Missing Persons

Missing Persons by Fay Faron is a crime-writer’s reference on the work of finding people, the bread and butter of much real private-investigation work, and a frequent driver of mystery and thriller plots. Written by a working PI, it shows crime writers who becomes a private investigator and how missing-person cases really get worked: the methods, the records, the realities behind the fictional gumshoe. Reviewed as the specialized craft reference it is, it does a useful, focused job, with the now-familiar caveat about its age.

The lens, as with all these references, is craft: the value is authentic detail for writing believable investigators and cases, and this review treats it as that tool, focused on what it gives a storyteller.

The real work of finding people

The book’s value is its focus on the actual mechanics of locating people and the realities of the PI profession.

Faron writes from experience. She covers the types who really become private investigators, the ex-cops, the would-be tough guys, the reporters. She also covers the real methods used to trace someone. They differ sharply from the dramatic intuition fiction tends to portray. Real investigation is methodical, dependent on records, patterns, and patient legwork, and a writer who grasps that can build a detective whose process rings true.

Plenty of mystery plots turn on finding a missing person, and too many of them solve it with a gut feeling and a lucky break. That’s lazy. Faron shows the grind, and the grind is where believable tension lives.

Character as well as method

The section on who becomes an investigator impressed me more than the methods did. That helps a writer build a believable PI character instead of just a believable procedure. Know the real backgrounds, motivations, and types who do this work and you can build an investigator who feels like a member of the profession instead of a screen archetype. Faron’s insider perspective on both the work and the workers gives a crime writer a fuller, more authentic foundation for the investigator at the center of so much of the genre.

Is Missing Persons still current?

The standard limitation applies, and applies hard here. The book dates from 1997, and the digital era has transformed finding people more than almost any area of investigation: online databases, social media, public-records aggregators, and the vast digital footprint everyone now leaves have changed the work. The timeless fundamentals, the logic of a search, the kinds of records that matter, the patience required, still hold, but the specific methods are considerably dated, and a writer setting a contemporary story must update the techniques heavily against current practice.

The book grounds the lasting craft of the search; it can’t speak to the digital tools that now dominate it.

Is Missing Persons worth reading?

It’s a useful, focused crime-writer’s reference on finding people and the realities of the PI profession, valuable for its working-investigator grounding in both method and character, the kind of detail that keeps a missing-person plot credible. It loses ground for a 1997 vintage that dates its methods significantly in an area the digital era has transformed more than most.

Treat it as authoritative on the logic of the search and the people who do the work, and treat the specifics as history. Half a good book is still worth the shelf space for a crime writer building a PI.

Frequently Asked Questions