instead of the plot.
Why was John Carter such a failure?
Marketing. Disney removed both Mars and Princess from the title, never explained the frame story, and the film became one of the largest write-downs in studio history despite being considerably better than that record suggests.
What is the twist in Snowpiercer?
Reaching the engine reveals that the rebellion was planned by the people running the train, as a population control measure. The revolt was a component of the system instead of a threat to it.
Did The Matrix invent bullet time?
It popularized it at scale. The effect was built from a ring of still cameras fired in sequence around a subject, with the frames assembled into a move through a frozen moment, and nobody had attempted it at that size before.

🏷︎ Film List🏷︎ Film Trilogy🏷︎ Space Colonization

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment