Latest
It’s Not X, It’s Y: The AI Tell Shakespeare Wrote FirstWho Gets Rich From AI Data Centers? The Local, National and Global EconomyAre AI Data Centers Bad for the Environment? What’s True and What Isn’tAI Data Centers and Geopolitics: Chips, China, Spies and PowerAI Derangement Syndrome: Who Cares If the Cover Was Made With AI?How to Write a Plot Twist Readers Never See ComingBook Ads Getting Clicks but No Sales? The Problem Is the PageCan Writing a Memoir Make You Sick? The Toll Nobody Warns You AboutWhen Caregiving Ends and the Words Won’t ComeCan You Publish a Clean and a Spicy Version of the Same Book?Do You Need a Writing Buddy? What Works and What Doesn’tCan You Put Someone Who Wronged You in Your Novel?Kindle Unlimited or Wide? Where to Publish Your Debut NovelWriting Vampires: How to Build Your Own Vampire RulesWhat Software Do Novelists Use to Write a Book?What If Your Family Doesn’t Support Your Writing?ARC Reviews: Real Follow-Through Numbers, and Do Reviews Sell Books?The AI Singularity: Would a Conscious AI Even Care About Us?“Forbidden” AI Prompts: Why Viral Prompt Lists Are Mostly JunkAuthor Scam Emails: Fake Agents, Flattery and the $500 PitchWill AI Steal My Book? Turn Off Training Before You UploadThe Fear of Being Judged for Your Memoir: My Father Told Everyone to Burn MineShould You Only Use “Said” in Dialogue Tags? My Rules for Tags and AdverbsWhy a Good Book Isn’t Enough: Agents, Quiet Novels and What SellsShe Asked How to Format Her Comic for KDP. The Thread Went to War Over AI.Why Are Writing Groups So Hostile?My Ghostwriter Stopped Responding. What Do I Do?My Ghostwriter Missed the Deadline. What Are My Options?I Hate My Ghostwriter’s First Draft. Now What?Can I Get a Refund From a Ghostwriter?How Many Revisions Should a Ghostwriter Include?Can My Ghostwriter List My Book in Their Portfolio?My Family Doesn’t Want Me to Publish My Ghostwritten Memoir. Now What?Should a Ghostwriter Write a Free Sample Chapter?How Much Does a Ghostwriter Take Up Front?Can a Ghostwriter Get Me a Book Deal or a Literary Agent?Can I Work With a Ghostwriter Over Zoom or From Another Country?Ghostwriting a Tribute Book, Eulogy or Obituary for Someone You LostCan a Ghostwriter Write My Book in Spanish?Ghostwriting a Book for a Dental or Chiropractic PracticeWhy Keynote Speakers Need a Ghostwritten BookGhostwriting a Science or Research Book for General ReadersGhostwriting a Book for Teachers and EducatorsHiring a Ghostwriter for a Pilot’s or Aviation MemoirHiring a Ghostwriter for a Musician’s MemoirCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Whistleblower Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for an Immigrant’s StoryCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write About Losing Someone to Suicide?Can a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Depression or Mental Illness Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for a Special-Needs Parent’s Memoir

The Greatest Film Noir

Noir was named after the fact. French critics who had been cut off from American films during the occupation saw five years of backlog arrive at once in 1946, noticed that the crime pictures had turned fatalistic and black, and gave it a label the people making them never used.

That accident is why the form is so consistent. Nobody was working to a template, so what the films share is a condition instead of a formula: wartime and postwar anxiety, German expressionist technique brought over by emigre directors, cheap sets that lighting could hide, and a Production Code that forced everything interesting into shadow and implication.

Noir is the genre I trust to tell the truth about competence. Most crime pictures pay off the smart guy in the last reel, and I’ve always found that a little insulting. These films don’t. A man can do everything right and still end up face down on a wet sidewalk, and nobody in the picture pretends that’s unfair. That’s why I keep going back to them, and why the cheap imitations that just turn down the lights annoy me so much.

The pattern running down this list is that the protagonist is competent and it doesn’t matter. Every ranking below is the one carried by the linked review, with ties broken by year.

↑ All Entries

1. Dark City (1998)

► Read the full review of Dark City (1998)

RLR: 10+++ / 10

"The most underrated science fiction film ever made, and it is structurally a noir."

Dark City carries the highest rating on this page and sits low only because the sort places it by year. It arrived in 1998, a year before The Matrix, with the same central idea and none of the credit.

It’s noir in structure and not in decoration. A man wakes with no memory beside a body, is pursued for a murder he can’t remember, and investigates his own possible guilt through a city that’s permanently night.

The reveal, that the city is an experiment and the night is total, converts the genre’s fatalism into a literal condition. Roger Ebert recorded a commentary track for it and named it the best film of its year.

A man wakes with no memory beside a body, is pursued for a murder he can’t remember, and investigates his own possible guilt through a city that’s permanently night.

The reveal, that the city is an experiment and the night is total, converts the genre’s fatalism into a literal condition.

Roger Ebert recorded a commentary track for it and named it the best film of its year, and it arrived a year before The Matrix with the same central idea. Dark City is the film I’d put in front of anybody who thinks they’ve seen enough noir, and people still treat it as a footnote. The Matrix walked off with the credit a year later. It irritates me every time somebody calls this one derivative, because the dates run in exactly the opposite direction.

For WritersMaking a genre’s fatalism literal is a legitimate escalation. Noir’s sense that the city is arranged against you becomes a fact here, and the reader who knows the form recognizes the joke. When you work inside a tradition, look for the metaphor everybody uses and make it true. The result reads as both a continuation and an argument. That’s the most durable position available.

↑ All Entries

2. The Maltese Falcon (1941)

► Read the full review of The Maltese Falcon (1941)

RLR: 10 / 10

"The film that established the template, made by a first-time director who stuck to the book."

The Maltese Falcon is first because it set the visual and narrative template the rest of this list is working inside. Huston was a screenwriter making his directorial debut and adapted Hammett by the simple method of breaking the novel into shots and filming what was there.

Bogart’s Sam Spade is the reason the archetype exists. He’s not honorable, sleeps with his partner’s wife, and turns the woman in at the end because his partner was killed and something has to be done about it. That’s a code instead of a morality, and every later private detective is working from it.

The supporting cast is the other half. Sydney Greenstreet was sixty-one and making his first film, Peter Lorre’s Cairo is played as unmistakably coded, and Elisha Cook Jr established the small-time gunman as a type. The falcon itself is worthless. That’s the point and the line the film closes on.

Huston was a screenwriter making his directorial debut and adapted Hammett by breaking the novel into shots and filming what was there. That’s why the dialogue survives almost intact.

Sydney Greenstreet was sixty-one and making his first film, Peter Lorre’s Cairo is played as unmistakably coded, and Elisha Cook Jr established the small-time gunman as a type.

The falcon is worthless. That’s the point and the line the film closes on, and no version of the plot would have worked if it had been valuable. This is the film I’d hand to anybody who wants the whole form in one sitting. Spade still unsettles me. He’s a louse for half the picture and I’d trust him over every cleaner hero Hollywood made afterward, because when he does the ugly thing at the end he can tell you exactly why.

For WritersA MacGuffin that turns out to be worthless retroactively makes the book about the people chasing it. Everything anybody did is exposed as having been for nothing. When you build a plot around an object, consider devaluing it at the end. The reader re-examines every choice, and the object never has to have been interesting because the pursuit was always the subject.

↑ All Entries

3. Double Indemnity (1944)

► Read the full review of Double Indemnity (1944)

RLR: 10 / 10

"Wilder and Chandler hated each other and produced the genre’s perfect screenplay."

Double Indemnity is the canonical noir and the collaboration that produced it was miserable. Wilder co-wrote with Raymond Chandler, who was an alcoholic novelist with no screen experience and who loathed Wilder personally, and the script is the best either of them worked on.

The structure is the innovation. The film opens with Walter Neff dictating his own confession into a dictaphone, wounded, so the audience knows from the first minutes that it ends badly and watches the rest as a foregone conclusion.

Edward G. Robinson’s Keyes is the reason it hurts. The pursuer isn’t police, he’s the friend, and the film’s actual love story is between the two men. The final exchange about the match is the closest thing to tenderness in the entire genre.

Wilder co-wrote with Raymond Chandler, who was an alcoholic novelist with no screen experience and who loathed Wilder personally, and the script is the best either worked on. Edward G. Robinson’s Keyes is the reason it hurts. The pursuer is the friend instead of the police, and the film’s actual love story is between the two men.

The confession frame means the audience knows from the opening minutes that it ends badly, so the whole picture is watched as a foregone conclusion. Keyes is the part that moves me. Neff’s scheme is clever and cold, and I don’t care about it half as much as I care about the man who liked him. That friendship curdling in front of a foregone conclusion hurts more than any killing in the genre.

For WritersPut the pursuer inside the protagonist’s affections. When a stranger hunts you, that’s jeopardy; when the one person who likes you hunts you, that’s a different and larger thing. When you need an investigator, look among your protagonist’s friends. Every scene between them carries a second layer, and the reader is anxious during conversations containing no threat at all.

↑ All Entries

4. The Third Man (1949)

► Read the full review of The Third Man (1949)

RLR: 10 / 10

"Post-war Vienna, a zither score, and the most famous entrance in cinema."

The Third Man is the best-looking film on this list and the only major noir made outside America. It gives it a setting no studio could have built. Occupied Vienna in 1949 was still bombed out and divided between four powers, and Reed shot in it.

Graham Greene wrote it and the tilted angles, the wet cobbles and the sewer chase are the expressionist inheritance used at full strength. Welles appears after an hour of being talked about, lit in a doorway by a neighbor’s window, and says nothing. Anton Karas was a zither player Reed found in a wine garden, and scoring the whole film on a single folk instrument was a decision nobody would approve now. The cuckoo clock speech was Welles’s own addition and is historically wrong, which he knew. Occupied Vienna in 1949 was still bombed out and divided between four powers, and Reed shot in it instead of building anything.

Anton Karas was a zither player Reed found in a wine garden, and scoring an entire film on one folk instrument is a decision nobody would approve now.

Welles appears after an hour of being talked about, lit in a doorway by a neighbor’s window, and the cuckoo clock speech was his own addition and is historically wrong.

For WritersShoot the ruin instead of building the set. Occupied Vienna was still bombed out and divided between four powers, and Reed filmed in it instead of constructing anything. When your setting has a real equivalent, go and look at it. Invented decay is generic and observed decay is specific, and readers who have never been there can still tell which you did.

↑ All Entries

5. Sunset Boulevard (1950)

► Read the full review of Sunset Boulevard (1950)

RLR: 10 / 10

"Hollywood’s most lacerating film about itself, narrated by a dead man."

A corpse floating in a swimming pool narrates Sunset Boulevard. Wilder got away with it after preview audiences laughed at a first version featuring a morgue.

The casting is the cruelty. Gloria Swanson had been a real silent star whose career ended with sound. Erich von Stroheim had been a major director reduced to acting. Buster Keaton, H.B. Warner and Anna Q. Nilsson appear as themselves playing bridge, and DeMille appears as himself directing.

Louis B. Mayer reportedly told Wilder he should be tarred and run out of town for it. The film is about an industry that discards people and that industry made it, using the people it had discarded.

Gloria Swanson had been a real silent star whose career ended with sound, and Erich von Stroheim had been a major director reduced to acting, playing her butler and former husband.

Buster Keaton, H.B. Warner and Anna Q. Nilsson appear as themselves playing bridge, and DeMille appears as himself directing on a real Paramount stage. Louis B. Mayer reportedly told Wilder he should be tarred and run out of town for it, and the industry it’s about made the film using the people it had discarded.

For WritersCast the biography instead of the type. Swanson was a silent star ended by sound and von Stroheim a major director reduced to acting. That means the film is documenting what it depicts. When you write about a profession, find people whose actual history is the subject. What they bring is unavailable to research, and readers feel the difference without being able to identify it.

↑ All Entries

6. Chinatown (1974)

► Read the full review of Chinatown (1974)

RLR: 10 / 10

"The most studied screenplay in American cinema, and Polanski changed the ending."

Chinatown is the defining neo-noir and Robert Towne’s screenplay is taught more than any other American script. It uses the California water wars as the engine and buries the actual crime underneath a land fraud. The structure is a detective who’s competent throughout and wrong about everything. Gittes solves the case correctly and his solving it’s what gets Evelyn killed. That inverts the entire private eye tradition this list opens with. Towne wrote an ending where Evelyn survives and Polanski insisted on the one in the film, against the writer’s objection, and was right. Polanski appears himself as the man who slits Gittes’s nose. Robert Towne’s screenplay is taught more than any other American script, and uses the California water wars as the engine while burying the actual crime underneath a land fraud.

Gittes solves the case correctly and his solving it’s what gets Evelyn killed. That inverts the entire private eye tradition the genre was built on.

Towne wrote an ending where Evelyn survives and Polanski insisted on the one in the film against the writer’s objection, and Polanski appears himself as the man who slits Gittes’s nose.

Chinatown ruined the soft ending for me in this genre, and I’m grateful for it. Towne’s version, with Evelyn alive, would have made a good movie. Polanski’s stays with you for days, and whenever a writer softens an ending because a test audience flinched, I think about how close this one came to being gutless.

For WritersA detective who solves the case and makes everything worse is the hardest version of the form. Competence causing catastrophe denies the reader a win. When your protagonist is good at their job, consider letting that be the problem. Readers expect skill to be rewarded, and a book where skill is the mechanism of disaster is one they’ll argue about for years.

↑ All Entries

7. L.A. Confidential (1997)

► Read the full review of L.A. Confidential (1997)

RLR: 10 / 10

"Ellroy adapted by people who understood what to cut."

L.A. Confidential is the best literary adaptation on this list and the achievement is subtraction. Ellroy’s novel is enormous, has four intersecting plots and a timeline spanning years, and Hanson and Helgeland removed most of it without losing the argument.

Three cops with incompatible codes is the structure. Crowe’s Bud White is violence with a moral rule, Pearce’s Exley is ambition wearing ethics, and Spacey’s Vincennes is corruption that’s forgotten it’s corrupt, and the film doesn’t endorse any of them. Crowe and Pearce were both unknown Australians, which Hanson had to fight the studio for, and casting nobodies as the leads while surrounding them with Spacey, DeVito and Cromwell is why the film works.

Ellroy’s novel is enormous, with four intersecting plots and a timeline spanning years, and Hanson and Helgeland removed most of it without losing the argument.

Crowe and Pearce were both unknown Australians, which Hanson had to fight the studio for, and casting nobodies as leads while surrounding them with Spacey, DeVito and Cromwell is why it works.

Three cops with incompatible codes is the structure, and the film doesn’t endorse any of them, including the one who survives.

For WritersAdapting a sprawling novel means identifying the argument and discarding the plot. Four intersecting storylines became three cops with incompatible codes. That’s the book’s point instead of its content. When you condense, find the thesis and keep whatever shows it. Preserving events and losing the argument produces a faithful summary nobody who loved the original recognizes.

↑ All Entries

8. The Big Sleep (1946)

► Read the full review of The Big Sleep (1946)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Nobody involved could work out who killed the chauffeur, including Chandler."

The Big Sleep has a plot that doesn’t resolve and the film is better for not caring. During production the crew wired Chandler to ask who killed the chauffeur and he admitted he didn’t know. What it’s instead is Bogart and Bacall, who had married between films, and a series of scenes in which the plot stops entirely so two people can talk. The bookshop sequence and the horse racing dialogue exist for no narrative reason. Hawks reshot serious portions after the war to add more Bacall. That’s why two versions exist and why the released cut is the less coherent and more enjoyable one. During production the crew wired Chandler to ask who killed the chauffeur and he admitted he didn’t know, and the film proceeds without resolving it.

Hawks reshot considerable portions after the war to add more Bacall. That’s why two versions exist and the released cut is the less coherent and more enjoyable one.

The bookshop sequence and the horse racing dialogue exist for no narrative reason at all. That’s the clearest statement of what the film is for.

For WritersA plot hole nobody can answer doesn’t necessarily matter. The crew wired Chandler to ask who killed the chauffeur and he admitted he didn’t know, and the film proceeds regardless. When your story has a loose end, ask whether anybody is invested in it. Readers forgive gaps in machinery and never forgive gaps in motivation, and writers usually worry about the wrong one.

↑ All Entries

9. The Killers (1946)

► Read the full review of The Killers (1946)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Hemingway’s short story is the first twenty minutes, and the rest is invention."

The Killers adapts a Hemingway story that runs a few pages and ends where the film’s first act does. Two men arrive at a diner to kill a Swede who, told they’re coming, refuses to run and lies in the dark waiting.

Everything after that was invented, structured as an insurance investigator reconstructing the dead man’s life through flashbacks from multiple witnesses. That is Citizen Kane‘s structure applied to a crime picture.

It’s Burt Lancaster’s first film and Ava Gardner’s first significant one, and Siodmak was one of the German emigres who brought the lighting with him.

Hemingway’s story runs a few pages and ends where the film’s first act does, with a man told killers are coming who refuses to run and lies in the dark waiting.

Everything afterward was invented, structured as an insurance investigator reconstructing a life through flashbacks from multiple witnesses. That’s Citizen Kane applied to a crime picture.

It’s Burt Lancaster’s first film and Ava Gardner’s first significant one, and Siodmak was one of the German emigres who brought the lighting with him.

For WritersAdapting a story that ends at your first act break is a gift. Hemingway supplies the situation and the writer supplies the reason. That’s the easier half to invent. When you find a fragment that poses a question, take it. A complete story leaves you nothing to do; a situation with no explanation is an entire book waiting for whoever answers it.

↑ All Entries

10. Out of the Past (1947)

► Read the full review of Out of the Past (1947)

RLR: 9 / 10

"The purest example of the form, and Robert Mitchum never raises his voice."

Out of the Past is the most concentrated dose of noir fatalism on this list. A man running a gas station in a small town is found by his past, goes back, and knows from the first minute that it’ll kill him.

Mitchum’s performance is the model for the genre’s exhausted protagonist. He’s not fighting anything, he’s complying with something he recognizes as inevitable, and the flatness of the delivery is the characterization.

Jane Greer’s Kathie is the most complete femme fatale in the form because she’s not performing. She shoots people, lies continuously, and the film never suggests she’s conflicted about any of it. Mitchum’s flatness is the characterization. He’s not fighting anything, he’s complying with something he recognizes as inevitable, and the delivery never varies.

Jane Greer’s Kathie is the most complete femme fatale in the form because she’s not performing. She shoots people, lies continuously, and the film never suggests she’s conflicted. Tourneur shoots the Mexican sequences in bright sunlight. That was unusual for the form and makes the return to the shadows read as a sentence instead of a style. Out of the Past is the one I’d reach for when I want a film that won’t lie to me about how things go. Mitchum never asks for sympathy and the film never begs for it on his behalf. Greer is so cold she makes every later femme fatale look like she’s auditioning.

For WritersFlatness is a performance choice. Mitchum isn’t fighting anything; he’s complying with something he recognizes as inevitable, and the delivery never varies. When you write somebody resigned, resist giving them struggle. A character who has stopped resisting is more unsettling than one fighting a losing battle, because the reader is still hoping and they are not.

↑ All Entries

11. White Heat (1949)

► Read the full review of White Heat (1949)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Cagney’s last great gangster performance, and the mother fixation is the film."

White Heat is a gangster picture that arrived a decade after the cycle ended and updated it with psychology. Cody Jarrett has crippling headaches, sits in his mother’s lap, and is deranged and not merely ruthless.

The prison mess hall scene, in which he learns of his mother’s death and a dozen men have to physically restrain him, is the best piece of acting Cagney did, and he largely improvised it. The undercover subplot gives the film its real cruelty. The man Jarrett trusts most is a federal agent, and the betrayal hits harder than the violence. Cagney largely improvised the prison mess hall scene, where Cody learns of his mother’s death and a dozen men have to physically restrain him, and it’s the best acting he did. The undercover subplot supplies the real cruelty, since the man Jarrett trusts most is a federal agent and the betrayal hits harder than the violence. Cody has crippling headaches and sits in his mother’s lap, and the film treats the derangement as a medical fact and not as a metaphor.

For WritersA protagonist with a physical condition the reader can see has jeopardy built in. The headaches arrive at the worst moments and need no plotting to justify them. When you need unpredictability, put it in the body instead of the temperament. Readers accept a medical fact without question and can never anticipate its timing, so every tense scene carries an extra variable free.

↑ All Entries

12. Where the Sidewalk Ends (1950)

► Read the full review of Where the Sidewalk Ends (1950)

RLR: 9 / 10

"A cop kills a suspect by accident and investigates his own crime."

Where the Sidewalk Ends has the best premise in classical noir. A violent detective kills a man during questioning, conceals it, and is then assigned to the case, so the investigation and the cover-up are the same activity.

Preminger reunited Dana Andrews and Gene Tierney from Laura and made the considerably harder film. Andrews’s Dixon is a cop who hates criminals because his father was one. That’s a motive the film states once and never repeats.

It’s unusually clear-eyed about police violence for 1950, and the resolution requires the protagonist to confess instead of being caught.

Preminger reunited Dana Andrews and Gene Tierney from Laura and made the considerably harder film, where the detective is the problem instead of the solution. Andrews’s Dixon hates criminals because his father was one. The film states it once and never repeats it.

It’s unusually clear-eyed about police violence for 1950, and the resolution requires the protagonist to confess instead of being caught.

For WritersA protagonist investigating a crime he committed is the cleanest trap available. Every step forward is a step toward his own exposure. When you need pressure without an antagonist, look for a structural bind. A character who can’t decline the assignment without admitting why is more thoroughly caught than one being pursued, and the trap tightens with his own competence.

↑ All Entries

13. The Asphalt Jungle (1950)

► Read the full review of The Asphalt Jungle (1950)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Huston invented the heist film here and every entry in it since owes him the structure."

The Asphalt Jungle established the heist template: assemble the crew, establish the specialisms, execute the plan, and watch it come apart through human failure and not bad luck. What makes it noir instead of a caper is that everybody is tired. Sterling Hayden wants enough money to buy back a horse farm in Kentucky, the planner is fresh out of prison and wants one last job, and none of them are excited about any of it.

Marilyn Monroe appears in an early small role, and the film’s ending, a dying man reaching a field of horses, is the most sentimental thing Huston ever shot and it works. Huston established the heist template here: assemble the crew, establish the specialisms, execute the plan, and watch it come apart through human failure.

Sterling Hayden wants enough money to buy back a horse farm in Kentucky, the planner is fresh out of prison, and none of them are excited about any of it.

Marilyn Monroe appears in an early small role, and the ending, a dying man reaching a field of horses, is the most sentimental thing Huston shot.

For WritersA plan that fails because of people and not because of police is the harder and better version. The scheme here’s sound, so the reader is watching character and not error. When you write an operation, make the plan good. Failures caused by bad planning are frustrating; failures caused by somebody’s weakness are tragedy, and only the second gives you an ending that means anything.

↑ All Entries

14. Rififi (1955)

► Read the full review of Rififi (1955)

RLR: 9 / 10

"A thirty-minute silent robbery, directed by an American who had been blacklisted out of Hollywood."

Rififi is French, and Jules Dassin directed it. He was an American who had made noir in Hollywood until the blacklist made him unemployable and he left for Europe. The heist sequence runs roughly half an hour with no dialogue, no music and no sound beyond the work itself. It was reportedly so procedurally accurate that the film was banned in several countries on the grounds that it functioned as instruction. Dassin also plays the Italian safecracker under a pseudonym because he couldn’t afford the actor he wanted. That’s the sort of thing the blacklist produced.

Jules Dassin had made noir in Hollywood until the blacklist made him unemployable and he left for Europe, and this is what he did with the exile.

The heist runs roughly half an hour with no dialogue, no music and no sound beyond the work, and was reportedly banned in several countries as instruction.

That silent half hour is the best argument I know against the modern habit of scoring every second of tension. Dassin trusts the sound of the work itself to hold you. Most thrillers now would bury the same sequence under a pounding score, and I’d walk out of them remembering nothing.

Dassin also plays the Italian safecracker under a pseudonym because he couldn’t afford the actor he wanted.

For WritersSilence is the most reliable tension device available and the cheapest. Half an hour with no score means every sound the crew makes is a risk the reader is tracking. When you write a sequence requiring quiet, remove your own narration too. A reader told nothing must listen, and the absence of authorial comment is what converts description into suspense.

↑ All Entries

15. Kiss Me Deadly (1955)

► Read the full review of Kiss Me Deadly (1955)

RLR: 9 / 10

"The film where noir collides with the atomic age and both lose."

Kiss Me Deadly takes Mickey Spillane’s Mike Hammer, a brutal and stupid private detective, and uses him as a critique instead of a hero. Aldrich despised the source material and filmed it anyway.

Hammer punches his way through the plot looking for something valuable and the something turns out to be a case containing fissile material. The great whatsit is the first nuclear MacGuffin and the film ends with it opened. It’s the point where classical noir ends. The apocalyptic ending, the contempt for the protagonist and the Cold War anxiety all point forward to a genre that wouldn’t return until the seventies. Aldrich despised Spillane’s Mike Hammer and filmed him anyway, using a brutal and stupid private detective as a critique instead of a hero.

The great whatsit is the first nuclear MacGuffin and the film ends with it opened. That’s the point where classical noir stops. The apocalyptic ending, the contempt for the protagonist and the Cold War anxiety all point forward to a genre that wouldn’t return until the seventies.

For WritersFilming a character you despise is a legitimate strategy if you never soften him. Aldrich uses a brutal and stupid detective as a critique instead of a hero, and the film’s contempt is never stated. When you write somebody you disapprove of, resist editorializing. The events will make your case, and a narrator who signals disapproval has told the reader what to think and removed their discovery.

↑ All Entries

16. The Killing (1956)

► Read the full review of The Killing (1956)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Kubrick’s third film, told out of order, made at twenty-eight."

The Killing is where Kubrick became Kubrick. A racetrack robbery told in fragmented chronology, doubling back to follow each participant through the same afternoon, with a newsreel narrator supplying times. That structure was borrowed from Lionel White’s novel and executed with a precision nobody expected from a twenty-eight-year-old on a small budget. It’s the direct ancestor of Reservoir Dogs, which Tarantino has acknowledged.

Sterling Hayden again, and the ending, in which everything comes apart because of a suitcase latch and a poodle on a runway, is the purest expression of noir’s argument about planning. Kubrick was twenty-eight and the fragmented chronology was borrowed from Lionel White’s novel, with a newsreel narrator supplying times across a single afternoon.

It’s the direct ancestor of Reservoir Dogs, which Tarantino has acknowledged, and Sterling Hayden is again the man with a plan and no luck. The ending, coming apart because of a suitcase latch and a poodle on a runway, is the purest expression of noir’s argument about planning.

For WritersA stated timetable lets you scramble chronology without losing the reader. The narrator supplies clock times, so the viewer can reassemble the afternoon while watching it out of order. When you break sequence, give the reader an anchor. A time, a location or a repeated event lets them hold the shape, and structure without an anchor reads as confusion and not as design.

↑ All Entries

17. Touch of Evil (1958)

► Read the full review of Touch of Evil (1958)

RLR: 9 / 10

"The opening shot is three minutes and twenty seconds, and Welles was fired before the edit."

Touch of Evil is the last film of the classical cycle and Welles got the job by accident when Charlton Heston assumed he was directing and the studio went along with it. The opening crane shot follows a car with a bomb in the boot through a border town for over three minutes in one take, and the studio later laid credits over it. Universal recut the film, Welles wrote a fifty-eight page memo objecting, and a version following his notes was assembled in 1998. Welles plays Quinlan himself, bloated and corrupt and right about the suspect for the wrong reasons, and Marlene Dietrich delivers the epitaph.

Welles got the job by accident when Charlton Heston assumed he was directing and the studio went along with it. Universal recut the film, Welles wrote a fifty-eight page memo objecting, and a version following his notes was assembled in 1998.

The recut makes me angry every time I think about it. Universal had Welles making the last great film of the cycle and treated it like raw footage, and it took forty years and a fifty-eight page memo to get something close to what he meant. I’d send anybody straight to the 1998 version.

Welles plays Quinlan himself, bloated and corrupt and right about the suspect for the wrong reasons, and Marlene Dietrich delivers the epitaph.

For WritersA protagonist who is right for the wrong reasons is the most uncomfortable version available. Quinlan plants evidence and the suspect is guilty. That means the film can’t let anybody be simply correct. When you write institutional wrongdoing, consider making the outcome accurate. Corruption that produces the right answer is far harder for a reader to dismiss than corruption that produces an injustice.

↑ All Entries

18. The Long Goodbye (1973)

► Read the full review of The Long Goodbye (1973)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Altman put Philip Marlowe in 1973 and let him be wrong about everything."

The Long Goodbye is a deliberate act of vandalism against the genre this list is built on. Altman takes Chandler’s Marlowe, a man of 1940s principles, and drops him into a Los Angeles of health food and yoga where nobody wants what he’s selling. Elliott Gould plays him as a mumbling anachronism who spends the film being lied to and agreeing with people. The camera never stops moving and almost never settles. That was a deliberate refusal of noir’s composed frames.

Marlowe does something at the end that Chandler’s Marlowe would never do, and it was so unpopular that the studio pulled and remarketed the film. It’s been reassessed as among the best films of the decade. Altman takes Chandler’s Marlowe, a man of 1940s principles, and drops him into a Los Angeles of health food and yoga where nobody wants what he’s selling. The camera never stops moving and almost never settles. That was a deliberate refusal of noir’s composed frames.

Its ending, in which Marlowe does something Chandler’s Marlowe would never do, was so unpopular the film was pulled and remarketed. I enjoy this one more than I admire it. Gould’s mumbling Marlowe is a sharp joke on the whole tradition, and the ending shocks me. My reservation is the camera. Altman’s endless drift makes a point, and after the first hour the point starts to feel like a habit.

For WritersTransplanting a character into a decade that has no use for them is a complete premise. Marlowe’s code is intact and nobody in 1973 wants it. That generates every scene. When you write somebody out of time, keep them unchanged and change everything around them. The friction comes from the world instead of the character. That means it never has to be explained.

↑ All Entries

19. Body Heat (1981)

► Read the full review of Body Heat (1981)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Double Indemnity remade in Florida heat, and Kathleen Turner’s debut."

Body Heat is Lawrence Kasdan’s directorial debut and an unapologetic reworking of Double Indemnity, transposed to a Florida heatwave where everybody is sweating and nobody has air conditioning.

The heat is the device. It explains the clothing, the irritability and the sense of a place where judgment has gone, and it replaces the Production Code constraints with something the 1981 rating allowed. Kathleen Turner’s Matty is the best femme fatale since Jane Greer and the film’s final reveal is more ruthless than anything in the 1944 original. The heat explains the clothing, the irritability and the sense of a place where judgment has gone, replacing the Production Code constraints the 1944 original worked under.

Kathleen Turner was making her first film and the final reveal is more ruthless than anything in Double Indemnity. Kasdan had written Raiders and Empire and this is his directorial debut, shot during a real Florida heatwave the production used and not fought.

For WritersPhysical discomfort is an economical substitute for a plot device. The heat explains why everybody is irritable and making bad decisions, so the film never argues anybody is out of character. When you need characters to behave badly, give them a condition instead of a motive. Readers accept weather, exhaustion and pain without examining them, where a stated reason invites scrutiny.

↑ All Entries

20. Memento (2000)

► Read the full review of Memento (2000)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Told backwards, because that is what it is like not to know how you got here."

Memento runs its color scenes in reverse order and its black-and-white scenes forward, meeting in the middle. That’s a gimmick only if the subject were anything else.

It’s not a gimmick here because the structure reproduces the condition. The audience arrives in each scene with no memory of what preceded it, exactly as Leonard does, and has to reconstruct from notes and photographs.

Nolan adapted his brother’s short story and made it for around nine million dollars. The final reveal is that the protagonist has been lying to himself deliberately. That recontextualises the entire film and is the last thing the audience learns.

The color scenes run in reverse and the black-and-white scenes run forward, meeting in the middle, and the structure reproduces the condition instead of depicting it. The final reveal is that Leonard has been lying to himself deliberately. That recontextualises the whole film and is the last thing the audience learns. Nolan made it for around nine million from his brother’s short story, and it’s hard to rewatch once solved.

For WritersA structural device earns itself when it reproduces the protagonist’s condition in the reader. Reverse chronology in a book about anything else is a trick; here it’s the only honest way to tell it. When you reach for unusual structure, ask what it does to the person reading. If they experience what the character experiences, keep it; if they admire your ingenuity, cut it.

↑ All Entries

21. Brick (2005)

► Read the full review of Brick (2005)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Hammett dialogue in a Californian high school, played completely straight."

Brick is the most committed genre transplant on this list. A student investigates an ex-girlfriend’s death using the full vocabulary and structure of 1930s hardboiled fiction, and nothing in the film acknowledges that this is unusual. The slang is never explained. Johnson wrote a glossary and refused to include it, so the audience is expected to keep up exactly as a reader of Hammett would be, and the vice-principal acts as the police chief in a meeting over apple juice.

It cost around half a million dollars, was shot in Johnson’s old high school in San Clemente, and launched both him and Joseph Gordon-Levitt. Johnson wrote a glossary of the slang and refused to include it, so the audience is expected to keep up exactly as a reader of Hammett would be.

The vice-principal acts as the police chief in a meeting conducted over apple juice. That’s the clearest statement of how seriously the film takes its own transplant.

It cost around half a million dollars, was shot in Johnson’s old high school in San Clemente, and launched both him and Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

For WritersRefuse the glossary and the reader learns the dialect. Johnson wrote one and declined to include it, so the audience keeps up exactly as a reader of Hammett would. When you build a vocabulary, resist explaining it. Readers acquire language from context faster than writers believe, and every definition you supply tells them the world is a costume instead of a place.

↑ All Entries

22. Sin City (2005)

► Read the full review of Sin City (2005)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Miller’s panels reproduced shot for shot, which is the achievement and the limitation."

Sin City is the most literal comic adaptation ever made. Rodriguez shot it against green screen using Miller’s panels as storyboards, gave Miller a co-directing credit, and resigned from the Directors Guild instead of removing it.

The monochrome with selective color is a real achievement and the film looks like nothing else. It’s also the limitation, because a comic’s compression works on a page and produces narration-heavy sequences on screen. It sits here and not higher because the fidelity is to the artwork and not to the storytelling, and the three interlocking stories don’t accumulate into anything. Rodriguez shot it against green screen using Miller’s panels as storyboards, gave Miller a co-directing credit, and resigned from the Directors Guild instead of removing it.

The monochrome with selective color is a real achievement and the film looks like nothing else. That’s also its limitation. A comic’s compression works on a page and produces narration-heavy sequences on screen, and the three interlocking stories don’t accumulate into anything. I enjoy Sin City for the look and find it unsatisfying. Every frame could hang on a wall. The trouble is that nobody on screen stops narrating long enough to become a person, and three stories that go nowhere together leave me admiring the craft and caring about nobody.

For WritersA comic’s compression works on a page and produces narration-heavy sequences on screen. Three interlocking stories don’t accumulate into anything because the form they came from didn’t need them to. When you adapt across media, check what the original form was doing for free. Panel transitions, page turns and reading pace all do work that prose or film has to supply deliberately.

↑ All Entries

23. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005)

► Read the full review of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Shane Black’s directorial debut, a Christmas noir that narrates itself badly on purpose."

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is a parody of hardboiled narration written by somebody who had clearly read all of it. Downey tells the story badly, forgets things, goes back, apologizes to the audience and admits he’s been withholding.

The plot is a real Chandler-shaped mystery underneath it, with a missing sister, a Hollywood party and a body that shouldn’t be there, and it resolves properly instead of dissolving into the joke. It was Downey’s first lead after his legal difficulties and directly preceded Iron Man. Val Kilmer’s Gay Perry is the best supporting performance in any Shane Black film.

Downey tells the story badly, forgets things, goes back, apologizes to the audience and admits he’s been withholding. That parodies the convention while delivering the information. The plot underneath is a real Chandler-shaped mystery with a missing sister, a Hollywood party and a body that shouldn’t be there, and it resolves properly.

It was Downey’s first lead after his legal difficulties and directly preceded Iron Man, and Val Kilmer’s Gay Perry is the best supporting performance in any Shane Black film.

For WritersAn unreliable narrator is funnier than a clever one. Forgetting, backtracking and apologizing delivers the same information while telling the reader what kind of book they’re in. When you use first person, consider letting them be bad at it. A narrator who admits they’ve been withholding is more engaging than one who conceals competently, and the reader forgives the structure entirely. My piece on point of view in fiction digs into this.

↑ All Entries

24. Blade Runner (1982)

► Read the full review of Blade Runner (1982)

RLR: 7 / 10

"The film that proved noir could be transplanted whole into science fiction."

Blade Runner is noir wearing science fiction and every element transfers directly. A detective pulled out of retirement for one last case, a client who’s lying, a femme fatale, permanent rain, venetian blind shadows and voiceover narration in the original release.

That narration was studio-imposed and Ford has said he delivered it badly on purpose. The existence of seven versions is the defining fact about the film and the Final Cut from 2007 is the one Scott stands behind. It failed commercially against E.T. and its influence on production design has been more total than almost any film of its decade. Every noir element transfers directly: a detective pulled out of retirement, a lying client, a femme fatale, permanent rain and venetian blind shadows. The voiceover was studio-imposed and Ford has said he delivered it badly on purpose, and the existence of seven versions is the defining fact about the film.

It failed commercially against E.T. and its influence on production design has been more total than almost any film of its decade.

I like Blade Runner more as a place than as a story. The city is the star, and I’d happily spend two hours wandering around in it. Deckard’s case is thin, though, and seven versions tell you the people who made it never agreed on what it was about. That’s a lot of patching for a film this admired.

For WritersEvery noir element transfers directly because the form was never about the period. A detective pulled out of retirement, a lying client, permanent rain and venetian blind shadows work identically in 2019. When you relocate a genre, check which conventions are structural and which are decorative. Structural ones travel anywhere, and the failures are always the books that kept the hats.

↑ All Entries

25. Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

► Read the full review of Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

RLR: 5 / 10

"Beautiful, slow, and answering a question the original was careful not to ask."

Blade Runner 2049 is the most beautiful film on this list and the one with the least to say. Deakins finally won an Academy Award for it and the images are extraordinary throughout.

The problem is that it resolves things the original left open. The ambiguity about Deckard was the source of thirty years of argument, and settling it converts a question into a plot point. It runs a hundred and sixty-four minutes, is deliberately slow, and lost a great deal of money. The craft isn’t in dispute; what it’s for is. I’m torn on this one. Deakins earned that Oscar in every shot, and I’d frame half the film. Then it spends nearly three hours answering a question I wanted left alone, and the slowness starts to feel like self-regard. I came away impressed and a little cheated. Deakins finally won an Academy Award for it and the images are extraordinary throughout, especially the Las Vegas sequences in orange particulate.

Settling the question about Deckard converts thirty years of argument into a plot point. That’s a poor exchange.

It runs a hundred and sixty-four minutes, is deliberately slow, and lost a great deal of money, and the craft isn’t in dispute.

I’d take any film on this list over a polished crime picture where the smart guy wins. Noir respects its audience enough to show what happens to people who think they can outplay the system, and the best of these still leave me furious on the protagonist’s behalf. No other American genre makes me feel that as reliably, and I want more films willing to try.

For WritersSettling a question your predecessor left open converts thirty years of argument into a plot point. That’s a poor exchange. When you continue somebody else’s work, identify what was deliberately unresolved and leave it. The ambiguity is the property’s most valuable asset, and answering it’s a one-time payment that ends the conversation permanently.

↑ Back to Navigation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best film noir?
Six films share a 10. The Maltese Falcon is first on the year tiebreak because it established the template, and Huston made it by breaking Hammett’s novel into shots and filming what was there.
Where does the term film noir come from?
French critics in 1946, who had been cut off from American films during the occupation, saw five years of backlog arrive at once and noticed the crime pictures had turned fatalistic. Nobody making them used the term.
What makes a film noir instead of a crime film?
The protagonist is competent and it doesn’t matter. The system defeats him instead of a person. That’s why Chinatown, where the detective solves the case and that’s what gets everybody killed, is the genre’s logical endpoint.
Is Blade Runner a noir?
Structurally, completely. A detective pulled out of retirement, a lying client, a femme fatale, permanent rain and voiceover narration. Dark City does the same thing a year before The Matrix and carries the highest rating here.
Which noir has the best screenplay?
Double Indemnity or Chinatown. Wilder co-wrote the first with Raymond Chandler, who loathed him, and Robert Towne’s Chinatown script is the most studied in American cinema.
Why does The Big Sleep not make sense?
Because nobody involved knew who killed the chauffeur. The crew wired Chandler during production to ask and he admitted he didn’t know either, and the film proceeds without resolving it.
Is Rififi worth watching?
Yes, for a thirty-minute robbery with no dialogue, no music and no sound beyond the work. Jules Dassin made it in France after the blacklist made him unemployable in Hollywood.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment