DEI Writing Handbook

Writing characters whose backgrounds differ from your own tends to make writers anxious, and that anxiety usually produces one of two bad results. Either the writer avoids difference entirely and writes a monochrome world, or they write characters defined solely by their identity, checklists of traits standing in for people. Both fail for the same reason: they treat identity as the character instead of as one layer of a whole human being. This course teaches a way past the anxiety, by building every character from psychology first.

The core idea is that human psychology runs on patterns that hold across every background, and building on those patterns produces real characters of any identity, while building on identity alone produces artificial ones.

Psychology runs deeper than identity

Human psychology operates by observable patterns that exist regardless of background. Attachment styles, the ways people organize information, the ways they express emotion and build relationships, these are the deep structures of a person, and they cut across every ethnic, cultural, and social line. A character with an anxious attachment style, from any background, seeks reassurance and fears abandonment in recognizable ways. Start there, at the level of universal human psychology, and you are building a person instead of a representative.

This is why psychology has to come before identity in character construction. When you build from a real psychological core, the character is already a specific human being, and their identity becomes one of the layers shaping how that psychology expresses itself, instead of the whole of who they are. Build the other way, starting from identity and adding traits to match, and you get a figure who exists to represent a category, which reads as artificial no matter how respectfully it is done. The deep patterns are what make a character feel like a person. Identity textures those patterns. It does not replace them.

Identity forms through experience

Identity is not a fixed label a person carries. It forms through experience, through the specific things that happened to this specific person, which is why two people who share a background can be profoundly different. A character’s relationship to their own identity is itself a product of their history, their family, the particular events that shaped how they see themselves and their place in the world. This is the difference between a character who has an identity and a character who is a stand-in for an identity.

Writing this way means asking how a particular character came to their sense of themselves, instead of assigning them the assumed attitudes of their category. Two characters from the same background might relate to it in opposite ways, one embracing it, one in tension with it, because their individual experiences differed, and that individuality is exactly what makes each of them a real person. When you trace a character’s identity to their specific lived experience instead of to a demographic assumption, you get someone particular and believable, which is the whole goal. The character owns their identity the way real people do, through the history that formed them.

People carry multiple identities at once

Real people are never a single identity. They are the intersection of many, their background, their family role, their work, their generation, their beliefs, their temperament, all layered and sometimes in tension. A character built on one identity layer is flat, but a character built on the interplay of several is dimensional, because the layers create the internal complexity that real people have. The tension between a character’s different identities is often where the most interesting drama lives.

So you build characters with multiple layers that interact, and you pay special attention to where those layers pull against each other. A person torn between the expectations of their upbringing and the demands of their present life, between who their family needs them to be and who they are becoming, has the kind of internal conflict that generates real story. This is how you write depth into any character regardless of background, by refusing to reduce them to one dimension and instead building the several layers whose interaction makes a person feel complicated and true. One layer is a label. Several in tension is a human being.

Cultural patterns are real, not political

Cultures genuinely do shape how people organize information, express emotion, and build relationships, and these patterns persist across generations. Writing them well means treating them as real frameworks that shape a character’s behavior, neither ignoring them nor exaggerating them into stereotype. A character formed within a particular cultural pattern will tend to communicate and relate in ways that pattern shapes, and rendering that accurately is part of writing them as a full person instead of a generic one.

The skill is holding two things at once: the cultural pattern is real and shapes the character, and the individual is more than the pattern. A character expresses their culture through their own particular personality, so two people from the same culture express it differently, filtered through their individual psychology. Get this right and you avoid both errors, the flatness of ignoring culture entirely and the stereotype of reducing a person to it. The cultural framework is one of the forces that shaped a specific human being, and writing it with that balance, real but not total, is what lets you write across difference with confidence instead of anxiety.

Using AI as an assistant here

The characters are yours and the psychological work is the craft. No tool builds a person. But a tool helps with the checking. You can use AI to test whether a character is built on real psychology or has collapsed into a single-identity checklist. You can have it flag where a character’s behavior reads as stereotype instead of as an individual expressing a background through their own personality. You can use it to check whether the layers of a character’s identity interact or just sit side by side. It surfaces the flatness. You build the person.

Frequently Asked Questions