Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

Behind the Book: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea

TL;DR: Verne wrote political manifestos with a plot wrapped around them, and the characters are paper thin. I never finished 20,000 Leagues until recently, because the book is kind of boring. What it needed was a central character who wasn’t Nemo and who wasn’t the book, so this version hands the narration to the harpooner. Ned Land doesn’t believe in sea monsters, wants off the ship from the first hour, and counts hatches, days, and exits.

I couldn’t finish this book. I tried more than once across a lot of years and only got to the end of Verne’s original recently, because it’s kind of boring, and saying that about a classic isn’t a fashionable position.

The real subject behind this book: how this book connects to two others, Ayrton, Nemo, and the shared universe Verne built.

The premise was never the problem. Three people are pulled out of the sea and held aboard a vessel that officially doesn’t exist, by a man who won’t explain himself. That’s a good situation and it’s still a good situation.

What Verne does with it is the problem, and it’s bothered me for years. He had three prisoners aboard the strangest vessel ever built and he used them as an audience for a lecture. A situation that good deserved people who wanted something, and I think he wasted it. So the situation stayed and the vantage point moved.

What’s wrong with Jules Verne as a novelist?

He wrote political manifestos and wrapped a plot around them. That’s true of every Verne novel I’ve read, and it’s certainly true of the three that make up the Nemo books. There’s an argument the book wants to make, and the story exists to move the argument from one end of the volume to the other.

The cost lands on the characters. They’re paper thin. They exist to hold positions, to ask the questions that let somebody else answer, and to move the plot to the next place where the argument can be advanced.

Verne was doing something deliberate and it worked for the readership he had. It leaves a modern reader with a strong situation and nobody inside it, and I think that’s why so many people abandon the book the way I did. They blame themselves for failing to appreciate a classic, when the fault sits with the book.

The book on this: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea is Verne’s story retold by the harpooner, a man who doesn’t believe in sea monsters and wants off the Nautilus from the first hour.

Why is Ned Land the narrator instead of Professor Aronnax?

Because the book needed a central character who wasn’t Nemo.

Nemo drives the original and he can’t narrate it, since the whole effect depends on not knowing what he’s doing or why. So the story goes to one of the prisoners. Verne gave it to Aronnax, who’s a naturalist handed the greatest specimen collection in the world and unlimited time to study it. He’s a prisoner who doesn’t much want to leave. That produces pleasant description and no pressure.

Ned wants out from the first hour and never stops. Everything he sees, he assesses for whether it helps him get off the ship. The same coral forest that makes Aronnax reach for his notebook makes Ned measure distances.

It’s a unique viewpoint, and I’m drawn to unique viewpoints. Handing the story to the person with the most to lose changes what the book is about without changing a single event in it.

How does Ned Land work out what the Nautilus is?

From the wound pattern, before he ever sees it. Three ships come into port with their hulls staved in, from three separate locations, with damage consistent enough that the location can’t be the cause. A reef doesn’t do that. Something that moves does that. The newspapers decide it’s a narwhal grown past all reason, because men who haven’t been on the water write the newspapers. Ned works from the damage. Impact damage, at speed, with no follow-up strike. That means whatever hit those ships hit them in passing.

He can’t name it. He’s a shape, a wound pattern, and a consistency that speaks of engineering instead of biology. That’s enough to know it isn’t an animal, and it’s where the book starts.

Does Captain Nemo have a first officer in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea?

Nemo’s executive officer, and she isn’t in Verne at all. She’s been aboard since 1853. She runs the ship the way a first officer runs a ship, and her attention is the thing that makes escape difficult. Ned finds the equipment room on day six and gets about forty seconds with it before she appears at the door.

Ned doesn’t know her name. Lakara is what he calls her in his own head, because a person you need to understand deserves a name, and the name is what the quality of her suggested to him.

She assessed him in the first sixty seconds on the hull. Large, calm under unexpected circumstances, counting before he stopped moving. Two people sizing each other up and both being right is a better engine than a guard who doesn’t notice. Lakara was the character I enjoyed writing most. Verne never gave Nemo anybody who could look back at the prisoners and do the same arithmetic they were doing, and adding her felt like repairing a hole in the original.

What does Ned Land count?

Everything that would help him leave, and he starts in the first hour.

Not the days. Those come later. The sounds come first. Footsteps in the corridor outside, a rotation every four hours based on the two changes he hears before he falls asleep. The drive frequency, consistent. That means constant speed. That means a destination instead of wandering.

His conclusion about the door is the sharpest thing in the early chapters. One room on the ship is locked and his isn’t. The lock is a statement of ownership. The unlocked door is a statement of confidence. Together they say something complete. You’re here, the door is open, and it doesn’t matter.

A man who reads a hallway that way is a better narrator than a man who reads a coral forest.

I loved writing a narrator who reads a room like a prisoner. Every observation he makes has something riding on it, and that pressure is exactly what Verne’s professor never had.

Who else is aboard the Nautilus?

Conseil, Aronnax’s servant in the original, is doing his own version of the same work.

He notices different things from different positions and starts handing over what he sees without being asked. A crewman the prisoners call the Mechanic has been giving something to the dog. Conseil watched it happen from a doorway, twice, and picked up the man’s name from an acoustic position where he could hear the crew talking.

There’s also a dog. He’s called Skipper, he goes into the water with them, and he ends up on the ship. Two of the three prisoners are building an intelligence picture and somebody who hasn’t explained why is feeding the dog. Aronnax, meanwhile, is being handed the greatest specimen collection in the world and is learning, slowly, to give Ned the layout along with the wonder.

How was Lakara recruited?

Nemo didn’t ask her anything.

Her one recorded exchange with him is short. Something in her settled, the way a calculation settles when the final number arrives, and she asked when they were leaving. He asked her name. Lakara, she said. Lakara Sue.

He didn’t ask where she was from or what she was running from, because those aren’t things he asks. He offered what he had to offer, she took it, and the taking was the whole of the contract. Whatever she had been, and whatever she’d done in the country whose name she carries and is finished with, stayed hers. That’s the recruitment policy of a man running a vessel that doesn’t officially exist, and it explains the crew better than any speech would.

Is Ned Land honest about his own motives?

More than most narrators are, and he says why.

Seventeen days in, before the first real attempt, he stops to tell the reader that he wants to say what he did and why he did it, because the real version is more instructive than the version where he had a plan.

That’s a working man’s standard for an account, and it isn’t the standard Verne’s Aronnax applies. Aronnax reports wonder. Ned reports what he tried, what it cost, and where his reasoning was improvisation dressed up afterward.

I like Ned more for that confession than for anything else he does. Narrators who pretend they had a plan all along are cheating the reader, and I’ve never trusted them.

What’s different about this version of 20,000 Leagues?

The events are Verne’s. The vantage point isn’t.

The frigate is the USS Susquehanna out of San Francisco, not the Abraham Lincoln, and her captain believes in the creature because he’s made the mistake of reading the newspapers. The ship is hulled, three men and a dog go into the water, and they come up inside the Nautilus. From there the book runs on what Ned notices in unobserved hours. Hatches, doors, the one interior room that’s locked when nothing else on the ship needs a lock, the position of the crew, how many seconds he gets before somebody arrives.

Nemo is still Nemo and he’s still not explaining himself. The difference is that the man watching him is trying to get out instead of trying to write him up.

Where does 20,000 Leagues fit in the Victorian Era Series?

It’s book one of three about Nemo.

Twenty Thousand Leagues, then The Mysterious Island, then Eurydice. The Time Machine sits alongside them as a standalone. Each one started the same way. I reread the source, I found the argument it was really making, and I found somebody in it who had been given nothing to do. Ned here. Ayrton in Eurydice.

You don’t need Verne to read this. It’s built from the original and complete on its own.

I’d rather readers meet Nemo through Ned than through a naturalist taking notes. A story about captivity belongs to the man who wants out, and Verne gave it to the one man aboard who was happy to stay.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s different about this version of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea?
It’s narrated by Ned Land, the harpooner, instead of Professor Aronnax. Verne gave the story to the one prisoner who was pleased to be aboard, and this version gives it to the man who wants off the ship from the first hour.
Why did Richard Lowe rewrite Jules Verne’s novel?
Because he couldn’t finish the original until recently and found it boring. In his view Verne wrote political manifestos with a plot wrapped around them. That leaves a strong situation and paper-thin characters inside it.
Who narrates 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea?
Ned Land, a working harpooner with twenty-two years at sea, who doesn’t believe in sea monsters and says so on the first page. He deduces that the thing hulling ships is engineered instead of biological before he ever sees it.
Who should narrate a retelling of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea?
Because the effect of the original depends on not knowing what Nemo is doing or why. The book needed a central character who wasn’t Nemo, so the narration goes to the prisoner with the most reason to pay attention.
Who is Captain Nemo’s first officer?
Nemo’s executive officer, invented for this version and aboard the Nautilus since 1853. Her attention is what makes escape difficult, and Ned never learns her real name, so Lakara is what he calls her in his own head.
What does Ned Land count on the Nautilus?
Sounds first, then days. Corridor footsteps on a four-hour rotation, a constant drive frequency indicating a destination, and the single locked interior room on a ship where nothing else needs a lock.
What new characters appear in this retelling?
Nemo’s executive officer, aboard since 1853, recruited without being asked where she came from or what she was running from. He offered what he had, she took it, and the taking was the entire contract.
Do you need to read Jules Verne first?
No. The novel is built from Verne’s original and complete on its own. It’s book one of The Adventures of Captain Nemo. That continues with The Mysterious Island and then Eurydice.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment