The rules we learned in 2016, and the ones we learned in 2020, are evolving faster than the platforms we use to discuss them.
The core of it has not moved. Honesty is still honesty whether you are telling the truth to somebody’s face or through a cartoon avatar in a video call. Respect is still respect regardless of the medium carrying it.
What changed is the terrain. Some of the old landmarks are still standing, treat people decently, be honest, do good work, and the ground around them looks nothing like it did.
We are all improvising, in roughly the position of early internet users working out email etiquette. People used to write in capitals because nobody had told them it read as shouting. That is the phase we are in with a great deal of modern professional conduct.
This book will not hand anybody a perfect blueprint, because nobody has one.
Why does distance make ethics matter more?
Because when nobody can see you, the only thing holding the arrangement together is trust.
Technology made work more complicated and at the same time made conduct more load-bearing. You can now work from anywhere, at any hour, with anyone on the planet, and every part of that depends on people doing what they said they would when nobody is checking.
When a manager cannot physically observe what you are doing, integrity stops being a virtue and becomes a currency. It is the thing being traded on, whether or not anybody names it.
That is the argument for the book existing now, not a decade ago. The same principles carry considerably more weight in a distributed workplace than they did in a building.
The book on this: The Ethical Workplace covers professional conduct when the office is distributed, including what to do when the boss or the company is the problem, with five case studies of organizations that got it wrong and one that got it right.
What is the book’s definition of ethics?
Making good choices when nobody is forcing you to.
It is the voice that says perhaps I should not take credit for this idea, or perhaps I should mention that the client said no before I talked them into yes. It does not always point at the easiest route and it usually keeps you from driving off a cliff.
And when you ignore it, it keeps nagging until you correct course, which is the practical reason to listen to it early instead of late.
The everyday version of the same idea is simpler. Ethics is the difference between being the person everybody wants to work with and the person everybody avoids in the break room.
Why is there a chapter on when DEI becomes unethical?
Because a book on workplace ethics that only examines one direction is not examining anything.
There is a chapter on diversity, equity and inclusion and a separate one on where those initiatives go wrong. The second is explicitly not an argument against the principles, which the book treats as sound. It is an argument that good intentions produce bad outcomes when implementation fails or when the pursuit of one kind of fairness creates another kind of unfairness.
Overcorrection is the failure mode it describes. An organisation swinging so far toward inclusion that it produces new exclusion.
Handling both halves is the only defensible way to write that material. A book that praised the principles and never examined the practice would be advocacy, and one that attacked the practice while ignoring the principles would be something else.
What do you do about an unethical boss?
Something other than what HR will tell you.
The problem is the power imbalance. A difficult colleague can be avoided or worked around. A boss controls your assignments, your evaluations, your advancement and possibly your employment, and that changes what is available to you.
Which is why the standard advice about having a conversation is close to useless in this situation. It assumes two parties who can both walk away from the exchange, and only one of them can.
The book’s reassurance is worth having. You are not imagining it. The disorientation of working for somebody whose conduct does not make sense is a normal response to an abnormal situation, and there is a separate chapter for when the problem is not the boss but the company.
What happens when the company itself is the problem?
That is a different situation from a bad boss and it gets its own chapter.
The book’s image for it is being a passenger on the Titanic after you have spotted the iceberg and before anybody else believes you. You can see the problem clearly, you know where it is heading, and you are on a ship committed to its course.
Systemic corruption runs deeper than individual bad actors or isolated incidents. When the behaviour is built into the culture, the business model, or standard operating procedure, you are not dealing with people who made poor choices. You are dealing with an institution operating as designed.
So the question narrows to three. Whether you try to save the ship, save yourself, or warn others before impact. Those are three different decisions with different costs and the chapter treats them that way instead of recommending one.
How do you handle a difficult colleague?
By first working out whether the behaviour crosses a line.
Every workplace has one. The colleague who takes credit for other people’s ideas, the manager who has a tantrum when something does not go their way, the person who produces drama wherever they are standing.
The chapter is careful to separate that from ordinary friction. It is not about somebody who chews loudly or schedules too many meetings. It is about conduct that undermines people or produces a toxic environment, and confusing the two categories is how a reasonable person acquires a reputation for being difficult themselves.
The question was never whether you will encounter it. You will. The question is what you do with it when it arrives.
What has happened to work-life balance?
It stopped being balance, and the replacement word is doing some work it did not earn.
Balance once meant leaving at five and not thinking about work until nine the following morning. It now means holding on to some version of a personal identity while the kitchen table is a conference room and the bedroom wall is a video background.
The phrase has become quaint when the boundaries were removed by technology instead of negotiated away. What replaced it is integration, which sounds better and mostly means work has spread into every corner of the available space and most of the available hours.
Naming that accurately is the chapter’s contribution. A person struggling with integration is not failing at balance. They are managing a different problem that has been given a friendlier name.
What does the book say about your digital footprint?
That it used to be a celebrity problem and is now everybody’s.
What you post, like, share and comment on follows you across a career, and deleting something does not remove it once screenshots exist. The line between personal and professional has blurred past the point where most people are tracking it.
The platforms were built for personal sharing instead of professional life and became career infrastructure anyway. Even the one that is supposed to be the professional venue has turned into a hybrid of resume, broadcast and performance that nobody quite designed.
There is also a chapter on what is arriving next. Gig arrangements that do not fit traditional employment categories, contractors working full time for a single client, and freelancers whose income depends on a platform algorithm. Those relationships carry ethical questions that did not exist when the frameworks were written.
Which case studies does the book use?
Four failures and one success, and the success is the unusual choice.
Enron for executive-driven corruption. Theranos for deception by a charismatic leader. Cambridge Analytica for data ethics.
Then Wells Fargo, which is the most instructive because it worked in the other direction. Not corruption from the top but impossible sales targets that made ethical behaviour incompatible with keeping a job. Ordinary employees became participants in systematic fraud because the alternative was not surviving the quarter.
And Microsoft, for getting it right. A company with a reputation for aggressive practice and internal competition, running a performance system that set employees against each other, which rebuilt its culture without sacrificing performance.
Most books in this category only run disasters. Including one recovery makes the argument that a different outcome is available instead of merely desirable.
What does the book ask of the reader?
Less than you might expect, and it says so in the last chapter.
After twenty chapters analysing what everybody else is doing wrong comes the uncomfortable part, which is what you are supposed to do about any of it. Not in a theoretical world where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour punished, but in the actual one, where you have bills and a career.
The first thing it establishes is that you are not responsible for fixing every ethical problem you encounter. You are not Batman and your workplace is not Gotham City. Attempting to single-handedly reform a toxic culture or bring down a corrupt executive is a specific kind of mistake with a predictable outcome.
The goal is not becoming an ethical superhero who never puts a foot wrong. It is being thoughtful about your choices, honest about the difficulties, and decent to the people you work with, whether they are next to you or on the other side of the planet.
The Guides That Get Your Book Written, Published, and Sold
Four short, practical guides on writing, publishing, and selling your book, plus the occasional note when there's something worth your time. No fluff, no daily inbox clutter. Drop your email and they're yours.
We use MailerLite to manage our list and send these emails. Your address is used only to send you what you signed up for. We will not sell it, share it, or use it for anything else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.