The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

They Hated the Rotation Until They Could Put the Phone Down

This entry is part 21 of 21 in the series The Operations Room
TL;DR: The valuable half of an on-call schedule is the part where you are not on it, and that half only exists if the boundary is real. My team disliked the rotation I introduced until they worked out what it bought them, which was three weeks out of four where they did not have to carry their phone at all.

Give people weeks where nobody will call them, and the on-call week becomes something they can survive.

What is wrong with calling people in a fixed order?

Everybody carries the phone and nobody is ever free of it.

Before the rotation, we had four people running the primary infrastructure and a simple escalation order. Call the first person. If no answer, the second. Then the third. Then the fourth.

That arrangement looks fair on paper and it is not. Person one takes almost every call and gets destroyed. Person four is almost never reached and learns nothing.

The worse problem is what it does to the other three. Any of them might be next, so all four keep their phones on them all the time. Four people carry the burden and only one of them gets the calls.

How should an on-call rotation work?

One person, one week, then the next person.

Nothing else to it. During your week you are the one who gets called. During the other weeks you are not.

Nobody found this appealing at first. My team hated it, because what they saw was a week where every call was theirs with no one to pass it to.

The week they were on had become harder. That part of their reaction was correct.

Why do people come around to a rotation?

Because they work out what happens during the other three weeks.

Off rotation, they did not have to keep their phones with them. They did not have to answer. They could go somewhere without coverage, have dinner without checking, and sleep without listening for anything.

That had never been available under the old arrangement, and none of them had noticed it was missing until they got it.

An on-call week is a cost. Three weeks of genuine freedom is what you buy with it, and the trade is a good one as long as the freedom is real.

What happens in a genuine emergency?

Anyone can be reached, and that path has to exist.

I put procedures in place so a real disaster could still reach anybody. Not everything is survivable by one person on duty, and a rotation that pretends otherwise will be broken quietly on the first bad night, which destroys it permanently.

The distinction I drew is the part that makes it work. Off-rotation people did not need to be on call and did not need to be in a position to answer.

They might get reached. They were not required to be reachable. That is a different thing and it is the whole difference between a rotation and a schedule that exists on paper.

When is it acceptable to break the rotation?

When the situation requires more than one person, and almost never otherwise.

The escape hatch is the most fragile part of the whole arrangement. Used for real emergencies, it costs nothing and preserves the boundary. Used because the person on duty was unsure and wanted company, it teaches everyone that off weeks are not real.

Two or three casual uses and the rotation is decoration. People go back to carrying their phones, because they have learned that not being on call does not mean anything.

Protecting that boundary is the manager’s job and it costs something. Occasionally the person on duty struggles alone with something a colleague could have solved faster, and that is the price of everyone else having a real week off.

Why does this matter more than compensation?

Because nobody leaves over the night they got called.

They leave over two years of never being able to put the phone down. The particular Tuesday is not what wears people out. The absence of any period where the phone does not matter is what does it.

That is the entire argument about operations burnout without using the word. A team with genuine weeks off can sustain a hard on-call week indefinitely. A team where every week is a low-grade on-call week runs down slowly and nobody can point at when it started.

For a small company this is one of the few retention levers available that costs no money. A rotation with a real boundary is a scheduling decision and a discipline, and it changes how the job feels considerably more than a raise does.

The Guides That Get Your Book Written, Published, and Sold

Four short, practical guides on writing, publishing, and selling your book, plus the occasional note when there's something worth your time. No fluff, no daily inbox clutter. Drop your email and they're yours.

We use MailerLite to manage our list and send these emails. Your address is used only to send you what you signed up for. We will not sell it, share it, or use it for anything else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many people do you need for a rotation?
Three at minimum and four is better, since two people alternating weeks means every other week is on call, which is barely different from always being on call. Below three, the answer is usually outside help for overnight coverage rather than a rotation.
Should on-call be paid extra?
Paying for it is common and reasonable, and the money is not what makes it sustainable. A well-paid rotation with no real boundary still wears people down. Pay for it and protect the off weeks, rather than treating payment as the whole answer.
How far ahead should the schedule be published?
Far enough that people can plan around it, which usually means a quarter. The value of an off week depends on knowing it is coming, and a schedule published a week ahead delivers much less of that value.
What if the person on call cannot solve the problem?
Name in advance the situations that justify calling somebody else, and give the person on duty authority to make that call without asking permission. Judgment exercised against a written rule is fine. Judgment exercised out of uncertainty is what erodes the boundary.
Does a rotation work when everyone owns different systems?
Only with cross training, since a rotation among specialists who cannot cover for each other is four separate permanent on-call assignments. The rotation and the cross training have to arrive together.
How do you introduce a rotation to a team that will dislike it?
Explain what the off weeks mean before the first week begins, because the cost is obvious and the benefit is not. Mine disliked it until they experienced a week where the phone did not matter, and explaining that in advance would have shortened the objection.

📁︎ Technology

🏷︎ IT Operations🏷︎ Leadership🏷︎ On Call

📝 Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment