Latest
SMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableFree BooksJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends On

Cause of Death

Cause of Death

A Writer's Guide to Death, Murder and Forensic Medicine

Series:Howdunit
Published:January 1, 1992
ISBN:0898795249
Pages:240
ISBN:978-0898795240
Language:English
Share:

Buy Now

Description:

TL;DR

6/10. A Writer’s Digest forensic reference by a physician, covering death, autopsy, and the procedures that follow, the complement to a wounding guide. Competent on the timeless basics, but its early-1990s forensic detail is badly dated in a field transformed by DNA and new technology. A foundation to check against current sources.

Cause of Death by Keith D. Wilson is the forensic companion to the injury references on the crime writer’s shelf: where one book covers wounding, this one covers what comes after, death, the body afterward, the autopsy, and the official machinery that processes a corpse. It’s a Writer’s Digest reference aimed at mystery, crime, and thriller writers who need their death scenes and investigations to survive scrutiny from readers who know how these things work.

Wilson is a physician, so the medical material has a baseline credibility. Fiction fudges the procedural reality of death constantly, with coroners announcing time of death to the minute over a cooling body. Competent is the word I keep coming back to here: solid, useful, and nothing that made me sit up.

What it documents

The book walks a writer through what happens to a body, from the moment of trauma through to burial. It covers how a body changes after death, how pathologists conduct autopsies, the paperwork and legal procedures a death sets in motion, and the laws governing how authorities handle and investigate deaths. For a mystery writer whose plot turns on a body, a time of death, a cause, an autopsy finding, this is the factual grounding that keeps the procedural spine of the story believable.

It answers the practical questions most people, thankfully, never have to ask. A mystery that gets the autopsy wrong has no business asking readers to trust its clues.

Keep reading

Writing a mystery that plays fair and still surprises: accurate forensics ground a fair-play mystery; here’s the craft around the clues.

Where it sits among its shelfmates

This one doesn’t stand out from its shelfmates, and I won’t dress it up.

The crime-writer’s reference shelf is crowded with overlapping titles. Cause of Death is the death-and-forensics specialist, complementary to a wounding-focused book instead of redundant with it, and a writer doing serious crime work might reasonably own both. On its own subject it’s competent and useful. No single standout feature lifts it above the category. It’s a solid, workmanlike reference instead of an exceptional one.

Its value is proportional to how central death investigation is to what you’re writing.

Keep reading

Research for fiction: how much, and how to hide it: forensic facts matter only if worn lightly; the article shows how to deploy research invisibly.

Is Cause of Death still current?

The familiar caveat applies and is sharper here than for anatomy, because forensic science is one of the fastest-moving fields touching crime fiction. The book is from the early 1990s, and DNA analysis, forensic technology, and investigative procedure have advanced dramatically since, so the specific procedural and forensic detail is considerably dated. A contemporary crime writer can’t rely on it for current accuracy and must supplement it heavily; the broad realities of death and autopsy endure, but the current forensics that often drive modern mysteries aren’t here.

Is Cause of Death worth reading?

It’s a competent, useful forensic reference for crime writers, the death-and-autopsy complement to a wounding guide, grounded by a physician author. But its early-1990s vintage leaves its forensic and procedural detail significantly out of date in a field that’s transformed, so it works as a foundation to be checked and updated instead of a current authority. It has a modest place on the serious crime writer’s shelf, useful for the timeless basics of death and its handling, unreliable for the modern forensics a contemporary mystery often needs.

Solid but dated. A contemporary mystery built on this book’s forensics alone would fall apart in front of any reader who follows true crime, and a writer shouldn’t have to learn that the hard way.

Explore the hub

The Writing Hub: mystery, research, and the rest of the craft, gathered in one place.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Cause of Death by Keith D. Wilson cover?
I found it walks a writer through what happens to a body, from the moment of trauma through to burial. It covers how a body changes after death, how autopsies are conducted, and the paperwork and legal procedures a death sets in motion. It also lays out the laws governing how deaths are handled and investigated. For a mystery writer whose plot turns on a body, a time of death, or an autopsy finding, I think this gives the factual grounding that keeps the procedural spine of a story believable.
How is Cause of Death different from a forensic wounding guide?
I see it as the death-and-forensics specialist on the shelf, covering what comes after death instead of the wounding itself. Where a wounding-focused reference covers injury to the living body, this one covers the body afterward, the autopsy, and the official machinery that processes a corpse. I think of the two as complementary and not redundant, and a writer doing serious crime work might reasonably own both.
Has forensic science changed since the early 1990s?
Dramatically: the book is from the early 1990s, and forensic science, DNA analysis, and investigative procedure have advanced dramatically since. The book is from the early 1990s, and forensic science, DNA analysis, and investigative procedure have advanced dramatically since. The broad realities of death and autopsy endure, but the specific forensic techniques are considerably dated.
Is Cause of Death by Keith D. Wilson still accurate?
Not really. I read the book as coming from the early 1990s, and DNA analysis, forensic technology, and investigative procedure have advanced dramatically since then, so the specific procedural and forensic detail is considerably dated. I’d say the broad realities of death and autopsy still hold, but a contemporary crime writer can’t rely on it for current accuracy and needs to supplement it heavily. The current forensics that often drive modern mysteries simply aren’t in this book.
Who should read Cause of Death?
I’d point mystery, crime, and thriller writers toward it, especially ones whose plots turn on a body, a time of death, a cause, or an autopsy finding. It answers the practical questions writers have about the realities most people, thankfully, never have to learn firsthand. I think its value scales with how central death investigation is to what a writer is working on.
Does Cause of Death stand out among forensic references for writers?
Not really. I found it competent and useful on its own subject, but no single standout feature lifts it above the crowded shelf of crime-writer references. It reads as a solid, workmanlike reference instead of an exceptional one. Its worth depends on how central death investigation is to the story a writer is telling.

About the author

Keith D. Wilson

Keith D. Wilson

Keith D. Wilson, MD, is an American physician and writing-craft author whose two Writer's Digest Howdunit titles are among the most-recommended medical references for crime and mystery writers. He co-wrote Code Blue: A Writer's Guide to Hospitals, Including the ER, OR, and ICU (1999) with David W. Page, MD, Professor of Surgery at Tufts, and authored Cause of Death: A…

More about Keith D. Wilson

Back