Latest
Royce Blake: Why Benefits Beat Features in Every Pitch You MakeJoe Rockey: The Psychology of Getting People to Be Honest and to BuyBen the Automator: How to Automate the Work That Wastes Your DayPaul Barry: Making Habit Change Conversational So Nobody Feels HopelessJoe Rockey: The Coming Recession Is About People, Not EconomicsDiana Lee: Using AI as a Thought Partner That Amplifies What Makes You HumanRutherford Pascal: What New Coke, Microsoft, and 32 Years in Pharma Teach About LeadershipAnthony Markey: Why Podcasting Beats Pitch-Slapping as a Way to NetworkBen the Automator: Why Digital Transformation Starts With People, Not SoftwareDeanna Farnell: How a Corporate CPA Rebuilt Her Life Around Healing Stress at the RootDaniel Holguin: Leadership Lessons From a Cancer Survivor and Former Police OfficerDoug Hohulin: How AI Could Save a Billion Lives and Prevent Avoidable DeathsRalph Brown: Four World Records and a Race Around the Entire PlanetMichael O’Brien: Why Startups Fail and What VCs Actually Look ForShawn Abeling: What Bad Leadership Looks Like From the Ground UpRhonda Bowen: Why Great Leaders Are Really Great CommunicatorsNikhil Raval: How to Actually Understand and Lead Gen ZDan Shinder: The Power of Forgiveness and Choosing What You Expose Yourself ToVladimir Ingerman: A Soviet Engineer’s Journey Through Oil, Gas, and InnovationRob Fenstermaker: The Warrior Spirit and What It Means to Lead as a ManDoris Walsh: Coaching High Achievers Torn Between Success and FulfillmentJoe Rockey: Why Your Pricing Fails Before You Ever Set a NumberPacing Problems Nobody Talks AboutWhat AI Does Well, and What It Cannot DoThe Most Dangerous Thing You OwnThe Story That Made Me Cry at My KeyboardWhat a Belly dancer Taught Me About WritingGood Security Policy Names NamesWriting Fairy Tales: Techniques That Make Stories WorkMaster Superhero Fiction: Top 10 Writing TechniquesRhythm in Writing: How to Give Your Prose a PulseI’ll Write It Myself SomedayALLi Author Self-Publishing Success StoryEmotional Writing: 8 Inspiring Techniques for Deeper ConnectionsLiterature Related Holidays: Over 100 Festive Dates for BookwormsUsing an Animal’s POV: 7 Tips for Unique StorytellingThematic Writing: 7 Techniques That Hold a Book TogetherSoftware Testing: 10 Things Most Teams Get WrongUncanny Valley in Writing: What It Is and How to Use ItWhy YouTube Sucks: A Love-Hate Account (With the Numbers)Facing Hurricane Irma: 7 Lessons in Storm SurvivalWhy TikTok Sucks: The Criticism, Backed by the NumbersEcho Chambers: Why You Are in More Than You ThinkTales from the Digital Trenches: War Stories from the Early Days of ComputingSearch Engine Echo Chambers – Why Google Shows You What You Want to HearMainstream Media Echo Chambers: When the News Becomes a Team SportEcho Chambers in Fiction – How to Write Characters Trapped in Their Own CertaintyWhy Yelp Sucks: 7 Reasons, An Unfiltered ReviewWhat Makes a LinkedIn Post Go ViralCharacter Development: An 8-Step Guide

Murder One

Murder One

A Writer's Guide to Homicide

Series:Howdunit
Published:January 1, 1997
ISBN:089879773X
Pages:228
ISBN:978-0898797732
Language:English
Share:

Buy Now

Description:

TL;DR

6/10. A crime-writer’s reference focused on homicide, the genre’s defining crime, covering types of murder, means, and especially the cover-ups that form the puzzle at the heart of mystery fiction. Its mid-1990s specifics are dated by advances in forensic capability, and it works best alongside its companion volume, but it’s a focused, useful niche tool.

Murder One by Mauro V. Corvasce narrows the crime-writer’s reference down to the single subject at the dark heart of so much of the genre: murder. The author’s companion volume surveys criminal methods broadly. This one focuses on homicide. Its types. The weapons and means involved. The way killers attempt to cover their crimes, and how all of it can be used believably in fiction. For the mystery, thriller, and crime writers whose plots turn on a killing, it offers focused, realistic grounding in the genre’s defining crime.

Reviewed as a craft tool, it serves that specific purpose, with the usual caveats and care.

The lens is craft, as always: this review treats the book as a resource for writing believable murder in fiction, not as anything operational, and keeps to what it offers a storyteller.

The genre’s defining crime

Murder is the engine of an enormous share of crime fiction, and the book’s value is treating it with the specific, realistic detail that keeps a fictional killing credible. Corvasce covers the different types of murder and the realities of various means. Then, crucially, how killers attempt to conceal their crimes. The cover-ups. The disposal. The efforts to evade detection, the territory a mystery plot lives in.

A writer who understands how murders are realistically committed and concealed can construct a crime that holds up. It’s to survive the scrutiny of the fictional investigator and the knowledgeable reader, the foundation of a satisfying mystery.

Keep reading

Plotting a murder mystery the detective has to earn: Corvasce’s realistic homicide detail, in the craft of constructing the central crime.

The cover-up as plot

The book’s attention to how criminals cover up murders is its most plot-useful angle, because the concealment of a crime is the puzzle at the center of the mystery genre. The interplay between how a killer hides a crime and how an investigator uncovers it’s the essential cat-and-mouse, and realistic detail on the cover-up gives a writer the raw material to construct a credible puzzle, one where the clues that crack the case make sense and the killer’s mistakes feel earned instead of convenient.

Understanding concealment realistically is, for a mystery writer, understanding the structure of the genre itself.

Keep reading

Writing a thriller where the tension never breaks: the killer-versus-investigator dynamic at the heart of the form.

What are the weaknesses of Murder One?

The standard limitations apply, with the necessary note of care given the subject. The book dates from the mid-1990s, and forensic and investigative capability, the means by which murders are detected and solved, has advanced enormously since, so the realities of what a killer could plausibly conceal have shifted, and a writer setting a contemporary story must update against current forensic capability. As with all such references, it’s grounding for fiction, not anything else, and its value is strictly in writing believable crime.

It’s also a narrow, single-subject reference, useful to the crime writer and overlapping with its companion volume, best used as part of a set. Dated in its particulars, like its shelfmates.

Is Murder One worth reading?

It’s a focused, useful crime-writer’s reference on murder, the genre’s defining crime, valuable for its realistic detail on the types of homicide and especially on the cover-ups that form the puzzle at the center of mystery fiction. It loses ground for its mid-1990s vintage, significant here because the forensic capability that catches killers has advanced so much since, and for the narrowness of a single-subject reference best used alongside its companions.

Treat it as authentic grounding for believable murder fiction, to be checked against current forensic reality, useful to the crime writer and dated in its specifics. A capable, focused niche tool.

Explore the hub

The Writing Hub: crime writing, research, and the rest of the craft, gathered in one place.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Mauro V. Corvasce’s book Murder One cover?
I found it to be a crime-writer’s reference focused specifically on murder, the genre’s defining crime. It covers the different types of homicide, the weapons and means involved, and how killers attempt to cover their crimes. It also gets into disposal and the efforts to evade detection. That’s the territory a mystery plot lives in. For writers whose plots turn on a killing, it offers focused, realistic grounding and not broad crime coverage.
How does Murder One compare to its companion volume on criminal methods?
The companion volume surveys criminal methods broadly across many kinds of crime, while Murder One narrows down to homicide specifically. I found Murder One to be the more specialized of the two, focused entirely on the genre’s defining crime and not crime in general. I think the two work best used together, since Murder One goes deep on murder where the companion book stays wide.
What is the most useful part of Murder One for writers?
I found the attention to how criminals cover up murders to be the most plot-useful angle in the book. Concealment is the puzzle at the center of the mystery genre, so realistic detail on the cover-up gives a writer the raw material to construct a credible mystery. That interplay between how a killer hides a crime and how an investigator uncovers it’s the essential cat-and-mouse of the form. Getting that concealment right means the clues that crack the case make sense and the killer’s mistakes feel earned instead of convenient.
Is the information in Murder One still current?
No, I found it dated in its particulars. The book comes from the mid-1990s, and forensic and investigative capability has advanced enormously since then. That means what a killer could plausibly conceal has shifted, so a writer setting a contemporary story needs to check the details against current forensic reality. It still works as grounding for fiction, but not as an up-to-date technical picture.
Who should read Murder One?
I’d point mystery, thriller, and crime writers to this one, especially those whose plots turn on a killing. It gives realistic grounding in the genre’s central crime, from types of murder to how killers try to cover their tracks. Writers should keep in mind that the specifics need checking against current forensic capability given the book’s age. It works best as part of a set alongside its companion volume and not as a standalone reference.
Is Murder One irresponsible for explaining how killers cover up crimes?
I reviewed it strictly as a craft tool for fiction writers, not as anything operational, and that’s the lens I think it deserves. Its purpose is helping a writer construct a believable mystery plot, where the killer’s concealment and the investigator’s discovery of it have to hold up to scrutiny. The value is in making fiction credible, not in offering anything beyond what a writer needs to build a satisfying puzzle. I treated it the same way I’d treat any craft reference on a dark subject, useful for the story it helps a writer tell.

About the author

Mauro V. Corvasce

Mauro V. Corvasce is a longtime American police detective and co-author of two Writer's Digest Howdunit titles that remain go-to references for crime and mystery novelists: Modus Operandi: A Writer's Guide to How Criminals Work (1995) and Murder One: A Writer's Guide to Homicide (1997), both co-written with fellow detective Joseph R. Paglino. The books draw directly on the co-authors'…

More about Mauro V. Corvasce

Back