Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

Thrillers Part 5 – The Solid Craft

Part 5 – The Solid Craft

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Failures

Every entry here is rated 8 and a good number of them turn on an account the audience should not trust. The Usual Suspects is assembled in front of you out of whatever is in the room. Memento runs backwards because its narrator cannot check anything. Primal Fear spends two hours establishing a condition and ninety seconds removing it.

The other thread is money. Following cost about six thousand dollars, Pi about sixty thousand, and both are debut features by directors who went on to spend two hundred million on a single picture. Neither film is worse for the constraint.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the fifth of nine parts.

The Usual Suspects, Memento and Following all reorganize chronology and only one of them cheats. Take the shapes apart in the Plot Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. Under Siege 1 & 2 (1992, 1995) [full review]

► Read the full review of Under Siege 1 & 2 (1992, 1995)

1992
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.5/10

"Die Hard on a battleship, then Die Hard on a train, and the first one works."

Andrew Davis made the only Seagal film that works as a film, and he did it by treating the star as a fixed quantity and building an actual thriller around him. Casey Ryback is a cook on a battleship who used to be something else, and nobody discovers this until the midpoint.

Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey are doing most of the acting and both of them are enjoying themselves enormously. Strannix is a former CIA operative running a theatrical operation for money, and the film gives him enough grievance to be legible without explaining him at length.

The 1995 sequel moves the premise to a train and is a straight repeat with less craft. Geoff Murphy shoots the action competently and the confined geography of a locomotive cannot do what a battleship did, because there is nowhere for anybody to hide. Davis went on to direct The Fugitive the following year off the strength of this one.

For WritersDavis takes a performer with an extremely narrow range and builds a story that never asks him to leave it. Ryback does not have an arc, does not deliver a speech and does not change, and the film puts every requirement for variation onto the antagonists instead. When you have a fixed character, stop trying to develop them and develop the situation around them. Readers accept a constant protagonist if everything they meet is different. They will not accept a constant protagonist standing in a constant world for very long. Vary the opposition along one axis at a time, because a world that changes in every direction at once reads as a different book each chapter.

↑ All Entries

2. Basic Instinct (1992) [full review]

► Read the full review of Basic Instinct (1992)

1992
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"Verhoeven made a film about a police force that cannot tell seduction from investigation."

Verhoeven and Joe Eszterhas made the most commercially successful erotic thriller ever released and the construction is far more careful than the reputation suggests. Every piece of evidence against Catherine Tramell is also evidence that she is being framed. The film took over three hundred and fifty million dollars against a forty-nine million budget.

Sharon Stone plays a novelist who writes books that predict murders, and the film’s cleverest decision is that she is never rattled. She controls every interrogation, she enjoys the attention, and Verhoeven never gives the audience a private moment to check her against. The film took over three Verhoeven and Stone fought publicly throughout production and afterward.

Michael Douglas’s Nick Curran is the genuinely unpleasant part of the film and it is deliberate. He has killed civilians, he is under psychiatric supervision, and his behavior toward Beth is indefensible. The picture is about a compromised man being outplayed. The film took over three Eszterhas was paid three million dollars for the spec script, a record at the time.

The ice pick under the bed is the last shot and it is the correct ending. Verhoeven fought to keep it, and the whole film collapses into a different picture if the camera holds on the couple instead of moving down to the floor. Jan de Bont shot it two years before directing Speed himself.

For WritersVerhoeven never gives Catherine a scene alone. She is on camera only when somebody is watching her, so the audience has no unobserved behavior to test her against and every reading stays available. When you write a character whose guilt is the question, deny the reader any private moment with them. A single unwatched scene settles the matter, and readers treat solitude as truth-telling even when you intended nothing at all by it and were simply moving a character between rooms. Controlling narrative perspective covers the mechanics. The discipline costs you interiority entirely, so the character has to be legible through what other people do in response to them.

↑ All Entries

3. The Usual Suspects (1995) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Usual Suspects (1995)

1995
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.5/10

"The story is assembled in front of you out of whatever happens to be in the room."

Bryan Singer made it for six million dollars and Christopher McQuarrie built the screenplay backward from a twist. That is the film’s great strength and its permanent limitation. Verbal Kint tells a customs agent a story in an office and the film is the story being told.

Kevin Spacey won for a performance that works in two directions at once. Every tic, every hesitation and every piece of physical weakness is a construction, and the film only reveals the construction in its final ninety seconds. McQuarrie took the title from a Village Voice column before the screenplay existed.

The problem is that it survives exactly one viewing intact. A second pass reveals a plot with no obligations, because none of it happened, and scenes that played as suspense become a man improvising at a desk. That is a defensible design and it is also a cost.

Chazz Palminteri’s Kujan gets less credit than anybody. He is intelligent, aggressive and being played for ninety minutes by somebody he correctly identifies as the weakest man in the room. The bulletin board is the cruellest shot in nineties crime cinema. McQuarrie too Singer shot the whole thing in thirty-five days on borrowed San Pedro locations.

For WritersMcQuarrie assembles the entire narrative out of objects visible in the room where it is being told, and the audience never notices because those objects have no reason to be noticed. A coffee cup. A manufacturer’s name. A bulletin board. When you plant a reveal, hide it in things the reader has no motive to inspect. Background furniture, described once and never returned to, is the only reliable hiding place, and the reveal lands because they saw it and declined to look. Plot devices that work covers where a plant can sit. Background furniture is also the only plant you can place in the first chapter without the reader marking it for later.

↑ All Entries

4. Mission: Impossible (1996) [full review]

► Read the full review of Mission: Impossible (1996)

1996
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"De Palma directing a franchise launcher, and the vault sequence has no dialogue."

De Palma took a television property and opened by killing the entire team in the first fifteen minutes, a genuinely aggressive way to start a franchise. Jim Phelps is the traitor, the original series fans objected loudly, and the film was right. Paramount had been trying to develop the property for the better part of a decade before this.

The Langley vault sequence is the set piece and it runs almost silent. Pressure-sensitive floor, temperature alarm, sound detection, and a man lowered on a wire who cannot sweat. De Palma establishes all three constraints before the break-in and then lets the audience track each one.

The plot is genuinely hard to follow on a first viewing and De Palma has said he does not consider that a problem. The NOC list, the mole, the Job identity, the aquarium restaurant. What the film cares about is the mechanism of each sequence instead of the connective tissue.

Cruise was thirty-three and producing. The career pivot happens here. The franchise’s entire subsequent identity, practical stunts performed by the lead with a visible face, starts with him being lowered into that room on a wire. Paramount had been tryin Emilio Estevez appears uncredited as Jack and dies in the opening sequence.

For WritersDe Palma establishes three separate detection systems before anybody enters the vault, so the audience is tracking floor pressure, temperature and sound at once during a scene with almost no dialogue. Every bead of sweat is a plot point. When you write a heist or an infiltration, teach the constraints before the attempt and never add a new one mid-sequence. A rule introduced during the action is an author intervening. Rules established in advance let the reader do all the worrying on your behalf. Conflict that drives story covers constraint as pressure. Three constraints is about the limit, since a reader tracking four stops tracking any of them and starts waiting for the outcome instead.

Porter wants seventy thousand dollars, Creasy does not want the job, and Casey Ryback never changes at all. Build a want that drives in the Protagonist Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. Ransom (1996) [full review]

► Read the full review of Ransom (1996)

1996
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.7/10

"A father goes on television and offers the ransom as a bounty on the kidnappers instead."

Ron Howard remade a 1956 Glenn Ford picture and kept its one great idea: a father refuses to pay and puts the ransom on the kidnappers’ heads as a bounty instead. The film spends forty minutes as a conventional thriller before that decision. Howard had made Apollo 13 the previous year and shot this back to back with it.

Mel Gibson plays Tom Mullen as somebody whose confidence is the problem. He is an airline owner who bribed a union official, he is used to negotiating, and the film is careful that his refusal to pay is at least partly ego instead of strategy.

Gary Sinise’s Jimmy Shaker is a police detective running the kidnapping. The film reveals that early instead of holding it, and the choice converts the second half from a mystery into a contest between two men who both know. Howard ha It is a remake of a 1956 Glenn Ford film built on the same central reversal.

The television broadcast is the sequence everybody remembers. Mullen on live news offering the money as a bounty, the kidnappers watching, and Howard shooting it as a man making a decision he cannot take back while his wife watches from a few feet away. Howard ha Richard Price and Alexander Ignon wrote the screenplay from the original story.

For WritersHoward spends forty minutes establishing a compliant, frightened father before the broadcast, so the reversal lands as a rupture instead of a character trait. The audience has watched him do everything correctly and fail. When you want a decision to shock, establish the ordinary response first and let it be genuinely attempted. A character who breaks pattern in chapter two has no pattern to break. One who has complied for a hundred pages makes a single refusal enormous when it comes. The compliant stretch has to contain real effort, because a reader who suspects the character was always going to refuse feels the hundred pages as delay.

↑ All Entries

6. Primal Fear (1996) [full review]

► Read the full review of Primal Fear (1996)

1996
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"Edward Norton’s debut, and the last ninety seconds reframe the whole film."

Gregory Hoblit adapted William Diehl and cast Edward Norton in his first film role against Richard Gere, and the entire picture exists to deliver a final scene. An altar boy is charged with murdering an archbishop and claims he cannot remember it. Leonardo DiCaprio was offered the role first and passed. Norton got the audition off the back of it.

Norton was twenty-six and had been doing theatre. The performance runs two characterizations, a stammering frightened boy and a violent second personality, and the film builds a legal strategy around the audience believing the first one. Leonardo DiCaprio was of Norton was working off-Broadway and auditioned against roughly two thousand others.

The courtroom material is competent instead of exceptional and the film knows it. Laura Linney’s prosecutor is given real intelligence and no chance, Gere’s defense attorney is vain in a way the script keeps noting, and the church corruption subplot exists to supply motive. Leonardo DiCaprio was of Paramount had Gere attached first and built the production around his schedule.

For WritersThe final scene works because Norton spends ninety minutes making the stammer specific. It is not a general nervousness. It fails on particular consonants, it worsens under particular questions, and the consistency is what sells the reversal. When you build a performance a character is giving, make the performance technically detailed instead of broadly indicated. Readers disbelieve a lie assembled from general impressions and accept without question one that has been built out of consistent technical specifics they can check against each other. Build the tell before you build the lie, since specifics invented to support a deception you already wrote will not connect to each other.

↑ All Entries

7. Following (1998) [full review]

► Read the full review of Following (1998)

1998
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"Nolan’s debut, shot on weekends for about six thousand dollars."

Nolan made it for around six thousand dollars, shooting on weekends across a year with a cast of friends, and the structure is already the one he would use for the next twenty-five years. Three timelines cut together, identified by the protagonist’s haircut and clothing.

The premise is a writer who follows strangers for material and breaks his own rule by following the same man twice. Cobb burgles flats not to steal but to disrupt, and the argument he makes about people only valuing what they lose is the film’s one genuine idea.

It runs sixty-nine minutes and nothing in it is wasted. The black and white was a budget decision, the locations are friends’ apartments, and the entire film is legible because Nolan rehearsed every scene extensively before committing any of it to film he could not afford to waste.

For WritersNolan identifies each of three timelines by the protagonist’s hair and clothing and nothing else. No captions, no dissolves, no score cues. The audience learns the code in the first ten minutes and never gets lost across sixty-nine. When you scramble chronology, pick one physical marker per strand and hold it absolutely. Readers will follow any structure if orientation is free, and they abandon a simple one the moment they have to work for it. Pacing problems nobody talks about covers orientation cost. One marker per strand is the ceiling, because a second cue gives the reader something to reconcile and reconciling is the work you were avoiding.

↑ All Entries

8. Pi (1998) [full review]

► Read the full review of Pi (1998)

1998
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.3/10

"Made for sixty thousand dollars raised a hundred at a time."

Darren Aronofsky made it for sixty thousand dollars raised in hundred-dollar increments from family and friends, shot on high-contrast black and white reversal stock that blows out every highlight, and won the directing prize at Sundance with it. Aronofsky paid back every hundred-dollar investor within a year of the Sundance sale.

Max Cohen is a number theorist with cluster headaches who believes the stock market has a pattern, and the film’s structure is his deterioration. Aronofsky uses a rig strapped to the actor so the camera moves with his head, putting the audience inside the migraine.

The two pursuing parties are the film’s best joke. A Wall Street firm wants the number for money and a Hasidic sect wants it because they believe it is the true name of God, and both approach him with the same escalating politeness. Aronofsky paid The stock Aronofsky used was discontinued shortly afterward and is almost unusable now.

For WritersAronofsky straps the camera to the actor so it moves with his body, and the audience experiences the instability instead of watching a man report it. The technique costs nothing and does what pages of interior monologue could not. When you write a character in a degraded mental state, find a formal device the reader is subjected to. Description of confusion keeps the reader outside and comfortable. A structure that confuses the reader briefly has put them exactly where the character has been living for the whole book. Brief is the operative word, since a reader confused for a whole chapter puts the book down and blames you instead of the character.

↑ All Entries

9. Ronin (1998) [full review]

► Read the full review of Ronin (1998)

1998
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.3/10

"The best car chases ever filmed, and nobody ever finds out what is in the case."

Frankenheimer was sixty-eight and made the best car chase film of the decade with practical vehicles, real streets and stunt drivers in the cars while the actors were filmed separately. Nothing in the Paris or Nice sequences is a model or a composite. Frankenheimer had made The Manchurian Candidate thirty-six years earlier and Grand Prix in 1966.

The plot is deliberately withheld and the film never explains it. A case, several interested parties, and nobody ever states what is inside. David Mamet did an uncredited rewrite and the dialogue carries his fingerprints in every scene about professional process. Frankenheimer had made The J. D. Zeik wrote the original screenplay and Mamet’s rewrite went uncredited by choice.

Frankenheimer used roughly three hundred stunt drivers across the Paris and Nice sequences and closed real streets for both. He had made Grand Prix in 1966 and knew precisely what a camera mounted inside a moving car could and could not deliver to an audience.

Robert De Niro’s Sam is the film’s engine and the character is defined entirely by caution. He checks exits, he refuses to enter a room he has not scouted, and the ambush-versus-meeting conversation in the first act sets the terms for everything that follows. Frankenheimer had spent the preceding decade largely in television.

The Nice chase runs against traffic through a tunnel at genuine speed and Frankenheimer shot it with the camera inside the vehicles. Several of the cars were modified with the driver seated on the opposite side, so the actors could appear to be driving while a professional actually was.

For WritersThe case is never opened and its contents are never named, and the film loses nothing. Every character wants it, several die for it, and the audience accepts the stakes from the behavior of the people pursuing it. When you need an object to drive a plot, consider leaving it undefined. A specified prize invites the reader to evaluate whether it is worth the deaths. An unspecified one is valued entirely by what people will do for it, a measurement you control completely. That is a measurement you control completely and never have to justify to anybody.

Munich tracks a man coming apart entirely through changing habits and never diagnoses him once. Learn the technique in the Showing and Telling Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. Elizabeth (1998) [full review]

► Read the full review of Elizabeth (1998)

1998
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"A political thriller that happens to be a costume drama."

Shekhar Kapur shot a Tudor succession story as a political thriller and the framing is the whole argument. Elizabeth inherits a throne, is surrounded by men calculating her removal, and the film is about a woman learning that survival requires becoming something inhuman. Blanchett was nominated and lost to Gwyneth Paltrow. People are still arguing about it.

Cate Blanchett was twenty-nine and largely unknown outside Australia. The performance moves from frightened to calculating across two hours with no single scene of transformation, and the final sequence with the hair being cut is the outcome instead of the cause. Blanchett w Kapur had made Bandit Queen in India and had never worked in English before this.

Geoffrey Rush’s Walsingham is the film’s most interesting construction. He is not loyal in any sentimental sense. He is a professional who has decided this monarch is the survivable option, and the assassination montage near the end is delivered as housekeeping. Blanchett w Michael Hirst wrote it and went on to create The Tudors a decade afterward.

The history is loose and Kapur has been open about that. Compressions, invented conversations, a Duc d’Anjou played for comedy. What the film gets right is the atmosphere of a court where every conversation is a negotiation about whether the speaker will be alive next year.

For WritersKapur never gives Elizabeth a scene where she decides to become the Virgin Queen. The transformation happens across dozens of small accommodations, each one defensible, and the audience only registers the total at the end when she has her hair cut. When you write a character becoming something, resist the decision scene. An arc assembled from compromises the character would each defend is harder to argue with and considerably more disturbing to sit through as it accumulates. Each compromise has to be small enough to pass without comment, because one the reader would refuse breaks the chain and ends the arc early.

↑ All Entries

11. Payback (1999) [full review]

► Read the full review of Payback (1999)

1999
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.1/10

"Two completely different films exist, and the director’s cut is the one to watch."

Two films exist under this title and the difference is instructive. Brian Helgeland adapted Richard Stark’s The Hunter, delivered a desaturated film in which Porter is genuinely unpleasant, and was removed from the project. Paramount reshot roughly a third of it with a new ending and a narration track.

The theatrical version is the one that works. The narration gives Porter a register the director’s cut strips out entirely, Kris Kristofferson at the top of the organization supplies an antagonist with actual size, and the warmer ending lands where the colder one simply stops.

The amount is the joke in both versions. Porter wants seventy thousand dollars, everybody he asks assumes he wants more, and the running gag is a criminal organization unable to process a man who means exactly what he says about a small number. Richard Stark published twenty-four Parker novels and never let the character be likeable.

For WritersPorter wants seventy thousand dollars and will not accept more, less, or a different arrangement. Every scene is somebody attempting to substitute a larger offer and failing. That single fixed want organizes the entire film with no further motivation supplied. When you write a driven character, make the want small, exact and non-negotiable. Vague ambition requires constant re-explanation. A specific figure needs stating once, and every scene afterward can then be built on somebody attempting to move it. The question that fixes stuck plots is usually about want. A small figure also protects you from inflation, since a character who wants millions has to keep wanting more as the book raises its own stakes.

↑ All Entries

12. Audition (1999) [full review]

► Read the full review of Audition (1999)

1999
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.1/10

"A romantic drama for an hour, and then it is not."

Takashi Miike opens with fifty minutes of a gentle romantic drama about a widower being persuaded by a friend to hold fake film auditions to meet a wife. Audiences walked out of the last third at festivals and several screenings had medical staff on hand.

The tonal management is the achievement. Nothing in the first half is marked as wrong except a single shot of a sack in an apartment that moves, and Miike holds that image for several seconds and then returns to the romance for another twenty minutes.

Eihi Shiina plays Asami with almost no expression and a voice barely above a whisper, and the performance is the reason the film works, and not the violence. She is sincere throughout, including at the end, and the film never converts her into a monster with a plan.

The last twenty minutes are genuinely difficult and the film has an argument underneath them about male self-deception. Aoyama’s entire courtship is a lie he told himself was harmless, and the film’s position is that the lie is where the horror starts. Miike shot it in about three weeks and has said he did not expect the reaction it got.

For WritersMiike plants one wrong image, a sack that moves, at around the forty-minute mark and then returns to a romantic comedy for twenty more. The audience carries that shot through every subsequent pleasant scene. When you want dread underneath ordinary material, place one unexplained detail early and then refuse to reference it. The reader will hold it themselves, and every warm scene afterward will feel wrong in a way they cannot attribute to anything you wrote. Subtext in fiction is built out of exactly these placements. Place the detail where the scene has other business, because an unexplained image in an otherwise empty paragraph announces itself as a plant.

↑ All Entries

13. Memento (2000) [full review]

► Read the full review of Memento (2000)

2000
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.4/10

"Told backwards, because that is what it is like not to know how you got here."

Nolan adapted his brother’s short story and ran the film backward in color sequences interleaved with a forward-running black and white strand, and the two meet in the middle at the exact moment the audience learns what has been happening. Jonathan Nolan wrote the short story while his brother was already developing the film.

The structure is the condition. Leonard cannot form new memories, so the audience is put in his position by being denied everything that came before each scene. They know what is about to happen and not what caused it, precisely his experience inverted. The two strands alternate throughout and converge in a single scene at the center.

Nolan shot it in twenty-five days for around nine million dollars and no distributor would take it for close to a year after it was finished. Newmarket eventually released it themselves and it took more than forty million, the reason Insomnia and Batman Begins happened.

The Sammy Jankis material is the film’s real subject and most of the argument about the ending turns on it. Teddy’s account in the final scene reclassifies the entire story, and Nolan gives the audience exactly enough to believe him or to decide he is lying to keep himself useful.

Guy Pearce plays Leonard as somebody who has decided that having a purpose is worth more than having the truth, and the last line, delivered as a decision and not a confession, is the most chilling thing in the picture. He took the part for a fraction of his rate after one read.

For WritersNolan puts the reader inside the protagonist’s disability by removing context instead of describing it. Leonard cannot remember what came before. Neither can the audience, because the scene before has not been shown yet. The structure delivers the condition instead of reporting it. When a character has a perceptual limitation, look for a structural way to impose it on the reader. Description of a limitation creates sympathy and imposition of it creates understanding, and those two effects are not remotely the same thing. Writing Heroes and Villains works adjacent ground. Structural imposition is also the one technique a reader cannot skim past, since skipping the device means losing the plot along with it.

Audition spends fifty minutes as a romance and Man on Fire spends an hour on swimming lessons. Learn what patience buys in the Pacing Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. American Psycho (2000) [full review]

► Read the full review of American Psycho (2000)

2000
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"An adaptation two other filmmakers walked away from."

Mary Harron adapted Bret Easton Ellis and made a comedy, the reading the novel supports and almost nobody expected. Patrick Bateman is a Wall Street executive who murders people and cannot get anybody to notice either the murders or him. Harron cast Bale over Leonardo DiCaprio and the studio replaced her briefly before reversing.

The business card scene is the film’s thesis in ninety seconds. Four men comparing stationery with escalating distress, bone against eggshell, and Harron shoots it with the gravity of a hostage negotiation. Bateman nearly faints over a watermark. Harron cast Bale over L Guinevere Turner co-wrote the screenplay with Harron and appears in the film.

Christian Bale plays the whole thing as performance. Bateman describes his morning routine in detail, lectures on Huey Lewis while wearing a raincoat, and says outright that there is no real him. Nobody in the film listens to a word of it. Harron cast Bale over L Ellis has said the adaptation is better than he expected and funnier than the novel.

Lions Gate replaced Harron with Oliver Stone and cast Leonardo DiCaprio in the lead, then reversed both decisions within months when DiCaprio left for The Beach. Harron returned with Bale, who had been her choice throughout and who nobody at the studio had wanted at any point.

The ending refuses to confirm whether anything happened. A confession is dismissed, an apartment is empty and for sale, a lawyer claims to have had dinner with a man Bateman killed. Harron has said the murders happened and the novel is less certain than she is.

For WritersHarron plays the horror as comedy by keeping everybody around Bateman oblivious. He confesses repeatedly, in public, to people who mishear him or change the subject. The joke and the horror are the same fact: he is invisible. When your material is unbearable played straight, look for whether the situation contains a joke that is also the point. Comedy that arises out of the horror instead of relieving it is what lets a reader stay in the room with material they would otherwise close. The joke has to come out of the situation instead of the narration, because a narrator making light of the material has stepped outside it.

↑ All Entries

15. Man on Fire (2004) [full review]

► Read the full review of Man on Fire (2004)

2004
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"Tony Scott at his most aggressive, and the first hour is the reason the second works."

Tony Scott adapted A. J. Quinnell, moved the story from Italy to Mexico City, and shot it with stuttering frame rates, burned-in subtitles that move around the frame and color that changes inside single scenes. The style divides people permanently. Scott had wanted to make it since 1980 and waited more than twenty years for the rights.

The first hour is the reason the second one works. Creasy is a burnt-out former operative who does not want the job, and the film spends real time on a bodyguard and a nine-year-old becoming friends over swimming lessons and homework. Scott had wanted t Dakota Fanning was nine during the shoot and Washington has called her the reason it works.

Denzel Washington plays the drinking and the self-disgust without any of the dignity the part invites, and the scene in which he tries to shoot himself and the round fails to fire is played without music or comment. Scott had wanted t It was filmed largely in Mexico City with the cooperation of local authorities.

The revenge half is methodical and genuinely ugly. Creasy works up a chain, he uses explosives and improvised tools, and the film never presents any of it as satisfying. The exchange at the end is the only decision he makes that the picture treats as a victory.

For WritersScott spends an hour on swimming lessons and homework before a single act of violence, and every minute of that is the interest the second half spends. Nothing about the revenge works without it. When you plan a story of retribution, count the pages you have given the relationship being avenged. Writing deaths that matter covers the arithmetic. Readers care about a loss they watched accumulate and not one they were told about, and the ratio is closer to even than most writers allow. Count the pages before you write the revenge, because the accumulation cannot be added retroactively once the reader is already waiting for violence.

↑ All Entries

16. Munich (2005) [full review]

► Read the full review of Munich (2005)

2005
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.5/10

"The least characteristic film Spielberg has made."

Spielberg adapted George Jonas’s Vengeance and made the least comfortable film of his career. A team is assembled after the 1972 Olympics to assassinate the people responsible and the picture is about what the work does to them across several years. Tony Kushner and Eric Roth share the screenplay credit and the argument over it was public.

The assassinations are deliberately incompetent. Bombs are too large, a target’s daughter answers a telephone, a hit on a woman in the Netherlands is protracted and shameful, and the film refuses to stage any of it with professional smoothness. Tony Kushner and Eric Spielberg shot it in Malta, Budapest and Paris over roughly four months.

Eric Bana’s Avner deteriorates in stages the film never announces. He starts checking hotel rooms, then dismantling telephones, then sleeping in a closet, and by the last act he is unable to be in a room with a wall he has not examined. Tony Kushner and Eric Daniel Craig was cast as Steve months before he was announced as Bond.

The film was attacked from every direction on release and Spielberg has said that was expected. It gives Palestinian characters an articulated position, it declines to endorse the operation, and the final shot of the New York skyline is the argument stated in one image.

For WritersSpielberg shows Avner’s damage entirely through habit. Checking a room, then a telephone, then sleeping in a closet. Nobody diagnoses him, nobody has a conversation about trauma, and the audience tracks the deterioration through a changing set of physical routines. When you write psychological damage, put it in behavior and take it out of dialogue. One whose habits keep narrowing makes the reader notice, and noticing is worth more. A character who describes their own state has told the reader. What show do not tell actually means is exactly this. Habit also gives you a clock, since the reader can measure how far gone somebody is by how much of the routine is left.

↑ All Entries

17. Inside Man (2006) [full review]

► Read the full review of Inside Man (2006)

2006
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"A bank robbery where nothing is stolen."

Spike Lee made a heist film in which the heist is a cover for something else entirely, and the structure is announced in the first line. Dalton Russell explains that he will tell the audience exactly what happened and then does, and it takes two hours to become comprehensible.

The bank robbery is designed to fail in a particular way. Hostages and robbers in identical jumpsuits, a hostage-negotiation stalemate, and the actual objective is a safe deposit box nobody will report missing because its contents cannot be acknowledged. It is the highest-grossing film of Spike Lee’s career by a substantial margin.

Denzel Washington’s Frazier is under an internal investigation for missing money and the film uses that constantly. He is negotiating while his own credibility is in question, and Chiwetel Ejiofor’s partner is watching him for reasons neither man discusses. It is th Russell Gewirtz wrote it as a spec script and it sold in a weekend.

Jodie Foster’s Madeline White is the film’s oddest element, a fixer with access to everybody and no stated employer, and Lee uses her to demonstrate that the actual power in the story never enters the building. It is th Lee shot it in New York with a crew he had worked with across several films.

For WritersRussell tells the audience in the opening seconds that he will explain everything, and the promise is kept literally and uselessly. He is describing a plan they cannot follow yet. When you open with a narrator who claims transparency, you buy enormous trust and spend none of it, because the reader has no framework to place the information in. The explanation only becomes an explanation retroactively, and the delay is free tension. The promise has to be kept literally in the end, because a narrator who claimed transparency and then quietly withheld has cost you every later assurance the book tries to make.

Eastern Promises teaches you to read a criminal record off a man’s back without a word of exposition. Study the method in the World Builder’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

18. Sunshine (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of Sunshine (2007)

2007
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"Two-thirds of an excellent film, and the argument about the last third has run for twenty years."

Danny Boyle sent a ship to restart a dying sun and Alex Garland wrote it with physicists consulting, and the first two acts are the most rigorous science fiction thriller of the decade. Resource decisions, oxygen arithmetic, and a crew arguing about mission priority. Brian Cox consulted on the physics and the crew trained with him before shooting began.

The Icarus I distress beacon is the hinge. A second ship that failed seven years earlier is found, a decision is made to investigate, and the film is honest that the decision is defensible and wrong. Every subsequent death traces back to it. Brian Cox consult Boyle and Garland had made 28 Days Later together three years earlier.

The visual scheme is the achievement. The sun is photographed as unbearable instead of beautiful, the observation deck sequences are shot through filters that only permit a fraction of the light, and John Murphy’s score does more emotional work than the screenplay does. Brian Cox consult The cast lived together in university halls for two weeks before filming.

The third act converts into a slasher film and the argument about that has never settled. Boyle has defended it as the only honest ending, the crew’s mission succeeds, and the shift in genre is jarring enough that most viewers rate the film on how they took it.

For WritersGarland makes the fatal decision reasonable. Investigating the second ship has a real payoff, the crew debates it properly, and the vote is close. Everything afterward is consequence instead of punishment. When you need a catastrophic choice, build the strongest available case for it and let a competent character make it. A disaster caused by stupidity is something the reader watches happen to other people. One caused by a decision they would have made is something they carry. The case has to be made before the reader knows the outcome, since a justification offered afterward reads as the book defending itself.

↑ All Entries

19. The Brave One (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Brave One (2007)

2007
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.7/10

"A vigilante film that lets its protagonist narrate her own deterioration."

Neil Jordan directed Jodie Foster as a radio host whose fiance is killed in a Central Park attack that leaves her hospitalized, and the film is a vigilante picture that keeps refusing to be satisfying about it. Foster produced it herself and has said the ending was the reason she nearly walked away.

Foster plays Erica as somebody who is frightened of what she is doing while doing it. The first shooting is panic, the second is less so, and the film tracks her getting used to it through her own radio broadcasts, the smartest device in the script.

Terrence Howard’s Detective Mercer is the film’s real problem and its most interesting one. He works out what she is, he likes her, and the ending has him handing her his own weapon to stage a scene. Jordan has been criticized for it and the criticism is fair.

For WritersJordan uses Erica’s own radio programme as her confession, so the audience hears her process the killings in a voice built for public broadcast. She is explaining herself to strangers because she cannot explain herself to anybody who knows her. When you need interiority from a private character, find a professional context where they are obliged to speak. The performance of candor to an audience of strangers reveals considerably more than an honest conversation with a friend ever would. Professional obligation also gives you a reason for the confession to be shaped, and the shaping tells the reader as much as the content does.

↑ All Entries

20. Eastern Promises (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of Eastern Promises (2007)

2007
RLR: 8 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"The tattoos are the central idea and they are not decoration."

Cronenberg followed A History of Violence with another film about a man performing an identity, set in the Russian mafia in London. Viggo Mortensen learned enough Russian to pass, studied the tattoo system, and the film treats the ink as a readable criminal record. Mortensen visited Russian prisons during preparation and was mistaken for a local.

The bathhouse fight deserves its reputation. Mortensen is naked, unarmed and fighting two men with linoleum knives, Cronenberg shoots it in long takes with no score, it takes a long time, he is badly hurt, and nobody in it looks competent. Mortensen visited Russi Steven Knight wrote it and had written Dirty Pretty Things four years before.

Naomi Watts carries the other half and the film gives her the least interesting material. The midwife investigating a dead girl’s diary is a device for entering the organization, and the picture’s interest visibly drains whenever it leaves Mortensen and Vincent Cassel. Mortensen visited Russi Mortensen was nominated for Best Actor and lost to Daniel Day-Lewis.

The reveal reframes the whole film and Cronenberg refuses to celebrate it. The last scene is Nikolai alone at the head of a table having achieved exactly what he was sent to achieve, shot as a life sentence instead of a victory. Mortensen visited Russi Cronenberg shot the bathhouse sequence across two days in a real London facility.

For WritersCronenberg builds the entire character on a tattoo system the audience is taught to read. Nikolai’s history is on his body, other characters examine it in a formal ceremony, and by the third act a viewer can read a stranger’s back. When you invent a system inside a story, teach it in a scene where it costs the characters something. Explanation handed over for free is exposition. A system demonstrated under pressure becomes a language the reader owns, and you can use it silently afterward. Physical detail as story covers the technique directly. Teach it once, under pressure, and never explain it again, because a second explanation tells the reader you did not trust the first one.

Honorable Mentions: Thrillers Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier or above and each is on the list.

Capricorn One (1977)

⭐ 6.7/10

Peter Hyams staged a faked Mars landing and then had the astronauts become a liability. The desert pursuit with two biplanes and a helicopter is genuinely good and Elliott Gould is the reporter.

The Long Good Friday (1980)

⭐ 7.6/10

Bob Hoskins plays a London gangster whose empire is dismantled across one Easter weekend by an enemy he cannot identify. The last shot is four minutes of his face in the back of a car.

Cutter’s Way (1981)

⭐ 7.1/10

Jeff Bridges and John Heard investigate a murder neither of them can prove, and the film is really about a damaged veteran who needs the conspiracy to be true. It disappeared on release and has been rediscovered repeatedly since.

Prince of the City (1981)

⭐ 7.4/10

Lumet ran three hours on a narcotics detective who agrees to inform and discovers there is no version of cooperation that ends well. Treat Williams is in almost every scene.

State of Grace (1990)

⭐ 7.1/10

Sean Penn goes back to Hell’s Kitchen as an undercover officer among the friends he grew up with, and Gary Oldman plays the one who cannot be managed. It was released the same week as Goodfellas and vanished.

Jacob’s Ladder (1990)

⭐ 7.4/10

Adrian Lyne built a Vietnam veteran’s disintegration out of subway platforms, hospital corridors and faces shot at the wrong frame rate. The visual technique was copied by a decade of horror games.

The Hand That Rocks the Cradle (1992)

⭐ 6.8/10

Rebecca De Mornay takes a nanny position with a plan and the film is patient about how long the family takes to see it. The greenhouse sequence is the best thing in the nineties domestic thriller cycle.

Single White Female (1992)

⭐ 6.3/10

Jennifer Jason Leigh moves in and begins replacing her roommate one detail at a time. The haircut scene is the moment the film turns and it is staged without a word of explanation.

Pacific Heights (1990)

⭐ 6.5/10

John Schlesinger built a thriller out of tenancy law, with Michael Keaton as a resident who cannot be removed and does not have to break any laws to destroy two people.

Dead Again (1991)

⭐ 7.0/10

Kenneth Branagh runs two timelines in color and black and white with the same actors, and the reveal about who was who is genuinely well hidden. Derek Jacobi is the hypnotist.

The Last Seduction (1994)

⭐ 7.1/10

Linda Fiorentino plays the most ruthless character in nineties American film and the picture never once asks the audience to like her. It went to television first and was disqualified from the Academy Awards for it.

Red Rock West (1993)

⭐ 7.0/10

Nicolas Cage is mistaken for a hitman in a Wyoming bar and takes the money, then meets the actual hitman. John Dahl keeps escalating a small mistake for ninety minutes.

Dishonorable Mentions: Thrillers That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had a premise worth the budget and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

Man on a Ledge (2012)

⭐ 6.6/10

Sam Worthington on a hotel ledge as a distraction for a heist happening next door, a fine premise undone by a conspiracy requiring a dozen people to behave irrationally on schedule.

Contraband (2012)

⭐ 6.4/10

Mark Wahlberg on a smuggling run with a plot that adds a new complication every fifteen minutes until none of them matter. The Panama sequence belongs in a different film entirely.

Hide and Seek (2005)

⭐ 5.9/10

De Niro and Dakota Fanning in a film with four alternative endings shot because nobody could agree which one worked. The released version resolves an imaginary friend plot in a way the preceding ninety minutes contradict.

Perfect Stranger (2007)

⭐ 5.5/10

Halle Berry and Bruce Willis in a thriller whose killer was changed during production, and the final reveal requires a character to have done things the film showed somebody else doing.

Killer Elite (2011)

⭐ 6.4/10

Statham, Owen and De Niro in a film based on a book whose factual claims were disputed, with a conspiracy explained twice and clear neither time. The action is competent and attached to nothing.

Sabotage (2014)

⭐ 5.7/10

David Ayer gave Schwarzenegger a DEA team being killed one at a time and a reveal that contradicts the team dynamic established for ninety minutes. The tone swings without any control at all.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

Every film on this page rates an 8, so the ordering is chronological and the arguing has to happen about membership instead of rank. Elizabeth on a thriller list is the one people will object to first. Tell me whether it belongs.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Keyser Soze?
The identity is the twist and the film’s answer is that he is Verbal Kint, the man telling the story. The complication is that almost nothing in the account is verified, so the audience is left with a name and a bulletin board.
How does the Memento structure work?
Color sequences run backward and black and white sequences run forward, alternating, and the two strands meet in the middle of the film. The reversal puts the audience in Leonard’s position by denying them what came before each scene.
Is Ronin’s case ever opened?
No. The contents are never named or shown. Every faction wants it, several people die for it, and Frankenheimer lets the audience price it entirely by what people are willing to do to get hold of it.
Was the Mission: Impossible vault scene done with wires?
Yes, and Cruise performed it. The sequence establishes three separate detection systems before the break-in, pressure on the floor, temperature and sound, and then plays almost entirely without dialogue for several minutes.
Why is Audition considered so disturbing?
Miike spends fifty minutes on a gentle romantic drama before the final third, with one unexplained shot of a moving sack around the midpoint. Festival screenings had medical staff present and audiences walked out.
Is American Psycho all in his head?
Mary Harron has said the murders happen and the novel is less certain than she is. The film’s ending shows a dismissed confession, an empty apartment and a lawyer claiming to have had dinner with a man Bateman killed.
What do the tattoos mean in Eastern Promises?
They record sentences served, ranks achieved and crimes committed within the Russian prison system, and they cannot be faked without consequence. Viggo Mortensen researched the real markings and the film teaches the audience to read them.
How much did Following cost to make?
Around six thousand dollars. Christopher Nolan shot it on weekends across a year with friends as cast and crew, operated the camera himself, and rehearsed every scene extensively because he could not afford wasted film.

🏷︎ Film List

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment