The vampire is the most adaptable monster in the form. That’s why the range below is so wide. It’s carried disease allegory, sexual anxiety, addiction, colonialism, class and loneliness, and it survives every reinterpretation because the central image asks nothing of the plot.
What the ranking shows is that the best entries all narrow the premise and not expand it. The top of this list is films that ask one question about the myth, and the bottom is films that use it as a costume.
My favorite monster is the vampire, and I get protective of it.
It can carry grief and appetite in the same body, and too many studios hand it a blue-gray filter and a gun and call that a movie. The films I rank highest trust one sharp question about the myth. The ones near the bottom make me sigh, because the setups were usually good and somebody lost their nerve.
Every rating is the one the linked review carries. Ties are broken by year.
1. The Blade Trilogy (1998-2004)
► Read the full review of The Blade Trilogy (1998-2004)
"The foundation document of modern Marvel cinema, and nobody credits it."
Blade takes the top of this list on consequence as much as quality. In 1998 a Marvel property with an unknown character, an R rating and a Black lead opened in summer and made over a hundred and thirty million dollars. That’s the film that made everything after it possible. X-Men followed two years later.
The blood rave opening is still the best cold open the genre has produced. A club, a crowd, sprinklers, and then a man in a coat walks in and the film has explained its entire world without a word of exposition.
Wesley Snipes plays Blade as competent and irritated and not tortured. That’s why the character works where later brooding half-vampires don’t. He’s a job, he’s good at it, and the film treats his condition as a medical inconvenience he manages with injections and not as a curse he agonizes over.
I’d put Blade at the top without the box office history. Snipes playing a vampire hunter as a tired professional with a medical problem is the smartest character choice in the genre, and the brooding imitators missed it completely. My one complaint is the third film. The first two justify that 9, and the last one wastes it.
The second film is Del Toro’s and is better made, with the Reapers as a new creature design, and the third is where the run collapses. In 1998 a Marvel property with an unknown character, an R rating and a Black lead made over a hundred and thirty million dollars.
The blood rave opening explains the entire world without a line of exposition, using a club, sprinklers and a man in a coat walking in. Snipes plays Blade as competent and irritated, not tortured, and the second film is Del Toro’s and the better made.
2. Sinners (2025)
► Read the full review of Sinners (2025)
"The most ambitious vampire film in a generation, and it earns the ambition."
Sinners is the rare genre piece where the supernatural element is saying something specific instead of supplying atmosphere, and it’s fully realized in a way almost nothing else on this list attempts. What separates it’s that the horror and the argument are the same object. The vampirism isn’t a metaphor laid over a story about something else; it’s the mechanism the story runs on. That means a viewer who only wants the horror gets the argument anyway.
Sinners thrilled me. Coogler made a genre picture where the scares and the argument are one thing, so nobody in the audience gets to take the fun and skip the point. That’s hard to pull off, and most filmmakers who try end up with a lecture wearing fangs. I’d point any horror writer at this before any other film on the page.
It’s also formally ambitious in ways the genre rarely risks, and the film delivers that ambition in its execution and doesn’t just gesture at it.
Coogler uses the vampire as a way into a specific place and year and not as a genre exercise. That’s the decision the film rests on.
The juke joint sequence is the centrepiece and is staged as a musical performance that becomes something else without a cut announcing it.
Michael B. Jordan plays twins and the technical work supporting that’s invisible. That’s the correct standard for it.
3. Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979)
► Read the full review of Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979)
"Herzog remade a masterpiece and stands beside it without embarrassment."
Nosferatu the Vampyre does the thing remakes almost never manage. That’s to accept it can’t beat the original and find a different film inside the same story. Herzog set out to honor Murnau’s 1922 silent and not improve on it, and kept the plot almost exactly.
What he changed is the tone. Kinski plays Dracula as exhausted and not predatory, a creature tired of its own continuation who envies the dead, and the performance is closer to grief than to menace. Murnau implies that reading and never states it.
The pacing is deliberately slow and ritualistic, the plague sequence with rats in the town square used eleven thousand real rats, and the film is closer to a funeral than to a horror picture.
Herzog changed nothing structural, using Murnau’s plot and frequently his shots, with the intention of honoring instead of improving. Kinski plays Dracula as exhausted, not predatory, a creature tired of its own continuation who envies the dead. The 1922 film implies that reading and never states it. That means Herzog found a new work inside an existing one.
4. Vampyr (1932)
► Read the full review of Vampyr (1932)
"The strangest and dreamiest vampire film ever made, and it barely has a plot."
Vampyr is the most unsettling film on this list and it achieves that by abandoning narrative logic for dream logic. That has its own rules and follows them consistently. Dreyer shot much of it through gauze stretched in front of the lens to produce a haze nobody has reproduced, and used a cast of almost entirely non-professionals including the film’s financier in the lead role. The sequence filmed from inside a coffin, looking up through the glass panel as the lid is screwed down and the faces recede, is the most frightening shot in the genre and it’s over ninety years old. The film shows nothing supernatural at any point.
I really enjoy Vampyr, and that coffin shot scares me more than anything with fangs in it. My reservation is the dream logic. It keeps you at arm’s length for long stretches, and there are moments where I’d trade some of the haze for a scene that grabbed me by the collar. Dreyer shot through gauze and used a deliberately degraded image. That produces a picture that looks like a memory of a film. The burial sequence filmed from inside the coffin, looking up through the glass at the faces, had no precedent. It was made in German, French and English versions at the same time and failed in all three, and Dreyer didn’t direct again for eleven years.
5. Black Sunday (1960)
► Read the full review of Black Sunday (1960)
"Bava’s debut, and the atmosphere is thick enough to cut."
Black Sunday is among the most visually ravishing horror films ever shot and it was Mario Bava’s first credited film as director, made in black and white on a small budget with a control of fog, candlelight and moving camera the Italian gothic never bettered.
The opening is the most brutal thing in horror cinema of its decade. A mask lined with spikes is hammered onto a woman’s face, in close-up, in 1960, and the film was banned in Britain for eight years largely on that sequence.
Barbara Steele plays both the witch and her descendant and became the defining face of European horror from this one performance. The film is far more interested in atmosphere than in plot and the plot suffers accordingly.
Bava’s debut as credited director, shot in black and white with a lighting style that defined Italian horror for a decade.
Barbara Steele plays both the witch and the descendant, and the opening execution with the spiked mask was cut in several countries. It established Steele as a genre figure and Bava as a cinematographer who could direct.
6. Martin (1977)
► Read the full review of Martin (1977)
"What if there is no such thing as a vampire, only a disturbed young man who believes he is one?"
Martin dismantles the entire genre by removing every supernatural element and keeping the behavior. Romero’s protagonist needs blood, uses razor blades and syringes of sedative and not fangs, can’t turn into a bat, and is visibly unaffected by crucifixes and garlic.
The question that produces is devastating. If the vampirism is a delusion then the film is about untreated mental illness in a collapsing Pennsylvania steel town, and the old cousin convinced Martin is Nosferatu is the actual danger in the house.
Romero never resolves which reading is correct. The black-and-white flashbacks to gothic castles may be memory or fantasy, and the film is constructed so that both interpretations survive to the end.
Martin is the film I’d hand to anybody who thinks vampire movies are silly. Romero strips out the fangs and the capes and leaves a lonely young man in a dying steel town, and that unsettles me more than any castle ever has. My one reservation is the refusal to settle it. I admire the trick, and part of me still wants Romero to show his hand once.
Romero’s film refuses to establish whether Martin is a vampire or a disturbed young man, and provides evidence for both throughout.
The black-and-white sequences are either memories of centuries or fantasies, and the film never adjudicates.
Romero has called it his favorite of his own films, and it was made for around a hundred thousand dollars.
7. Cronos (1993)
► Read the full review of Cronos (1993)
"Del Toro arrived fully formed, on a small budget, in Mexico."
Cronos contains almost everything Del Toro’s later work is known for and it was his debut, made in Mexico for well under two million dollars. A clockwork device with an insect sealed inside it, a gentle protagonist subjected to body horror, and real tenderness about physical decay.
The vampirism has a mechanism instead of a mythology. The Cronos device must be used, each use is degrading, and the film is entirely honest that the alternative is death. That makes it a film about addiction and about an old man who doesn’t want to stop existing.
Cronos moves me because of the grandfather. An old man who doesn’t want to stop existing is about as human a monster as the genre has, and Del Toro treats him with real tenderness. It’s a debut, and I can feel the small budget pinching in places, and that’s the reservation that holds it at an 8.
Federico Luppi plays an antiques dealer and grandfather instead of a victim, and the relationship with the granddaughter who keeps his secret is the film’s actual subject. Del Toro’s debut, built on a clockwork device that grants life and requires blood. That’s a mechanism instead of a curse.
The relationship between the grandfather and the granddaughter is the film’s actual subject and she never once fears him.
Ron Perlman appears in his first collaboration with Del Toro, and the film won nine Ariel awards in Mexico.
8. Thirst (2009)
► Read the full review of Thirst (2009)
"The most morally serious vampire film of its era wrapped inside the most lurid."
Thirst takes the premise and gives it to a Catholic priest. That makes every feeding a theological problem instead of an appetite. Park Chan-wook’s protagonist volunteers for a medical trial, dies, and returns. The first half is about a man trying to feed without killing, taking blood from a coma patient and from his own hospital, and the second half is a domestic thriller about two people who can’t leave each other and can’t stop escalating. It’s explicit, extremely funny in places, and disturbing, and the final sequence on a cliff at dawn is one of the few endings in the genre that feels like a resolution instead of a stopping point. Park Chan-wook adapts Zola’s Thérèse Raquin with a Catholic priest who becomes a vampire through a failed medical trial. This one treats the condition as a moral problem for somebody who has spent his life on moral problems. That’s the premise’s whole value. Song Kang-ho plays the guilt without any of the romanticism the genre normally supplies.
9. Let Me In (2010)
► Read the full review of Let Me In (2010)
"An American remake of a beloved foreign film that justifies its own existence."
Let Me In arrived two years after Let the Right One In to considerable hostility and is the rare remake that justifies itself. Matt Reeves made the colder film, moving it to New Mexico with Reagan-era radio broadcasts underneath.
The significant change is interpretive and not structural. The original leaves the relationship between the child vampire and the older man ambiguous; the remake states plainly that he was once the boy, and frames the relationship as grooming. That’s the reading the source supports and the one the original was too careful to commit to. Chloë Grace Moretz and Kodi Smit-McPhee are both better than the film needed. Reeves kept the events and changed the emphasis, with the New Mexico setting and Reagan-era broadcasts about evil supplying a colder Americanness.
The Swedish film leaves the relationship between the child vampire and the older man ambiguous; the remake states plainly that he was once the boy.
That’s the reading the source supports and was too careful to commit to. That’s why the remake justifies itself.
10. The Brides of Dracula (1960)
► Read the full review of The Brides of Dracula (1960)
"The rare sequel that is better than the film it follows, and Dracula is not in it."
Brides of Dracula is the best-looking Hammer film and Christopher Lee is nowhere in it, having declined to return. Terence Fisher built the film around Baron Meinster instead, and the substitution is an improvement.
Meinster is a spoiled young aristocrat kept chained in his mother’s castle because she can’t bring herself to kill him. That’s a considerably more interesting situation than an ancient force of evil. The mother is the most tragic figure in the Hammer cycle.
The color, the production design and Peter Cushing’s Van Helsing are all at their peak here, and the studio spent the next decade failing to match it. I think losing Lee was the best accident Hammer ever had. A mother who can’t bring herself to kill her son breaks my heart more than any count ever did. The film around her is still a Hammer picture, stiff in the way those films are stiff, and that’s what keeps it from climbing any higher. Cushing’s Van Helsing dominates the film and Dracula doesn’t appear in it at all, despite the title.
Terence Fisher stages the finale with a windmill casting a cross-shaped shadow. That’s the best visual idea in the Hammer cycle.
Cushing objected to the original ending and the replacement was written to his specification.
11. Byzantium (2012)
► Read the full review of Byzantium (2012)
"Neil Jordan returning to territory he helped define and finding something new in it."
Byzantium is Jordan coming back to the vampire film eighteen years after Interview with the Vampire and making something quieter and more class-conscious. Two women, mother and daughter in appearance, surviving in an English seaside town in decline.
The mythology is new. There are no fangs; the transformation happens on an island that must be found, and the killing is done with a sharpened thumbnail. That’s one of the few fresh images the genre has produced in decades.
The subject underneath is who’s permitted to be immortal. The brotherhood that governs the condition doesn’t admit women, and the film is about two people living outside a system that’s never acknowledged them. Neil Jordan returns to the material twenty years after Interview with the Vampire and makes a considerably less operatic film.
The mother and daughter structure, with one protecting and one wanting to confess, is the strongest thing in it and the source of every scene. Saoirse Ronan and Gemma Arterton are both good and the film was barely released. That’s the main reason nobody knows it.
12. A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night (2014)
► Read the full review of A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night (2014)
"The best debut the genre has produced this century and the coolest film on this list."
A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night is a black-and-white Iranian vampire western shot in California standing in for a fictional Iranian town called Bad City, and the aesthetic is the argument and not decoration. The single best image the modern genre has produced is in it. A vampire in a chador, which works as a cape, skateboarding down an empty street at night, and the film knows exactly what it has.
Underneath the style it’s about a woman moving safely through a place that’s not safe for women, and about who she chooses to follow home. Amirpour made it for almost nothing and it announced a career.
Ana Lily Amirpour shot it in black and white in California standing in for an Iranian town, in Persian.
The skateboard sequence with the chador trailing behind her is the image the film is built on and was in the first short. It’s a western structurally, with a stranger arriving in a town where everybody is already compromised.
13. Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1966)
► Read the full review of Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1966)
"Christopher Lee returns and is given no dialogue at all."
Prince of Darkness brought Lee back to the role after eight years and he doesn’t speak a word, which by his account was because he refused the dialogue he was given as unusable.
The absence works entirely in the film’s favor. He hisses, stares and moves, and the silence reads as something inhuman and not as a limitation. Every later silent monster owes something to a contract dispute.
The resurrection sequence, in which a servant is hung upside down over Dracula’s ashes and opened, is the most nasty thing Hammer put on screen, and the surrounding film is atmospheric and slow.
Christopher Lee has no dialogue at all, which he later said was because the lines were unusable, and the studio said it was a choice.
The resurrection sequence, with a servant bleeding a man over the ashes, is the most effective thing Hammer staged.
Back to back with Rasputin, it was shot using the same sets. That’s visible if you know to look.
14. From Dusk Till Dawn (1996)
► Read the full review of From Dusk Till Dawn (1996)
"Two completely different films stapled together, and the staple holds."
From Dusk Till Dawn spends its first half as a tense Tarantino-scripted crime thriller about two brothers running a hostage family toward the Mexican border, with no supernatural content of any kind and a real sense of threat from Clooney’s brother. Then they reach the Titty Twister and Rodriguez takes over completely. The switch is abrupt, unsignalled and total, and roughly half the cast is dead within ten minutes of it.
It works because the first half was made properly and not as a setup. The crime film is good enough to stand alone. That’s why the audience follows the turn instead of feeling tricked by it.
The first half is a hard crime picture written by Tarantino and played entirely straight, with a frightening Clooney. The turn at the bar arrives without warning, foreshadowing or acknowledgement, and the film changes genre completely.
Whether you love it depends on whether that delights or annoys you, and there’s no version that satisfies both.
15. Vampires (1998)
► Read the full review of Vampires (1998)
"The one film that treats vampire hunting as a job."
Vampires is on this list because Carpenter made the only entry in the genre that’s about labor. The crew has a van, a winch, a per-diem argument, a Vatican contract and a working method refined over years. The method is the best thing in it. They harpoon a vampire, attach the cable to a truck, and drag it into sunlight, because that’s the efficient way to do it. No stakes, no crosses, no ceremony. James Woods plays the lead as a contractor and not as a hero, with no destiny, no brooding and no tragic backstory that matters, and the film’s refusal of all of that is its entire appeal.
I’m fond of Carpenter’s crew because they treat vampire hunting like a plumbing job. I think a winch and a truck beat a stake and a speech every time. My reservation is that the contractor attitude leaves the film cold in places, and past the method there isn’t much in it to care about. Carpenter’s crew winches the vampire into daylight with a cable and a truck. That’s a procedure with equipment and a payroll.
James Woods plays Crow as somebody who has been doing this too long to find it interesting. The Vatican is the employer. That makes the theology contractual, and the film is closer to a western than to horror.
16. Daybreakers (2009)
► Read the full review of Daybreakers (2009)
"The best vampire worldbuilding premise in years, and the film does not fully trust it."
Daybreakers has the strongest premise on this list and abandons it halfway. The Spierig brothers imagined a near future where vampirism has won. Most of humanity is undead, society runs at night, and the remaining human population is farmed for blood and is running out.
The worldbuilding detail is the best thing in it. Coffee served with a blood ratio, subway advertising for blood substitutes, cars fitted with daylight driving cameras, corporate planning meetings about supply forecasts, and a homeless population of starving vampires degenerating into something worse.
Then it remembers it’s an action film and the satire gives way to gunfire. Everything interesting is in the first forty minutes and the third act is a chase. Daybreakers frustrates me. Coffee with a blood ratio and starving vampires on the street are the kind of ideas any writer would envy, and the film throws them away for a chase. I still like the first forty minutes enough to give it a 7, and I’d love to see the version that stayed a satire all the way through. The premise is an economy instead of a horror, with a blood shortage, a substitute product in development and a corporation managing supply.
The Spierig brothers build the office culture properly, with commuting done underground and coffee served with a blood ratio. The resolution is a cure that can be transmitted. That turns the third act into an epidemiology problem and is the film’s best idea.
17. Stake Land (2010)
► Read the full review of Stake Land (2010)
"A post-apocalyptic road movie where the vampires are weather, not villains."
Stake Land understands something most of the genre misses: the monsters don’t have to be the point. The vampires here are an environmental condition, closer to infected than to aristocrats, and the film is about the people traveling through them.
The actual antagonist is a religious cult that’s decided the plague is divine and is helping it along. That’s the correct choice and gives the film somewhere to go.
Mickle shoots rural America with real attention and the relationship between the boy and the hunter is written with restraint and not sentiment.
It’s a road movie through a collapsed America where vampires are treated as a condition of the landscape and not as a mystery. Nick Damici plays the mentor as somebody teaching a trade instead of a philosophy. That keeps the film out of sentiment.
The religious cult using the infected as a weapon is the strongest idea and arrives late.
18. The Transfiguration (2016)
► Read the full review of The Transfiguration (2016)
"Martin, forty years later, in Queens."
The Transfiguration is explicitly in conversation with Martin and updates the question instead of repeating it. A boy in a Queens housing project believes he’s a vampire, keeps notebooks on the rules, and watches vampire films to learn how to behave.
That last detail is the smarter version. He’s not deluded about a folklore he inherited; he’s constructing an identity from a genre. That’s a more contemporary and more disturbing proposition. The film is quiet, grounded and deeply sad, and the violence and isolation of the setting are the actual subject with the vampirism as the lens.
A boy in New York may be a vampire or may be a disturbed child obsessed with vampire films, and the film watches and not explains.
It’s explicitly in conversation with Let the Right One In and Martin, and names both on screen. The realism is the method, with the violence shot flatly and the aftermath given more time than the act.
19. Abigail (2024)
► Read the full review of Abigail (2024)
"A heist gone wrong where the hostage is the problem."
Abigail is a single great idea executed with energy and enthusiastic splatter. A crew of criminals kidnaps a twelve-year-old ballerina to ransom her to her wealthy father, holes up in a remote mansion, and discovers what she is.
The structure is a locked-room heist film where the thing they stole is hunting them, and the film works out the implications properly. Nobody can leave, nobody trusts anybody, and the hostage has all the time in the world. Alisha Weir is clearly having the best time of anybody involved. The film doesn’t transcend its premise and delivers on it completely. That puts it above several more ambitious entries lower down this list.
Abigail is a lot of fun, and I don’t need more from it than it delivers. A ballerina hunting her kidnappers is the kind of idea I wish more horror would simply run with. My reservation is that it never goes deeper than the splatter, so it’s a great night out and nothing more.
The structure is a heist film for its first act, with a crew abducting a child and discovering what they’ve taken. Alisha Weir plays the ballet sequences herself and the choreography is used as the violence. That’s the film’s one real invention. Radio Silence made Ready or Not and the tone is identical, with a confined location and an escalating body count.
20. The Fearless Vampire Killers (1967)
► Read the full review of The Fearless Vampire Killers (1967)
"A horror comedy more interested in atmosphere than in jokes, and better for it."
The Fearless Vampire Killers is beautiful, uneven and lands more often as a gothic than as a comedy. That appears to have been Polanski’s actual intention before MGM recut and redubbed it for American release.
The castle ball sequence, in which the vampires dance and the mirror reveals only the three living people in the room, is the best single idea in any vampire comedy. It’s more valuable as production design than as comedy. The snow-bound Transylvanian sets are among the best of the period and Sharon Tate is in it. That gives the film an atmosphere it didn’t ask for. Polanski made a real Hammer parody that also works as a Hammer film, with the production design taken entirely seriously.
The Jewish vampire sequence, where the cross has no effect, is the best joke in the film and the one everybody remembers. Sharon Tate is in it and the studio recut and redubbed the American release, which Polanski disowned.
21. Count Yorga, Vampire (1970)
► Read the full review of Count Yorga, Vampire (1970)
"One smart idea the genre took years to catch up with."
Count Yorga is here for a single decision that everything afterward copied. Drop a traditional old-world vampire into contemporary Los Angeles, with seances, station wagons, telephones and answering machines, and take the collision seriously.
Blacula, Fright Night, The Lost Boys and a great deal else are working in territory this film opened, and it was made cheaply and fast with no expectation of influence. It was originally conceived as softcore and rewritten during production.
Robert Quarry plays Yorga with real authority and the film’s ending is bleaker than the budget suggests it’ll be. Originally conceived as a softcore film, it was rewritten into a straight horror during production. That’s visible in the structure.
Robert Quarry plays Yorga as a contemporary figure operating in Los Angeles. That predates the modern-setting cycle by years. The ending is unusually bleak for 1970 and the sequel a year later is the better made of the two.
22. The Vampire Lovers (1970)
► Read the full review of The Vampire Lovers (1970)
"Hammer ran out of ways to shock and turned to sex, and got something better than that deserved."
A studio losing its audience to harder horror made The Vampire Lovers as a commercial decision, and the result is more interesting than the cynicism behind it. Roy Ward Baker adapted Le Fanu’s Carmilla. That predates Dracula by twenty-six years.
Ingrid Pitt plays Carmilla with real melancholy and not as a seductress, and the performance keeps insisting on loneliness in a film that was commissioned for other reasons.
It’s closer to its source than most Hammer adaptations managed and it launched a trilogy that abandoned the restraint immediately.
Hammer’s adaptation of Le Fanu’s Carmilla, made when the studio had begun competing on explicitness and not atmosphere. Ingrid Pitt is good and the film is more faithful to the novella than its reputation suggests. Cushing is in it and the production is the first of a loose trilogy that declines sharply.
23. Blacula (1972)
► Read the full review of Blacula (1972)
"Far better than its title and its reputation, and the prologue is genuinely tragic."
People dismiss Blacula on its name, and it doesn’t deserve that. The opening, in which an African prince visits Dracula in 1780 to petition against the slave trade and Dracula curses him and seals him in a coffin for his trouble, is a real piece of writing. William Marshall was a classically trained Shakespearean actor and plays it with complete seriousness, insisting on the prologue being added to give the character dignity, and he owns the film entirely.
I’ve got mixed feelings about Blacula and none of them are about Marshall. That prologue, with a prince asking Dracula to help end the slave trade, deserved a far better film to follow it. What comes after is dated in ways I can’t argue away, and I respect Marshall enormously for dragging the film up to his level.
It’s dated elements that make it easy to dismiss and a central performance that doesn’t permit it. That’s roughly where it sits. William Marshall was a classically trained Shakespearean actor and insisted the character be given a dignified origin, which he largely wrote himself.
The prologue in 1780, with an African prince appealing to Dracula to help end the slave trade, is better than anything that follows.
No film of its cycle grossed more, and Marshall’s performance is the only reason it survives.
24. Blood for Dracula (1974)
► Read the full review of Blood for Dracula (1974)
"The weirdest, saddest, and most unexpectedly poignant Dracula film ever made."
Blood for Dracula is a 1974 oddity produced under Andy Warhol’s name and directed by Paul Morrissey, and it’s unlike anything else in the genre. Dracula can only drink the blood of virgins, can’t find any in Italy, and is physically failing as a result.
Udo Kier plays him as pathetic instead of threatening, being carried between rooms by a servant, vomiting violently after feeding on the wrong blood, and the performance is affecting.
Unexpectedly, the film is poignant about a predator who no longer fits the world he preys on, and Joe Dallesandro plays a Marxist handyman with a New York accent in nineteenth-century Italy. The film doesn’t explain it.
Paul Morrissey made it back to back with Flesh for Frankenstein using the same crew and sets in Italy.
A dying Dracula requiring virgin blood and traveling to Catholic Italy to find some is the premise. That’s a joke the film sustains. Udo Kier plays the count as physically failing throughout, and Roman Polanski appears briefly in a tavern scene.
25. Vampire’s Kiss (1988)
► Read the full review of Vampire’s Kiss (1988)
"A film that exists to contain one of the most committed performances in screen history."
Vampire’s Kiss is strange and considerably more interesting as a document of Nicolas Cage than as a film about a publishing executive who believes he’s becoming a vampire. Cage ate a live cockroach on camera, twice, because he thought it would be more shocking than any effect. He recites the alphabet in a sequence that’s outlived the film entirely, and developed a transatlantic accent nobody asked for and which drifts across the running time.
Around him, the film is a reasonable satire about a man whose behavior toward women was already monstrous before any of this started, and it can’t keep pace with what its lead is doing.
Cage’s performance is the film and includes the alphabet scene and eating a live cockroach, which he suggested himself.
Its premise is that a literary agent may be becoming a vampire or may be having a breakdown, and the film is funnier if it’s the second. It failed completely on release and has become the source of a serious proportion of the internet’s Nicolas Cage material.
26. Nadja (1994)
► Read the full review of Nadja (1994)
"Downtown nineties independent cinema filters Dracula through Jim Jarmusch’s address book."
Nadja is a singular artifact of a New York moment instead of a successful horror film. Almereyda shot it in black and white with Dracula’s daughter living in Brooklyn after her father’s death. Its vampire point-of-view sequences were shot on a Fisher-Price PXL-2000, a discontinued children’s toy camera recording on audio cassette. That produces a pixellated smeared image nothing else looks like.
Peter Fonda plays Van Helsing as a burnout, Jarmusch produced and appears, and the film is more valuable as a document of a scene than as a story. Michael Almereyda shot portions on a Fisher-Price PXL-2000 toy camera. That produces a degraded image used for the vampire’s perspective.
David Lynch produced it and appears briefly, and it’s shot in black and white in a downtown New York that no longer exists. Peter Fonda plays Van Helsing as a burnt-out obsessive. That’s the film’s one funny idea.
27. Underworld Series (2003-2016)
► Read the full review of Underworld Series (2003-2016)
"The most successful attempt to turn the vampire into a pure action franchise."
The Underworld films are here as the clearest case of the monster reduced to a costume for a gunfight. Five films of vampires against werewolves in a blue-grey palette, with a mythology that expands across sequels and prequels and never resolves into anything.
Kate Beckinsale is the constant and the first film is the best, with a good hook in the centuries-long war and a decent Romeo and Juliet structure underneath.
Everything the genre is usually about, appetite, mortality, intimacy, is absent by design. These are films about factions and weapons in which the participants happen to be supernatural. Underworld is the series I’d show anybody asking what I mean by a costume. I like the first film and Rise of the Lycans, and I admit the look never wavers. It still bores me in a way nothing higher on this page does, because the vampires could be any faction with guns and it wouldn’t change a scene.
Five films with a consistent palette, an escalating mythology and Kate Beckinsale anchoring four of them. Rise of the Lycans is the best of them and the one nobody saw, being a straight medieval revolt picture with Michael Sheen. It never attempts to be about anything and never breaks its own visual contract. That’s why it sustained five films.
28. The Last Voyage of the Demeter (2023)
► Read the full review of The Last Voyage of the Demeter (2023)
"A few pages of Dracula expanded into a whole film, with mixed but entertaining results."
Stoker gives the Demeter’s crossing a handful of log entries, and Øvredal builds an entire ship-bound siege out of them. That’s a good idea for an adaptation.
The claustrophobia works and the creature design is a real choice, going for a bat-like animal instead of a nobleman. That suits a film where nobody knows what they’re dealing with.
It’s about twenty minutes longer than the material supports, the crew are types instead of people, and the audience knows the ending from the first scene. The film never finds a way around that. It adapts a single chapter of Stoker, the ship’s log. That’s a good idea for a film and a thin one for two hours. The confined setting works and the creature design is closer to the novel than most adaptations attempt.
The outcome is known from the first scene, which the film treats as inevitability and not as a problem to solve.
29. Innocent Blood (1992)
► Read the full review of Innocent Blood (1992)
"A vampire film fused with a mob movie, and the staple does not quite hold."
Innocent Blood has a funny idea and never balances it. John Landis put a French vampire in Pittsburgh feeding exclusively on organized crime. That means her victims keep coming back as vampire mobsters.
Robert Loggia is excellent as a capo who enjoys being turned and immediately grasps the professional advantages, and his scenes are the best thing in the film by a distance.
The tonal chaos is the problem. Landis made An American Werewolf in London and could hold horror and comedy together; here the tone changes scene to scene and neither mode accumulates.
John Landis makes a vampire film crossed with a mob picture, where the victims come back and the organization acquires an advantage.
Anne Parillaud plays a vampire with a code who breaks it once. That’s the entire plot. Robert Loggia is enjoying himself enormously as a mob boss delighted by his own new condition.
30. Renfield (2023)
► Read the full review of Renfield (2023)
"One gloriously unhinged Cage performance, and a film that does not know what it is."
Renfield has a funny premise. Dracula as an abusive employer, and his familiar attending a support group for people in codependent relationships. That’s a real idea with somewhere to go. Nicolas Cage is doing a full theatrical Dracula and appears to be having the best time of anybody involved. Nicholas Hoult is a good straight man and the two of them are in a better film than the one being made around them.
That film can’t decide between workplace comedy, splatter action and self-help satire, and attempts all three at the same time and not sequentially. I wanted to like Renfield more than I did. Cage chewing through a theatrical Dracula is worth seeing, and the codependency idea made me laugh. Then the film keeps swerving between gore and self-help, and two good performances end up waiting for a movie to show up. Cage plays Dracula as a manipulative partner and not as a monster, using the exact vocabulary of a controlling relationship.
The support group premise is funny, with a familiar recognizing his employer in every description other people give of their partners. It’s a workplace comedy, a gore film and a crime story at once, and can’t pick one.
31. Vamp (1986)
► Read the full review of Vamp (1986)
"Worth seeing almost entirely for Grace Jones."
Vamp is a stylish, uneven eighties horror comedy built around one unforgettable element. That’s Grace Jones as a vampire stripper who doesn’t speak a single word in the entire film.
Her performance sequence, in body paint designed by Keith Haring and a wire dress, is a real piece of cinema surrounded by a film that’s very little else going on.
The lighting is aggressively green and red throughout and is the second-best thing in it. That indicates the level.
Grace Jones plays the lead vampire with no dialogue at all. That’s the correct use of her and the film’s best decision. The neon lighting scheme is aggressive and consistent, and the production design is doing considerably more than the script. It’s a comedy first and the horror is incidental. That’s why it sits where it does.
32. The Invitation (2022)
► Read the full review of The Invitation (2022)
"A promising gothic premise sanded down to nothing."
The Invitation is the bottom of this list and it’s instructive about why. The setup is good: a woman takes a DNA test, discovers an aristocratic English family she’s related to, and is invited to a wedding at the estate. That’s Gothic in the proper sense, about inheritance, class and a woman entering a house that’s plans for her, and every element of it is available.
This version removes all of it. A PG-13 certificate forbids the tone the material requires, the reveal arrives too late to develop, and what remains is glossy, watchable and entirely forgettable.
The Invitation is a bigger letdown than its rating suggests, because the first act had everything. A DNA test leading a woman into an old English family that’s been planning for her is a terrific Gothic setup. Then somebody decided it had to be PG-13, and the studio sanded off the tone the story needed to chase a bigger audience. Studios keep doing this to horror, and it wastes a good premise every damn time.
To secure a PG-13 rating, it was cut. That removes almost everything a vampire film in this tone requires.
The Gothic estate setting and the class material in the first act are promising and go nowhere.
Nathalie Emmanuel is better than the film and the Dracula reveal arrives with no build behind it.
