Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionBeneath a Scarlet SkyLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeStranger in a Strange LandThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleySailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldPodkayne of MarsOpen: An AutobiographyDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillLifeI, RobotA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralProfiles in CourageThe MAGA DoctrineRight Wing RevolutionNetworking Your Way to SuccessThe Sage of SagittariusRadioThe College ScamThe Bell JarThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyMasters of NetworkingStop, in the Name of GodPa’anTime for a Turning PointCampus Battlefield21 Days to Success with LinkedIn: Business Social Networking the Gnik Rowten WayThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery TimesLife of Pi50 Years of Duty: One Police Officer’s Compelling Journey from State Trooper to County SheriffBreaking Rank: A Top Cop’s Exposé of the Dark Side of American Policing

Star Wars: A New Hope (1977) Review

TL;DR: Star Wars: A New Hope (1977) rates 8.5 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. A New Hope is the film that created modern blockbuster cinema, and it did so by being something very specific: a myth engine. Lucas wasn’t writing character studies.
A New Hope (1977)8.5 / 10

Official trailer

The Force Awakens (2015)1 / 10

A New Hope is the film that created modern blockbuster cinema, and it did so by being something very specific: a myth engine.

Lucas wasn’t writing characters in the conventional sense. He was populating archetypes, the farm boy, the wizard, the rogue, the princess, and placing them in a universe with such complete visual and sonic identity that the archetypes felt fresh instead of familiar. The Death Star trench run is thirty minutes of pure mythological storytelling, and it works because Lucas built the mythology carefully enough that the audience believed in the stakes.

My rating: 8.5. This rating is for A New Hope alone, evaluated as the film it is. The Force Awakens is discussed separately because comparing them is instructive about what distinguishes a real character arc from its hollow imitation.

Few films make me as happy as this one, and the half point I hold back is for the dialogue, which clanks whenever the archetypes have to talk like people. Everything else sells me: the look of the universe, the sound of it, and the way Lucas makes a farm boy’s longing feel like the most important thing in the galaxy.

The Myth Engine

Joseph Campbell’s hero cycle is the underlying structure of myth, and Lucas absorbed it more than he applied it.

The ordinary world, the call to adventure, the refusal, the mentor, the threshold, the ordeal and the return are all here because that’s how stories about transformation have always worked when they work. I think that’s why the film still feels fresh. Lucas trusted a very old shape and filled it with things nobody had seen.

Luke Skywalker works as a protagonist because he starts incompetent and arrives at his capability through loss and learning instead of through the discovery of pre-existing ability. He can’t shoot straight. He doesn’t know how to use the Force. He gets in the way, and the people around him are better at almost everything. His growth is real because Lucas, unlike the makers of The Force Awakens, understood that a hero has to work for his moment. I like that the film lets Luke be a bit of a whiner at the start.

The binary sunset scene is the film’s emotional center and one of cinema’s most efficient pieces of character establishment. Luke watching the twin suns set, longing for something he can’t name yet, that image tells you everything about who he is and what he wants without a word of exposition. Lucas trusted the image. It paid off completely.

For Writers Luke’s arc works because he’s bad at being a hero for most of A New Hope. He misses shots, needs rescuing, relies on others constantly, and succeeds in the trench run by abandoning his targeting computer and trusting something he barely understands. That incompetence is the story. Without it there’s no arc, no growth, no earned moment. Before you write your protagonist’s first impressive feat, establish what they’re bad at first. The failure creates the space the success needs to mean something.

John Williams

Williams’ score is the film’s emotional architecture. The Force theme, the binary sunset melody, the Rebel fanfare, the Imperial march, these are the story, operating in a different tone at the same time. Remove the score and A New Hope loses a third of its power. The music is doing character work, world-building work, and emotional work that the visuals and dialogue don’t carry alone.

This is the highest function a film score can serve.

The music carries emotional information that the images generate and can’t fully deliver alone. Williams understood this intuitively and has shown it across a career that’s the most significant in the history of film scoring, and A New Hope is where he first did it at full scale. I’d rank this score above the film itself, and if I had to give up one of the two, I’d keep the music.

The Force Awakens as Contrast

The Force Awakens gets its 1 through a failure that the contrast with A New Hope makes visible: Rey is a protagonist who never fails. She flies a ship she’s never flown without difficulty. She beats trained fighters without training. She accesses Force powers without development. She’s never threatened, never outmatched, never required to grow because she arrives already capable of everything the story needs her to do.

This is the Mary Sue problem in its purest form, not a female protagonist, not a powerful protagonist, but a protagonist who has been protected from narrative consequence by writers who confused capability with character. A character who can do everything has nothing to earn and therefore nothing to prove and therefore no story.

The Force Awakens is also a structural copy of A New Hope: same beats, same plot mechanics, different costume.

The decision to remake instead of continue was the first evidence that the franchise’s new ownership didn’t understand why the original worked. You can’t honor a myth by repeating it, and watching the new ownership try irritates the hell out of me. It’s a very expensive photocopy of a film I care about.

Luke vs. Rey Luke starts the film wanting to leave Tatooine but afraid to. He ends it trusting something he doesn’t understand to make a shot that saves the galaxy. That arc exists because Lucas gave him room to fail first. Rey starts the film already capable of almost everything and ends it still capable of almost everything. The gap between those two character designs is the entire difference between storytelling and wish fulfillment.
For Writers The Force Awakens shows what happens when you protect your protagonist from failure. Rey’s capability is never in doubt. That means the audience’s investment in her success is never fully engaged. Threat requires credible failure. Without credible failure there’s no tension. Without tension there’s no story. Before you write your protagonist through a challenge, ask whether they could fail. If the answer is no, the challenge isn’t one. Put them somewhere they might lose.

Is Star Wars: A New Hope worth watching?

A New Hope gets its 8.5 as the film that invented modern science fiction cinema and did it with enough structural integrity and human truth that the invention held.

The worldbuilding is original and Lucas deploys the myth structure correctly. I think the dialogue is the only thing that keeps it from a 9 or better. The Force Awakens gets its 1 because it copied the shape and missed everything that made the shape matter, the personal stakes and the transformation, and I have no patience left for it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is George Lucas a good director?
Good at certain things and limited in others. His visual sense is real and original. His sense of myth structure is sound. His direction of actors and his dialogue are weak, the performances in the prequel trilogy show what happens when actors are given Lucas’s direction without editors who can fix the results. A New Hope’s performances are good largely because the casting was right and the editors (including Marcia Lucas) shaped the film into what it needed to be. Lucas’s contribution is real. It’s not the contribution of a complete filmmaker.
Which version of A New Hope should be watched?
The 1977 original theatrical cut, if accessible. The Special Edition changes are largely additions that clutter instead of improve, the Greedo shoots first change is the most discussed because it alters Han’s character, but the added Mos Eisley sequences and Jabba scenes are also problematic for different reasons. The original cut communicates the film Lucas and his collaborators made. The Special Editions communicate what Lucas wished he’d been able to make in 1977, a different and lesser thing.
Why does Han’s return matter so much?
Because Ford spent the entire film establishing Han’s cynicism as authentic instead of as performance. He walks away. He means it when he walks away. The stated self-interest is believable. That means when it fails, when he comes back because he can’t be that person, the failure is meaningful. If the cynicism had been clearly fake from the beginning, the return would be expected. Because Ford made it real, the return is the film’s emotional climax even though the explosion is the visual one.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.