Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

Thrillers Part 3 – The Excellent

Part 3 – The Excellent

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Failures

Every film in this tier is rated 9 and several of them reached that on almost no money. Pontypool is one room and a radio desk. District 9 delivers an entire occupation through eviction paperwork. Misery is two people and a bedroom.

The pattern is that constraint forces a decision, and the decision becomes the film. That is true of the expensive entries too: The Insider has nothing physical at stake for most of its length and Mann shoots a confidentiality agreement like a loaded weapon.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the third of nine parts.

Annie Wilkes, John Doe, Hans Landa and Kyung-chul are four completely different threats and only one of them explains himself. Build opposition in the Antagonist Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. Misery (1990) [full review]

► Read the full review of Misery (1990)

1990
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.8/10

"Two people and a bedroom, and Kathy Bates won Best Actress for a horror film."

Rob Reiner adapted Stephen King with two actors and one house and won Kathy Bates an Academy Award, an outcome a horror performance almost never gets. Paul Sheldon crashes his car in a Colorado blizzard and is pulled out by the wrong person. Reiner had made The Princess Bride and Stand By Me and this was his third King adaptation.

Bates plays Annie Wilkes as somebody whose politeness is the frightening part. She does not shout for most of the film, she apologizes, she uses invented profanity, and the register shifts without warning and then shifts back as though nothing happened. Bates was forty-one and had spent two decades in theatre with almost no film work behind her.

The hobbling is the scene everybody remembers and the novel is considerably worse. King has Annie amputate a foot with an axe and cauterize it with a blowtorch. William Goldman argued for keeping it and Reiner refused on the grounds that the audience would stop watching.

The typewriter is the film’s best object. A missing n, a demand for correct paper, a burned manuscript, and a writer forced to produce work he despises for an audience of one. King wrote it about cocaine and about readers who wanted more Carrie, and both readings hold.

For WritersBates plays almost the entire part in a polite register and shifts out of it for seconds at a time. The violence is rare and the courtesy is constant, so the audience spends the film waiting for a change that mostly does not come. When you write an unstable character, make the baseline pleasant and the departures brief. A character who is menacing on every page becomes weather the reader adjusts to. Writing Heroes and Villains works the same ground. One who is kind for twenty pages and wrong for a single line keeps them reading the kindness for evidence.

↑ All Entries

2. Falling Down (1993) [full review]

► Read the full review of Falling Down (1993)

1993
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"A laid-off engineer abandons his car in traffic and walks across Los Angeles."

Joel Schumacher put Michael Douglas in a short-sleeved shirt and a tie, abandoned him in a Los Angeles traffic jam, and let him walk west across the city becoming progressively more armed. The film was read as endorsement on release and it is not. Schumacher shot in Los Angeles in the summer of 1992, months after the riots, and the heat is real.

The construction is careful about what D-Fens actually is. He has been unemployed for a month and has not told anybody, he has a restraining order against him, and the family he is walking toward is frightened of him. Every grievance he voices is real and none of them justify him.

Robert Duvall’s Prendergast is the counterweight and the film gives him the same day in a different register. Last shift before retirement, a wife who calls constantly, colleagues who do not respect him, and he absorbs all of it and goes home. The two men meet for ninety seconds.

The neo-Nazi surplus store scene is where the film states its position out loud. A man who assumes D-Fens is on his side is corrected violently, and the correction is the only moment the character is unambiguously right about anything. Douglas has said the part was the hardest of his career because the film never lets him be right.

For WritersSchumacher runs Prendergast’s day in parallel and gives him every provocation D-Fens gets. Traffic, humiliation, a bad marriage, institutional contempt. He absorbs all of it and goes home, and the comparison is the film’s entire argument without a word of commentary. When you write a character whose choices you want questioned, build somebody in identical circumstances who chooses differently. The reader does all the judging and you never write a scene in which anybody states what the book thinks. Theme in fiction covers the method. The mirror character has to be genuinely sympathetic, because a strawman alternative tells the reader what to conclude just as crudely as a speech would.

↑ All Entries

3. Carlito’s Way (1993) [full review]

► Read the full review of Carlito’s Way (1993)

1993
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"Built entirely on dread instead of surprise, and the ending is the first shot."

De Palma and Pacino made a second crime film together and it is better than Scarface in every way that matters. Carlito is out of prison on a technicality, genuinely intends to retire, and spends the film being pulled back by obligations he cannot refuse without becoming somebody else.

Sean Penn’s Kleinfeld is one of the great supporting performances. A coked-out lawyer who got Carlito released and now expects a return, and Penn plays the deterioration across months without ever asking for sympathy. The scene on the boat is where the film turns and neither man says what has happened.

The Grand Central sequence is De Palma at his best. Escalators, a concourse, a ticket hall, a shifting geometry of pursuers, and Carlito ninety seconds from a train to Miami. The audience knows where everybody is at every moment, the hardest thing in action staging.

For WritersDe Palma opens on the shooting and closes on it, so the audience spends two hours watching a man make reasonable choices toward an end they already know. Every act of loyalty reads as a step toward the platform. When you frame a story with its own ending, the middle stops being about what happens and becomes about which decision was the fatal one. Give the reader four or five candidates for the fatal decision and let them carry that question the whole way. The frame also guarantees a reader finishes the book, since they already know the destination and are reading to find out which turn was the wrong one.

↑ All Entries

4. Se7en (1995) [full review]

► Read the full review of Se7en (1995)

1995
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.6/10

"It rains for the entire film except the end, and by then you know that cannot be good."

Fincher took a studio thriller and refused to light it. The city has no name, it rains for six of the seven days, and Darius Khondji processed the stock to crush the blacks so entire scenes take place in rooms the audience cannot fully see.

The structure is a countdown the detectives never get ahead of. They arrive after every murder. The sloth victim is alive and that is worse. John Doe is not caught, he walks into a police station covered in blood and surrenders, and the last act is him directing the ending he wrote.

Kevin Spacey’s name was kept off the posters and out of the opening credits so the audience would not anticipate him, and the studio agreed. He appears with forty minutes left and the car ride to the desert is the film’s best writing. New Line had wanted Denzel Washington, who turned it down and has said publicly that he regrets it.

Andrew Kevin Walker wrote it while working in a Tower Records store in Manhattan and has said the city in the script is the one he was walking home through. New Line bought an earlier draft with a different ending and the original was restored by an administrative error.

The box was the fight. New Line wanted an alternative ending with a chase and Fincher and Pitt both refused, and the shooting script Pitt signed for had the original. The contents are never shown in any frame and the entire third act depends on a courier’s face and Somerset’s reaction.

For WritersFincher never opens the box and never shows the contents. Somerset looks, the audience watches him look, and the information arrives through one line and a reaction. The restraint is why the ending survived thirty years of imitation. When your story turns on an object or an image, ask whether the reader needs to see it. Describe the reaction of somebody who has, give one factual detail, and stop. Their version will be worse than anything you could write and it will belong to them entirely. Sensory detail is how you hand over the parts.

The Sixth Sense, 12 Monkeys and Se7en all withhold something structural and none of them cheat to do it. Study the shapes in the Story ARC Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. 12 Monkeys (1995) [full review]

► Read the full review of 12 Monkeys (1995)

1995
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"Determinism with no escape hatch, and the film closes the loop in front of a child."

Gilliam expanded Chris Marker’s La Jetee from twenty-eight minutes of still photographs into a feature and kept the central device intact: a man watching his own death as a child without knowing what he is looking at. Everything in the film is already fixed. Marker’s original was assembled almost entirely from still photographs with one moving shot.

Bruce Willis plays Cole as somebody being broken by the travel instead of strengthened by it. He is filthy, confused, medicated and frequently wrong about what year he is in, and the performance has almost none of the star register he was being paid for.

Brad Pitt was nominated for Jeffrey Goines and the performance is genuinely uncomfortable. Constant movement, constant talking, a physical restlessness that never stops, and the film keeps it up long enough that the audience stops being able to tell whether he is a suspect. Pitt trained at a psychiatric facility for weeks and had trouble stopping afterward.

The loop closes at an airport and Gilliam holds on a child watching a man die. Cole has seen this his whole life and has been trying to reach it, and the film’s position is that he was never going to change anything. The observer in the background is the actual answer.

For WritersGilliam shows the ending in the first two minutes as a recurring dream and the audience watches it four more times before they understand what they saw. The image never changes. What changes is how much context they have for it. When you plant a scene that will pay off later, show it early without explanation and return to it without emphasis. Each return costs you nothing and the final pass will land as recognition instead of revelation, and recognition is the stronger of the two. The restraint is the hard part, because every instinct says to flag the plant on its first appearance so nobody misses it.

↑ All Entries

6. The Game (1997) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Game (1997)

1997
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"A man’s life is dismantled by a company he hired, and nobody can tell what is real."

Fincher followed Se7en with a film in which nothing can be verified. Nicholas Van Orton is given a birthday present, a participation game with no stated rules, and within a week his bank accounts are empty and people are shooting at him. Fincher shot it in San Francisco with Michael Douglas, who was fifty-two and did most of it himself.

Michael Douglas plays a man whose entire identity is control being systematically stripped of it, and the physical performance is the reason the film works. He is genuinely frightened and increasingly filthy, and by the Mexico sequence he has nothing left to operate with. The film cost fifty million dollars and took a hundred and nine, an outcome nobody at the studio expected.

The ending requires a quantity of planning that cannot survive examination and the film knows it. Fincher has been open that the logistics do not hold. What holds is the experience of the two hours before it, and the audience’s willingness to forgive depends entirely on whether they were frightened.

For WritersFincher builds two hours on a question the audience cannot answer and then delivers a resolution that does not bear checking. The film survives because the uncertainty was the product and the explanation was only ever the exit. When you write a story on an unanswerable premise, spend everything on the experience and accept that the explanation will disappoint somebody. A reader who was genuinely unsettled for three hundred pages will forgive a thin last chapter. A reader who was never unsettled at all will not forgive you anything, and no explanation will rescue that.

↑ All Entries

7. Face/Off (1997) [full review]

► Read the full review of Face/Off (1997)

1997
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.3/10

"The operatic peak of nineties American action, and the premise is completely absurd."

John Woo’s best American film, and the premise is so absurd that committing to it completely was the only available strategy. An FBI agent takes the face of a terrorist in a coma, the terrorist wakes and takes his, and both men then have to live in each other’s houses.

Travolta and Cage are each playing the other actor’s performance, a genuinely difficult technical exercise and mostly succeeds. Cage as Archer is restrained and grieving. Travolta as Troy is enormous and enjoying himself. Neither is doing an impression of a character. Woo had made The Killer and Hard Boiled in Hong Kong and this is his last American film that works.

The family material is what separates it from the rest of Woo’s American work. Archer’s daughter is afraid of him, his marriage is dead, and Troy is a better father than Archer was. The film states that plainly and refuses to resolve it. The script had been circulating since 1990 with Stallone and Schwarzenegger attached at one point.

The church shootout is the last great Woo set piece, with the doves, the slow motion and the standoff through a mirror. The boat chase afterward is where the film runs out and the last twenty minutes are conventional in a way nothing before them was.

For WritersWoo takes a premise nobody could defend and refuses to apologize for it at any point. No character comments on the absurdity, the medical procedure is explained once in a register of total seriousness, and the film never winks. When your premise is preposterous, commit harder instead of softer. A story that acknowledges its own silliness has given the reader permission to stop investing. One that treats an absurd situation with complete gravity gets the reader to treat it that way too. Commitment has to extend to the supporting cast, since one character reacting to the premise as ridiculous licenses the reader to do the same.

↑ All Entries

8. The Sixth Sense (1999) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Sixth Sense (1999)

1999
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.2/10

"The twist is famous and the film underneath it is better."

Shyamalan wrote a ghost story that is structurally a two-hander about a man who cannot reach his wife and a boy nobody believes, and the supernatural material is the smaller half. It made close to seven hundred million dollars and defined his career permanently. Disney sold the distribution rights before release and lost several hundred million dollars doing it.

The construction is the achievement and it is genuinely fair. Malcolm never speaks directly to anybody except Cole. Nobody hands him anything. Every door he opens was already open. The red motif marks every scene where the two worlds touch, and the film shows the audience the rules repeatedly.

Haley Joel Osment was eleven and the performance is the reason the film is not merely a twist. The scene in the car where he tells his mother what her own mother said is played without any effects at all, and Toni Collette does the whole thing in reaction.

The twist has damaged its own film culturally, because two decades of imitation trained audiences to hunt for one. Watched now without expectation it is a film about grief and communication in which the reveal is the least interesting element. Shyamalan has never escaped the expectation it created and has said so in several interviews since.

For WritersShyamalan constructs the deception entirely from omission and never once has a character lie or a camera cheat. Malcolm addresses nobody but Cole. No door is opened for him. Every scene survives a second viewing because nothing in it was false. When you build a reveal, audit every scene for whether it works with the secret known. A trick that needs one cheated moment is a trick. Plot devices that work covers the line between a design and a trick. A structure where every moment was true and merely misinterpreted is a design, and readers reread designs.

↑ All Entries

9. The Insider (1999) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Insider (1999)

1999
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.8/10

"A film that makes contract law frightening."

Michael Mann made a thriller in which the threat is litigation and nobody is shot. Jeffrey Wigand knows what the tobacco companies knew, Lowell Bergman wants it on Sixty Minutes, and CBS declines to run it because the network is being sold. Mann adapted a Vanity Fair article by Marie Brenner and CBS cooperated with none of it.

Russell Crowe was thirty-five playing a man in his fifties and the performance is entirely internal. Wigand is not heroic. He is angry, proud, socially difficult and correct, and the film is precise about how much of his motivation is about being disrespected. Crowe gained thirty-five pounds, greyed his hair and slowed his speech for the part.

The golf course scene is the film’s thesis. Wigand is told that his confidentiality agreement has been expanded retroactively, with no threat and no raised voice, and Mann shoots it in wide daylight on manicured grass. Corporate power looks exactly like courtesy. Wigand’s confidentiality agreement was genuinely expanded after he had already signed it.

The hotel room sequence where Wigand comes apart is Mann at his most controlled. No score for most of it, a fax arriving, a man in a room he cannot leave, and a wife on a telephone who has stopped being on his side. Pacino plays Bergman as somebody who is right and insufferable in exactly equal measure.

For WritersMann builds two and a half hours of genuine dread out of depositions, telephone calls and legal correspondence. Nobody is physically threatened in a way that reads as danger, and the pressure is unbearable because the institutions are patient and the individuals are not. When you write against an organization, keep it polite. Violence gives the reader an opponent they understand. A letter that arrives on time and does exactly what it says is a far worse thing to be facing than a threat. Conflict that drives story covers institutional pressure. Procedural pressure also scales without new characters, because the same institution can apply it again from a different department every chapter.

Inglourious Basterds is four conversations at a table and the tension is entirely in language. Learn the technique in the Dialogue Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. Battle Royale (2000) [full review]

► Read the full review of Battle Royale (2000)

2000
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.5/10

"A school class on an island, and the director had been fifteen in a munitions factory."

Kinji Fukasaku was sixty-nine, had lived through the war as a teenager conscripted into a munitions factory, and made a film about a government forcing a class of fifteen-year-olds to kill each other. The Japanese Diet debated banning it. Fukasaku had directed Battles Without Honor and Humanity and was dying while he made this.

The premise is delivered with total bureaucratic flatness. An instructional video, a cheerful presenter, a bag of randomly assigned weapons, and collars that explode. The administrative register is what makes it unbearable, and not the violence. No American distributor would touch it for a decade and it circulated on imported discs.

Takeshi Kitano plays the teacher and the film gives him a private grievance that is never fully explained. He is disappointed in the class, he has a difficult daughter, and the last scene between him and Noriko is the only warmth in the picture. Kitano was already Japan’s biggest star and took the part for a fraction of his usual fee.

The film’s argument is generational and specific to Japan in 1999, about adults who wrecked an economy blaming the children who inherited it. Everything that borrowed the premise afterward kept the arena and dropped the argument. The Hunger Games comparison has been made constantly and Suzanne Collins has denied reading it.

For WritersFukasaku delivers the atrocity through an instructional video with a cheerful presenter and a laminated map. The bureaucratic packaging is what makes it land, because it establishes that this is routine and somebody designed the forms. When you write institutional horror, show the paperwork. A monstrous act announced by a monster is a villain. The same act delivered on a clipboard by somebody following procedure tells the reader how far the rot goes and does it in one scene. Why villain motivations fall apart is the opposite failure. Procedure is also the only way to write institutional evil without giving the reader somebody to defeat and calling the problem solved.

↑ All Entries

11. Traffic (2000) [full review]

► Read the full review of Traffic (2000)

2000
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"Three narratives, none of which resolves the others, and a color system that tells you where you are."

Soderbergh shot three storylines in three color grades and operated the camera himself on all of them. Mexico is bleached yellow, Ohio is blue and cold, San Diego is warm and natural, and the audience knows which thread they are in before a face appears.

The structure argues that the drug war is a system nobody inside can see whole. A judge appointed as drug czar whose daughter is using, a cartel wife discovering what her husband did, two DEA agents guarding a witness, a Tijuana officer working for a general. None of them meets most of the others.

Benicio del Toro carries the Mexican thread almost entirely in Spanish and won the Oscar for it. Javier Rodriguez wants a lit baseball field for the kids in his neighborhood and that is the whole of his ambition, and the film ends on him in the stands watching a game.

For WritersSoderbergh assigns each storyline a color and shoots it that way from the first frame, so the audience orients instantly across a hundred and forty-seven minutes of cross-cutting. The device is invisible as technique and total as function. When you run parallel threads in prose, give each a fixed signature and never vary it. Readers abandon multi-thread books when they have to work out where they are, and they will follow four threads happily if the answer is free. Controlling narrative perspective covers the mechanics. The signature has to be something the reader can identify in one line, since a marker they have to think about is not free and costs you the thread.

↑ All Entries

12. Swordfish (2001) [full review]

► Read the full review of Swordfish (2001)

2001
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.5/10

"The opening monologue is better than the film’s reputation and the bus sequence is better than both."

Dominic Sena made a film whose opening monologue is better than its reputation and whose bus sequence is better than both. John Travolta explains what is wrong with Dog Day Afternoon for two minutes, and the film never again reaches that level of confidence. Halle Berry was paid an additional half million dollars for a scene lasting seventeen seconds.

The hacking is nonsense and the film is not interested in pretending otherwise. Hugh Jackman is asked to break a Department of Defense system in sixty seconds with a gun to his head, and Sena shoots it as a performance instead of a technical problem.

The explosion sequence is the one piece of genuine filmmaking. A three hundred and sixty degree bullet-time shot of a building collapsing outward, achieved with a rig of a hundred and thirty-five cameras, and it cost more than most of the rest of the production.

For WritersTravolta opens the film by explaining, at length and correctly, why the ending of Dog Day Afternoon fails, and the speech is the best writing in the picture. It also sets a bar nothing afterward reaches. When you open on your strongest material, understand what you have spent. A first chapter that is markedly better than chapter four teaches the reader to expect a decline and they will read the rest measuring it. Save something. The fix is usually to move the best sequence instead of weakening it, because your strongest material is worth more in the middle where books lose people.

↑ All Entries

13. The Bourne Identity (2002) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Bourne Identity (2002)

2002
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"A man works out what he is from what his own body can do."

Doug Liman made it for sixty million dollars against studio resistance, rewrote Ludlum’s plot almost entirely, and replaced the Cold War apparatus with a man who cannot remember why he is good at this. The amnesia is the only reason the audience can identify with him.

The fight choreography changed the genre. Matt Damon trained in Filipino martial arts for months and the Paris apartment sequence is close-quarters, fast, ugly and shot with enough coverage to follow. A pen is used as a weapon and the film treats it as ordinary.

The Mini chase through Paris is the last great practical car sequence before digital took over. A small car in narrow streets, real stairs, real traffic, and Liman shooting from inside the vehicle so the audience is at the driver’s eye level throughout. Liman reshot roughly a third of the film after test screenings and Universal nearly shelved it.

Clive Owen’s Professor is the film’s best minor decision. A rival asset with four lines of dialogue who dies in a field telling Bourne they both look at people the same way, and the entire sequel is set up in about ninety seconds. Owen had just made Croupier and was on nobody’s list for a Hollywood part at that point.

For WritersBourne’s amnesia gives the audience a protagonist discovering his own capability at the same rate they are. He does not know he can do this until he does it, so every competence beat is a reveal instead of a demonstration. When you write an expert character, consider hiding the expertise from them. A reader watching somebody surprise themselves gets the pleasure of skill without the flatness of a protagonist who has already priced every situation. Concealed expertise also gives you a reason for the character to be afraid, and an already-competent protagonist can almost never justify one.

The Insider generates two and a half hours of dread out of depositions and faxes. Work out where pressure actually lives in the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. The Departed (2006) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Departed (2006)

2006
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.5/10

"Scorsese’s first Best Picture, and it is a remake of a Hong Kong film."

Scorsese remade Infernal Affairs, moved it to South Boston, doubled the running time and won the Academy Award he had been denied for thirty years. The additions are mostly profanity, a psychiatrist both men are sleeping with, and Jack Nicholson doing whatever he decided to do that day.

DiCaprio is doing the best work in the picture and it took years for that to be acknowledged. Billy Costigan is falling apart continuously, medicated, unable to prove he is a policeman to anybody, and the panic attacks are played as a man running out of physical capacity.

Scorsese had been nominated five separate times without winning and the Academy gave him Director and Picture for a remake. Several critics noted at the time that it was a strange way to correct the record. Thelma Schoonmaker also won for the editing of the final ten minutes.

The elevator is where the film separates from its source. Scorsese kills almost everybody in the last ten minutes and then adds an execution the original refused, converting an ambiguous ending into a resolved one. The rat on the railing is the one moment the film explains itself.

For WritersBoth men spend the film unable to prove who they are. Costigan’s file has been erased and Sullivan’s history has been buried, so identity here is a document instead of a fact about a person. Every scene turns on paperwork, an envelope, a computer record. When you write an identity plot, make the proof physical and losable. A character whose only evidence is a file somebody else controls can be erased, and the reader feels the vulnerability in every scene near a desk. Physical proof is also easier to threaten than a secret, since the reader can see the folder sitting on a desk in a room the protagonist cannot enter.

↑ All Entries

15. Michael Clayton (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of Michael Clayton (2007)

2007
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"A legal thriller where almost nothing happens in a courtroom."

Tony Gilroy had written the Bourne films and directed this himself, and it is the opposite of them. Nobody runs. A law firm’s outside counsel has a breakdown during a deposition and the firm’s fixer is sent to manage it, and the management is the plot.

Tom Wilkinson’s Arthur Edens is the film’s engine and the opening monologue is the best writing in American film of that decade. Six minutes of a man describing the moment he understood what he had spent his career doing, delivered over black and a car park.

Tilda Swinton won for a performance built almost entirely on rehearsal. Karen Crowder practises her answers in a hotel room, sweats through blouses, and every confident public statement the film shows has been preceded by a scene of her assembling it. Swinton has said she found the character more frightening to play than anything supernatural.

The last shot is two and a half minutes of George Clooney in the back of a taxi doing nothing. He has won, the fare is running, and Gilroy holds on his face past the point of comfort while the credits start. It is the correct ending and no studio would greenlight it now.

For WritersGilroy shows Karen Crowder rehearsing before every public moment, so the audience sees the assembly and then the finished product. The competence is real and the cost is visible, and she never once explains herself. When you write a capable antagonist, show the preparation. A villain who is simply good at things is a fact. One the reader has watched sweat through a blouse practising an answer becomes a person, and the reader will dread them more for it. Why characters feel flat covers the opposite error. Preparation is the cheapest way to humanize an antagonist, and it never costs you any of the menace the way a sympathetic backstory does.

↑ All Entries

16. Live Free or Die Hard (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of Live Free or Die Hard (2007)

2007
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.1/10

"A genuine return to form after twelve years, held back by a PG-13 certificate."

Len Wiseman brought McClane into a cyberterrorism plot twelve years after the last one and the result is the best of the later sequels, a low bar cleared with room. The film is at its strongest when it stops being about computers. Willis was fifty-two and insisted on doing a substantial amount of the physical work himself.

Timothy Olyphant’s Gabriel is written as a former government contractor executing a systematic infrastructure attack, and the plan is coherent. Traffic, finance, power, in that order, and the film explains it once and then trusts the audience. The film was released as Die Hard 4.0 outside North America, and nobody has ever explained that.

The action is practical far more often than it needed to be. The car into the helicopter, the elevator shaft, the tunnel sequence with the vehicles reversing, all staged with real objects. The fighter jet at the end is where the film loses its footing entirely.

For WritersGabriel’s plan is stated once, in order, and then executed in that order across two hours. Traffic, finance, power. The audience is never confused about what stage they are in because the sequence was announced. When you have a complex antagonist plan, give the reader a numbered structure early and hold to it. Readers can follow almost any scheme if they know how many steps remain, and they lose interest immediately in one that arrives as a series of surprises. A numbered plan also gives you free pacing, because the reader supplies their own urgency as the remaining steps run down.

↑ All Entries

17. Pontypool (2008) [full review]

► Read the full review of Pontypool (2008)

2008
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.7/10

"An infection carried by language, in one room, on almost no money."

Bruce McDonald made a zombie film set entirely inside a radio station in rural Ontario where the infection is carried by the English language. Nothing is shown. The whole event arrives as call-ins, traffic reports and a stringer describing a crowd. McDonald shot it in about two weeks on a budget under two million Canadian dollars.

Stephen McHattie plays a washed-up shock jock who has been demoted to a small-town morning slot, and the voice is the entire production budget. He narrates a catastrophe he cannot see, becomes progressively less sure the callers are real, and keeps broadcasting. McHattie had been a character actor for thirty-five years and this is the lead he never got.

The mechanism is the film’s one genuinely original idea. Certain English words become infectious, understanding is the vector, and the only cure is to break the meaning of the word by using it wrongly. The last act is two people deliberately speaking nonsense. Tony Burgess adapted his own novel and the mechanism is considerably stranger on the page.

For WritersMcDonald never shows the outside. Everything the audience knows arrives through a microphone from people who are frightened and unreliable, and the horror is assembled from audio alone. When you want an event to feel larger than your budget or your page count, report it instead of staging it. A catastrophe described by somebody who can only see part of it is bigger in the reader’s head than any version you could render, and it costs a fraction of the words. Reported catastrophe also ages better than staged catastrophe, since nothing in the reader’s version can date the way a described spectacle does.

Pontypool never leaves a radio booth and District 9 tells you the ending before it starts. Learn what timing buys in the Pacing Handbook.

↑ All Entries

18. District 9 (2009) [full review]

► Read the full review of District 9 (2009)

2009
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"Worldbuilding delivered entirely through logistics and paperwork."

Neill Blomkamp expanded his own short film with thirty million dollars from Peter Jackson and shot Johannesburg as itself. The ship arrives over a city that already had forced removals in its history, and the film never has to explain the parallel. Blomkamp had been attached to direct a Halo film that collapsed, and Jackson funded this instead.

The documentary opening is doing structural work instead of stylistic. Talking heads, archive footage and security camera material establish that Wikus is already finished, so the audience watches the first act knowing the ending is bad and not knowing how. It cost thirty million dollars and took over two hundred, and was nominated for Best Picture.

Sharlto Copley improvised most of his dialogue and had never acted. Wikus is a middle manager, a nepotism hire, cheerful and cruel in the first twenty minutes, and the film makes the audience follow him without ever making him admirable. Copley was a producer friend of Blomkamp’s and had appeared in the original short for free.

The film abandons the documentary format around the midpoint and most people do not notice. Blomkamp has said it was a practical decision instead of a design one, and the shift is the single most criticized thing about an otherwise disciplined picture. The sequel has been announced repeatedly across fifteen years and has never gone into production.

For WritersBlomkamp opens with talking heads describing Wikus in the past tense, so the audience knows he is finished before they meet him. The first act is then unbearable because every cheerful moment is being watched from the far side of a catastrophe. When you want a reader to dread an ordinary scene, establish the outcome first. A character being pleasant while the reader knows what is coming generates more pressure than any amount of foreshadowing. Pacing problems nobody talks about covers the timing. The technique costs you surprise and buys you dread, a trade almost always worth making outside the final chapter.

↑ All Entries

19. Inglourious Basterds (2009) [full review]

► Read the full review of Inglourious Basterds (2009)

2009
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.4/10

"Five chapters of people talking in four languages, and the violence is brief."

Tarantino wrote a war film in which almost nothing is a battle and everything is a conversation with a table between two people. Five chapters, four of them built on somebody trying to pass, and the tension comes entirely from language. Tarantino had been writing the script on and off for close to a decade before shooting it.

Christoph Waltz won for a part several actors had turned down because it required fluency in four languages. Landa is polite, delighted and entirely without loyalty, and the opening farmhouse scene is twenty minutes of a man being courteous to somebody he has already decided about.

The basement tavern sequence is the film’s best construction and the most instructive. The Germans are suspicious, the disguise is holding, and the whole thing collapses on a hand gesture indicating the number three. One detail, established earlier, deployed without comment. Michael Fassbender was largely unknown and had learned German for an entirely different project.

Tarantino wrote the opening farmhouse scene as a short film years before the rest of the screenplay existed, and it plays almost entirely unchanged. Waltz has said the four languages were the reason several other actors passed on the part and the reason he took it without hesitating at all.

The ending rewrites history and the film has been arguing with itself about that since release. Hitler dies in a burning cinema, killed by a Jewish projectionist and a Tennessee lieutenant, and the last line is Tarantino talking about his own film through a character’s mouth.

For WritersThe tavern scene turns on a German ordering three drinks with the wrong fingers, a detail Tarantino established in an earlier scene with no emphasis at all. The audience who noticed feels the collapse a half second early. When you plant a detail, place it in a scene that has other business and never return to it. A detail introduced with any emphasis becomes a promise. One buried in ordinary action is a trap the reader springs on themselves, with no help from you at all. Subtext in fiction is built out of exactly these placements.

↑ All Entries

20. I Saw the Devil (2010) [full review]

► Read the full review of I Saw the Devil (2010)

2010
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.8/10

"Revenge pursued past the point where it means anything."

Kim Jee-woon built a revenge film in which the protagonist catches the killer in the first act, beats him, releases him with a tracker, and repeats the process. The premise is the argument about what revenge does to the person taking it. The Korean ratings board rejected it twice and Kim cut roughly ninety seconds to secure release.

Lee Byung-hun plays Kim Soo-hyun as a man methodically converting himself into something worse to finish the job. The film is explicit that each release causes further deaths, and it refuses to let him be unaware of that. He knows. He continues. Lee and Choi had worked together before and barely spoke during the shoot.

Choi Min-sik’s Kyung-chul is not given a psychology and does not need one. He is appetite with a vehicle, and the film’s cruelest move is establishing that he is genuinely enjoying the pursuit more than his victim is. Choi had played the protagonist in Oldboy seven years earlier and took this as the inversion.

The ending gives Soo-hyun exactly what he planned and the film shoots it as a defeat. He walks away from a house, the mechanism works, and he comes apart on a street in a way the entire two hours has been arranging. Kim has said the last shot was the first thing he wrote and everything else worked backward from it.

For WritersKim makes his protagonist repeatedly choose to release a killer he has already caught, and every release costs somebody else their life. The film establishes this early and then makes him do it again. When you write escalating vengeance, price each escalation in harm to third parties and keep the protagonist informed. A character who does not know what their choices cost is naive. One who knows the cost and proceeds anyway is the subject, and the reader has to sit with having wanted it. The reader has to have wanted the first escalation, or the arc reads as a character study of somebody they never agreed with.

Honorable Mentions: Thrillers Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier and each is on the list to be written.

Dial M for Murder (1954)

⭐ 8.2/10

A husband arranges his wife’s killing, the plan fails in the first twenty minutes, and the rest is him improvising a frame in real time. Almost all of it takes place in one apartment.

The Wrong Man (1956)

⭐ 7.4/10

Hitchcock shot a true story of mistaken identity with almost no style at all, and the flatness is what makes it frightening. Henry Fonda is processed through a system that has no mechanism for being wrong.

Rope (1948)

⭐ 7.9/10

Two students murder a classmate, hide the body in the room, and host a dinner party on top of it. Hitchcock shot it in long takes disguised as a single continuous move and James Stewart is the guest who starts noticing.

Frenzy (1972)

⭐ 7.4/10

Hitchcock returned to London at seventy-two and made his most brutal film. The reverse tracking shot away from a door, down a staircase and into the street is the coldest thing he ever staged.

The 39 Steps (1935)

⭐ 7.6/10

The template for every innocent-man-pursued thriller that followed, built on a music hall performer with a perfect memory and a chase across Scotland with a handcuffed couple in the middle of it.

The Lady Vanishes (1938)

⭐ 7.8/10

An elderly woman disappears from a moving train and everybody aboard insists she was never there. The film spends an hour making the audience doubt the protagonist along with everybody else.

The Secret in Their Eyes (2009)

⭐ 8.2/10

Juan Jose Campanella built a cold case around a retired investigator writing a novel about it, and the football stadium sequence is a single continuous shot that descends from the sky into a crowd and out through a tunnel.

Headhunters (2011)

⭐ 7.5/10

Morten Tyldum adapted Jo Nesbo into a Norwegian thriller where a corporate recruiter steals art on the side and picks the wrong mark. The outhouse sequence is the most unpleasant escape in the genre.

The Chaser (2008)

⭐ 7.8/10

Na Hong-jin sends an ex-cop turned pimp after a client who is killing his women, and the police have the murderer in custody for most of the film and cannot hold him. The failure is bureaucratic and the tension is watching paperwork lose.

Coherence (2013)

⭐ 7.2/10

James Ward Byrkit shot it in his own house over five nights with no script, giving the actors individual instructions each evening. A dinner party splits into parallel versions and the film tracks every branch.

Green Room (2015)

⭐ 7.0/10

Jeremy Saulnier trapped a punk band in a backroom at a neo-Nazi venue and let the violence be clumsy and slow. Patrick Stewart plays the owner as a man solving a logistics problem with no feeling attached to it.

Wind River (2017)

⭐ 7.7/10

Taylor Sheridan set a murder investigation on a Wyoming reservation in winter and built the whole film around jurisdiction and cold. The standoff is resolved in about four seconds and it is the most shocking cut in the film.

Dishonorable Mentions: Thrillers That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had a working premise and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

The Woman in the Window (2021)

⭐ 5.6/10

Amy Adams in an agoraphobic Rear Window that was reshot after test screenings and sat on a shelf before being sold to Netflix. The reveal requires the protagonist to have forgotten something the film showed her doing.

The Girl on the Train (2016)

⭐ 6.5/10

Emily Blunt commits fully to a blackout narrator and the film resolves the mystery by having a character explain it in a kitchen. The unreliability stops being a device the moment it becomes a plot point.

Lucy (2014)

⭐ 6.4/10

Luc Besson built a film on the discredited claim that people use ten percent of their brains and then escalated past any possible stakes. By the third act the protagonist cannot be threatened by anything.

Transcendence (2014)

⭐ 6.2/10

Wally Pfister shot Christopher Nolan films for a decade and then directed one where Johnny Depp is uploaded to a network and becomes unstoppable within twenty minutes. The film has no idea what its own position is.

The Little Things (2021)

⭐ 6.3/10

Three Academy Award winners in a serial killer procedural that ends without confirming whether the suspect did anything. The ambiguity is not earned by the preceding two hours and reads as a shrug.

Chaos Walking (2021)

⭐ 5.7/10

A premise about audible thoughts on a colony world, adapted across six years and multiple reshoots into something with no tension anywhere. Every character broadcasts their intentions constantly, removing all suspense.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

This tier is nineteen films rated at a 9 and one outlier, and the ordering inside it is chronological instead of ranked. Swordfish sitting level with The Insider will annoy people, and the rewatch scale is doing something specific there. Tell me which one you would promote.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

What is in the box in Se7en?
Fincher never shows it and never confirms it in any frame. The audience gets a courier’s reaction, Somerset looking inside and one line of dialogue. New Line wanted an alternative ending and both Fincher and Brad Pitt refused.
Is Misery worse in the book?
Considerably. King has Annie amputate a foot with an axe and cauterize the wound with a blowtorch. William Goldman argued for keeping it and Rob Reiner refused, on the grounds that the audience would stop watching.
Is Falling Down a defense of its main character?
No, and it was read that way on release. D-Fens has a restraining order against him, his family is frightened of him, and the film runs Robert Duvall’s detective through the same day with the same provocations to make the comparison.
What is 12 Monkeys based on?
Chris Marker’s 1962 short film La Jetee, twenty-eight minutes assembled almost entirely from still photographs. Gilliam kept the central device, a man watching his own death as a child without understanding it.
Is Battle Royale the same story as The Hunger Games?
The premises are close and Suzanne Collins has said she had not read or seen it. Fukasaku’s 2000 film is a specific argument about Japanese generational failure. Everything that borrowed the arena afterward dropped it.
Why is District 9 shot as a documentary?
Only partly, and Blomkamp has said the shift away from it was practical instead of designed. The talking heads establish that Wikus is already finished, so the first act plays with the audience knowing the outcome.
How does the tavern scene in Inglourious Basterds go wrong?
A British officer in disguise orders three drinks using the wrong fingers. Germans count from the thumb. The detail is established earlier with no emphasis and the entire scene collapses on it.
What language is Pontypool’s infection carried in?
English. Certain words become infectious and understanding is the vector, so the only available cure is to break the meaning of a word by using it wrongly. The last act is two people deliberately speaking nonsense.

🏷︎ Film List

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment