Latest
SMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableFree BooksJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends On

Murder One

Murder One

A Writer's Guide to Homicide

Series:Howdunit
Published:January 1, 1997
ISBN:089879773X
Pages:228
ISBN:978-0898797732
Language:English
Share:

Buy Now

Description:

TL;DR

6/10. A crime-writer’s reference focused on homicide, the genre’s defining crime, covering types of murder, means, and especially the cover-ups that form the puzzle at the heart of mystery fiction. Its mid-1990s specifics are dated by advances in forensic capability, and it works best alongside its companion volume, but it’s a focused, useful niche tool.

Murder One by Mauro V. Corvasce and Joseph R. Paglino narrows the crime-writer’s reference down to the single subject at the dark heart of so much of the genre: murder. The authors’ companion volume surveys criminal methods broadly. This one focuses on homicide. Its types. The weapons and means involved. The way killers attempt to cover their crimes, and how all of it can be used believably in fiction. For the mystery, thriller, and crime writers whose plots turn on a killing, it offers focused, realistic grounding in the genre’s defining crime.

Reviewed as a craft tool, it serves that purpose. I’m of two minds about it: the material on cover-ups is sharp and plot-ready, and the forensic side has aged badly enough to get a careless writer into trouble.

The lens is craft, as always: this review treats the book as a resource for writing believable murder in fiction, not as anything operational, and keeps to what it gives a storyteller.

The genre’s defining crime

Murder drives an enormous share of crime fiction, and the book’s value is treating it with the realistic detail that keeps a fictional killing credible. Corvasce and Paglino cover the different types of murder and the realities of various means.

Then how killers attempt to conceal their crimes. The cover-ups. The disposal. The efforts to evade detection, the territory where a mystery plot unfolds.

A writer who understands how murders are realistically committed and concealed can construct a crime that holds up. It has to survive the scrutiny of the fictional investigator and the knowledgeable reader, the foundation of a satisfying mystery.

Keep reading

Plotting a murder mystery the detective has to earn: Corvasce and Paglino’s realistic homicide detail, in the craft of constructing the central crime.

The cover-up as plot

The book’s attention to how criminals cover up murders is its most plot-useful angle, because the concealment of a crime is the puzzle at the center of the mystery genre. The link between how a killer hides a crime and how an investigator uncovers it is the essential cat-and-mouse, and realistic detail on the cover-up gives a writer the raw material to construct a credible puzzle, one where the clues that crack the case make sense and the killer’s mistakes feel earned instead of convenient.

Understanding concealment realistically is, for a mystery writer, understanding the structure of the genre itself.

Keep reading

Writing a thriller where the tension never breaks: the killer-versus-investigator dynamic at the heart of the form.

What are the weaknesses of Murder One?

The standard limitations apply, with the necessary note of care given the subject. The book dates from the mid-1990s, and forensic and investigative capability, the means by which murders are detected and solved, has advanced enormously since, so the realities of what a killer could plausibly conceal have shifted, and a writer setting a contemporary story must update against current forensic capability. As with all such references, it’s grounding for fiction, not anything else, and its value is strictly in writing believable crime.

It’s also a narrow, single-subject reference that overlaps its companion volume. The overlap irritates me. Two books where one tighter book would do means the reader pays twice for some of the same ground.

Is Murder One worth reading?

It’s a focused, useful crime-writer’s reference on murder, the genre’s defining crime, valuable for its realistic detail on the types of homicide and especially on the cover-ups that form the puzzle at the center of mystery fiction. It loses ground for its mid-1990s vintage, significant here because the forensic capability that catches killers has advanced so much since, and for the narrowness of a single-subject reference best used alongside its companions.

Treat it as solid grounding for believable murder fiction and check every forensic detail against current reality. The cover-up material is worth the read. The forensics would get a modern killer caught fast and sink your plot with him.

Explore the hub

The Writing Hub: crime writing, research, and the rest of the craft, gathered in one place.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Murder One by Mauro V. Corvasce and Joseph R. Paglino cover?
I found it to be a crime-writer’s reference focused on murder, the genre’s defining crime. It covers the different types of homicide, the weapons and means involved, and how killers attempt to cover their crimes. It also gets into disposal and the efforts to evade detection. That’s the territory a mystery plot lives in. For writers whose plots turn on a killing, it offers focused, realistic grounding and not broad crime coverage.
How does Murder One compare to Modus Operandi?
Modus Operandi surveys criminal methods broadly across many kinds of crime, while Murder One narrows down to homicide. I found Murder One to be the more specialized of the two, focused entirely on the genre’s defining crime and not crime in general. I think the two work best used together, since Murder One goes deep on murder where the companion book stays wide.
What is the most useful part of Murder One for writers?
I found the attention to how criminals cover up murders to be the most plot-useful angle in the book. Concealment is the puzzle at the center of the mystery genre, so realistic detail on the cover-up gives a writer the raw material to construct a credible mystery. That link between how a killer hides a crime and how an investigator uncovers it is the essential cat-and-mouse of the form. Getting that concealment right means the clues that crack the case make sense and the killer’s mistakes feel earned instead of convenient.
Is the information in Murder One still current?
No, I found it dated in its particulars. The book comes from the mid-1990s, and forensic and investigative capability has advanced enormously since then. That means what a killer could plausibly conceal has shifted, so a writer setting a contemporary story needs to check the details against current forensic reality. It still works as grounding for fiction, but not as an up-to-date technical picture.
Who should read Murder One?
I’d point mystery, thriller, and crime writers to this one, especially those whose plots turn on a killing. It gives realistic grounding in the genre’s central crime, from types of murder to how killers try to cover their tracks. Writers should keep in mind that the specifics need checking against current forensic capability given the book’s age. It works best as part of a set alongside its companion volume and not as a standalone reference.
Is Murder One irresponsible for explaining how killers cover up crimes?
I reviewed it strictly as a craft tool for fiction writers, not as anything operational, and that’s the lens I think it deserves. Its purpose is helping a writer construct a believable mystery plot, where the killer’s concealment and the investigator’s discovery of it have to hold up to scrutiny. The value is in making fiction credible, not in offering anything beyond what a writer needs to build a satisfying puzzle. I treated it the same way I’d treat any craft reference on a dark subject, useful for the story it helps a writer tell.

About the author

Mauro V. Corvasce

Mauro V. Corvasce is a longtime American police detective and co-author of two Writer's Digest Howdunit titles that remain go-to references for crime and mystery novelists: Modus Operandi: A Writer's Guide to How Criminals Work (1995) and Murder One: A Writer's Guide to Homicide (1997), both co-written with fellow detective Joseph R. Paglino. The books draw directly on the co-authors'…

More about Mauro V. Corvasce

Joseph R. Paglino

Joseph R. Paglino is a longtime American homicide and criminal investigator and co-author, with Mauro V. Corvasce, of two Writer's Digest Howdunit titles that have become essential references for crime and mystery writers: Modus Operandi: A Writer's Guide to How Criminals Work (1995) and Murder One: A Writer's Guide to Homicide (1997). He holds a B.S. in Criminal Justice from…

More about Joseph R. Paglino

Back