I wrote this book because I got tired of marketing advice that assumed I had a normal brain.
Every marketing book, course and guru told me the same things. Maintain consistent daily habits. Network regularly. Follow a systematic content calendar.
Great advice. Genuinely good advice, for somebody who can do it.
What happens when you force it?
You burn out, repeatedly, and you conclude the problem is you.
For years I tried to fit myself into the neurotypical marketing mould. I would build the calendar, commit to the daily habit, set up the weekly cadence. It would work for a few weeks and then stop working, and each time it stopped I understood it as a personal failure. Everybody else managed these proven systems. I could not stick to them.
That interpretation is the expensive part. Not the failed calendar, which costs a fortnight. The conclusion that you are undisciplined, which costs years and gets reinforced every time you try again.
I am an autistic ADHD introvert who ended up in marketing because I left my corporate job and suddenly had to work it out. Nothing about the standard advice was written with that in mind, and there is no reason it should have been. It was simply never going to fit.
What changed?
I stopped fighting my brain and started building around it.
It has a specific operational meaning. Consistency is not available to me on demand. Intensity is, in unpredictable but substantial bursts. So the question stops being how do I become consistent and becomes what can I build that runs on intensity.
In practice: I do not write a post a day. I write a month of them in two days when the hyperfocus arrives, then schedule them out. The audience sees consistency. The production was nothing like consistent. Those two things were never required to match and almost every piece of advice conflates them.
Is hyperfocus really an advantage?
On the right task it is a large one, and here is the example I use.
On one project, most marketers would have read a few trade publications and called that research. My hyperfocus arrived and I spent weeks understanding the entire supply chain, the regulatory environment, and the technical specifications that mattered to the customers.
That produced positioning opportunities nobody else had found. Not because I was cleverer, but because nobody else had gone that deep, because for a normally regulated person there was no reason to. The depth was not a strategy. It was what my brain does when it engages, pointed at something useful for once.
The trick is not summoning hyperfocus, which cannot be done. It is having something worth its while when it turns up.
The book on this: The ADHD Marketer is 22 chapters on marketing with this brain instead of against it, from a decade of doing it and burning out first.
What about the parts that need consistency?
Some genuinely do, and pretending otherwise is how this advice becomes useless.
Following up with a lead has a window. Invoices have dates. Some cadences are structural and no amount of reframing changes that.
For those, the answer is not discipline, because discipline has already been tried extensively and did not work. It is automation, batching, and systems that do not depend on remembering. A reminder that fires is worth more than an intention that is stronger. That is not a workaround for a deficiency, it is the correct engineering response to a known constraint.
Should you ignore conventional advice?
No. Translate it.
The underlying principles in most marketing advice are sound. Be visible. Say useful things. Follow up. Understand who you are talking to. None of that is wrong and none of it is what fails.
What fails is the delivery mechanism, which nearly always assumes a steady daily output. Keep the principle, replace the mechanism. Be visible becomes produce in bursts and distribute steadily. Network regularly becomes have a small number of real relationships instead of a weekly quota.
Almost every piece of advice survives this translation. It just has to be done deliberately, because nobody is going to do it for you.
What would I tell somebody burning out on this?
The failure is the method, not you. Several years of evidence is data about fit instead of about character.
Separate production from publication. They were never required to happen at the same rate.
Keep something ready for when hyperfocus arrives. It is coming and you cannot schedule it, so have the deep work queued.
Automate anything with a deadline. Do not rely on remembering, because you already know how that goes.
Translate instead of discard. The principles are usually fine. The daily-habit packaging is what does not fit.
The thing I would go back and tell myself is that no amount of trying harder was going to make the content calendar work, and the years spent proving that were the actual waste.
The Guides That Get Your Book Written, Published, and Sold
Four short, practical guides on writing, publishing, and selling your book, plus the occasional note when there's something worth your time. No fluff, no daily inbox clutter. Drop your email and they're yours.
We use MailerLite to manage our list and send these emails. Your address is used only to send you what you signed up for. We will not sell it, share it, or use it for anything else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.