Latest
SMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableFree BooksJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends On

Vamp (1986)

TL;DR: Vamp (1986) rates 5.5 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Grace Jones dominates a slight neon-soaked eighties horror comedy in a wordless, mesmerizing turn. Judged as a complete film it’s mediocre.
5.5 / 10   Richard Wenk

Official trailer

Vamp deserves its 5.5 as a stylish, uneven eighties horror comedy that’s worth seeing almost entirely for one unforgettable element, Grace Jones as a vampire stripper who never speaks a word and dominates every frame she occupies. The film around her is a slight, familiar college-comedy-meets-horror affair, two frat pledges venturing into a seedy strip club to hire a dancer and discovering the place is run by vampires.

It’s minor and dated and not especially good, but it has a strong visual sensibility, real cult charm, and a Grace Jones performance so magnetic that it lifts the film into something memorable.

I go back and forth on Vamp. Whenever Grace Jones walks into frame I sit up, and whenever the film cuts back to the frat boys I start wondering what’s in the fridge. Its reputation rests on style and on that singular central presence instead of on its story. Judged as a complete film it’s mediocre. Judged as a delivery system for Grace Jones and a neon-soaked eighties look, it has real, if limited, appeal.

Grace Jones as the Vampire

Grace Jones plays Katrina, the vampire queen who rules the strip club, and her performance is the reason the film endures. Jones, already an icon of art-pop strangeness, brings an otherworldly physical presence to the role, and the film’s smartest decision is to give her no dialogue at all.

She communicates entirely through movement, posture, and predatory stillness, and the silence makes her more alien and more threatening. She’s less a character than a force, a being of pure exotic menace.

Her centerpiece is an extended performance art striptease, choreographed and costumed in elaborate body paint and wire sculpture, and I think it’s the best thing in any eighties vampire movie. Jones turns the dance into something ritualistic and threatening, a display of power, and I find it more unnerving than anything the makeup department throws at me.

Craft NoteThe film gives its strongest presence no dialogue, letting Grace Jones communicate entirely through movement and stillness. That makes her more alien and more powerful than words could. The silence is a choice. When you have a performer or character whose power is physical and iconic, dialogue can diminish them by making them ordinary and explicable. Grace Jones’s wordless vampire is a force of nature because she never speaks. Sometimes the strongest choice for a strong presence is to remove the very thing that would humanize and therefore shrink them. Let the image speak.

The Neon Style

The film’s other real asset is its look. Director Richard Wenk shoots the seedy underworld of the strip club and the surrounding streets in a strong palette of saturated neon, lurid pinks and greens and purples that give the film a distinctive eighties comic-book quality. The cinematography is accomplished, using color and light to create a heightened, unreal nightscape that’s more interesting than the story unfolding within it.

This visual flair lends the film a cult appeal beyond its modest content.

The neon aesthetic, the elaborate vampire makeup, and the stylized club setting create a world that’s fun to look at even when the plot is going nowhere. Wenk clearly had a strong visual sensibility and a limited script, and the film coasts on the former while the latter lets it down. The style is the substance here, and while that’s a thin foundation, it’s enough to give the film a memorable surface and a lasting niche following.

I’d happily watch Wenk’s neon streets with the sound off. The pinks and greens do more for the mood than any line of dialogue in the script.

The Weak Film Around It

Once you set aside Grace Jones and the neon, the film is thin.

The central story of the two college pledges is generic and the characters are forgettable, standard eighties comedy types going through familiar motions. The comedy is broad and frequently falls flat, the horror is mild, and the film’s attempts to balance the two tones are clumsy. Long stretches without Jones sag badly, and the film struggles to fill its runtime with anything absorbing.

The two pledges lose me. They’re so bland I couldn’t pick either one out of a lineup, and I’d have cut a good twenty minutes of their business to get back to the club sooner.

The film also suffers from a fundamental slightness. There’s no real theme, no ambition beyond delivering some laughs, some neon, and some Grace Jones, and even on those modest terms it only intermittently succeeds. It’s the kind of minor eighties genre film that’s survived almost entirely on the strength of one element, a cult object more than a good movie. Fans of eighties horror comedy and Grace Jones will find enough to enjoy. Anyone else will find a forgettable film with a few strong parts.

CompareSet Vamp beside Near Dark, released the following year, and the gap between minor and major eighties vampire cinema is clear. Near Dark used its premise to build real character and dread. Vamp uses its premise as a thin frame for style and a star turn. Both are eighties vampire films, but one is a fully realized work and the other a stylish trifle redeemed by a single magnetic presence. Vamp is the lesser film by a wide margin, worth seeing for Grace Jones the way you might visit a gallery for a single painting.

Is Vamp worth watching?

Vamp gets its 5.5 as a slight, stylish eighties horror comedy redeemed almost entirely by Grace Jones’s mesmerizing, wordless performance as a vampire stripper and by a strong neon visual sensibility. Jones is unforgettable, her body-paint striptease a high point of cult cinema, and the film’s saturated comic-book aesthetic gives it a memorable surface. It loses real points for a thin, generic story, forgettable characters, flat comedy, and long stretches that sag whenever its star is absent.

I land on 5.5 because I can’t go higher for a film that sags every time its star leaves the room, and I can’t go lower on anything with that body-paint dance in it. See it for Grace Jones and the neon, and bring something to do with your hands during the frat-boy scenes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Vamp about?
Two college pledges venture into a seedy strip club to hire a dancer for a party and discover the place is run by vampires. It’s a slight eighties horror comedy, familiar in its college-comedy-meets-horror setup, raised by its style and its central performance.
How is Grace Jones in Vamp (1986)?
Unforgettable, and the reason to see the film. She plays the vampire queen with no dialogue at all, communicating through movement and predatory stillness. That makes her alien and threatening. Her body-paint striptease is a mesmerizing high point of cult cinema.
Why does Vamp (1986) have a cult following?
For Grace Jones and for its strong neon visual style. Director Richard Wenk shoots the film in saturated pinks, greens, and purples, creating a distinctive eighties comic-book nightscape. The style and the star turn give it lasting appeal beyond its modest content.
Is Vamp (1986) good?
Not really, as a whole. The central story is generic, the characters forgettable, the comedy flat, and long stretches sag whenever Grace Jones is off screen. It’s a thin film redeemed by a few strong elements instead of a good one.
Is Vamp (1986) worth watching?
For fans of eighties horror comedy and Grace Jones, yes. Watch it for her magnetic wordless performance and the neon style, the way you might visit a gallery for a single painting. Anyone wanting a strong complete film should look elsewhere, but the best parts are memorable.

Sources

Writing in This Genre

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.