Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

What I Wrote on September 11, 2001

TL;DR: On the evening of 11 September 2001 I sat down and wrote about what I had watched that day. I never revised it. Reading it twenty-five years later, some of it holds up, some of it is wrong in ways that took years to become visible, and one paragraph asks for something that never happened. The document is reproduced here unedited, because a thing written before anyone knew how it turned out is a different kind of record than anything written since.

I heard it on the car radio. An announcer describing a fire in one tower of the World Trade Center, and a fireman being interviewed about how hard that kind of fire would be to fight. Then, partway through the interview, the announcer broke in. A second plane.

By the time I reached the office the first tower was down.

That night I wrote about it. Not for anyone, and not for publication. I wrote it because writing is what I do when something is too large to hold, and then I left it alone for twenty-five years.

Why publish it unedited?

Because the value is in what it does not know.

Everything written about that day since has been written by someone who knows what came next. Two wars. Twenty years in Afghanistan. The Patriot Act. The security apparatus that grew up around all of it. A generation that has no memory of airports before the queues.

A document written that evening knows none of that. It is a record of a specific mind at a specific hour, and every prediction in it is still open. Edit it, and it becomes a commentary on history. Leave it alone, and it stays evidence.

So here it is, with nothing changed but two typos.

What I wrote on 11 September 2001

As I drove to work this morning I turned on the radio as usual, and heard the announcer talking about a major fire in one tower of the World Trade Center in New York. They were interviewing a fireman who was informing us as to how difficult it would be to put out this kind of fire. I soon found out that an airplane had crashed into the side of the building.

As the man talked he was interrupted by a horrified announcer, a second plane had crashed into the second tower of the World Trade Center. The world watched in horror as, on live television, a plane blew through one side of the building and flames jetted out hundreds of feet. By the time I arrived at work, the first tower had collapsed.

I rushed into the office to discover this was a major terrorist attack. Three targets had been hit, both towers of the World Trade Center and a substantial portion of the Pentagon had ceased to exist. There were reports of a fourth attack, a crash, a car bomb and dozens of other stories of incredible violence flying around the news. It was terrifying, horrible and without doubt one of the worst things that I have ever seen.

What has happened? A small army of terrorists, the forces of evil, have taken their war to the shores of the United States. They have struck a blow typical of all cowards, they have convinced simple-minded, easily manipulated people of the necessity to kill thousands or even tens of thousands of innocent human beings. They have caused mindless destruction in the name of their cause. These are the forces of chaos, and make absolutely no mistake about it, today we have seen the effects of pure, evil unmasked.

What is a terrorist? This is a special brand of scum. They are not fit to be called human beings, and I would not call them animals as that would be degrading those other beings that share our planet with us. Terrorists are the kind of scum that even drug dealers and hardened criminals would not want to be associated with.

Why didn’t the United States see this coming? The people of the United States are, for the most part, civilized, good human beings. It can be very difficult for a good being to recognize evil in the first place, and it can be virtually impossible for any of us to understand to what this kind of scum is capable of.

We in the United States have our shortcomings. We don’t always do the right thing, and sometimes we do some pretty silly things, but overall, we are a good and caring people who genuinely want to see the rest of the planet do well.

What should the United States do now? First of all, we need to understand that this attack came from a small group of evil creatures. These creatures do not deserve mercy as they are not civilized in any definition of the word.

It also needs to be understood that we MUST REMAIN CIVILIZED. We are not barbarians, we are good human beings. We do not need to needlessly strike out at innocents without cause.

We must and we will strike back. However, we must be absolutely sure that we strike intelligently and with the precision of a surgeon who knows exactly what manner of cancerous tumor he is removing. It is our right to defend ourselves, and it is our right to demand and establish justice, it is our duty to ensure that justice is indeed served properly and in good time.

One critical goal of this attack was to destroy some of the symbols of American power. The biggest symbol is the World Trade Center.

We MUST rebuild the twin towers, grander and more beautiful than ever before. We must clean up the damage, plan a new set of towers, and get them reconstructed as fast as possible. The towers must be rebuilt to show these uncivilized sub-human beings that they cannot do permanent damage.

We MUST identify, with certainty, who is responsible for this attack, and we must do it quickly. The United States spends billions or even tens of billions of dollars every year on intelligence, every single piece must be turned towards finding the culprits.

Once we do identify, with certainty, the responsible parties, they must be destroyed, without mercy and without delay. It is imperative that evil not be tolerated when it has unmasked itself for all to see.

Most important of all, we must now understand that we are at war with these terrorists. We are at war and we must act as if we are at war. All of our military power must be channeled towards finding these creatures and taking them out. Fast.

Finally, we MUST NOT allow evil to corrupt our basic good. We must continue to hold out our hand to the rest of the world. We must continue to help establish order on the planet. And we must not harm innocents in our search for the guilty.

What the document gets right about that day

The reporting is accurate, which surprised me. Radio first, then the second plane during a live interview, then the collapse before I reached the office. The confusion about a fourth attack and a car bomb is exactly right, because that is what was on the air for hours.

The structural instinct holds too. Almost every paragraph is a question with an attempt at an answer. What has happened. Why didn’t we see it coming. What should we do now. A mind under that much load reaches for a framework, and questions are the cheapest framework available.

And the last paragraph is the one I am gladdest about. Do not let this change what we are. Do not harm innocents while looking for the guilty. That was written by someone furious enough to spend three paragraphs on the word scum, and he still put the restraint at the end, in the position of most weight.

What it gets wrong

Three things, and they are wrong in different ways.

The towers. I wanted them rebuilt exactly as they were, grander, and fast. That never happened and was never going to. What went up instead was one building, One World Trade Center, opened thirteen years later, alongside a memorial occupying the footprints of the originals. Two voids in the ground where the towers stood, with the names cut into the parapets.

I was wrong about what the response should be, and I was wrong for a reason worth naming. I was thinking about the buildings as symbols of power and about defiance as the answer. What was built is a place about the people who died. That is the better decision and I would not have reached it that night.

The language. Scum, creatures, sub-human, not fit to be called human beings. Three paragraphs of it. I understand the man who wrote that and I am not going to pretend I would have written differently at nine that evening.

But the essay argues against itself and does not notice. It insists we must remain civilized and must not harm innocents, and it spends its first third establishing that the enemy is not human. Those two positions do not sit together. Once a category of person is placed outside the human, the restraint has nothing to hold on to.

Certainty. The word appears twice, both times in capitals or close to it. Identify with certainty. Once we identify with certainty. I was insisting on it because I could feel how easily it would be skipped.

It was the right thing to insist on and it is the part of the essay that reads most like a warning to its own author. Whether the standard was met in what followed is an argument people are still having, and the version of me writing that night had no idea he was setting a test that the next several years would be graded against.

What a document written in the moment can do

This is the part that matters beyond one essay.

Anything written after an event is shaped by knowing how it came out. That shaping is invisible to the writer. You cannot un-know the ending, and every sentence you produce arranges itself around it, selecting the details that led there and quietly dropping the ones that pointed elsewhere.

A contemporaneous document has none of that. It preserves the wrong theories, the rumours that turned out to be nothing, the emotional register before it was tidied up, and the specific things a person believed would happen. All of that is information, and none of it survives in a memoir written later, because a memoir written later is a story and a story needs the parts to fit.

The car bomb in my second paragraph is a good example. There was no car bomb. But it was on the radio, and a record that includes it tells you something true about that morning that a corrected account cannot.

The same goes for the fury. A version written now would be measured, and measured would be false. Nobody was measured that night.

Why should you write things down on the day?

The practical version, for anyone who wants a record worth having in twenty-five years.

Write it the same day, badly. Quality is not the point and revision is the enemy. What you want is the state of your mind before it settles, and it starts settling within hours.

Include what you do not know. The rumours, the wrong numbers, the thing you were told that turned out to be untrue. Those are the parts that prove the document is contemporaneous, and the parts that carry the texture.

Do not tidy it later. The moment you go back and fix it, it becomes a hybrid, and a hybrid has the authority of neither. Keep the original and write a new document if your view changes.

Say what you expect to happen. This is the hardest and the most valuable. Predictions written before the outcome are the only honest test of how you were thinking. Mine were partly wrong, which is why they are worth reading.

Date it and put it somewhere it will survive. An undated file is worth a fraction of a dated one. Mine survived on a hard drive through several computers, mostly by luck.

What would I say to the man who wrote it?

Not much, and none of it corrective.

He was right that it was one of the worst things he would ever see. He was right to write it down. He was right, in the last paragraph, about the only thing that turned out to matter.

He was wrong about the towers, and the country made a better choice than the one he wanted.

What I notice most is how badly he wanted the response to be precise. A surgeon who knows exactly which tumour he is removing. That is a good image, and it is asking for something enormously harder than it sounds.

Twenty-five years on, the document is not valuable because it was right. It is valuable because it was written before anyone knew, and there is no way to produce that after the fact. If something is happening to you now that you will still be thinking about in 2051, write it down tonight, and do not fix it later.

The wider entry on the day, and what writers owe a subject like this, is September 11th: A Writer’s Tribute. More of the argument for writing it down while it is happening is in the memoir hub, and the family version of it is Behind the Wire, which exists because my grandfather wrote his own account down after the war.

Three books that record the day properly

Touching History covers the air side, from the FAA command floor to the fighter cockpits. Ordinary Heroes is the first chief on the scene at the towers, written by the man who was running the lobby. American Phoenix covers the Pentagon, which is the part of that day almost nobody writes about.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why publish a personal account of 9/11 unedited?
Because the value is in what it does not know. Everything written since has been written by someone aware of what followed, so every prediction in a document written that evening is still open. Editing it turns it into commentary on history. Leaving it alone keeps it as evidence of what one mind held at one hour.
What did the account get wrong?
It demanded the twin towers be rebuilt exactly as they were, which never happened and should not have. It spent three paragraphs establishing the enemy as not human while also insisting on staying civilized, two positions that do not sit together. And its central demand, absolute certainty about responsibility before striking, turned out to be far harder to meet than the writer assumed.
Why is a contemporaneous document more useful than a memoir?
Because anything written afterward is shaped by knowing the outcome, and that shaping is invisible to the writer. A record made on the day preserves the wrong theories, the rumours that came to nothing, the emotional register before it was tidied, and the specific predictions a person held. A memoir written later is a story, and a story needs its parts to fit.
How do you write a record worth keeping?
Write it the same day and write it badly, because revision is the enemy and the mind starts settling within hours. Include the rumours and wrong numbers, since those carry the texture and prove the document is contemporaneous. Never tidy it later, because a hybrid has the authority of neither version. State what you expect to happen. Then date it and store it somewhere it will survive.
Were the twin towers rebuilt?
No. One World Trade Center opened thirteen years after the attack, alongside a memorial occupying the footprints of the original towers, with the names of the dead cut into the parapets around two voids in the ground. The choice was to build a place about the people who died instead of a monument to defiance.
What did the account get right?
The reporting sequence is accurate: radio first, the second plane breaking in during a live interview, the first collapse before reaching the office, and the confusion about a fourth attack and a car bomb that was on the air for hours. The structure holds, with almost every paragraph posing a question and attempting an answer. And the closing insistence on not harming innocents while searching for the guilty was placed in the position of most weight by someone who was furious.


📁︎ Memoirs📁︎ Society📁︎ Writing Craft

🏷︎ History🏷︎ Memoir🏷︎ research🏷︎ Writing Craft

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment