Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

The Greatest Zombie Films

The dead walk. The living argue about whether to board the windows.

The zombie is really about the living. What they do when the social contract collapses, when resources become scarce, when the stranger at the door might be the end of everything. The best zombie films use the undead as a pressure cooker for human nature, and what gets cooked is always the same question: when civilization ends, what are we?

The list covers six decades and every tone of the genre: Romero’s political allegory, Boyle’s rage-virus reinvention, Wright’s comedy masterpiece, Korean melodrama, Spanish found footage, Japanese meta-horror, and one film set in a radio station that never shows a single zombie on screen. Not all of them shuffle. Several of them run. One of them falls in love.

Zombie films are a corner of horror I have a real weakness for, and I’ll defend the best of them against anyone who calls them cheap gore. The dead are the dullest thing on screen. What interests me is watching ordinary people decide, under pressure, who they’re willing to leave outside the door. When a zombie film gets that right, I think it tells more truth about us than most prestige dramas manage.

↑ All Films

1. Night of the Living Dead (1968)

► Read the full review of Night of the Living Dead (1968)

Type: Slow Shufflers · Romero Origin · Accidental Civil Rights Film
Dir: George A. Romero · Duane Jones / Judith O’Dea
⭐ 7.9/10

“They’re coming to get you, Barbara.”

George Romero made the film that defined the modern zombie.

And he made it for $114,000 in black and white in Pittsburgh with no stars. The genius move was casting Duane Jones, a Black actor, as the competent, rational protagonist, not as a statement but as a practical choice, Jones being the best actor available. In 1968 America, audiences watched a Black man take charge of a group of white people trying to survive a crisis, only to be shot by a white posse at the end.

The ending isn’t an accident. Romero understood exactly what he’d made.

Night of the Living Dead invented the template: the farmhouse siege, the group dynamic collapsing under pressure, the zombies as backdrop for human failure. Every later zombie film is working in conversation with this one, whether it knows it or not.

For WritersRomero’s farm house is the genre’s defining enclosed space, a location that creates the pressure of confinement while the threat accumulates outside. The zombies are almost beside the point: the horror is the group of living people who can’t agree on how to survive. When you write ensemble horror, the internal conflict is always more interesting than the external threat. The threat creates the conditions. The people create the story.

↑ All Films

2. Dawn of the Dead (1978)

► Read the full review of Dawn of the Dead (1978)

Type: Slow Shufflers · Romero Sequel · Shopping Mall as American Satire
Dir: George A. Romero · David Emge / Ken Foree / Scott Reiniger / Gaylen Ross
⭐ 7.9/10

“When there’s no more room in Hell, the dead will walk the Earth.”

The best zombie film ever made and one of the great satires of American consumer culture. Four survivors hole up in a shopping mall and discover that the zombie apocalypse, inside a Monroeville mall in 1978, isn’t that different from ordinary American life.

The zombies shuffle through the mall instinctively because the mall is where they always went. The survivors take luxury goods, eat good food, ride motorcycles through the corridors. The mall is paradise. Paradise is where you go to die.

Tom Savini’s practical effects are the genre’s definitive visual grammar (blue-gray skin, exposed viscera, the indignity of the undead) and Dario Argento’s assistance with the European cut produced a different but equally valid film. The mall setting is the argument. The zombies are the punchline. The survivors who refuse to leave even when they can are the joke’s actual target.

Dawn of the Dead is the Romero film I’d hand to anyone who thinks zombie movies are dumb. What delights me is how funny it’s willing to be about something so bleak. Romero lets his survivors have the fun anybody would have with a mall to themselves, then lets that fun curdle into the trap. My one small complaint is that the middle runs a touch long, and I’d forgive it far worse.

For WritersRomero sets his zombie film in a mall because the mall is the perfect symbol for the world the zombies have inherited, a space entirely organized around consumption, whose specific atmosphere of mindless plenty is barely distinguishable from the zombie state. When you choose a setting for horror, ask what the setting itself is saying about the world your characters inhabit. The setting that is also an argument produces richer horror than the setting that’s simply a location. There’s more on this in my article on settings that do real work.

↑ All Films

3. 28 Days Later (2002)

► Read the full review of 28 Days Later (2002)

Type: Fast Runners · Rage Virus · Empty London as Image of the End
Dir: Danny Boyle · Cillian Murphy / Naomie Harris / Brendan Gleeson / Christopher Eccleston
⭐ 7.6/10

“It started as rioting. And right from the beginning you knew this was different.”

Danny Boyle didn’t make a zombie film. He made a rage virus film. The infected aren’t dead, they’re alive and overwhelmed by an emotion amplified to murderous intensity, and Boyle uses this distinction to make a film about what happens to human society when the restraint that makes civilization possible is removed.

Jim waking up alone in an empty London is the genre’s most iconic opening image, shot on DV at dawn before the city woke, the absolute urban silence communicating the end of the world more effectively than any CGI apocalypse.

The film’s third act shift (the military compound, Eccleston’s Major Henry West and his logic of survival) turns the film into an argument about whether the threat from outside is more dangerous than the threat from inside, and reaches the correct answer: the infected are running. The soldiers are thinking. The soldiers are worse.

For WritersBoyle shoots the empty London sequences on digital video at actual dawn, the video image and the natural light communicate reality in a way no staged production could. When you write apocalypse, the sensory detail of the absent ordinary is more powerful than the spectacle of destruction. The empty road, the stopped bus, the shop with its door open. These are the apocalypse rendered as personal experience.

↑ All Films

4. Shaun of the Dead (2004)

► Read the full review of Shaun of the Dead (2004) Review

Type: Slow Shufflers · Romantic Zombie Comedy · Every Joke Also a Character Note
Dir: Edgar Wright · Simon Pegg / Nick Frost / Kate Ashfield / Dylan Moran
⭐ 7.9/10

“We’re coming to get you, Barbara.”

Easily the best zombie comedy ever made and, depending on the day, the best zombie film period. Edgar Wright and Simon Pegg’s film works because it’s a good romantic comedy (Shaun’s inability to grow up, his relationship with Ed versus his relationship with Liz, his failure to become the kind of person his girlfriend needs) that also happens to be a zombie film. The zombie apocalypse is the pressure that forces Shaun to become an adult.

The zombies are the plot mechanism for a character arc that would be exactly as emotionally true without them.

Wright’s visual comedy (the foreshadowing cuts, the repetition motif, the jokes that pay off thirty minutes after setup) is the most formally sophisticated comedy direction in British cinema. The film has been watched enough times by enough people that its setups and payoffs are now shared cultural reference points. That’s the definition of a classic.

Shaun of the Dead makes me happy every time it comes to mind, because it’s a better romantic comedy than most films that set out to be one. Wright and Pegg care about Shaun growing up, and the zombies are the kick in the pants he needed. My one quibble is that a couple of the dramatic turns near the end are heavier than the comedy around them has prepared me for.

For WritersWright and Pegg establish Shaun’s ordinary life in the first act with enough specific, repeated detail that the zombie apocalypse’s arrival is marked by how little it changes, Shaun walks to the corner shop through zombies without noticing because the zombies look exactly like his normal neighbors. When your protagonist is oblivious, show the obliviousness through specific behavioral repetition before the world changes. The joke is funnier because the setup was real.

↑ All Films

5. Train to Busan (2016)

► Read the full review of Train to Busan (2016)

Type: Fast Runners · Korean Melodrama · Father-Daughter as the Actual Story
Dir: Yeon Sang-ho · Gong Yoo / Ma Dong-seok / Jung Yu-mi / Kim Su-an
⭐ 7.6/10

“Just look straight ahead. Don’t look back.”

For my money, the best zombie film of the 21st century and the one that most completely vindicates the genre’s potential for real emotional weight. Yeon Sang-ho sets his film on a train, the most efficient possible closed space for zombie mechanics, and builds it around a workaholic fund manager and his daughter, the failure of his fatherhood, and his attempt to become the father she needs on the worst possible day. The zombie outbreak is devastating and inventively staged. The emotional core is devastating in a completely different way.

Ma Dong-seok’s Sang-hwa, the working-class husband protecting his pregnant wife, is the film’s moral center and its most complete character: a man whose specific quality of simple, direct, physical loyalty is presented as the highest available form of human response to catastrophe. The class argument running beneath the surface (whose lives the privileged characters are willing to sacrifice) is Romero’s argument updated for Korean corporate culture. The genre travels.

Train to Busan moves me in a way few zombie films do, and Ma Dong-seok is the reason. When a big, plain man puts himself between the dead and the people he loves, the genre is about as moving as it gets. My reservation is the melodrama. Yeon pushes for tears a little too hard in the last act, and I can tell the film is still trying to move me after it already has.

For WritersYeon builds the father-daughter relationship with specific, economical detail before the outbreak. Seok-woo is established as a man who doesn’t know his daughter’s favorite song, who has forgotten her school recital, whose emotional absence is specific. When your disaster story requires an emotional payoff involving a relationship, the investment must be specific before the disaster arrives. That failure makes the redemption cost something real.
CTAThe zombie film’s specific craft challenge, using the undead to reveal the living, applies directly to fiction. The Conflict and Tension Handbook covers how external threat reveals character in ways ordinary narrative can’t.

↑ All Films

6. World War Z (2013)

► Read the full review of World War Z (2013)

Type: Fast Swarmers · Global Scale · Better Than Its Reputation
Dir: Marc Forster · Brad Pitt
⭐ 7.0/10

“Movement is life.”

World War Z deserves its place for its zombie mechanics (the swarming behavior, the human ladder scaling the Jerusalem wall, the visual grammar of a hive-mind infestation) and for the WHO facility finale that replaced the original Moscow third act. The film is a procedural thriller about one man trying to find the zombie pandemic’s source before it ends everything, and it does this with real tension and real scale.

The Jerusalem sequence is the film’s centerpiece and the zombie genre’s most spectacular single set piece: the wall scaling, the city falling, the chaos of a society that built walls to keep the dead out and filled them with the sound that drew the dead in. The scale is the achievement. The smaller WHO corridor finale that follows is the film’s argument about how to survive it: not by fighting the flood but by making yourself invisible to it.

For WritersForster’s zombie swarm works by specific rules (they move toward sound, they ignore the ill, they cascade over obstacles) and the plot’s resolution follows directly from those rules. When you establish the rules of your threat, the solution must emerge from those rules. The ending that uses the threat’s own logic against it is always more satisfying than the ending that introduces new information to defeat it.

↑ All Films

7. Day of the Dead (1985)

► Read the full review of Day of the Dead (1985) Review

Type: Slow Shufflers · Romero’s Darkest · Bub the Zombie as the Film’s Conscience
Dir: George A. Romero · Lori Cardille / Terry Alexander / Joseph Pilato
⭐ 7.2/10

“We’re all just waiting to die.”

Romero’s third dead film is his angriest and his most formally daring. The zombie apocalypse has progressed to the point where the living are the minority, hiding in an underground bunker, and the film is interested in what the survivors’ specific social pathologies look like when there’s nowhere to go and nothing left to do but wait. Joe Pilato’s Captain Rhodes is the genre’s most purely repellent human antagonist, not a villain with a perspective but a man whose specific quality of authoritarian stupidity actively destroys any chance of survival.

Bub, the zombie Dr. Logan trains, who responds to classical music and salutes a dead soldier and pulls a gun on the man who killed his teacher, is the film’s most important element: a zombie with something recognizably human still present, whose specific quality of loyalty and memory makes him more sympathetic than any of the living military characters. Romero’s argument isn’t subtle. The humans are less human than the dead.

Day of the Dead is Romero at his most bitter, and I respect it for that, though it’s a hard film to watch. Rhodes is so loathsome that his scenes feel like being shouted at for an hour. That’s the point, and it’s also why Dawn outranks it for me. Bub makes up for a lot. A dead man saluting a dead soldier is the image from this film I’d keep if I could keep only one.

For WritersRomero makes Bub more sympathetic than the human antagonists by giving him specific emotional responses (the music, the salute, the final act of retribution) that communicate something persisting beneath the zombie state. When you write monsters with residual humanity, the specific retained behavior is more convincing than general personality. Give the monster one thing it remembers. That one thing is the argument. Writing Monsters is worth a look on this.

↑ All Films

8. The Return of the Living Dead (1985)

► Read the full review of The Return of the Living Dead (1985) Review

Type: Fast / Talking · Punk Horror Comedy · Brains as the Zombie’s First Vocabulary
Dir: Dan O’Bannon · Clu Gulager / James Karen / Don Calfa / Linnea Quigley
⭐ 7.3/10

“Send more paramedics.”

Dan O’Bannon’s punk zombie film invented several things the genre has used ever since: the zombie that craves specifically brains, not just flesh, the zombie that can speak and explain its own condition, and the tragicomedy of a zombie apocalypse unleashed by bureaucratic incompetence and military overreaction. The film is aware of Night of the Living Dead (explicitly, metatextually, with characters discussing whether Romero’s film was based on a true story) and uses that awareness to establish its own rules as distinct from Romero’s.

That zombie who calls for more paramedics on the police radio is the genre’s most economically delivered horror-comedy beat, the implication of what happened to the paramedics, the banality of a zombie using emergency services as a food delivery system, arrived in four words. O’Bannon understood that the best horror-comedy moments are the ones where the punchline is also frightening.

For WritersO’Bannon’s zombies speak (they can explain that they eat brains because only the warmth of living brain relieves the pain of being dead) which makes them at once more horrifying and more sympathetic than silent shambling ones. When your monster can articulate its own condition, the articulation must make things worse. The monster’s perspective should deepen the horror.

↑ All Films

9. 28 Weeks Later (2007)

► Read the full review of 28 Weeks Later (2007) Review

Type: Fast Runners · The Sequel That Opens With the Greatest Scene in the Genre
Dir: Juan Carlos Fresnadillo · Robert Carlyle / Rose Byrne / Jeremy Renner / Idris Elba
⭐ 7.0/10

“I love you. Goodbye.”

The sequel opens with ten minutes that are the single greatest sequence in the zombie genre: a farmhouse, a small group of survivors, a knock at the door, the arrival of a boy, and then the infected, and then a man who abandons the woman he loves to save himself, running through a field, making it to a boat, watching her die from the water.

Robert Carlyle’s Don and the act of cowardice he commits in those ten minutes is the best character establishment in the genre: we know exactly who he is, what he’s capable of, and what the film’s emotional reckoning will require of him, all in ten minutes, before the title card appears.

The rest of the film doesn’t quite match the opening, few things could, but it’s an impressive sequel that expands the world, introduces new horror mechanics (the helicopter sequence, the night-vision sequence in the dark), and ends honestly about what happens when you bring the infection back to the continent.

The opening of 28 Weeks Later is ten minutes I’d put up against anything in horror, and Carlyle running across that field is the cowardice the whole film hangs on. My reservation is everything after the title card. The film turns into a competent, noisy sequel, and I missed the moral weight of those first ten minutes the rest of the way. That drop is what holds it to a 7 for me.

For WritersFresnadillo establishes Don’s cowardice in the opening sequence with specific physical action. We watch him do the worst thing a person can do, and we understand him completely from that single act. When you establish a character’s defining flaw, show the flaw in action at the earliest possible opportunity. The specific act is always more convincing than any description of the tendency.

↑ All Films

10. Zombieland (2009)

► Read the full review of Zombieland (2009) Review

Type: Fast Shufflers · American Road Comedy · Bill Murray Cameo as Cinema History
Dir: Ruben Fleischer · Jesse Eisenberg / Woody Harrelson / Emma Stone / Abigail Breslin
⭐ 7.7/10

“It’s time to nut up or shut up.”

The American answer to Shaun of the Dead, a road trip comedy set in zombie apocalypse America that understands the genre’s pleasures well enough to deliver them while also being funny about them. Woody Harrelson’s Tallahassee is the genre’s most purely enjoyable protagonist since Shaun, a man who has found his purpose in the zombie apocalypse, who’s better at this world than the one that preceded it, and whose specific grief (the Twinkie quest is a misdirection; what he lost is something more devastating) gives the comedy its emotional foundation.

The Bill Murray cameo is the zombie comedy’s greatest single scene, Ghostbusters Zombie Bill Murray, the pleasure of watching a film that loves cinema enough to make this joke, executed with total commitment. The cameo is funnier because it’s also frightening for about thirty seconds. That thirty seconds is everything.

For WritersFleischer and Reese build Tallahassee’s backstory as a misdirection, the Twinkie obsession implies one kind of loss, the reveal delivers a completely different and more devastating one. When you write comedy characters with hidden emotional cores, the misdirection that makes the reveal work is worth more than any amount of direct exposition. The joke that turns out to be the truth is always the best joke.

↑ All Films

11. [REC] (2007)

► Read the full review of [REC] (2007) Review

Type: Fast Infected · Spanish Found Footage · The Last Five Minutes Are Unbearable
Dir: Jaume Balagueró / Paco Plaza · Manuela Velasco
⭐ 7.4/10

“Whatever happens, keep filming.”

The found footage zombie film done correctly, a 78-minute film that spends its first act establishing ordinary life in an apartment building, locks the doors at the twenty-minute mark, and doesn’t let anyone out. Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza understand that found footage horror works through the amateur camera’s relationship to its subject: the camera that’s always slightly wrong, that can’t quite keep up, that sees things in the periphery that the operator hasn’t registered yet.

The final sequence (the penthouse, the night-vision camera, what is in the dark at the end of the room) is the found footage genre’s most effective horror scene, using the night-vision’s green tint to make everything visible and nothing comprehensible at the same time. What’s in the dark is terrifying. The way it moves toward the camera when it notices the light is one of cinema’s great horror images.

[REC] scares me more than anything else on this list, and I don’t say that lightly. It’s lean and nasty, and it never wastes a minute of its 78. The penthouse finale is the scene I’d show anyone who thinks found footage is a gimmick. If I had a complaint, it would be that the ordinary chatter of the first twenty minutes tests my patience a little before it pays off.

For WritersBalagueró and Plaza use the building’s architecture (floors, stairwells, apartment doors) to create a spatial map of escalating danger that the audience can track. As the film progresses, each floor becomes tied to a specific level of threat, and moving upward means moving toward greater danger. When you write enclosed space horror, map the space as a dramatic structure. The geography should communicate the story’s escalation.

↑ All Films

12. Dawn of the Dead (2004)

Type: Fast Runners · Zack Snyder Debut · The Opening 10 Minutes Are Extraordinary
Dir: Zack Snyder · Sarah Polley / Ving Rhames / Jake Weber / Ty Burrell
⭐ 7.3/10

“When there’s no more room in Hell…”

Snyder’s debut feature opens with ten minutes that are the equal of anything in the genre: Ana waking up, the neighbor girl, the husband, the car, the suburb in chaos, Johnny Cash’s “The Man Comes Around” playing over the opening credits montage of the world ending on television. Those first ten minutes (the ordinary life that exists for thirty seconds before everything ends, the domestic detail of the bedroom and the hallway) are as good as the zombie genre has ever been at communicating the collapse of the ordinary world.

The rest of the film is a solid, well-paced zombie action film that uses the mall setting as efficiently as it can without matching Romero’s satirical depth. The decision to make the zombies fast instead of slow changes the film’s specific quality of dread (Romero’s zombies are inevitable, Snyder’s are urgent) and the film is honest about which kind of horror it’s delivering.

For WritersSnyder’s opening ten minutes work because of the extreme compression (thirty seconds of the ordinary life, then the end of everything, then the credits) which communicates the catastrophe’s speed more effectively than any amount of buildup. When you open with apocalypse, the ordinary life that precedes it must be established with enough specific detail to register as real before it’s destroyed. Thirty seconds of specific domestic life is enough. Two minutes of it is too much.

↑ All Films

13. Land of the Dead (2005)

► Read the full review of Land of the Dead (2005) Review

Type: Slow Shufflers · Romero 4th Film · Big Daddy as the Revolution’s Protagonist
Dir: George A. Romero · Simon Baker / Dennis Hopper / Asia Argento / Eugene Clark
⭐ 6.8/10

“They’re just looking for a place to go. Same as us.”

Romero’s fourth dead film completes the political arc he began in 1968.

The zombies have now organized and learned, and they follow Big Daddy, a Black zombie gas station attendant who remembers enough of his former life to direct the dead toward the walled city where the living elite have sheltered. Dennis Hopper’s Kaufman is the film’s capitalist villain, controlling the city from a luxury skyscraper while the working class lives in the streets below. The allegory isn’t subtle. Romero didn’t do subtle in his zombie films.

The film was made in the immediate aftermath of the Iraq invasion and Romero’s anger at American class divisions and imperial overconfidence is present in every frame. Big Daddy is a more gripping protagonist than any of the human characters, and the film’s ending (the zombies walking away instead of finishing the humans, having achieved their goal of eliminating the people who treated them as targets) is the genre’s most explicitly political conclusion.

For WritersRomero makes Big Daddy the film’s real protagonist by giving him a clear objective, the capacity to organize others toward that objective, and the restraint at the end to stop when the objective is achieved. When your monster has real agency and real motivation, the monster’s story becomes as interesting as the human story, sometimes more so. The zombie who decides when to stop is more frightening than the zombie who can’t.

↑ All Films

14. Warm Bodies (2013)

► Read the full review of Warm Bodies (2013) Review

Type: Slow Shufflers · Zombie Romeo & Juliet · The Unreliable Narrator Zombie
Dir: Jonathan Levine · Nicholas Hoult / Teresa Palmer / Rob Corddry / John Malkovich
⭐ 6.9/10

“What am I doing with my life?”

A zombie film narrated by a zombie: R’s interior monologue, articulate and sardonic and entirely inaccessible to the people around him, is the genre’s most formally inventive choice since Bub. Jonathan Levine’s film uses the zombie-Romeo-and-Juliet premise as a vehicle for a funny, warm story about the alienation of the living (R’s complaint that he can’t connect with other zombies mirrors the film’s human characters’ inability to connect with each other) and finds in the genre a surprisingly elegant metaphor for emotional numbness and its cure.

The film’s argument (that love is literally the cure for zombie-ism, that the heart starting to beat again is the mechanism by which the dead return to life) is completely absurd and completely committed to, and the commitment makes it work. You accept the premise because the film accepts it completely and asks you to meet it there.

Warm Bodies charms me in places and disappoints me in others. R’s narration is a clever idea, and Hoult makes a mumbling corpse more likable than he has any right to be. Past the halfway mark the film settles into a teen romance I’ve seen too many times, and the bite goes out of it. It’s a 6 from me because I admire the nerve of the premise more than I enjoy where it goes.

For WritersLevine gives R an interior monologue that the world can’t hear. That creates the dramatic irony of a character whose inner life is rich and articulate and whose outer presentation is entirely mute. When you write characters who can’t express themselves, the gap between interior richness and exterior limitation is the source of both comedy and pathos. The character who thinks clearly and communicates badly is one of fiction’s most reliable sources of emotion.

↑ All Films

15. One Cut of the Dead (2017)

► Read the full review of One Cut of the Dead (2017) Review

Type: Meta · Japanese Comedy Masterpiece · Don’t Read About This Film Before Watching It
Dir: Shin’ichirô Ueda · Takayuki Hamatsu / Yuzuki Akiyama
⭐ 7.6/10

“Fast. Cheap. Good. But I don’t feel anything.”

Stop reading this entry if you haven’t seen the film.

Watch it first. The less you know, the better the experience. What I’ll say: the film opens with a 37-minute single-take zombie horror film that appears to be competent but slightly wrong in specific ways you can’t quite identify. Then the film reveals what it is, and the 37 minutes you just watched become something completely different.

It’s the zombie genre’s most formally inventive film, made for approximately $25,000, and it became an international phenomenon because the word of mouth couldn’t be contained.

Ueda made a film about making films, about what it costs to make something under impossible conditions, about the love of the form that makes the impossible conditions worth it. The zombie elements are almost beside the point. They’re the vehicle for an argument about craft and passion and family and the joy of making something work despite everything. It’s the most life-affirming zombie film ever made.

One Cut of the Dead is the entry on this list that makes me happiest. It’s a love letter to everyone who ever tried to make something with no money and too little time, and the second half had me rooting for a film crew the way people root for a ballclub. My one small gripe is that those first 37 minutes ask a lot of patience from someone who doesn’t know what’s coming. Stick with it anyway.

For WritersUeda structures the film as a reveal that retroactively recontextualizes everything preceding it. The second half of the film makes the first half mean something completely different. That means the audience watches the same film twice: once in ignorance and once in full knowledge. When you write stories that hinge on revelation, consider whether the revelation can change what the audience experienced as well as what it knows. The story that means two different things before and after the reveal is worth twice as much as the story that simply surprises.
CTAWriting the zombie genre, using the undead to make arguments about the living, requires understanding what horror is for. The Genre Mastery Handbook covers horror craft from the ground up, including what makes the monster work and when it stops working.

↑ All Films

16. Zombie (1979) / Flesh Eaters

► Read the full review of Zombie (1979) / Flesh Eaters Review

Type: Slow Shufflers · Lucio Fulci · The Zombie vs. Shark Scene
Dir: Lucio Fulci · Tisa Farrow / Ian McCulloch / Richard Johnson
⭐ 6.9/10

“The boat can leave now. Tell the crew.”

Lucio Fulci’s Zombie is the Italian zombie film at its most purely visceral: not interested in Romero’s social allegory, interested in atmosphere, practical effects, and the dread of a Caribbean island. The film opens with a zombie on a boat in New York Harbor and ends with zombies crossing the Brooklyn Bridge, and between those images it delivers the most atmospheric tropical horror in the genre.

Fulci’s island (the heat, the colonial legacy of the voodoo elements, the way the dead emerge from the earth) is the film’s achievement.

The underwater zombie versus shark sequence is either the greatest or the most insane scene in the zombie genre and is probably both: a practical stunt involving an actual shark and a man in zombie makeup, filmed underwater, that shouldn’t exist and does. No CGI could produce the insanity that the practical version delivers. Fulci committed to it completely and the commitment is the point.

Fulci’s Zombie is a film I enjoy more for its nerve than its story. The island heat and that shark scene are pure commitment, and I’d take that over a slick, careful zombie film any day. The reservation is everything between the set pieces. The characters are thin and the dialogue is flat, so the atmosphere has to carry scenes the script left empty.

For WritersFulci’s specific achievement is atmosphere. The film creates a persistent sense of tropical unease that makes the horror feel indigenous to the setting. When you write horror set in specific geographic locations, the horror should feel like something the land itself is producing instead of something that has been placed there. The Caribbean zombie isn’t the Pennsylvania zombie. The land is part of the argument. For a deeper treatment, try Writing Horror.

↑ All Films

17. Dead Set (2008)

► Read the full review of Dead Set (2008) Review

Type: Fast Runners · Charlie Brooker · Big Brother House as the Zombie Apocalypse’s Perfect Setting
Creator: Charlie Brooker · Jaime Winstone / Riz Ahmed · Channel 4 Miniseries
⭐ 7.8/10

“You’re in a house full of people who talk about themselves for a living. You’re going to be fine.”

Charlie Brooker’s five-episode Channel 4 miniseries is the best zombie television produced before The Walking Dead and an argument that the format Romero invented can be used for completely direct social satire. The Big Brother house survivors (a group of housemates who are already performing for cameras, whose behavioral dysfunctions are what got them on reality television in the first place) are the perfect zombie apocalypse ensemble because those dysfunctions are both the source of the comedy and the reason they’ll probably die.

Brooker’s argument is Romero’s argument updated for the reality television era: the living dead are us, shuffling toward whatever the screen shows us, unable to stop. The Big Brother house is the mall. The housemates are the zombies before the infection arrives. The infection just makes it visible.

For WritersBrooker’s setting is the argument, the Big Brother house, with its cameras and its performed personalities and its architecture of surveillance and display, is already a zombie environment before the zombies arrive. When your setting is also your theme, every scene works on two levels: the plot level and the argument level. Dead Set is a zombie story and a media critique in the same images at the same time.

↑ All Films

18. Pontypool (2008)

► Read the full review of Pontypool (2008) Review

Type: Unseen · Radio Station · Language as the Vector of Infection
Dir: Bruce McDonald · Stephen McHattie / Lisa Houle / Georgina Reilly
⭐ 6.9/10

“Do not translate this message.”

No zombie ever appears in this zombie film. Bruce McDonald’s film is set entirely in a radio station in a small Ontario town during a blizzard, where DJ Grant Mazzy receives increasingly disturbing reports of violence in the town outside: which he and his producer must interpret, describe, and broadcast to an audience they can’t see, using a medium that may itself be spreading the infection.

The conceit (language is the virus, certain English words are the vectors, understanding a word is how it enters you) is the most formally inventive zombie mechanic since the talking dead of Return of the Living Dead.

McDonald’s film works as pure radio drama. The horror is almost entirely auditory, communicated through what Mazzy hears and describes. McDonald trusts the audience to construct the horror from the reports. That produces something more frightening than any amount of visual gore could have.

Pontypool is the kind of horror film I treasure, confident enough to keep the monster offscreen and trust the audience to fill the gap. A man in a radio booth describing things he can’t see frightens me more than any horde. If I had to fault it, the explanation of the language virus gets tangled toward the end, and I forgive it that easily.

For WritersMcDonald generates horror entirely through implication and description. We hear what’s happening outside, we don’t see it, and the gap between report and reality holds the horror. When you write horror, the threat that’s described but not shown is almost always more frightening than the threat that’s depicted. The reader’s imagination supplies something worse than your description. Trust the gap.

↑ All Films

19. Dead Alive / Braindead (1992)

► Read the full review of Dead Alive / Braindead (1992) Review

Type: Splatter Comedy · Peter Jackson Pre-LOTR · The Lawnmower Scene
Dir: Peter Jackson · Timothy Balme / Diana Peñalver
⭐ 7.5/10

“I kick arse for the Lord!”

Peter Jackson’s pre-Lord of the Rings zombie comedy is the most extreme film on this list and the most purely committed to its own aesthetic of escalating, cartoonish gore. The lawnmower finale, Lionel clearing a house full of zombies with a lawnmower, is the zombie genre’s most sustained gross-out set piece, executed by a director who finds the excess funny and whose commitment to the bit makes the audience laugh.

Jackson’s film is also a real romantic comedy buried under the gore, Lionel’s relationship with his domineering mother and his inability to form adult relationships is the film’s actual subject, and the zombie apocalypse is the mechanism by which he’s forced to stop being his mother’s son and start being his own person. Jackson understood even then that the genre is always about the living.

For WritersJackson commits to the gore like someone who finds the excess comedically pleasurable. Dead Alive is a comedy first and a horror film second, and the tone of the violence (cartoonish, escalating, absurd) communicates that the film is laughing instead of disturbing. When you write extreme content for comedic effect, the tone must be unmistakably comic throughout. The moment the audience can’t tell whether you’re being funny or serious is the moment the extreme content becomes uncomfortable instead of entertaining.

↑ All Films

20. Kingdom (2019-2020)

► Read the full review of Kingdom (2019-2020) Review

Type: Fast / Cold-Sensitive · Korean Historical Drama · Joseon Dynasty Zombie Political Thriller
Creator: Kim Eun-hee · Ju Ji-hoon / Bae Doona / Ryu Seung-ryong · Netflix · 2 Seasons
⭐ 8.3/10

“The plague is spreading because of hunger.”

The most formally ambitious zombie work since The Walking Dead’s first season, a Korean historical drama set in the Joseon Dynasty in which a zombie plague and a political conspiracy are the same story. Crown Prince Lee Chang investigates his father’s apparent illness and discovers a plague of the undead being used as a cover for a coup.

Kim Eun-hee’s screenplay is the zombie genre’s most complete integration of the undead with political argument: the plague spreads because the poor are starving and desperate and eating the infected plant-flesh, and the political class knows and is using the plague to consolidate power.

This show’s zombie mechanics (the infected are dormant in the cold and active in the heat, which the Korean winter can be used to manage) are the genre’s most ingenious since Pontypool’s language vector, and the visual grammar of Joseon Dynasty armor and traditional architecture against the zombie horde is unlike anything else in the genre. Two seasons, twelve episodes, no wasted runtime.

Kingdom is the zombie story I recommend most eagerly right now. The Joseon setting gives the dead something fresh to crash into, and the idea that the plague and the palace plot are the same crime makes every episode feel like it matters. My only regret is that there are just two seasons. I wanted more, and I resent a little that the story stopped where it did.

For WritersKim integrates the zombie plague and the political conspiracy so completely that neither can be separated from the other. The plague is political, the politics are deadly, and the same people are responsible for both. When you write genre stories with political dimensions, the most powerful version is the one in which the genre’s threat and the political argument are the same thing instead of running in parallel. The plague that is also policy is more frightening than the plague that has policy implications.

What the Zombie Is Always About

What makes the zombie scary isn’t that it wants to eat you.

Plenty of things want to eat you. The zombie is scary because it used to be someone you knew (a neighbor, a parent, a child) and it’s retained the shape of that person while losing everything that made them a person. The horror is recognition without relationship. The form without the content.

Every great zombie film uses this horror as the vehicle for a different argument: about consumer culture (Dawn of the Dead), about rage and military authority (28 Days Later), about growing up (Shaun of the Dead), about class and fatherhood (Train to Busan), about language and media (Pontypool, Dead Set), about political power (Land of the Dead, Kingdom). The zombies are the pressure cooker. The argument is always about the living.

The worst zombie films forget this. They deliver zombies as spectacle (gory, kinetic, technically impressive) without asking what the spectacle is in service of. The best zombie films ask the question every time the dead appear on screen: what does this tell us about the people trying to survive them?

My verdict on the genre is plain enough. I don’t have any patience left for zombie films that treat the dead as an effects reel, and every hour spent on those is an hour stolen from the films on this list. The ones I care about put a frightened person in front of a door with somebody on the other side, and the choice they make there tells you who they were all along.

What zombie film is missing from this list?

The Walking Dead Season 1. Zom 100. Seoul Station. The Girl with All the Gifts. Drop your nominations, especially anything that uses the zombie for an argument nobody else has made.

↑ Back to Film Navigation

Honorable Mentions

1 more reviewed on this site and worth your time, ranked by the same scale as the list above.

21. The Resident Evil Series (2002-2016) Review

RLR: 7 / 10

Six films across fifteen years adapting a game series, and they’re more coherent as a body of work than any individual entry suggests.

► Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does the zombie keep working as a subject?
Because the creature carries no meaning of its own, so every filmmaker fills it. Romero used it for consumerism and race. 28 Days Later used it for contagion and speed. Train to Busan used it for class in a country with a very specific relationship to crowding. The monster is a container.
What makes a zombie film good instead of just gory?
The living. The infected are never the interesting part, because they can’t change. Every strong entry here’s about what people do to each other once the rules relax, and the failures are the ones that spend their attention on the creatures.
Has the zombie film genre been exhausted?
The American strand largely has, through repetition. The recent work that succeeds comes from elsewhere: Korean historical drama, a Japanese comedy shot to look like one take. Moving the frame is what keeps finding new material.
What can a writer take from six decades of zombie films?
How to use an unstoppable pressure to reveal character fast. The threat doesn’t negotiate, which strips out every option except who people are, and that compression is available in any story with a deadline.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment