What Changes When You Already Have One

This entry is part 6 of 6 in the series When to Write Your Book
TL;DR: The first book was a proof and the second starts with material. It is faster because the deciding is faster, it proves you work in a territory instead of that you wrote a book once, and it lifts sales of the first one. The trap is writing the book your first readers asked for, which is a mandate from a small group who already bought from you.

The second book is a different project, and almost nobody tells you how.

The first one was a proof. You were finding out whether you could do it, whether anybody would read it, whether you had enough to say. Everything about that project was shaped by uncertainty, including how long it took and how much of it you rewrote.

By the second, all of those questions have answers. You know you can finish. You know roughly what the process costs you in hours and attention. You know which parts you found hard and which you enjoyed, and you know what your first book failed to cover.

That last one is the important change. Most authors finish their first book with a list, whether they wrote it down or not, of the arguments they had to leave out, the chapters that got compressed, and the objections they never answered properly.

So the second book starts with material and a plan instead of a hope, and it usually takes less time and comes out better.

What also changes is what the second book does for you commercially, which is different from what the first one did and worth understanding before you start.

Write down what your first book left out while you still remember, because that list is the specification for the second one.

Why is the second book faster?

Because you are no longer learning the process while doing it.

A first-time author spends real time on questions that never come up again. How much detail belongs in a chapter. Whether a story is too personal. What to do when a section will not come together. How to react to a draft that reads wrong.

None of that is wasted and none of it repeats. Second time round those decisions are quick, because you have made them before and you know what your own answers are.

The writing itself is not much faster. The deciding is considerably faster, and deciding is most of where the months go.

What does a second book do that a first cannot?

It establishes a subject, not a fact.

One book proves you wrote a book. Two books about related territory proves you work in that territory, and that is a different claim entirely. It also survives the obvious objection that anybody can produce one book about the thing they are best known for.

A stranger checking you finds a pattern instead of an item. That reads as a practice, not a project, and it is considerably harder to dismiss.

The machines assembling answers about people respond to the same thing, because a repeated association is exactly what they treat as reliable.

A small signing table at an event. A woman signs a copy while a second stack of a different title sits beside her elbow

Should the second book be on the same subject?

Adjacent is the answer that works.

The same subject again produces a book that competes with your first one, and the first one has a head start. A completely different subject splits your record and neither association gets strong enough to be useful.

Adjacent means the same reader with a different problem, or the same problem examined from a stage further on. Somebody who found the first book useful has a reason to buy the second, and somebody finding the second one is a plausible reader for the first.

Two books that point at each other are worth more than two that sit apart.

What happens to sales of the first one?

They usually rise, which surprises people.

A new book brings attention to the name attached to it, and a share of the people who arrive go looking for what else exists. The first book benefits from the second in a way that has nothing to do with its own quality.

That effect compounds, which is why authors with several books report that the whole catalog moves whenever any one of them gets attention.

It is also an argument against treating the first book as a one-off experiment that either worked or did not. Judged alone at the time, plenty of first books look like failures that later turn out to have been the start of something.

What if the first book was disappointing?

That changes the reason for the second one and not whether to write it.

A first book that underperformed usually failed on distribution, positioning or goal instead of on the writing. All three of those are correctable and none of them requires a different author.

What the second book gets is everything learned from the first attempt, including the specific way it went wrong. Somebody who watched their first book land in silence knows considerably more about launching a book than somebody who has never had one.

The authors who stop after a disappointing first book are rarely the ones who could not write. They are the ones who took the outcome as a verdict on themselves and did not diagnose it.

When is the right time to start?

Sooner than the gap most people leave.

The material is freshest immediately after finishing, and so is the process knowledge. Authors who begin a second book within a year tend to find it simple. Authors who leave it five years have to relearn most of what they knew about their own working method.

There is also a momentum argument. Two books eighteen months apart reads as a body of work. Two books eight years apart reads as two separate events.

What that does not mean is rushing. It means starting the thinking while the last project is still in your hands.

What is the trap in the second one?

Writing the book your first readers asked for.

After a first book you get feedback, and some of it is requests. Cover this next. Go deeper on that. Write the practical version. Those requests come from people who liked the book, which makes them feel like a mandate.

They are a mandate from a small self-selected group who have already bought from you, and writing directly to them produces a narrower book with a smaller audience than the first.

Use the requests as evidence about what was unclear. Do not use them as a table of contents.

The Guides That Get Your Book Written, Published, and Sold

Four short, practical guides on writing, publishing, and selling your book, plus the occasional note when there's something worth your time. No fluff, no daily inbox clutter. Drop your email and they're yours.

We use MailerLite to manage our list and send these emails. Your address is used only to send you what you signed up for. We will not sell it, share it, or use it for anything else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a second book faster to write?
Usually. The writing takes about as long and the deciding is much quicker, because a first-time author spends real time on questions that never come up again and deciding is where most of the months go.
What does a second book prove that a first does not?
That you work in a territory instead of that you wrote a book once. A stranger checking you finds a pattern, not an item, which reads as a practice, not a project.
Should the second book cover the same subject?
Adjacent works best. The same subject competes with the first, a completely different one splits your record, and adjacent means the same reader with a different problem or the same problem a stage further on.
Do sales of the first book change?
They usually rise. A new book brings attention to the name, some of those people go looking for what else exists, and authors with several books report the whole catalog moves when any one gets attention.
Should I write a second book if the first disappointed?
Usually yes. First books that underperform normally failed on distribution, positioning or goal instead of writing, and all three are correctable by the same author with better information.
How long should I wait?
Less than most people do. The material and the process knowledge are freshest immediately afterwards, and two books eighteen months apart reads as a body of work where eight years apart reads as two events.
What is the risk with a second book?
Writing the one your first readers asked for. Those requests come from a small self-selected group who already bought from you, and following them produces a narrower book with a smaller audience.

📁︎ Ghostwriting

🏷︎ Business Book

📝 Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment