Latest
Joel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesThe Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.Getty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends OnWriting Your Worst Moments in a Memoir: Show the Evidence, Skip the VerdictHow to Register a Copyright for Your Book (and What Doesn’t Count)Your AI Chats Aren’t Private: Deleted ChatGPT Logs in CourtI Joined the Science Fiction Book Club 30 TimesThe Board Seat Scam: A 419 Letter in a Business SuitCitations in a Memoir: Endnotes, Footnotes and Fair UseThe Stores That Still Care: Publix, Walmart, Aldi, Best Buy and the RestThe Grocery Store Plan: Why Every Store Starts With Flowers
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Before 2014 I Spent a Thousand Hours a Year Watching Other People’s Work

TL;DR: Before 2014 I spent about a thousand hours a year watching other people’s creative work. After 2014 I spent those same hours producing my own. I didn’t become productive by giving things up. I became productive by changing what I did with the hours I already had.

People say they’re too busy to exercise, too tired to cook, too overwhelmed to read, and too stressed to spend time with friends. Then they watch Netflix for four hours.

Something doesn’t add up, and I think I know what it is. The hours spent watching don’t count as hours spent. They feel like the absence of activity instead of a use of time, and that makes them easy to lose.

What was my own number?

Before 2014 I spent roughly a thousand hours a year watching other people’s creative work. A thousand hours. That’s a serious part-time job. That’s more time than most people spend on anything they’d list as an interest, and I was spending it on the finished output of other people’s effort.

After 2014 I spent those hours producing my own.

The arithmetic of a thousand hoursThree figures from the post. Before 2014 Richard spent roughly a thousand hours a year watching other people's creative work. A tenth of that, a hundred hours a year or about two hours a week, is enough to write a book.The arithmetic of a thousand hours1,000hours a year watching others'work before 2014100hours a year will write a book2hours a week adds up to that
The arithmetic of a thousand hoursThree figures from the post. Before 2014 Richard spent roughly a thousand hours a year watching other people's creative work. A tenth of that, a hundred hours a year or about two hours a week, is enough to write a book.The arithmetic of a thousand hours1,000hours a year watching others' work before 2014100hours a year will write a book2hours a week adds up to that

A thousand hours a year went to watching; a tenth of that is enough to write a book.

The book on this: Turn Off the TV, Get Off Your Ass, and Do Something is 270 pages on the arithmetic of your own hours, first written in 2016 and rewritten for a world that put the whole internet in your pocket.

Did you have to give things up?

No, and people misread that every time.

I didn’t become productive by giving things up. I became productive by changing what I was doing with the same hours.

The distinction matters because sacrifice is a terrible engine. Anything framed as deprivation runs on willpower, and willpower is a finite resource that everybody eventually runs out of. What I did wasn’t deprivation. The hours were already allocated to leisure. They stayed allocated to leisure. What changed was whether that leisure involved making anything. The outputs since are the result of redirecting a thousand hours a year from the consuming side to the contributing side. Anybody with those hours has the same option.

Most days now have a shape to them. Client work takes the morning, my own books get the afternoon, and client work comes back in the evening, with the blocks shuffled around when they need to be. I think of that afternoon block as the thousand hours finally put to work, and I wouldn’t trade it back for any show ever made.

Is watching television bad for you?

Anything framed as deprivation runs on willpower, and willpower is a finite resource that everybody eventually runs out of.

No, and books that argue otherwise are both wrong and unhelpful. Television is a real art form, some of it is extraordinary, and a person who never watched anything would be missing something worth having. I still watch things. The book isn’t an argument for a monastic life.

The question is what those particular hours would produce if they went somewhere else, and whether, having seen both options written down, you’d prefer the other one.

For most people the answer to that is uncertain, and that’s fine. Never having asked is how the thousand hours disappear.

Why did Turn Off the TV need rewriting?

Because I wrote the first version in 2016, when the biggest digital distraction was cable television and the occasional smartphone check.

The competition for those hours has changed completely since then.

Today it’s a feed engineered by people whose full-time job is holding your attention, available in every room, in every gap, with no beginning and no end. A scheduled program at least ended. I hate how much of this is by design, because the companies building those feeds know exactly how many hours they’re taking from people who’d rather be making something.

The 2016 advice targeted something you had to actively choose. The current version targets something that arrives whether you choose it or not, and those need different arguments.

How do you find out your own number?

By counting for a fortnight, which almost nobody does and which does more than any resolution.

Not estimating. Counting. Your phone will tell you its part. The rest is a note on a piece of paper. Two weeks is enough to get a figure, and the figure is nearly always considerably higher than the guess.

The number is persuasive in a way that arguments aren’t. You can dispute an argument about attention and modern life. It’s very difficult to dispute your own screen time report multiplied by fifty-two.

My take

Count your hours for two weeks before you try to change anything. Don’t estimate. Your phone tracks part of it and a note on paper covers the rest. Multiply by fifty-two and the number will argue harder than I can. I didn’t give anything up after 2014. I moved those hours from watching other people’s work to making my own. The feeds are built to take that time, so you’ll have to take it back on purpose.

What do you do with the number?

Redirect instead of remove. Don’t resolve to watch less. Decide what those hours are for instead, and the watching takes care of itself.

Start with a tenth. A hundred hours a year is two hours a week and it’s enough to write a book. You don’t need the thousand.

Make the alternative easier to start than the feed. Whatever you’re redirecting into needs to be within reach, because the feed is always within reach.

Don’t treat it as sacrifice. Framed as loss it won’t survive a bad week. Framed as substitution it doesn’t need to.

Count again in six months. The number drifts back and nobody notices without measuring.

Steps for finding and redirecting your own hours.
Step What to do Why
Count for a fortnight Use your phone’s report plus a note on paper; don’t estimate The figure is nearly always higher than the guess
Multiply by fifty-two Turn two weeks into a yearly number Your own report is hard to dispute
Redirect instead of remove Decide what those hours are for The watching takes care of itself
Start with a tenth A hundred hours a year, two hours a week Enough to write a book
Make the alternative easy Keep it within reach The feed is always within reach
Frame it as substitution Don’t treat it as sacrifice Loss won’t survive a bad week
Count again in six months Measure again The number drifts back unnoticed

I keep coming back to that arithmetic because it’s unarguable. A thousand hours a year, for years, watching other people make things. Everything I’ve written since came out of the same hours, doing something else.

From the author
Turn Off the TV, Get Off Your Ass, and Do Something by Richard Lowe

Turn Off the TV, Get Off Your Ass, and Do Something
Screen hours are where most people’s spare time goes. Turn Off the TV, Get Off Your Ass, and Do Something is about getting that time back, rewritten in 2026 for the internet in your pocket.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many hours a year does the average person spend watching TV?
More than they’d guess and more than they’d admit. My own figure before 2014 was around a thousand hours a year, the equivalent of a serious part-time job spent on other people’s creative output.
Is watching television bad?
No, and that framing is why most of this advice fails. The question is what those specific hours would produce if they went somewhere else, and whether you’d prefer that.
Do you need more discipline to cut back on watching TV?
In my case, no. The outputs are the result of redirecting a thousand hours a year from the consuming side to the contributing side.
Why did Richard Lowe rewrite Turn Off the TV?
Because I wrote the first version in 2016, when the biggest digital distraction was cable television and the occasional smartphone check. That world is gone and the newer one is considerably better at taking your time.
How do you start cutting back on screen time?
By counting instead of by resolving. Most people have no idea what their real figure is, and the number itself does more work than any amount of commitment, because it’s difficult to argue with.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment