The Fly (1986)

Official trailer

Jeff Goldblum plays Seth Brundle opposite Geena Davis as Veronica Quaife, with John Getz as Stathis Borans.

Charles Edward Pogue and David Cronenberg wrote the screenplay from the original 1957 George Langelaan short story and the 1958 film screenplay. 20th Century Fox produced and released the film in August 1986 to major commercial and critical success. The Fly was Cronenberg’s first major mainstream commercial production after his earlier independent body-horror films including Videodrome and Scanners.

Nothing in eighties horror breaks my heart like this film. It’s a creature feature built on a love story, and I think Goldblum and Davis make Seth and Veronica so warm together that every new stage of his decay lands as grief.

The Fly is a landmark body-horror film and among David Cronenberg’s strongest productions. The film works at once as horror, as scientific tragedy, as relationship drama, and as AIDS-era metaphor about progressive bodily disintegration. Jeff Goldblum’s lead performance, the practical-effects work led by Chris Walas, and Cronenberg’s specific commitment to treating the body-horror material as real tragedy instead of as shock-spectacle, combine to produce a horror film with serious dramatic weight that the genre rarely achieves.

The film won the Academy Award for Best Makeup, confirming the critical and industry recognition for the practical-effects achievement.

Jeff Goldblum’s Performance

Jeff Goldblum plays Seth Brundle as a brilliant, eccentric scientist whose gradual physical and psychological transformation across the running time is a fiercely committed lead performance in body-horror cinema. The character must work at full intellectual capacity in the early scenes, with the post-teleportation transformations producing both physical changes and progressive psychological disintegration that Goldblum tracks across the full running time.

Goldblum’s verbal cadence, the rapid speech interrupted by careful pauses, gives Seth Brundle a particular cognitive tone that the transformation sequences progressively undermine. I find his late attempts to keep analyzing his own deterioration, while his body can no longer support the thinking, harder to watch than any of the gore. That’s the performance I’d rank above everything else in the film, and it’s the one that launched Goldblum’s later commercial profile.

The Practical-Effects Achievement

Chris Walas’s makeup effects work for The Fly is a major practical-effects achievement in modern horror cinema. The progressive Brundlefly transformation across the running time required sustained practical-effects density that the production team delivered with real craftsmanship. The film won the 1987 Academy Award for Best Makeup, confirming the critical and industry recognition.

The transformation stages were designed to track distinct phases of Seth Brundle’s bodily disintegration: the initial subtle changes, the dental-pulling sequence, the progressive deformation of facial features, the eventual full Brundlefly emergence in the closing reel. Each stage required separate prosthetic and makeup work that the cumulative effects density made possible. The practical approach gives the film its particular lasting visual tone that later CGI body-horror productions haven’t replicated.

The tooth-pulling sequence is the one that makes me squirm most, and I think it’s scarier than the full Brundlefly at the end because it’s so small and so human. Walas’s work there sells the horror before the film ever asks me to believe in a monster.

The AIDS-Era Reading

In 1986, at the height of AIDS-related cultural anxiety, The Fly arrived, and later critical writing has considerably developed the film’s reading as AIDS metaphor. The progressive bodily disintegration of a sexually active young man, the partner’s helpless witnessing of the disintegration, the medical inability to reverse the process, the eventual death request to the surviving partner, all are parallel structure to AIDS narratives that 1986 audiences experienced.

Cronenberg has later said the AIDS reading wasn’t his conscious intention during production but acknowledged the parallel structure works throughout the film regardless of authorial intent. The reading doesn’t require Cronenberg’s endorsement to function: the film’s structural commitment to bodily disintegration as inexorable tragedy is cultural document of 1986 AIDS-era anxiety whether the production team intended that reading or not.

I think the film is sadder for not being a deliberate allegory. Veronica watching the man she loves come apart, unable to help him, is what stays with me after the effects fade, and it’s why this sits so much higher for me than most body horror.

Is The Fly as good as people say?

Cronenberg is at his strongest in The Fly, and it’s a body-horror film with real dramatic weight.

Goldblum’s performance, Chris Walas’s Academy Award-winning makeup, and Cronenberg’s refusal to play the material as shock spectacle all work, and the ending, with Brundle asking Veronica to finish it, wrecks me. It deserves the 9 because it made me care this much about a man turning into a fly. Strongly recommended.

Frequently Asked Questions