Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

The Killers (1946)

TL;DR: The Killers (1946) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Robert Siodmak’s 1946 Hemingway adaptation. The murder happens in the first ten minutes.
The Killers (1946)
9 / 10

Official trailer

The Killers is Robert Siodmak’s 1946 American film noir expanding Ernest Hemingway’s 1927 short story. The film depicts two professional assassins arriving in a small New Jersey town to murder gas station attendant Pete Lund, who waits passively in his rented room for their arrival instead of fleeing when warned. Insurance investigator Jim Reardon later traces Lund’s actual identity as former boxer Ole Swede Andersen and uncovers his involvement in a payroll robbery years earlier that produced the circumstances leading to his eventual murder.

Burt Lancaster makes his film debut playing Ole Andersen. Edmond O’Brien plays Reardon. Ava Gardner plays Kitty Collins. Albert Dekker plays Big Jim Colfax. Sam Levene plays Lieutenant Lubinsky. William Conrad plays one of the killers. Charles McGraw plays the other killer. Anthony Veiller wrote the screenplay, though John Huston contributed considerably without credit. Mark Hellinger Productions and Universal Pictures produced the film on a budget of approximately 875,000 dollars. The work received four Academy Award nominations.

From its opening scenes, The Killers has me. Two hired men turn up in a small New Jersey town, the dread builds with every line, and Lancaster waits in his rented room for them without lifting a finger. I rate it a 9 because the rest of the picture lives up to that opening, and my only reservation is an investigator who’s the least interesting person in his own movie.

In The Killers, brief literary source material gets its foundational expansion into full-length noir adaptation. Hemingway’s original 1927 short story occupies approximately ten pages and depicts only the opening sequence where the two killers wait in the diner for Andersen to arrive. The remaining ninety minutes of the film are original elaboration that explains why Andersen accepted his death. Hemingway reportedly approved the adaptation as superior expansion of his source. Burt Lancaster’s film debut launched one of the principal American leading man careers of the postwar period.

Lancaster brought athletic physical presence, intelligent dialogue delivery, and the underlying intensity that the films that came after including From Here to Eternity (1953) and Sweet Smell of Success (1957) extended. The Killers also represented one of Ava Gardner’s first major roles, establishing her femme fatale capabilities that later entries in the genre would continue developing.

The Hemingway Expansion

Hemingway’s source story depicts only the opening sequence.

Two killers arrive at a diner. They tell the customers and staff they’re waiting for Ole Andersen. They threaten violence but leave without killing anyone in the diner. The story ends with Nick Adams visiting Andersen’s rented room to warn him. Andersen lies on his bed and tells Nick that running would do no good. The story ends without resolution.

The film expands this opening into elaborate noir investigation explaining why Andersen accepted his death. The expansion required heavy original creation instead of adaptation of existing source. Anthony Veiller and uncredited John Huston developed Andersen’s history as failed boxer, his involvement with Kitty Collins, his participation in the payroll robbery, and the later betrayals that produced his eventual murder. The expansion has aged into demonstration that excellent adaptations can sometimes considerably exceed source material when the source provides foundation instead of complete narrative.

I think the expansion is the smartest thing about the film. Hemingway gives you a man who won’t run and never says why, and the screenwriters spend the rest of the picture answering that in a way that makes his surrender hurt more.

For Writers

Source material can provide foundation instead of complete narrative that adaptations must reproduce faithfully. The same applies to creative work. The brief source that establishes situation can support extensive original elaboration instead of constraining work to its content.

Lancaster’s Debut

Burt Lancaster’s film debut as Ole Andersen launched one of the principal American leading man careers of the postwar period. Lancaster was thirty-three during production.

He had been working as circus acrobat and stage performer before Mark Hellinger cast him in the role. The combination of physical presence, intelligent performance, and underlying intensity produced material that established his standing immediately instead of requiring gradual career development.

Lancaster knocks me flat here. You can see the fighter’s body and a trusting heart in the same man, and Ava Gardner gives him every reason to lose his head.

Lancaster’s later career extended across multiple decades including From Here to Eternity (1953), Sweet Smell of Success (1957), Elmer Gantry (1960), Atlantic City (1980), and many others. He combined athletic physical capability with serious dramatic range across productions that few American leading men have matched. The Killers set the pattern that later work would extend. Lancaster died in 1994 having produced one of the more major American leading man careers of the twentieth century.

For Writers

Debut performances can establish star standing immediately instead of requiring gradual career development. Keep this one in mind for your own work. The first work that shows full capability creates conditions that later gradual development wouldn’t have produced.

The Flashback Investigation

The film structure follows insurance investigator Jim Reardon as he traces Andersen’s history through interviews with people who knew him at different periods.

Each interview produces a flashback depicting the events the interview subject witnessed. The investigation gradually assembles Andersen’s complete history from the partial accounts of witnesses. The structure creates dramatic suspense about how the disparate pieces will connect into coherent narrative.

Next to Lancaster, the jigsaw structure is what I enjoy most here. Each witness hands Reardon one more piece, and I find myself trying to beat him to the full picture.

The investigation structure has been imitated extensively in later films including Citizen Kane (1941) which had used similar approach.

The Killers extended the Citizen Kane structure to noir material. Later productions across multiple decades have continued to use witness-based investigation as organizational principle. The picture allows films to deliver complex narrative through multiple perspectives while maintaining dramatic momentum through the investigator’s pursuit of complete understanding.

For Writers

Witness-based investigation structures can deliver complex narrative through multiple perspectives. Useful for fiction. The investigator who pursues complete understanding through witness interviews provides structural device that complex stories can use productively.

Craft Note

Robert Siodmak directed extensive American noir productions including Phantom Lady (1944), The Killers (1946), and The Spiral Staircase (1946). He’d emigrated from Germany after the Nazi rise to power and brought European visual sensibility to American studio production. Siodmak returned to European production after the early 1950s and continued working through later decades. His noir filmography represents considerable contribution to the foundational period of the American genre.

Does The Killers still hold up?

I give The Killers a 9 because it takes ten pages of Hemingway and builds a whole doomed life out of them without losing the chill of the original. Lancaster’s debut is the best reason to watch, Gardner is right behind him, and the witness-by-witness structure keeps the dread alive to the end. I’d take off a point only for an investigator who’s a little bland next to everyone he interviews.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I read the Hemingway story first?
Reading the 1927 source story provides context for understanding the adaptation expansion. The story is brief and can be read in approximately fifteen minutes. The film works considerably as original work that uses the story as foundation.
How does The Killers compare to the 1964 remake?
Don Siegel directed a 1964 remake with Lee Marvin, John Cassavetes, and Angie Dickinson. The remake works differently and was made for television before theatrical release. The 1946 original generally receives stronger critical recognition.
How does The Killers fit Lancaster’s filmography?
The Killers launched his career. From Here to Eternity (1953), Sweet Smell of Success (1957), and Elmer Gantry (1960) extend his major dramatic productions. Each work justifies engagement.
How long is The Killers?
The film runs approximately one hour forty-three minutes. The runtime accommodates both the opening source material and the extensive original investigation that follows.
What is the cultural impact of The Killers?
Foundational impact within American film noir and continuing approach to Lancaster’s debut performance. The work continues to receive critical attention for years after.
Is The Killers right for younger viewers?
The film contains 1946-period violence and adult themes but no graphic content. Older teenagers can engage the material productively.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.