Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

Dead Alive / Braindead (1992) Review

Dead Alive / Braindead (1992) Review

TL;DR: Dead Alive (1992) rates 8 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Peter Jackson made the bloodiest film ever produced, reportedly using around three hundred litres of fake blood in the last twenty minutes alone, and underneath the lawnmower it is a story about a grown man who cannot leave his mother.
Dead Alive / Braindead (1992)
8/10

A Sumatran rat-monkey is shipped to a New Zealand zoo in 1957. A domineering woman follows her son on a date, is bitten by it, and begins to deteriorate. Her son keeps her in the basement because the alternative is telling somebody.

The 8 is for a splatter comedy that is genuinely about something and has the sense not to mention it. Lionel is a man in his twenties with no life, and every escalation in the film comes from him protecting his mother’s reputation instead of calling for help.

The deduction is for a middle stretch that circles, and for a first act that spends slightly too long on a zoo and a rat-monkey the film does not really need. Everything after that basement door closes for the first time is the part where this film properly comes alive, which is a poor choice of words and also just about the only correct one available to anybody.

It is also, by a considerable margin, the most physically excessive film on this page and probably anywhere. The final sequence is not an exaggeration of gore conventions, it is a demonstration of what happens when a director with practical effects and no supervision is given a lawnmower.

The Mother Is the Monster Before She Is a Monster

Vera is controlling, snobbish and entirely effective at it. She follows Lionel on a date, humiliates him in front of the woman, and the film establishes in ten minutes that this man has never made a decision.

When she is bitten, almost nothing changes about the household dynamic. He feeds her, cleans her, hides her, apologizes for her, and lies to visitors, which is precisely what he was doing before the infection.

That is the film’s actual joke and it is never stated. The zombie plot is a literalization of a relationship that was already unbearable, and the escalation is a man doing more and more appalling things to avoid an embarrassing conversation.

The dinner party sequence is where both halves meet. Lionel has to entertain guests while corpses are moving in the house, and the social humiliation is played as more urgent than the corpses, because to him it is.

The custard is the high point of that sequence and it is genuinely difficult to watch while working as a plain comedy of manners. A woman is eating, something is wrong with what she is eating, and the host cannot say anything without admitting what is in his basement.

For Writers

A horror premise that literalizes an existing relationship does not need to explain itself. The reader understands the metaphor and the film never has to acknowledge one exists. The rule is that the behavior must not change. Lionel treats his zombie mother exactly as he treated his living one, which is what makes the point.

Escalate through avoidance. Every worse thing that happens is a consequence of not having a conversation, which is both funny and recognizable.

Never let a character state the theme. If somebody says he needs to stand up to his mother, the film has become a lesson.

The Escalation Is Relentless

It begins with sedatives, then a basement, then more bodies, then a priest, then a party, and each solution requires a worse one.

The film’s structure is a chain of concealments, and Jackson keeps finding new ways for the situation to expand. A zombie couple produce a baby, which Lionel then has to take to a park, and the sequence is a parody of parenthood conducted with a corpse.

The custard scene and the ear are the two moments people remember from the middle, and both are doing the same job, which is to make an audience laugh at something they are also finding physically unpleasant.

What keeps it working is that Timothy Balme plays Lionel entirely straight. He is not a comic performer doing schtick, he is an anxious young man in continuous distress, and everything around him is absurd.

Diana Penalver does the same job as Paquita, the shopkeeper’s daughter who has decided from a tarot reading that Lionel is her destiny. She is the only person in the film pursuing something she wants, and her persistence is what eventually gets him out of the house.

Father McGruder

A priest arrives, announces that he kicks arse for the Lord, and proceeds to demonstrate it with martial arts against a cemetery of the dead.

The line has outlived the film in most places and the character is a genuinely good piece of construction. He is on screen for perhaps six minutes, is the most competent person in the picture, and is dispatched without ceremony.

What the sequence provides structurally is permission. Up to that point the film has been a domestic comedy with corpses, and the priest establishes that this is a picture where anything can happen at any scale.

His death also produces the film’s best sustained joke, since his remains continue participating in the plot for some time afterward in a manner the film treats as entirely ordinary.

Uncle Les is the other late arrival and the film uses him differently. He is a blackmailer who inherits the house, throws a party in it, and is the reason there are fifty people in a building full of corpses, which is the engineering the finale required.

For Writers

One character operating at a completely different register gives you permission to escalate. The priest tells the audience the ceiling has been removed. The technique requires you to remove them quickly. A character who can solve the problem cannot remain in the story.

Place the permission-granting scene at the midpoint. Everything before it is one kind of film and everything after can be another, and the reader will follow.

A joke that continues operating after the character is dead is the most efficient comic engine available, provided the story treats it as normal.

Twenty Minutes and Three Hundred Litres

The final sequence is a house party overrun, and the quantity of blood pumped through the set during it is the reason this film has the reputation it does.

Jackson reportedly ran a system delivering around five litres a second during the lawnmower sequence, and the floor is a slurry that the actors are physically struggling to stand in, which is visible and unfaked.

That physicality is why it still works. This is not a rendering, it is a room full of material that has weight and behaves like liquid, and the performers are genuinely fighting the conditions.

It is also, past a certain point, no longer disgusting. The excess crosses into abstraction somewhere around the tenth minute, and what remains is a man with a lawnmower held at waist height, walking forward, which is closer to slapstick than to horror.

The film knows this and leans into it. Lionel says he is going to have to kill everybody, flatly, as a practical assessment of a housekeeping problem, and then does exactly that for a quarter of an hour without any change of expression.

What Jackson Did Next

He made two more small New Zealand films, then Heavenly Creatures, and then the Tolkien adaptations, and the distance between this and those is the most remarkable career jump in the medium.

The connective tissue is the practical effects work. Weta was built by the people who made this, and the same instincts about physical creatures, prosthetics and scale produced the creature work in the trilogy.

The ending is also more Jackson than most people remember. Lionel goes into his mother, literally, through a wound, and has to cut his way out, which is a birth image so unsubtle that the film is clearly enjoying itself.

It is the correct ending nonetheless. He is reborn out of her, she is destroyed, and he walks away with a woman who has seen all of it, which is the only possible resolution for a film about a man who could not leave a house.

The film also flopped almost everywhere on release and was cut substantially in several territories, which is the usual fate of work made with this much conviction and no obvious audience. Its reputation has been built entirely by people recommending it to each other.

For Writers

A blunt symbolic ending is permitted if the whole work has been operating at that volume. Subtlety in the last ten minutes of a film with this much blood in it would read as cowardice. Match your resolution to your register.

Practical constraints produce technique that transfers. Everything in this film about physical creatures and scale is what its director later used on a considerably more respectable project.

Excess has a threshold past which it stops being disgusting and becomes abstract, and a work can use that deliberately. Know where your threshold is and either stop before it or go well past it.

Should you watch Braindead?

Yes, and know what you are getting. The bloodiest film ever made, a priest who kicks arse for the Lord, a zombie baby in a park, and underneath all of it a young man doing increasingly terrible things to avoid admitting that his mother is a problem.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dead Alive about?
A young man in 1950s New Zealand whose domineering mother is bitten by a Sumatran rat-monkey keeps her in the basement as she deteriorates, and the situation expands as he conceals each new body.
Is it the goriest film ever made?
By most measures yes. The final twenty minutes reportedly used around three hundred litres of fake blood, with a system delivering roughly five litres a second during the lawnmower sequence.
Is it really about anything?
A grown man who cannot leave his mother. The infection changes almost nothing about the household, since he was already feeding her, apologizing for her and lying to visitors.
What is the priest line?
He announces that he kicks arse for the Lord and demonstrates it with martial arts in a cemetery. The character is on screen for about six minutes and the line has outlived the film.
Is the gore disgusting?
Past a certain point it stops being. The excess crosses into abstraction around the tenth minute of the finale, and what remains is closer to slapstick than to horror.
Is this the same Peter Jackson?
The same one. Weta was built by the people who made this, and the instincts about physical creatures, prosthetics and scale are what produced the creature work in the Tolkien films.
How does it end?
Lionel goes inside his mother through a wound and cuts his way out, which is a birth image so unsubtle that the film is plainly enjoying itself, and it is the correct ending for the story.

This film appears on 2 of my film lists

🏷︎ 1990s🏷︎ Dark Comedy🏷︎ Family🏷︎ Practical Effects