Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

Crime Films Part 3 – The Excellent

Part 3 – The Excellent

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Watchable |
Part 7: The Failures

The best decision in this tier is Reservoir Dogs, and it was forced. Tarantino could not afford to stage the robbery, so he set the film entirely before and after it. A heist picture became a chamber piece about who talked.

The other pattern is the protagonist nobody would defend. Travis Bickle, Jack Carter, Harry Callahan and Carlito Brigante are all men the film declines to endorse, and each is more durable for it.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the third of seven parts.

Scorpio, John Doe and Derek Vinyard are all written at full strength and defeated anyway. Build opposition that hard in the Antagonist Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. In Cold Blood (1967) [full review]

► Read the full review of In Cold Blood (1967)

1967
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"Richard Brooks shot it in the actual Clutter house in Holcomb, using the real rooms where the killings happened."

Richard Brooks shot the film in the actual Clutter farmhouse, on the actual Kansas roads, with the actual gallows, four years after the hangings. Conrad Hall photographed it in black and white on Brooks’s insistence when the studio wanted color, and the result looks closer to news footage than to a 1967 studio picture.

Robert Blake plays Perry Smith as somebody who has been told his whole life that he is worthless and has half-believed it. The aspirin, the guitar, the drawings, the treasure-hunting fantasy: Brooks keeps the small ambitions in, and they are what make the murders unbearable instead of merely shocking.

The killings are held back for ninety minutes and then delivered in fragments as Perry describes them, with the camera staying on his face more than on the house. Brooks understood that the audience had come for the scene and gave it to them in a form they could not enjoy.

The execution sequence is the film’s argument and it is made without a speech. Rain on a window, a hood, a doctor with a stethoscope counting, and the shadow of the rope moving across Perry’s face while he talks about his father. Brooks films the state doing its work at exactly the same temperature he filmed the murders.

For WritersBrooks withholds the murders for ninety minutes and then reports them through the killer’s own account, so the audience receives the worst material filtered through the person who did it. They cannot watch it as spectacle because they are watching a face instead of a room. When you write an atrocity, decide who is delivering it before you decide what happens. A scene shown directly invites the reader to look. The same scene recounted by a participant makes the reader study the participant, and the second position produces discomfort instead of appetite. Writing deaths that matter works the same ground.

↑ All Entries

2. Point Blank (1967) [full review]

► Read the full review of Point Blank (1967)

1967
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.3/10

"Lee Marvin had script approval and used it to strip dialogue out, so the film communicates almost entirely through movement."

John Boorman took a Richard Stark novel and shot it like a European art film. Walker wants ninety-three thousand dollars he is owed and works methodically up a corporate chain to get it, and Boorman refuses to tell the audience whether any of it is happening or whether Walker died on Alcatraz in the first reel.

Lee Marvin plays the part almost without expression and Boorman shoots him walking. The LAX corridor sequence runs for over a minute on nothing but heels on tile, cut against Chris in an apartment, and the sound arrives before he does. It is the most imitated walk in crime cinema.

The organization Walker is fighting turns out to be an organization. Offices, receptionists, executives who cannot authorize a payment of that size, a man who explains he does not carry cash. Boorman’s joke is that the mob has become a corporation and nobody inside it can find the money either.

For WritersBoorman never resolves whether the film is happening. Walker takes a bullet on Alcatraz in the first minutes, and every subsequent scene is staged with enough dislocation to support a dying man’s fantasy without ever committing to it. The ambiguity costs the film nothing because the revenge plot works either way. When you want an unreliable frame, build a story that reads completely as literal and completely as internal. If the reader has to choose to make sense of events, you have written a puzzle. If both readings are whole, you have written something they will argue about.

↑ All Entries

3. Dirty Harry Pentalogy (1971-1988) [full review]

► Read the full review of Dirty Harry Pentalogy (1971-1988)

1971
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"The first film is sharper than its reputation, with Scorpio caught halfway through and released on a procedural failure."

Five films across seventeen years, and only the first two are any good. Don Siegel’s 1971 original is a genuinely nasty piece of work about a cop who is right about the killer and wrong about almost everything else, and it has been argued about since the week it opened.

Scorpio is the reason the first film survives. Andy Robinson plays him as a whining, physically unimpressive man who screams for a lawyer after being tortured on a football field, and the film puts that scene in knowing exactly what it does to the audience’s sympathy. Siegel refuses to make the villain dignified.

Magnum Force is the sequel that argues with its own predecessor. Harry hunts a death squad of motorcycle officers executing criminals, and the film’s position is that Callahan draws a line those men crossed. It is a direct answer to the fascism charge and it is more thoughtful than the original.

The last three are a collapse. The Enforcer is a lazy rerun, Sudden Impact exists for one catchphrase, and The Dead Pool is barely a film. Eastwood was directing better work elsewhere by then and the series had become an obligation. Eastwood was directing Bird and Unforgiven in the same stretch and the gap in ambition is embarrassing.

For WritersSiegel makes Scorpio pathetic instead of formidable. That decision is what keeps the first film uncomfortable fifty years later. A dignified villain lets the audience enjoy his defeat. A sniveling one forces them to notice what is being done to a person. When you write a character the reader should want punished, decide whether you want the punishment to feel good. If you want the reader implicated, strip the villain of presence at the moment of defeat. They will still want it and they will not enjoy it, and the difference is the whole moral weight of the book.

↑ All Entries

4. Get Carter (1971) [full review]

► Read the full review of Get Carter (1971)

1971
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"Newcastle is shot as a real industrial city in decline, on location, with a documentary flatness nothing British had attempted."

Mike Hodges shot Newcastle as an industrial wasteland and put Michael Caine in it wearing a London suit that marks him as foreign in every frame. Jack Carter has come north for his brother’s funeral and stays because the death does not add up, and the film never once suggests he is doing something admirable.

Caine plays Carter as a man with no warmth available. He is polite, quiet and completely without hesitation, and the film’s most famous shot is him standing naked in a doorway with a shotgun making a phone call. The violence is quick, ugly and usually inflicted on people who are terrified.

The discovery at the center is the film’s black heart and Hodges plays it with no music. Carter watches a reel of film in a projector room, understands what happened to his niece, and the rest of the picture is a man doing what he was always going to do with an added reason.

The ending is the reason the film matters. Carter finishes the job, walks a beach dumping the evidence, and is shot by a hired man who has been in the background for two acts. No music, no recognition, no last words. The body goes into the tide and the credits run.

British crime cinema never recovered from it. Every UK gangster film since has either imitated the coldness or reacted against it, and the 2000 Stallone remake is instructive mainly because it gives Carter a conscience and thereby removes the entire point. Hodges never made another film with this much contempt in it and neither did anybody else in Britain.

For WritersHodges kills Carter with a bullet from a character the audience has barely registered, at the end of a job he successfully completed. There is no confrontation and no final opponent. The revenge works and he dies anyway, for reasons set in motion offscreen several reels earlier. When you end a revenge story, consider separating success from survival. A protagonist who wins and lives has been rewarded. A protagonist who wins and dies has been assessed, and the reader has to decide what the assessment was for. Winning and surviving are two different rewards. Choose which one the story is handing out.

In Cold Blood withholds the murders and Reservoir Dogs pans off the ear. Work out when to look away in the Showing and Telling Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. Mean Streets (1973) [full review]

► Read the full review of Mean Streets (1973)

1973
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"Scorsese made it for around half a million dollars, largely in Los Angeles standing in for Little Italy."

Scorsese made it for under six hundred thousand dollars, shot most of the New York material in Los Angeles because he could not afford permits, and put his own preoccupations directly on screen for the first time. Charlie wants to be a good Catholic and a good earner at the same time and the film is about how that fails.

Johnny Boy is the problem and De Niro plays him as a man who genuinely does not understand why anybody expects him to pay debts. He is funny for an hour. The scene where he explains to Michael exactly why he will not pay, laughing, is the point where the audience realizes the film has been building toward something bad.

The camera is the other innovation. Scorsese straps it to Keitel for the bar entrance, shoots the fight in slow motion to a jukebox, and runs the whole picture on needle drops at a time when nobody was scoring films that way. Everything Goodfellas does in 1990 is already here in rough form.

For WritersScorsese gives Charlie two incompatible commitments and never lets him choose between them. He wants absolution and he wants standing in a business that forecloses it, and every scene is him servicing both and losing ground on each. When you write internal conflict, resist the scene where the character picks a side. Keep both wants active and make each action cost something on the other ledger. Conflict that drives story comes from a character running two accounts, not from a character deciding which one matters. Every scene should debit one ledger to credit the other.

↑ All Entries

6. Badlands (1973) [full review]

► Read the full review of Badlands (1973)

1973
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"Malick’s debut is narrated by Sissy Spacek in a register borrowed entirely from teenage magazines while the bodies accumulate."

Terrence Malick’s first film takes the Starkweather killings and narrates them through a fifteen-year-old girl reading her own life as a movie magazine romance. Sissy Spacek describes multiple murders in the register of a teenager describing a holiday, and the gap between the voice and the events is the entire film.

Martin Sheen plays Kit as a man performing James Dean and being complimented on the resemblance. He takes the compliment seriously. He is not intelligent, not charismatic in any real way, and utterly convinced he is a figure. The film treats that delusion as the most dangerous thing about him.

Malick shoots the Dakota badlands as pastoral. Golden light, wheat, a treehouse built out of a Swiss Family Robinson fantasy, all of it beautiful and none of it commenting on the killings happening inside it. The landscape declines to participate and that is the argument.

The ending gives Kit exactly what he wanted. He is caught, he is famous, the soldiers escorting him ask for souvenirs, and he distributes his possessions like a celebrity signing autographs. Malick lets the audience watch the delusion be confirmed by the system that is about to execute him.

For WritersMalick runs Holly’s narration at a fixed emotional temperature while the events escalate past it, and never once lets her voice catch up. She describes her father’s murder and a change of clothes in the same tone. The reader supplies all the horror because the narrator supplies none. When you want a reader to feel something a character cannot, keep the narrator’s register absolutely flat and let the facts do the climbing. A narrator who starts reacting appropriately gives the reader permission to stop working. Writing Heroes and Villains makes the same case about villains. Holly never once raises her voice and the film is unbearable for it.

↑ All Entries

7. The Taking of Pelham 123 (1974) and The Taking of Pelham 123 (2009) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Taking of Pelham 123 (1974) and The Taking of Pelham 123 (2009)

1974
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"The 1974 film’s real pleasure is competence under irritation, with everybody annoyed and nobody heroic."

Joseph Sargent’s 1974 film is about the New York transit system and the 2009 remake is about two men talking on a phone. That difference explains why one of them still works. Sargent spends real time on the control room, the dispatcher screens, the tunnel geometry and the physical problem of moving a train without a driver.

Robert Shaw plays Blue as a former mercenary running a military operation on a commercial subway car, and the crew’s discipline is what generates the tension. They have a timetable, they have fallback positions, and they kill on schedule instead of in anger. Walter Matthau opposite him is tired, rude and competent.

The 2009 version replaces the procedure with psychology. Travolta shouts, Denzel confesses to a bribe, and the two of them develop a relationship the original had no interest in. Tony Scott shoots trains in a way that makes the geography unreadable. That is fatal for a film about where a train is.

The original’s last shot is a sneeze. Matthau has one piece of evidence, he knocks on a door, and the film ends on a reaction from a man who thought he had escaped. Sargent cuts immediately. The remake ends with a chase across a bridge and explains itself twice on the way.

For WritersThe 1974 film spends its first twenty minutes on how a subway system actually operates, and every minute of that pays off later because the audience can evaluate the hijackers’ plan against real constraints. The remake skips it and has to manufacture tension with shouting. When you write a thriller set inside a system, teach the system first. Readers cannot feel suspense about a plan they cannot assess. Spend the pages on the mechanism, then let the antagonist exploit it, and the reader will be ahead of your characters in exactly the way you want.

↑ All Entries

8. Dog Day Afternoon (1975) [full review]

► Read the full review of Dog Day Afternoon (1975)

1975
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"It was shot on the street where the events happened, largely improvised, and the crowd becomes a participant."

Lumet shot it without a score, in sequence, in Brooklyn heat, and the film feels like a day that will not end because it was made like one. Sonny robs a bank to pay for his partner’s surgery, the vault holds almost nothing, and everything after that is improvisation in front of a growing crowd.

Pacino plays Sonny as a man with no plan and enormous nervous energy, and the Attica chant is the moment the film turns from a robbery into something else. He works the crowd, the crowd works him back, and the police lose control of the street before they lose control of the bank.

The phone call with Leon is the best scene in either actor’s career. Chris Sarandon plays it from a hospital bed, exhausted and unimpressed, and Sonny is reduced to pleading with somebody who has heard all of it before. The robbery stops mattering for six minutes.

The airport ending is filmed as anticlimax on purpose. A car ride, a quiet agent, and then a movement nobody sees coming, over in a second. Lumet gives Sal no last words and no music, and the final shot is Sonny on tarmac watching a body get loaded.

For WritersLumet gives Sonny no competence whatsoever and the film is tense for two hours anyway. The suspense comes from watching somebody improvise past the point where improvisation can work, with an audience gathering outside. When you write a protagonist under pressure, competence is not the only engine available. An incompetent person with genuine stakes and a shrinking exit generates more anxiety than a professional running a plan, because the reader cannot predict the next move either. Make sure the stakes are real and the exits are closing on a visible clock. Pacing problems nobody talks about covers the mechanics. Lumet shot in sequence, in the heat, with no score, and the exhaustion on screen is real.

↑ All Entries

9. Taxi Driver (1976) [full review]

► Read the full review of Taxi Driver (1976)

1976
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.2/10

"Schrader wrote it in about two weeks while living in a car and has been open about where the loneliness came from."

Schrader wrote it in a fortnight while living in his car, and Scorsese shot it during a New York garbage strike so the streets are genuinely full of refuse. Travis Bickle cannot sleep, cannot connect, and writes a diary that the film uses as narration without ever endorsing a word of it.

De Niro plays Travis as a man assembling a personality out of fragments he has observed. The Secret Service agent conversation, the political rally, the gun purchase, the mirror: each is him trying on a role. Nothing about him is stable and the film never provides a diagnosis.

Bernard Herrmann’s last score does enormous work. The saxophone line makes the city sound romantic at exactly the moments Travis finds it intolerable, and the brass under the violence is closer to a horror film. Herrmann finished the recording and died that night. Scorsese has said the brass under the massacre was Herrmann’s idea and that he argued for it.

The ending is the argument nobody agrees about. Travis kills three men, is called a hero by the newspapers, and drives away looking fine. Scorsese has said it is real and Schrader has implied otherwise, and the film gives the audience one shot in a rear-view mirror to decide with.

Foster was twelve and the production required a welfare worker on set and a body double for some material. Her scenes with De Niro in the diner are the only moments where Travis is talked to like a person by somebody who is not afraid of him, and she is the only character who sees him clearly.

For WritersSchrader gives Travis a diary and the film reads it aloud, and the diary is wrong about almost everything. He describes himself as a man who stands up while the images show a man who cannot hold a conversation. The narration is not a window, it is a symptom. When you give a character a voice-over or a journal, decide whether it is evidence or exhibit. Evidence explains the character to the reader. An exhibit lets the reader catch the character lying to himself. The unreliable narrator is built out of exactly that gap. Travis is the least reliable witness to his own life and the film hands him the microphone anyway.

Travis Bickle, Lefty Ruggiero and Jack Carter are three completely different engines. Build people that specific in the Character Writer’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. Blood Simple (1984) [full review]

► Read the full review of Blood Simple (1984)

1984
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"The Coens funded it by cutting a trailer for a film that did not exist and showing it to Minnesota investors door to door."

The Coens made their first film for a million and a half dollars raised door to door from Minnesota investors, shot it in Texas, and built the whole plot on a simple condition: nobody in it knows what anybody else has done. Four people, four partial accounts, and not one correct understanding among them.

M. Emmet Walsh’s private detective is the engine and he is genuinely frightening because he is casual. He takes money from a man to kill two people, kills the man instead, and spends the rest of the film cleaning up in a register somewhere between irritated and amused. He is never once nervous.

The burial sequence is the film’s centerpiece and it is almost unwatchable. Ray drives into a field with a man he believes is dead, discovers otherwise, and has to finish the job with a shovel while headlights approach on a distant road. Barry Sonnenfeld lights it with one flashlight and the car.

For WritersThe Coens build the entire plot out of information asymmetry and never let any character achieve a full picture. Abby dies believing she killed the wrong man. Ray dies without ever learning what happened. The audience knows everything and every character knows a fragment. When you construct a thriller from misunderstanding, keep a ledger of exactly what each person knows at each point and enforce it. The temptation is to let a character intuit something to move the plot. Every time you do it the structure loosens and the reader stops trusting the gaps. Plot devices that work and the ones that wreck a story split on this exact point. The Coens kept the ledger and every death in the film is a direct result of a gap in it.

↑ All Entries

11. Once Upon a Time in America (1984) [full review]

► Read the full review of Once Upon a Time in America (1984)

1984
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.3/10

"Leone’s cut ran close to four hours and the American release was reduced to around a hundred and thirty-nine minutes."

Leone spent a decade on it, delivered a four-hour film, and the American distributor cut it to a hundred and thirty-nine minutes and reassembled it in chronological order. The butchered version was released, reviewed as a disaster, and the full cut was not widely seen in the United States for years.

The structure is three time periods and Leone moves between them on objects and sounds. A telephone ringing across thirty-five years, a frisbee, a station locker. Noodles in 1968 is remembering and the film refuses to confirm whether the memory is reliable. The audience is asked to hold three decades at once and Leone never supplies a single caption.

The opium den ending is Leone’s last image and the most argued-about frame in his work. Noodles smiles at the ceiling in 1933 and the film cuts to credits. Either the whole 1968 material was a hallucination or the smile is a man deciding to stop remembering, and Leone gave no interviews that settled it.

The film’s treatment of Deborah and of Carol is the reason it remains difficult to recommend without warning. Two extended assault sequences, filmed at length, from a perspective that does not condemn them clearly enough for most viewers. Leone’s defense was that Noodles is not a hero, and it is not a sufficient defense.

For WritersLeone transitions between three eras on sound and object instead of on caption. A telephone rings in one decade and is answered in another. The reader is never told a year and is never lost, because the bridge itself carries the logic. When you move between timelines, find a physical object present in both and cut on it. Captions and chapter headings work and they announce the machinery. An object that belongs in both periods does the same job and makes the reader feel the connection instead of reading about it. Leone crosses thirty-five years on a ringing telephone and never captions a single jump.

↑ All Entries

12. The Naked Gun (1988, 1991, 1994, 2025) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Naked Gun (1988, 1991, 1994, 2025)

1988
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.6/10

"Nielsen plays every line straight and the films bury three or four more jokes in the background of every shot."

The Zucker brothers and Jim Abrahams built the joke density of Airplane onto a police procedural and cast Leslie Nielsen, who plays every line as though he is in a serious film. That commitment is the entire mechanism. Nielsen never signals a joke and the films never cut for a reaction.

The first film is the tightest. The Queen Elizabeth sequence, the baseball umpire material, the press conference, the parking lot: each set piece has a clean premise and then buries three visual gags in the background of every shot. Repeat viewings find jokes nobody caught the first time.

The sequels decline on a predictable curve. The Smell of Fear is thinner and Final Insult leans on celebrity cameos, and by 1994 the formula is visible. The 2025 revival with Liam Neeson works better than it should, for the same reason the original did: it cast a man known for playing straight.

For WritersNielsen plays every absurd line with the conviction of a man reading a charge sheet, and the films never cut to anybody reacting. Nobody inside the world finds it funny. That refusal is what makes the density survivable. When you write comedy, keep the characters unaware. A character who acknowledges the joke has told the reader how to respond and taken the discovery away from them. Humor on the page runs on the same principle: write it straight and let the reader find it. Nielsen never once acknowledges that anything unusual is happening, across four films.

↑ All Entries

13. The Thin Blue Line (1988) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Thin Blue Line (1988)

1988
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.0/10

"Morris’s reenactments were controversial because documentary orthodoxy held reconstruction to be dishonest, and the film freed a man."

Errol Morris set out to make a film about a Dallas psychiatrist who testified in death penalty cases, met Randall Adams by accident, and ended up producing the documentary that got a man off death row. The film was released in 1988 and Adams was freed the following year.

The reenactments were controversial and they are the point. Morris films the shooting repeatedly, differently, according to each witness’s account, and the milkshake hitting the road in slow motion is the same image every time while the details around it change. He is dramatizing testimony instead of events.

Philip Glass scores it as a loop, and the repetition does exactly what the reenactments do. The film is about a story being told over and over by people with reasons, and the music never resolves because the accounts never do. Glass wrote it before the final cut existed and Morris edited against the music.

The last scene is a tape recorder on a table. David Harris, who almost certainly did it, talks himself close enough to a confession that the Texas courts had to act, and Morris shows nothing but the machine. No face, no reaction, no commentary. Texas vacated the conviction in 1989 and Adams walked out after twelve years inside.

For WritersMorris reenacts the shooting once for every version of it, and the differences between the reenactments carry the argument. He is not showing what happened. He is showing what each witness claims, side by side, and the incompatibility is the finding. When you handle contested events in nonfiction, give each account its own full rendering instead of a summary comparison. A reader who has been inside four incompatible versions understands the problem. A reader given a paragraph explaining that the witnesses disagreed has only been told about it. Morris filmed the same shooting five different ways and let the differences make the case.

Carlito’s Way opens on its own ending and Once Upon a Time in America runs three decades at once. Take the shapes apart in the Story ARC Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. Thelma & Louise (1991) [full review]

► Read the full review of Thelma & Louise (1991)

1991
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.5/10

"Callie Khouri wrote it in her spare time while working as a music video producer and won the screenplay Oscar for it."

Callie Khouri wrote it in her spare time while producing music videos and it won her an Academy Award. Ridley Scott shot the American southwest as enormous and empty, and the film converts a weekend fishing trip into a flight across three states inside about twenty minutes of screen time.

The parking lot scene is the hinge and Scott films it without any ambiguity. Louise shoots a man who has already stopped, because of what he says afterward, and the film is clear that she has committed murder and equally clear about why she cannot go to the police. Everything else follows from that.

Geena Davis plays Thelma’s transformation as a series of small competences acquired fast. She robs a store using words she heard J.D. use the night before, and Scott shows it on a surveillance tape instead of directly, so the audience watches her become somebody through a security camera.

The ending was argued about before the film opened and Scott held the frame on the car in the air and cut to white. He shot an alternative with the car landing and refused to use it. The decision is the difference between a tragedy and a news item.

For WritersKhouri makes the inciting act indefensible on purpose. Louise shoots a man who is no longer a threat, and the film neither excuses it nor lets the audience dismiss her. Every subsequent decision is constrained by a crime that cannot be argued away. When you set a story in motion with a wrong act, resist softening it into self-defense. A clean justification gives your characters an exit and removes your plot. An indefensible act with an understandable cause traps them, and the trap is what the reader came for. Khouri wrote an act with no defense available and the plot came out of the trap.

↑ All Entries

15. Reservoir Dogs (1992) [full review]

► Read the full review of Reservoir Dogs (1992)

1992
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.3/10

"Tarantino could not afford to stage the robbery, so he set the film entirely before and after it."

Tarantino made it for a million and a quarter dollars and structured the whole film around a heist the audience never sees. The robbery happens between scenes. What is on screen is a warehouse, a bleeding man, and six professionals trying to work out which of them is police.

The budget constraint produced the structure and the structure is the film. One location, flashbacks to fill in each man, and a slow bleed in the middle of the floor functioning as a clock. Mr. Orange is dying in real time for the entire second half and the audience knows why and nobody in the room does.

The ear scene made the reputation and the reason it works is the camera moving away. Michael Madsen dances, the frame pans to an empty doorway, and the audience listens. Tarantino shot the violence directly as well and cut to the pan because the sound was worse.

Mr. Orange’s extended cover story is the best-constructed sequence in the film. He rehearses an anecdote about a drug deal in a men’s room, and Tarantino stages the anecdote as though it happened, with Orange walking through his own lie while narrating it. A fabrication rendered at full strength.

For WritersTarantino pans away from the ear and holds on an empty doorway, and it is the most violent thing in the film. The audience assembles an image from sound and their own supply, and whatever they build is worse than what a camera could have shown. When you write violence, consider moving the viewpoint at the moment of impact. Describe the room, the noise and the aftermath and leave the act itself off the page. A reader who built the scene themselves cannot later decide it was overdone. What show do not tell actually means is this and nothing else. Tarantino shot the ear directly as well, watched both, and used the pan.

↑ All Entries

16. Carlito’s Way (1993) [full review]

► Read the full review of Carlito’s Way (1993)

1993
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"De Palma opens with Carlito bleeding on a station floor beneath a mural advertising the retirement he never reaches."

De Palma and Pacino made a second crime film together and it is better than Scarface in every way that matters. Carlito is out of prison on a technicality, genuinely intends to retire, and spends the film being pulled back by obligations he cannot refuse without becoming somebody he has decided not to be.

Sean Penn’s Kleinfeld is one of the great supporting performances. A coked-out lawyer who got Carlito released and now expects a return, and Penn plays the deterioration across months without ever asking for sympathy. The scene on the boat is where the film turns and neither man says what has happened.

The Grand Central sequence is De Palma at his best. Escalators, a concourse, a ticket hall, a shifting geometry of pursuers, and Carlito ninety seconds from a train to Miami. De Palma stages it with total clarity and the audience knows where everybody is at every moment.

The film opens with Carlito dying and then explains how he got there. Every decision he makes is watched with the outcome already known. The billboard of a beach over the platform is the last image, and it is the retirement he was ninety seconds from reaching.

For WritersDe Palma opens on the shooting and closes on it, so the audience spends two hours watching a man make reasonable choices toward an end they already know. Every act of loyalty reads as a step toward the platform. When you frame a story with its own ending, the middle stops being about what happens and becomes about which decision was the fatal one. Give the reader four or five candidates and let them carry the question instead of answering it. De Palma shows the platform in the first three minutes and spends two hours walking toward it.

↑ All Entries

17. Get Shorty (1995) [full review]

► Read the full review of Get Shorty (1995)

1995
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.9/10

"Elmore Leonard’s dialogue survives the adaptation almost intact, a rare thing, because Scott Frank kept the rhythm."

Barry Sonnenfeld adapted Elmore Leonard and got the thing almost nobody gets right: the rhythm. The characters talk past each other, the plot advances through misunderstandings about who owes what, and nobody delivers a speech. Scott Frank’s screenplay is the best Leonard adaptation on film.

Travolta plays Chili Palmer as a loan shark who discovers that the movie business runs on exactly the skills he already has: leaning on people, reading a room, and never raising his voice. The joke is that Hollywood is a softer version of the work he is trying to leave.

Gene Hackman’s Harry Zimm is a schlock producer with no money and enormous confidence, and Hackman plays him as a man who has been failing successfully for thirty years. The scene where he pitches a film he does not own to people who cannot fund it is the comedy of the whole industry in four minutes.

For WritersScott Frank kept Leonard’s rule that nobody in a scene has the full picture and everybody thinks they do. Chili believes he is running the room. So does Harry. So does Bo. The comedy comes from watching three people operate confidently on incompatible assumptions. When you write dialogue comedy, give each speaker a different wrong idea about what the conversation is for. Jokes written as jokes need a setup. Jokes generated by mismatched intentions arrive continuously and cost you nothing in pace. Leonard’s people are all confident and all working from different information. That is the engine.

Get Shorty and Dog Day Afternoon both run on people talking past each other. Learn the technique in the Dialogue Handbook.

↑ All Entries

18. Se7en (1995) [full review]

► Read the full review of Se7en (1995)

1995
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.6/10

"The city is never named, the year is never given, and the killer is not seen until he surrenders covered in blood."

Fincher took a studio thriller and refused to light it. The city has no name, it rains for six of the seven days, and Darius Khondji shot on stock that was processed to crush the blacks so that entire scenes take place in rooms the audience cannot fully see.

The structure is a countdown that the detectives never get ahead of. They arrive after every murder. The sloth victim is alive and that is worse. John Doe is not caught, he walks into a police station covered in blood and surrenders, and the last act is him directing the ending he wrote.

Kevin Spacey’s name was kept off the posters and out of the opening credits so the audience would not anticipate him, and the studio agreed. He appears with forty minutes left and the car ride to the desert is the film’s best writing, with Doe calmly explaining that he is not special and that the world made him necessary.

The box was the fight. New Line wanted an alternative ending with a chase and Fincher and Pitt both refused, and the shooting script Pitt signed for had the original. Fincher never shows what is inside, and the entire third act depends on the audience building it from a courier’s face and Somerset’s reaction.

For WritersFincher never opens the box and never shows the contents in any frame. Somerset looks, the audience watches him look, and the information arrives through one line and a reaction. The restraint is why the ending survived thirty years of imitation. When your story turns on an object or an image, ask whether the reader needs to see it. Describe the reaction of someone who has, give them one factual detail, and stop. The reader’s version will be worse than anything you could write and it will be theirs. Sensory detail is how you hand them the materials. New Line wanted the box opened. Fincher and Pitt both refused and the ending survived thirty years of imitation.

↑ All Entries

19. Donnie Brasco (1997) [full review]

► Read the full review of Donnie Brasco (1997)

1997
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"Al Pacino plays Lefty as a man who has given thirty years to an organization that has never promoted him."

Mike Newell made the only mob film that is genuinely about the cost to the undercover officer. Joe Pistone spends six years inside the Bonanno family, his marriage collapses in the background, and the film keeps returning to a house in New Jersey where nobody recognizes him anymore.

Al Pacino plays Lefty Ruggiero as a career failure. Twenty-six hits and still not made, still answering to younger men, still borrowing money. He vouches for Donnie because nobody has ever needed him before, and the film is precise about how much that costs when the truth arrives.

The final scene is Lefty emptying his pockets onto a dresser, leaving his jewelry and his watch for his wife, and going out to a car he knows is taking him somewhere he will not return from. Pacino plays it as routine. The film gives him no speech and no confrontation.

For WritersNewell makes Lefty the film’s victim instead of its villain, and the betrayal lands because Lefty’s affection for Donnie is the only genuine relationship either man has. Pistone’s success requires Lefty’s death and the film never resolves that. When you write a deception plot, give the deceived party something the deceiver actually wants and cannot get honestly. Guilt on the deceiver’s side converts a caper into a story, a point arcs versus wounds works through, and the reader will feel it long before any character says so. Pistone’s success required Lefty’s death and the film refuses to resolve that. Newell holds the last shot on a dresser and a wedding ring.

↑ All Entries

20. American History X (1998) [full review]

► Read the full review of American History X (1998)

1998
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.5/10

"Edward Norton was nominated for Best Actor and fought the studio over the cut, and the released version is his."

Tony Kaye shot the black and white flashbacks as Derek’s past and the color present as his attempt to undo it, then fought the studio so publicly over the edit that he tried to have his name replaced with Humpty Dumpty. The version released is Edward Norton’s cut and it is the better film.

Norton’s performance is the reason it survives its own sermonizing. He plays the curbstomp sequence and the prison laundry conversations as the same man at different temperatures, and the physical transformation is the least interesting thing about it. The dinner table scene is twelve minutes of a family being taken apart by one person’s certainty.

The prison material is where the film is strongest and it is also the part that gets least discussed. Derek is abandoned by the Aryan Brotherhood for the specific reason that he applied their principles consistently, and the man who talks him out of it is doing laundry and refuses to make it a lesson.

The ending is the film’s weakest choice and it is deliberate. Danny is killed in a school bathroom by a boy he humiliated, and the closing narration reaches for a quote that the rest of the film had been too careful to need. Kaye and Norton disagreed about this and both had a point.

For WritersThe dinner table scene works because Derek is winning. He is articulate, fast, and better prepared than anybody arguing back, and the film lets him dismantle the table without inserting a character who defeats him. That refusal is what makes the later reversal credible. When you write a persuasive extremist, let them be persuasive. A straw man reassures the reader that they are safe. An argument delivered at full strength and then dismantled by experience is the only version that changes anybody. Characters trapped in their own certainty covers the failure mode. Let the extremist win the argument and lose to experience instead.

Honorable Mentions: Crime Films Without a Review Here Yet

None of these has a review on the site so far. Each belongs in the conversation and each is on the list.

Prince of the City (1981)

⭐ 7.4/10

Lumet spent three hours on a narcotics detective who agrees to testify and then discovers he cannot control which of his friends go down with him. Treat Williams is in almost every frame and the film refuses to give him a clean motive at any point.

Q&A (1990)

⭐ 6.7/10

Lumet again, with Nick Nolte as a detective who executes a man in the first scene and then supervises the investigation into it. The film is about how a department closes around one of its own and it is uglier about race than American crime cinema usually permits.

Gone Baby Gone (2007)

⭐ 7.6/10

Ben Affleck adapts Dennis Lehane and builds the whole film toward a choice with no good answer. The last twenty minutes ask whether a child is better off with an inadequate mother or a decent kidnapper, and the film declines to tell the audience who was right.

The Chaser (2008)

⭐ 7.8/10

Na Hong-jin sends an ex-cop turned pimp after a client who is killing his women, and the police have the murderer in custody for most of the film and cannot hold him. The failure is bureaucratic and the tension comes from watching paperwork lose.

Charley Varrick (1973)

⭐ 7.4/10

Don Siegel put Walter Matthau in a small-town bank job that accidentally takes mob laundering money, and the whole film is a competent man working out how far ahead he needs to be. Joe Don Baker plays the enforcer sent after him as a salesman with a clipboard.

Straight Time (1978)

⭐ 7.4/10

Dustin Hoffman plays a career burglar on parole who is pushed back into work by a parole officer with a grudge, and the film refuses to make either man sympathetic. The supermarket robbery is shot without any tension music at all.

Killing Them Softly (2012)

⭐ 6.2/10

Dominik shoots a small-time robbery and its consequences against 2008 campaign audio playing on every television in the background. The thesis is stated too plainly in the last line, and everything before it is precise about what happens when an economy of trust collapses.

Manhunter (1986)

⭐ 7.2/10

Michael Mann adapted Red Dragon five years before Silence of the Lambs and built the whole film on Will Graham reconstructing a killer by occupying his perspective. The house in the last act is lit entirely in blue and white and scored to Iron Butterfly.

The Drop (2014)

⭐ 7.1/10

Another Lehane, with Tom Hardy playing a Brooklyn bartender who appears slow and is not. James Gandolfini’s last role is a cousin who has lost his bar and cannot accept it, and the film’s final revelation reframes every earlier scene.

Bad Lieutenant (1992)

⭐ 7.0/10

Abel Ferrara and Harvey Keitel made a film about a Catholic policeman in complete moral collapse and refused to structure it as redemption. The baseball subplot runs underneath the whole picture and the ending is a debt being paid in the only currency left.

Public Enemies (2009)

⭐ 7.0/10

Mann shot Dillinger on early digital and the result divides people. The Little Bohemia sequence is among the best gun battles he has staged, and Depp plays Dillinger as a man who knows the era is ending and refuses to adjust.

Collateral (2004)

⭐ 7.5/10

Mann shot Los Angeles on digital because film could not hold the ambient light of the city at night, and the result looks like nothing else. Cruise plays a contract killer as a man with a schedule and the whole film happens in one night inside a cab.

Dishonorable Mentions: Crime Films That Failed

Also unreviewed here, and worth naming because each had the cast, the budget and a source worth adapting.

The Bonfire of the Vanities (1990)

⭐ 5.6/10

Brian De Palma adapted Tom Wolfe and miscast every part. Hanks cannot play a man the audience should dislike, the satire is blunted to protect the cast, and the production was documented in a book about its own failure that is better than the film.

Triple 9 (2016)

⭐ 6.3/10

John Hillcoat assembled Ejiofor, Affleck, Harrelson, Mackie, Winslet and Gal Gadot for a heist film with no protagonist and no argument. Characters are introduced and killed before the audience can place them, and the Russian mob plot is explained three separate times.

The Snowman (2017)

⭐ 4.1/10

Tomas Alfredson has said publicly that ten to fifteen percent of the script was never shot, and it shows in every reel. Michael Fassbender plays a detective whose investigation skips steps the film forgot to film, and Val Kilmer is dubbed by another actor throughout.

Kiss of the Dragon (2001)

⭐ 6.6/10

Jet Li deserved better than a plot assembled from photocopies. The fights are genuinely good and everything between them is a hostage exchange nobody wrote. Included because competence in one department cannot carry a film.

Jersey Boys (2014)

⭐ 6.8/10

Eastwood directing a jukebox musical about mob-adjacent musicians, staged with neither the energy of a musical nor the tension of a crime film. The fourth-wall narration rotates between four characters and none of them has anything to say.

Getaway (2013)

⭐ 4.4/10

Ethan Hawke drives a Shelby around Sofia for ninety minutes while a voice on a phone issues instructions. The editing averages under two seconds a shot, the geography is unreadable, and the film is a useful floor marker for what incoherent action looks like.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

Everything in this tier rates a 9, so the ordering inside it is chronological and not a ranking. Taxi Driver sitting level with The Naked Gun will bother people, and the rewatch scale is doing something different from a critical list. Tell me which one you would promote to Part 1.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Watchable |
Part 7: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best crime film of the 1970s?
Taxi Driver (1976) and Dog Day Afternoon (1975) are the two that have lasted best, both directed in New York within a year of each other. Get Carter (1971) is the British answer and is colder than either.
What does the ending of Taxi Driver mean?
Travis survives the shootout, is called a hero by the newspapers, and appears to have recovered. Scorsese has said it happened. Schrader has implied otherwise. The final glance in the rear-view mirror is the only evidence either way.
Is In Cold Blood the same as the Capote book?
Richard Brooks adapted Truman Capote’s 1966 book closely and shot on the real locations, including the Clutter farmhouse and the gallows. The book is the stronger work. The film’s execution sequence is the part that outdoes it.
Why is Reservoir Dogs shot in one location?
Money. Tarantino had a million and a quarter dollars and no budget for the robbery, so he wrote the heist between scenes and built the film in a warehouse. The constraint produced the structure the film is known for.
What is in the box in Se7en?
Fincher never shows it and never confirms it in any frame. The audience is given a courier’s reaction, Somerset looking inside, and one line of dialogue. New Line wanted an alternative ending and both Fincher and Brad Pitt refused.
Is Thelma and Louise a crime film?
It is a road film with a homicide in the first act and two armed robberies after it. The genre question is part of why it caused an argument in 1991. Callie Khouri won the screenplay Oscar for it.
Which Dirty Harry film is best?
The 1971 original for its nastiness and Magnum Force (1973) for the argument it makes against its own predecessor. The last three are a decline and The Dead Pool (1988) is barely a film.
Is Badlands based on a true story?
Yes. Terrence Malick drew on the 1958 killing spree by Charles Starkweather and Caril Ann Fugate, who murdered eleven people across Nebraska and Wyoming. Names and details were changed. Starkweather was executed in 1959 and Fugate was paroled in 1976.

🏷︎ Film List

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment