Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Krakatoa Is Erupting Again: What 1883 Did and What Anak Krakatau Is Doing Now

TL;DR: Krakatoa is erupting again. On 4 September 2026 the cone that grew inside the 1883 caldera threw ash to fifteen kilometers, closed Jakarta’s main airport, and grounded about 2,300 flights. The volcano that did this is a 157 meter stub, not the mountain that killed 36,417 people in 1883. This is what happened the first time, what’s happening now, what the monitoring data says, and why the question everybody asks about a second tsunami has a better answer than the headlines suggest.

At 4:11 in the morning on 4 September 2026, a seismograph on the Sunda Strait recorded a fourteen second event with a maximum amplitude of 33 millimeters. Small.

The kind of reading that goes into a log and stays there. Three more followed before six that morning, each one longer and stronger than the last, and then the volcano went quiet for most of the day.

It started again at 10:03 that night and didn’t stop.

By half past midnight the ash column had reached fifteen kilometers, roughly fifty thousand feet. That’s above the cruising altitude of every airliner in the region. The Darwin Volcanic Ash Advisory Center tracked the cloud moving west at about 74 kilometers an hour with a second layer at five and a half kilometers spreading south.

Soekarno-Hatta International, the second busiest airport in Southeast Asia, shut down. So did Halim, and Lampung, and eventually operations at Bali and Medan. The closures hit about 2,300 flights and 268,539 passengers across the four airports InJourney runs. Jakarta moved every level of school to remote learning. Fishing stopped.

The volcano doing this is called Anak Krakatau, child of Krakatoa, and it’s 157 meters tall. That’s shorter than the Washington Monument. It’s a stub of rock sitting in the flooded hole where a mountain used to be, and understanding why a stub can close an airport requires going back to what happened to the mountain.

That comparison stops me every time I read it. The mountain that made the loudest sound in recorded history left behind a stub of rock that tourists used to climb on day trips, and that stub just grounded more than a quarter of a million travelers. I’ve loved geology for most of my life because of moments like this one, when something small turns out to be tied to something enormous by a line you can trace.

What happened at Krakatoa in 1883?

The island of Krakatoa sat in the Sunda Strait, the channel between Java and Sumatra where the Indian-Australian plate grinds under the Eurasian one. Three cones had grown together to make one island: Rakata, Danan, and Perbuwatan. The whole structure stood on the rim of a much older caldera, formed when a previous volcano collapsed there, possibly in the sixth century.

Activity began on 20 May 1883. A German warship passing through reported a cloud of ash and dust seven miles high. For the next three months, ships and villagers on Java and Sumatra watched explosions that were loud but not alarming. In June a black cloud sat over the islands for five days. Pumice began turning up in the water. Local people treated the eruptions as a spectacle.

On the afternoon of 26 August the northern portion of the island destroyed itself. Four more explosions beginning at 5:30 the next morning finished the job. The largest, around ten in the morning on 27 August, is the loudest sound in recorded history. It was heard 3,000 miles away in Perth and near Rodrigues Island in the Indian Ocean. The pressure wave circled the planet seven times and was still detectable on barographs days later.

Somewhere between 18 and 25 cubic kilometers of rock went into the air, ash reached fifty miles up, and two thirds of the island collapsed into the emptied magma chamber. The official death toll is 36,417. Most of those people didn’t die from the explosion or the ash. They drowned.

The collapse pushed a wall of water up to 37 meters high across the strait, and it erased 165 coastal villages. The water carried a steamship called the Berouw nearly a mile inland on Sumatra and left it there with its entire crew dead. Pyroclastic surges crossed forty kilometers of open water and came ashore on Sumatra still hot enough to kill.

The Berouw is the detail that haunts me. A ship belongs on the water, and the sea picked this one up and set it down a mile inland on Sumatra with its entire crew dead. When I try to picture 1883, that’s the image my mind goes to first, long before any of the numbers.

How does an eruption on one island cool the whole planet?

The number people quote is the rock volume, but the rock isn’t what changed the climate. Sulfur is.

An eruption that reaches the stratosphere injects sulfur dioxide above the weather. Below that altitude, rain scrubs the atmosphere clean in a week or two. Above it there’s no rain, so the sulfur dioxide reacts with water vapor to form a haze of sulfuric acid droplets that spreads around the planet and stays for years. Those droplets are small, bright, and very good at reflecting sunlight back to space before it reaches the ground.

Krakatoa put roughly twenty million tons of sulfur up there.

Global average temperature dropped by something in the range of half a degree Celsius, with estimates running higher, and stayed down for around five years. Northern hemisphere summers cooled measurably. Sea levels fell, because the ocean contracted as it cooled. The same aerosol layer scattered light at sunset into reds and oranges so intense that fire brigades in New York were called out to nonexistent fires, and painters across Europe spent the next two years recording skies nobody had seen before.

The mechanism makes volcanoes a climate story as well as a geology story. It’s the same process that runs through the far larger event I wrote about in the Toba supereruption, where the sulfur load was large enough to put the entire species under pressure. Krakatoa is that mechanism at a scale small enough to have been documented by telegraph and newspaper instead of reconstructed from ice cores.

How do we know so much about an eruption from 1883?

Because a Dutch geologist named Rogier Verbeek was living in Java when it happened and went to work immediately.

Verbeek had already surveyed the region’s geology. After the eruption he traveled the affected coasts, collected eyewitness accounts, measured deposits, and observed the destruction himself. His report ran to 550 pages, and the government of the Dutch East Indies published it in 1885. It’s the reason the timeline is as precise as it is, and it’s one of the founding documents of modern volcanology.

The 1883 event also happened to be the first global disaster of the telegraph age. Barometers in Europe recorded the pressure wave.

Tide gauges as far away as the English Channel picked up the water disturbance. Ships’ logs across half the world recorded ashfall, floating pumice, and the sunsets. The eruption produced a dataset by accident, and it’s a decent lesson in why contemporary observation beats reconstruction. Somebody wrote it down while it was happening.

I spent five decades on an amateur passion for geology before I ever wrote a book that needed it, and the thing that keeps pulling me back is exactly this.

The rock record is a set of inferences. The 1883 record is a set of observations. When you can put the two against each other, you find out how good the inferences are.

What is Anak Krakatau and where did it come from?

The 1883 collapse left a caldera about 250 meters deep, with only a remnant of Rakata standing above water. Danan and Perbuwatan were gone.

The vent didn’t close. In 1927 a new cone broke the surface inside the caldera and the sea promptly destroyed it. It came back. It kept coming back, and by the 2010s Anak Krakatau stood 338 meters above the water and was growing at a rate people could measure year to year. It became a tourist destination. Boats ran day trips from the Java coast so visitors could climb a live volcano.

It’s a basaltic-andesitic cone. That matters. The 1883 magma was silica-rich and viscous, the kind that traps gas until the whole system fails at once. Anak Krakatau erupts a gassier, runnier magma in near-continuous Strombolian bursts, throwing incandescent rock in fountains instead of accumulating pressure for years. That’s a real difference in behavior, and it’s no reassurance. A cone that erupts constantly also builds fast, and a cone that builds fast on the unstable rim of a submarine caldera builds something that can fall over.

What happened in December 2018?

On the evening of 22 December 2018, at about 20:55 local time, the southwestern flank of Anak Krakatau slid into the sea.

The landslide was small by geological standards, under 0.2 cubic kilometers, roughly 150 to 180 million cubic meters of rock. It removed about two thirds of the island’s above-water volume and cut the cone from 338 meters to about 110. The material dropped into the deep caldera floor southwest of the volcano and displaced an enormous quantity of water in a few seconds.

Waves reached 85 meters close in and 13 meters on the coasts of Java and Sumatra. At least 437 people died, more than 14,000 were injured, and around 33,000 were displaced. It was the deadliest volcanic tsunami since 1883.

The part that should stay with anybody thinking about warning systems is this. Indonesia has a tsunami warning network. It’s built to detect earthquakes. A landslide doesn’t produce the sharp, short-period seismic waves that trigger it, so the network stayed silent.

Later analysis showed the collapse was detectable in long-period seismic data within about eight minutes, which is enough time to be useful, but nobody was reading for it. The wave arrived on a Saturday night at a coast full of holiday visitors, with no siren and no phone alert.

Researchers had modeled a flank collapse at Anak Krakatau and published the tsunami scenario years earlier. The hazard was known. It wasn’t systematically monitored.

That one is a scandal. I spent 33 years in enterprise IT, and the failure every operations person dreads is the alarm that was never wired to the thing that broke. In 2018 the signal sat in the long-period seismic data eight minutes before the water came ashore, and nobody’s job was to read it. Four hundred and thirty seven people paid for that gap with their lives, on a coast where the danger had already been published.

What is happening at Anak Krakatau right now?

The current sequence didn’t start in September. Indonesia’s Geological Agency raised the alert from Level II to Level III, the second highest on a four level scale, on 2 July 2026, after sulfur dioxide emissions and satellite thermal anomalies appeared through June and crater hotspots showed up on the tenth. A three kilometer exclusion zone went in around the crater and has stayed there.

Activity built through August. In the monitoring period from 22 to 31 August the agency recorded eruption columns of 50 to 400 meters above the crater, sulfur dioxide output between 715 and 2,922 tonnes a day, 174 eruption earthquakes and 714 emission events. The evaluation described shallow magma dynamics as very high.

Then came 4 September. Continuous eruption, described by the Geological Agency as resembling a lava fountain capable of producing lava flows, with the plume glowing bright red and rumbling audible at the Pasauran observation post across the water. People reported booming and vibration across West Java, Banten, and Lampung. Satellite instruments measured about 0.2 teragrams of sulfur dioxide injected into the upper troposphere within a day.

The nearest settlement is more than sixteen kilometers away, so nobody lives in the danger zone. The damage is being done by ash at distance: aviation, respiratory health, schools, and fishing. Indonesia’s disaster agency has gone as far as planning cloud seeding to bring rain down and wash ash out of the air.

Will Anak Krakatau cause another tsunami?

This is the question everybody asks, and the answer has three parts.

First, what the authorities are saying. The Geological Agency states that the volcano’s growth since the 2018 collapse remains limited and there’s currently no potential for a collapse large enough to trigger a tsunami. That’s a statement about the present shape of the cone. It lost two thirds of its volume seven years ago and hasn’t rebuilt the mass that fell over.

Second, what they’re careful not to say. Lana Saria, who heads the agency, put it plainly in a briefing: the repeated eruptions indicate a continued supply of magma and gas beneath the volcano, and officials can’t predict whether a larger eruption will occur. She also noted they evaluate the volcano on all monitoring data, not on the number of eruptions or the height of the ash column. That’s a scientist declining to be cornered into a forecast, and it’s the correct answer.

I respect that answer a great deal. Handing the public a comforting forecast would have been the easy move, and the pressure to do it in the middle of a crisis like this must be enormous. She described the limits of what her instruments can see and stopped there, and I’d trust a scientist like that long before I’d trust one who promised me certainty.

Third, the thing 2018 taught. The collapse that killed 437 people came from a landslide of less than a fifth of a cubic kilometer.

That’s small. Small enough that a cone which has been rebuilding for seven years could produce something comparable without first becoming the mountain it was in 2018. The 2018 study that modeled it concluded that these lateral collapses can happen without precursory signals and are an efficient and unpredictable tsunami source.

So: no immediate threat on current data, a monitored volcano, a documented mechanism, and a coastline with more than twenty million people living within a hundred kilometers. All four of those are true at once, and any account that gives you one of them is selling something.

What Krakatoa teaches about writing disaster

I’ve written about disaster from inside it. When Hurricane Irma came through, and again for Milton, the thing I kept noticing was the gap between the forecast and the experience. The forecast says a Category 5 with a certain wind field. The experience is a specific noise at three in the morning and a decision about whether the bathroom is better than the hallway.

Krakatoa has the same gap and it’s wider, because the numbers are so large that they stop meaning anything. Thirty six thousand people isn’t a quantity a reader can feel. One steamship a mile inland with its crew still aboard is.

The craft lesson reaches well past volcanoes, and I think it’s the most important thing a writer of disaster can learn.

When you write catastrophe, the scale figures are the setup and the single observed detail is the payoff. Verbeek understood this in 1885 without anybody explaining it to him. His report is full of measurements, and the reason people still read it is the eyewitness accounts he collected: what the sky looked like, what the sound did to people, the man who watched the water leave the harbor before it came back.

That’s also why Family on Ice follows one family through a volcanic winter instead of narrating a species-level catastrophe. A reader can hold a family. Nobody can hold a population estimate.

What this should mean to anyone reading it now

Anak Krakatau isn’t going to do what its parent did. The magma is different, the edifice is a fraction of the size, and 1883 was the failure of a system that had been loading for two centuries. What Anak Krakatau can do is close airports, put ash in the lungs of a city of ten million, and drop a piece of itself into the water without warning.

None of that is a reason for panic and all of it is a reason for the unglamorous work. Indonesia’s warning network couldn’t see the 2018 landslide because it was designed for a different kind of event. That’s the most transferable lesson here and it’s nothing to do with volcanoes. The failure mode is almost always the thing next to what you prepared for, arriving through a channel your instruments don’t watch.

I wrote a whole book on that idea. That is Real World Survival, and the argument is the same at every scale: prepare for the shape of trouble instead of the specific trouble, because the specific one will surprise you. If you want the wider collection, the Prepared, Not Paranoid hub gathers it, and the Disaster Recovery Hub covers the same reasoning applied to systems instead of households.

The volcano is still going as I write this. The seismographs are still recording. Somebody at the Pasauran post is listening to a mountain across the water, the way Verbeek’s eyewitnesses did, and writing down what they hear.

I hope whoever sits at that post has the instruments, the funding and the attention the job deserves.

Indonesia already learned in 2018 what it costs to watch for the wrong kind of trouble, and the families of 437 people learned it harder than anyone. I don’t ever want to write about Anak Krakatau because a piece of it slid into the strait on a holiday weekend while every alarm on the coast stayed quiet. Nobody can stop this volcano, but somebody can damn well be reading the data when it moves.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Krakatoa erupting right now in 2026?
Yes, though the volcano erupting is Anak Krakatau, the cone that grew inside the caldera left by the 1883 eruption. Indonesia’s Geological Agency raised it to Alert Level III on 2 July 2026, and a major eruption beginning late on 4 September sent ash to about fifteen kilometers, closing Jakarta’s Soekarno-Hatta International Airport and disrupting around 2,300 flights.
How many people died in the 1883 Krakatoa eruption?
The official figure is 36,417. Most died in the tsunamis that followed the island’s collapse, not in the explosions themselves. Waves reaching 37 meters destroyed 165 coastal villages on Java and Sumatra.
Could Anak Krakatau cause another tsunami like 2018?
Indonesian authorities say the cone’s growth since the December 2018 collapse remains limited and there’s no current potential for a collapse large enough to trigger a tsunami. The caution is that the 2018 landslide was under 0.2 cubic kilometers, which is small, and research afterward found that lateral collapses of that kind can occur without warning signals. No immediate threat on present data isn’t the same as no mechanism.
Why did the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami give no warning?
Indonesia’s tsunami network is built to detect earthquakes, and a landslide doesn’t produce the short-period seismic waves it looks for. Later analysis showed the collapse was identifiable in long-period seismic data within about eight minutes, but nobody was monitoring for that signal. At least 437 people died.
How did the 1883 Krakatoa eruption change the global climate?
It put roughly twenty million tons of sulfur into the stratosphere, where it formed a haze of sulfuric acid droplets that reflected sunlight for about five years. Global temperatures fell by around half a degree Celsius, sea levels dropped as the ocean cooled, and the same aerosol layer produced vivid red sunsets worldwide.
How tall is Anak Krakatau compared to the original Krakatoa?
Anak Krakatau currently stands about 157 meters above sea level, down from 338 meters before the 2018 flank collapse. The pre-1883 island was a merged structure of three cones on the rim of an older caldera, and two of those three were destroyed entirely in 1883.
Was Krakatoa really the loudest sound in history?
By the available record, yes. The climactic explosion around ten in the morning on 27 August 1883 was heard 3,000 miles away, and the pressure wave circled the planet seven times and remained detectable on barographs for days afterward. No documented sound since has matched it.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment