Latest
It’s Not X, It’s Y: The AI Tell Shakespeare Wrote FirstWho Gets Rich From AI Data Centers? The Local, National and Global EconomyAre AI Data Centers Bad for the Environment? What’s True and What Isn’tAI Data Centers and Geopolitics: Chips, China, Spies and PowerAI Derangement Syndrome: Who Cares If the Cover Was Made With AI?How to Write a Plot Twist Readers Never See ComingBook Ads Getting Clicks but No Sales? The Problem Is the PageCan Writing a Memoir Make You Sick? The Toll Nobody Warns You AboutWhen Caregiving Ends and the Words Won’t ComeCan You Publish a Clean and a Spicy Version of the Same Book?Do You Need a Writing Buddy? What Works and What Doesn’tCan You Put Someone Who Wronged You in Your Novel?Kindle Unlimited or Wide? Where to Publish Your Debut NovelWriting Vampires: How to Build Your Own Vampire RulesWhat Software Do Novelists Use to Write a Book?What If Your Family Doesn’t Support Your Writing?ARC Reviews: Real Follow-Through Numbers, and Do Reviews Sell Books?The AI Singularity: Would a Conscious AI Even Care About Us?“Forbidden” AI Prompts: Why Viral Prompt Lists Are Mostly JunkAuthor Scam Emails: Fake Agents, Flattery and the $500 PitchWill AI Steal My Book? Turn Off Training Before You UploadThe Fear of Being Judged for Your Memoir: My Father Told Everyone to Burn MineShould You Only Use “Said” in Dialogue Tags? My Rules for Tags and AdverbsWhy a Good Book Isn’t Enough: Agents, Quiet Novels and What SellsShe Asked How to Format Her Comic for KDP. The Thread Went to War Over AI.Why Are Writing Groups So Hostile?My Ghostwriter Stopped Responding. What Do I Do?My Ghostwriter Missed the Deadline. What Are My Options?I Hate My Ghostwriter’s First Draft. Now What?Can I Get a Refund From a Ghostwriter?How Many Revisions Should a Ghostwriter Include?Can My Ghostwriter List My Book in Their Portfolio?My Family Doesn’t Want Me to Publish My Ghostwritten Memoir. Now What?Should a Ghostwriter Write a Free Sample Chapter?How Much Does a Ghostwriter Take Up Front?Can a Ghostwriter Get Me a Book Deal or a Literary Agent?Can I Work With a Ghostwriter Over Zoom or From Another Country?Ghostwriting a Tribute Book, Eulogy or Obituary for Someone You LostCan a Ghostwriter Write My Book in Spanish?Ghostwriting a Book for a Dental or Chiropractic PracticeWhy Keynote Speakers Need a Ghostwritten BookGhostwriting a Science or Research Book for General ReadersGhostwriting a Book for Teachers and EducatorsHiring a Ghostwriter for a Pilot’s or Aviation MemoirHiring a Ghostwriter for a Musician’s MemoirCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Whistleblower Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for an Immigrant’s StoryCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write About Losing Someone to Suicide?Can a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Depression or Mental Illness Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for a Special-Needs Parent’s Memoir

Horror Films Part 9 – The Failures

Part 9 – The Failures

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Failures

These are the failures, and most of them fail the same way. A real idea sits inside the picture and nothing engages with it. Morbius treats a blood appetite as an inconvenient side effect, Leviathan builds a creature out of the faces of the dead and never asks what that means, and Satan’s Cheerleaders has a better premise in its second act than the one it started with.

The other pattern is a film serving something outside itself. The Mummy stops for twenty minutes to establish an organization for sequels nobody made, and World War Z discards the structure that was the whole of its source for one man flying between set pieces.

Putting these films on one page makes me grouchy, because most of them didn’t have to end up here.

Somebody on nearly every production here had a real idea, and the film let it slip. I forgive a cheap film for being cheap. I don’t forgive a studio for spending a fortune to bury the one interesting thing it paid for, and that happens again and again in this list.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the last of nine parts.

Prometheus has scientists removing helmets on an unsurveyed world, and Agatha gives four witches a job each and no appetite. Two failures worth studying in the Deep Character Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. Renfield (2023) [full review]

► Read the full review of Renfield (2023)

2023
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.2/10

"A support group where everybody hears metaphor and one man means it."

Chris McKay made a comedy about codependency with Nicolas Cage as Dracula and Nicholas Hoult as the familiar who has finally started attending a support group. Robert Kirkman wrote the original story, Ryan Ridley the screenplay, and Universal released it as part of a loose attempt to revive its monster properties after several earlier failures.

Cage is the reason to watch it and he’s wanted to play Dracula for decades. The makeup progression across the film is excellent, moving from a burned ruin in a hospital bed to something close to full recovery, and the performance treats the character as ancient instead of as camp.

The support group framing is the strongest material in the picture. Renfield describes an abusive relationship using therapeutic vocabulary, everybody in the room hears metaphor, and the comedy comes from a man being congratulated for insights about a situation considerably more literal than anybody present understands it to be.

The New Orleans crime subplot is where it comes apart. A cartel family, a corrupt police department and a shootout structure arrive to give the film an action shape it never needed, and the codependency material stops developing the moment they turn up and never recovers any momentum afterward.

Awkwafina plays the traffic officer and Ben Schwartz the cartel son, and a screenplay that’s two films in it strands both. The picture cost around sixty-five million dollars, lost money, and the good version of it is visible in about forty minutes of scattered material.

I wanted to like this more than I did. Cage is having the time of his life, and the support group jokes make me laugh every time. Then the cartel shows up and I lost interest. Somebody decided a comedy about an abusive relationship needed gunfights, and that call cost the film the thing that made it worth making.

For WritersThe film’s best joke is that an ancient supernatural arrangement maps exactly onto the language of a support group. Renfield describes literal servitude and the room hears metaphor. When you have a premise built on a single comparison, stay inside it for the whole book. The plot that arrives in the second act to give a comedy some structure is usually the thing that kills the comparison, because it demands scenes the joke can’t reach and characters who have no relationship to it. Protect the central idea from your own instinct to give it a shape. Theme in fiction covers the discipline.

↑ All Entries

2. Vamp (1986) [full review]

► Read the full review of Vamp (1986)

1986
RLR: 5.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.6/10

"Grace Jones says nothing at all and is the only thing anybody remembers."

Richard Wenk made a vampire comedy set almost entirely in a strip club across a single night, and Grace Jones plays the owner without a word of dialogue in the entire film. She was a recording artist instead of an actor at that point and the casting is the only reason anybody remembers the picture at all.

The Katrina performance is the sequence that survives. Jones dances in body paint designed by Keith Haring, the scene runs several minutes, and the film treats it as a set piece instead of as an interlude before the plot resumes. Nothing else in the picture operates at that level.

The lighting is the other distinctive element and it was a deliberate choice. Wenk shot the club interiors in saturated green and red gels with almost no white light anywhere, and the effect is closer to a music video of the period than to horror as it was being made in 1986.

The comedy is where it fails and the two leads can’t save it. Chris Makepeace and Robert Rusler play fraternity pledges looking for a stripper, the material they’re given is thin, and the film keeps returning to them when the audience has no reason to want that.

Sandy Baron plays the club manager and is funny in a picture that needed more of him. The last act moves into the sewers, the budget becomes visible, and a film that was distinctive for an hour resolves into something entirely ordinary in its final twenty minutes.

For WritersGrace Jones speaks no dialogue across the entire film and is the only thing anybody remembers. The performance is posture, movement and a body-paint sequence that runs several minutes without a word. When a character’s power is physical presence, dialogue dilutes it. Every line gives a reader something to evaluate, disagree with or find ordinary, and silence gives them nothing but the behavior. The discipline is resisting the scene where the silent figure finally explains themselves, because that scene is the one every draft wants and the one that spends everything you built. The silence is the asset and every line spends a little of it. What show do not tell actually means covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

3. Satan’s Cheerleaders (1977) [full review]

► Read the full review of Satan’s Cheerleaders (1977)

1977
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 4.0/10

"The better premise arrives in act two and nobody follows it."

Greydon Clark made a film about four cheerleaders and a coach who break down near a property belonging to a satanic cult, and the tone is the problem from the opening scene. It’s not frightening, not funny and not committed to either, and the picture never settles on what it’s attempting across ninety-two minutes.

The cast is considerably better than the material. John Ireland had been nominated for an Academy Award, Yvonne De Carlo had a long career behind her, and both are doing professional work inside a production that’s neither the budget nor the direction to make any use of what they brought to it.

The premise has an idea buried in it that the film never develops. One of the girls turns out to already have power of her own, the cult’s ceremony keeps failing because of it, and a picture willing to follow that would have been considerably more interesting than the one that exists.

The occult material is entirely generic and the film seems unaware that this is a weakness. Robes, an altar, chanting and a pentagram, assembled from other films, with no internal logic and nothing the audience can use to work out what any of the participants want or expect to happen.

For WritersOne of the girls already has power of her own, the ceremony keeps failing because of it, and the film never follows the idea anywhere. A good premise sits unused inside a picture doing something else. When you find a stronger idea while drafting, the temptation is to note it and carry on with the plan you already have. That’s usually the wrong call. A better premise discovered in the second act is worth restructuring around, because the reader will feel the more interesting book sitting underneath the one you delivered and will hold it against you. Plot devices that work covers the ground.

The Invitation withholds a name the trailer gave away, and Ghost Ship explains its haunting into an accounting problem. Structure it properly in the Plot Handbook.

↑ All Entries

4. Cheerleader Camp (1988) [full review]

► Read the full review of Cheerleader Camp (1988)

1988
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.1/10

"Three scenes of something real, undercut by a mascot."

John Quinn made a slasher at a cheerleading competition with Betsy Russell, Leif Garrett and a cast assembled largely from television, and the film is considerably more competent than its reputation allows without ever being good. It went to video quickly and has survived on the title alone.

The structure is conventional and the film obeys it without variation. A remote location, a competition, a group who dislike each other, and killings that arrive on a schedule an audience can predict inside twenty minutes of the opening. Nothing in it attempts anything the form hadn’t already done.

Betsy Russell is doing real work in it and the film gives her a problem. Alison is having nightmares, losing time and suspecting herself, and a picture willing to build on that would have had something. The material is there in three scenes and abandoned in every other.

The comedy is the weakest element and it undercuts everything around it. A mascot, a lecherous camp director and a running joke about a rival squad, none of which sits comfortably next to a film that also wants an audience to be frightened by what is happening to the people involved.

The reveal is the one thing it does properly. The film places the identity properly, the motive follows from what the audience has watched, and the last ten minutes are the only part of the film that looks like it was constructed instead of assembled from parts of other pictures.

For WritersAlison is having nightmares, losing time and suspecting herself, and three scenes take it seriously before the film returns to a mascot and a lecherous camp director. The tonal undercutting costs it everything. When you have a character with a real problem, the comedy around them has to come from somewhere that doesn’t diminish it. A joke at the expense of the situation tells a reader the situation isn’t serious, and once that has been established you can’t take it back in the third act. Decide early who the comedy is allowed to touch.

↑ All Entries

5. Leviathan (1989) [full review]

► Read the full review of Leviathan (1989)

1989
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.8/10

"The creature wears the faces of the crew and nobody asks why."

George Cosmatos made one of three underwater creature films released within months of each other in 1989, alongside The Abyss and DeepStar Six, and it’s the most nakedly derivative of the group. Stan Winston built the creature and the effects are the best thing in the picture by a considerable distance.

The Alien structure is followed beat for beat and the film makes no attempt to conceal it. A commercial crew, a corporate employer who knew, a discovery on a wreck, an infection, a mounting body count and a survivor sequence that ends almost exactly where the 1979 film placed its own.

Peter Weller leads a cast that’s overqualified. Ernie Hudson, Richard Crenna, Daniel Stern and Amanda Pays are all doing professional work, and the film gives each of them a single characteristic to play and no room at all to develop any of it further than that.

The creature design is where Winston made something original. The thing assimilates its victims and keeps them recognizable, so the final form carries the faces of crew members the audience has spent an hour with, an idea the rest of the film has no interest in pursuing.

The corporate material is stated and then dropped, the film’s clearest failure. The company knew what was on the wreck, a manager says as much on a video call, and the picture treats the betrayal as a plot beat instead of as the subject it plainly wanted to be at that moment.

This one feels like a house I’ve already lived in, since Alien built every room. Winston’s creature makes me cranky.

A monster wearing the faces of the crew is a terrific idea, and the film shrugs at it. The company that knew gets the same shrug, so two real subjects sat right there and Cosmatos walked past both of them.

For WritersWinston’s creature assimilates its victims and keeps them recognizable, so the final form carries the faces of crew the audience has spent an hour with. The film has no interest in the idea and uses it once. When a design or a rule implies something the story could be about, follow it. A monster made of the dead raises a question about what is left of them, and asking it costs one scene. Most derivative work fails not because the structure is borrowed but because the one original element in it goes unexamined. Ask what your one invention is saying and then let a character notice it. Subtext in fiction covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

6. World War Z (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of World War Z (2013)

2013
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"The novel had no protagonist. That was the point of it."

Paramount abandoned an entire third act set around a battle in Moscow and reshot roughly forty minutes at a cost in the tens of millions, with Damon Lindelof and Drew Goddard brought in to write the replacement. The production became a bigger story than the film and stayed that way through release.

Max Brooks published the novel as an oral history assembled from interviews across dozens of countries, with no protagonist anywhere in it and a structure built entirely on testimony given after the fact. The film discards every part of that for a single United Nations investigator flying between set pieces.

The Jerusalem sequence is the one piece that works and it works because of scale. A wall, a singing crowd, and a pile-up of bodies climbing itself over the top, and it’s the only passage in the film that retains any sense of a global event happening to a great many people at once.

The replacement third act is a quiet laboratory sequence in Cardiff and it’s considerably better than the abandoned Moscow battle sounded on paper. The film ends small, on a man walking slowly past infected who can’t detect him, the single decision the reshoots got right. Brad Pitt produced it through Plan B and the film took over five hundred and forty million dollars despite everything. A sequel was announced repeatedly across the following decade, David Fincher was attached at one point, and nothing was ever made. Matthew Fox was cut almost entirely.

For WritersThe novel’s entire method is a global event told through dozens of individual accounts with no center, and the film replaces it with one man flying between countries. The adaptation kept the title and discarded the form. When the structure is the work, changing it produces something carrying the same brand and none of the substance. Ask what a book’s shape is doing before you decide it’s negotiable, because form is frequently the argument instead of the packaging around it. An oral history says something about scale that a single protagonist can’t say at any length. Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

7. The Invitation (2022) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Invitation (2022)

2022
RLR: 5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.2/10

"Ninety minutes withholding a name you read in the trailer."

Jessica M. Thompson made a Dracula film that conceals being a Dracula film for most of its running time, and the marketing gave it away regardless. A woman discovers English relatives through a DNA test, is invited to a wedding at a country estate, and finds the arrangement considerably older than anybody has told her.

It’s a good premise with an entirely conventional execution. A bride is being selected instead of married, the household staff know, and the film has a real idea about marriage as a transaction that it states once and then abandons for corridor sequences and jump scares. Nathalie Emmanuel holds it together and the performance is better than the material. Evie is an artist working in catering, she’s alone in the world, and the film is at its strongest in the early scenes where people who are clearly assessing her for something court her.

The rating is the structural problem and it was a commercial decision. The film was cut for a wide audience, the violence is almost entirely bloodless, and a picture about consumption and ownership can’t say anything with the content it needs removed before release. Sony released it in August 2022.

Thomas Doherty plays Walter and the reveal arrives without any weight behind it. The film has spent ninety minutes withholding a name the audience worked out from the trailer, and nothing in the third act justifies the concealment or does anything with the name once it’s been spoken.

For WritersThe film spends ninety minutes withholding a name the audience worked out from the trailer, and the third act does nothing with it once spoken. Concealment has to buy something. When you withhold a fact, work out what the reader gets in exchange for not knowing it. A reveal that confirms what they already assumed isn’t a payment, it’s an admission that the structure was arranged around a secret with no value. The test is whether the book still works if you state the fact in chapter one, and if it works better, state it. Plot Handbook covers the ground.

The Swarm spends two hours on people restating the situation to each other. Put the information inside an argument instead, using the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Entries

8. Ghost Ship (2002) [full review]

► Read the full review of Ghost Ship (2002)

2002
RLR: 4 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.5/10

"A haunting explained is a scheme, and schemes get solved."

Steve Beck made a haunted ship film for Dark Castle and the opening sequence is the only reason anybody has seen it. A wire snaps across a crowded dance floor on an ocean liner in 1962 and cuts every passenger in half at the waist, and the film never comes close to that again.

The salvage premise is workable and the film handles it competently for about forty minutes. A tug crew find a liner adrift in the Bering Sea, the vessel is worth an enormous amount as salvage, and the money gives everybody aboard a reason to stay considerably longer than sense would allow.

Gabriel Byrne and Julianna Margulies are both better than the picture and the cast generally is. Isaiah Washington, Ron Eldard and Karl Urban fill out the crew, and each is given a profession and almost nothing else to work with once the ghosts start appearing.

The mythology is where it collapses entirely. A demonic figure has been harvesting souls aboard the ship for forty years, the arrangement is explained at length in a flashback, and the explanation converts an unsettling situation into an accounting problem with a supernatural middle manager. The last act abandons the ship as a location, the one asset the film had. Corridors, a flooded hold and an engine room are all established early and then largely unused, and the finale takes place in a set that could belong to any picture with a similar budget.

That opening got my hopes up, and the rest of the film let them down one scene at a time. A strong cast on an abandoned liner in the Bering Sea should be easy, and Beck turned it into a lecture about a soul-collecting bureaucrat. I’ve got no respect for a haunted ship movie that walks off its own ship, and this one abandons the corridors and the flooded hold it set up so carefully.

For WritersA demonic figure has been harvesting souls for forty years and the film explains the whole arrangement in a flashback. An unsettling situation becomes an accounting problem with a supernatural middle manager attached. When you explain a haunting, you convert it from a condition into a scheme, and schemes can be defeated by working out the rules. The audience stops being frightened and starts solving. If you must supply a mechanism, supply less of it than you think, and never in a flashback where a character narrates the terms to somebody who already knows them. Imagery that builds a usable space covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

9. The New York Ripper (1982) [full review]

► Read the full review of The New York Ripper (1982)

1982
RLR: 3 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.1/10

"The treatment is the argument, whatever the defense claims."

Lucio Fulci made the film that got him banned from Britain outright, and the print was escorted out of the country by customs instead of simply refused a certificate. It’s the nastiest thing he made and the one his defenders have the most difficulty accounting for.

The killer speaks in a duck voice, and it sounds like a detail from a comedy and is used for the opposite effect. The quacking arrives during the killings and over telephone calls, it’s never explained beyond a single line late in the film, and it’s unbearable to listen to.

The violence is sustained past any point of purpose and aimed almost entirely at women. Fulci’s defenders argue the film is about misogyny instead of an expression of it, and nothing in the direction supports that reading. The camera lingers, the sequences run long, and the picture has no interest in anybody’s interiority.

The New York location work is the only element with any real quality. Times Square before the cleanup, the Staten Island ferry, a sense of a city that was at that point close to broke, and Luigi Kuveiller shoots all of it with considerably more care than the material deserves.

The giallo structure is present and the film obeys it mechanically. A detective, a set of suspects, a psychiatrist and a reveal that follows from evidence the audience has been shown, all delivered without any of the invention Fulci brought to the supernatural films he made either side of it.

This film strikes me as ugly in a way that has nothing to do with gore. The duck voice grates, and the killings run long past any reason for them. I don’t buy the defense for a second. A director who wants to make a film about misogyny has to show me the women as people, and Fulci never bothers. The city footage is the only part I’d watch again, and that’s a damning thing to say about a horror film.

For WritersFulci’s defenders call the film a critique of misogyny and nothing in the direction supports that reading. When you write about something ugly, the treatment is the argument and no amount of stated intention overrides it. A reader judges where the camera sits, how long a scene runs and whose experience is available to them. Claiming a subject isn’t the same as having one, and the gap between them is visible on every page. Decide what you’re willing to look at and for how long before you write the scene. The camera lingers, the sequences run long, and nobody on screen is given an interior life to be damaged. Where you point it and how long you hold are the whole of what you said.

↑ All Entries

10. Prometheus (2012) [full review]

► Read the full review of Prometheus (2012)

2012
RLR: 3 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"They take their helmets off on an unsurveyed world."

Ridley Scott returned to the franchise thirty-three years later with a hundred and thirty million dollars and a screenplay by Jon Spaihts that Damon Lindelof substantially rewrote. The production design, the photography by Dariusz Wolski and the Michael Fassbender performance are all first rate. Fassbender’s David is the best thing in it by a wide margin. An android modeling himself on Peter O’Toole in Lawrence of Arabia, watching the film on the voyage, practising the diction, and secretly poisoning a crew member out of curiosity instead of malice or any instruction from anybody.

The crew behavior is the failure everybody names and it’s worse than the reputation suggests. Scientists remove helmets on an unsurveyed world, a biologist who fled a corpse approaches an unknown organism like a household pet, and a geologist with mapping drones gets lost in the structure he mapped.

The film asks a large question and declines to engage with it. Why did the makers want humanity dead, Shaw asks, and the picture treats the question as a reason for a sequel instead of as something worth examining within the two hours the audience is already sitting through.

The self-surgery sequence is the one piece that works completely. Noomi Rapace in an automated medical pod configured for male patients, operating on herself, staples and all, and the scene is shot in real time with a physical prop and almost no cutting away from what is happening.

This one makes me angrier than anything else here, because the pieces were all in the box. Fassbender is terrific and the self-surgery scene is as tense as anything in the franchise. Then a crew of scientists behaves as if whoever wrote them had never met a scientist, and a film that expensive has no excuse for that. It raised the biggest question the series ever asked and parked it for a sequel.

For WritersScientists remove helmets on an unsurveyed world and a biologist approaches an unknown organism like a household pet. Every crew decision exists to advance the plot instead of following from the person making it. When you need a character to do something dangerous, build the reason into who they are before the scene arrives. Fear, greed, exhaustion, a grudge or a deadline will all justify it. A professional behaving unprofessionally without one of those tells a reader the plot is in charge, and once they see the strings they see them everywhere. Why characters feel flat covers the failure.

Morbius smooths the discomfort out of its own premise and Renfield abandons its central comparison for a crime plot. Protect the idea, in the Theme and Meaning Handbook.

↑ All Entries

11. The Mummy (2017) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Mummy (2017)

2017
RLR: 3 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.4/10

"You paid for a mummy film and received a prospectus."

Universal built a shared universe announcement into a single film and the picture spends its running time establishing an organization instead of telling a story. The Dark Universe was canceled immediately afterward, six writers share the story or screenplay credit, and Alex Kurtzman has discussed the production openly since.

Tom Cruise is miscast in a way that’s structurally instructive. The part requires somebody a situation can overwhelm, and Cruise’s entire screen presence is competence under pressure, so the horror has nothing to push against and the film keeps converting menace into action sequences.

Sofia Boutella’s Ahmanet is good and the film keeps interrupting her. The character has a coherent motive, the makeup and movement work are excellent, and she spends the middle hour of the picture inside a containment cell while other people discuss what to do about her. The Russell Crowe sequence is the clearest symptom of what went wrong. A twenty-minute detour explaining an organization the film has no use for, delivered as exposition for sequels that were never made, with a Jekyll and Hyde transformation nobody in the audience had asked to see. The zero-gravity plane crash is the one good sequence and it was shot practically. The cast filmed it in a parabolic aircraft across dozens of flights, the weightlessness is real, and it sits in a film that’s no idea what to do with anything else it has.

For WritersThe film stops for twenty minutes so a character can explain an organization with no function in this story that exists to set up others. The audience paid for a mummy picture and received a prospectus. When you write inside a planned series, the current book still has to be the priority. A reader who notices they’re being sold the next one has stopped reading this one, and no amount of later payoff repairs the chapter where they worked it out. Set up the sequence with consequences instead of briefings. A reader forgives a slow book and never forgives being sold to inside one.

↑ All Entries

12. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) [full review]

► Read the full review of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)

2022
RLR: 3 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.9/10

"The arc reversed between properties, offstage."

Sam Raimi took over after Scott Derrickson left and the film contains recognizable Raimi construction inside a franchise assignment. Dutch angles, a possessed corpse used as a vehicle, and a real horror sequence built around a chase through a mirror dimension that nothing else in the franchise had attempted.

The Wanda decision is the central problem and it happened offscreen. WandaVision spent nine episodes on grief and accountability, ending with her choosing to release a town she’d enslaved, and this film opens with her murdering people to acquire children she’s never met in another universe.

The Illuminati sequence is well staged and structurally hollow. Five characters are introduced and killed inside about eight minutes, the deaths are the entire point of their presence, and none of them exists for any reason beyond demonstrating a threat level to an audience that already understood it.

Xochitl Gomez’s America Chavez is given a power, a trauma and almost no characterization. She can punch holes between realities, she can’t control it, and the film resolves that problem by having an authority figure tell her she can, the whole of her arc across two hours.

The Raimi horror material is the best thing in it and there’s not enough of it. The Wanda pursuit, the musical duel with notes used as projectiles, and the Defender Strange corpse sequence are all more inventive than the franchise usually permits anybody to be.

Raimi’s fingerprints are the only parts of this I’d defend, and there aren’t enough of them.

My biggest problem is Wanda. WandaVision built her a hard ending, and this film tossed it out between projects because the plot wanted a villain. That’s a slap at everybody who followed her for nine episodes, and I take it personally.

For WritersWanda finished a nine-episode series by choosing accountability and opens this film murdering people. The reversal isn’t dramatized anywhere. It happened between properties and the audience is asked to accept a new position with no transition offered. When a character changes between books, the change has to happen somewhere the reader can watch it. An arc completed offstage reads as an author needing a different character and taking one, and readers who invested in the earlier version experience it as a breach instead of as development. Write the turn on the page even when it costs you an episode, because the alternative costs you the character. Arcs versus wounds covers the ground.

Multiverse of Madness reverses a nine-episode arc between properties and never dramatizes the turn. Write the change where readers can watch it, using Character Writer’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

13. The Swarm (1978) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Swarm (1978)

1978
RLR: 2 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.0/10

"Two hours of people restating the situation in rooms with maps."

Irwin Allen assembled the largest cast available to him and made the film that ended the disaster cycle he’d built. Michael Caine, Katharine Ross, Richard Widmark, Olivia de Havilland, Henry Fonda, Fred MacMurray and Jose Ferrer are all in it, and none of them can do anything with what they were given.

African bees reaching Texas is the premise, and the film treats it as a military campaign. A general commands the response, a scientist argues with him for two hours, and the dialogue consists almost entirely of people restating the situation to each other in rooms with maps on the walls.

The bee effects are the technical problem and there was no solution available in 1978. The production used real bees with the stingers removed for close work, they refuse to behave as swarms on command, and the wide shots are visibly animated dots that never integrate with the footage underneath them.

The hallucination sequences are the film’s most remembered failure. Victims see a giant bee hovering in the room, rendered as a superimposition, and the effect is so far from frightening that the sequences play as comedy in exactly the way nobody involved could have wanted them to. Caine has discussed it for decades with considerable good humor and no defense of it. The film cost around twenty-one million dollars, took well under that, and Allen never recovered the position he’d held across the previous six years of the genre he effectively invented.

For WritersThe dialogue consists almost entirely of people restating the situation to each other in rooms with maps on the walls. A general argues with a scientist for two hours and nothing either says changes anything. When your characters are discussing a problem instead of acting on it, the scene is a status report. Readers accept one of those and not four. Give somebody the authority to decide and somebody else a reason to disobey, and the same information arrives inside a conflict instead of inside a briefing. Information delivered inside an argument is the only kind readers absorb without noticing. Conflict that drives story covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

14. Morbius (2022) [full review]

► Read the full review of Morbius (2022)

2022
RLR: 2 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.1/10

"The discomfort at its middle was the whole reason to make it."

Daniel Espinosa made a film Sony produced to retain character rights, and Sony delayed the release six separate times across two years. Sony returned it to cinemas after internet jokes suggested an audience existed, and it took under three hundred thousand dollars the second time it opened.

Jared Leto plays a biochemist who cures his own blood disorder using bat DNA and acquires an appetite, a premise with a real horror film inside it. The picture treats the condition as a superpower carrying an inconvenient side effect and never once engages with what the character is doing to people.

The visual signature is a smoke trail following every fast movement, and it’s the only distinctive choice anywhere in the film. Every action sequence is shot in darkness against grey backgrounds with the trails filling the frame, so the choreography is impossible to follow from one beat to the next.

Matt Smith is the only performer who identified which film he was making. Milo is delighted by his own transformation, he dances alone in an apartment, and the performance belongs in a film willing to be what this one keeps declining to be about itself.

Adria Arjona and Jared Harris are both wasted and the ending is incoherent. Two post-credit sequences attempt to connect the film to a franchise it’s no relationship with, the mechanics of how that character arrives are never established, and Sony abandoned the arrangement shortly afterward.

I have a low tolerance for films made to hold onto character rights, and this one feels exactly like that.

Leto had a real horror premise in his hands, and the film treats it like a gym membership with a side effect. Smith is the only one having any fun, and I kept wishing the picture would follow him out of the room. It was delayed six times, and I can’t find anything in the finished film that the extra time improved.

For WritersThe premise is a man who has to consume blood to survive and the film treats it as an inconvenient side effect of a cure. The horror sitting inside the concept is never engaged. When your premise has an uncomfortable center, that discomfort is the reason to write it at all. Smoothing it into a power leaves you with a story about somebody who can do things, available in every other book on the shelf. The uncomfortable version is harder to sell and it’s the only one worth the year it takes. Write the version that makes you uncomfortable to reread.

↑ All Entries

15. Agatha All Along (2024) [full review]

► Read the full review of Agatha All Along (2024)

2024
RLR: 1 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.9/10

"A party roster where a cast should have been."

Jac Schaeffer created a nine-episode series continuing a character from WandaVision, and the premise is a witches’ road that grants a wish at the end of it. Kathryn Hahn returns and is the only element the series has any confidence in from the opening episode onward.

The structure is a series of trials and it’s the weakest thing about the show. Each episode presents an obstacle, the coven passes it, and the format announces itself so clearly in the second episode that an audience can predict the shape of every hour remaining before the first one has finished.

The coven are given professions and almost no interiority. A potions witch, a divination witch, a green witch and a protection witch, each introduced with a single trait, and the series keeps promising to develop them across episodes that arrive and then spend their time somewhere else entirely. The seventh episode is good and demonstrates what the rest could have been. Patti LuPone’s Lilia moves through her own timeline out of order, experiencing her life as a tarot reading, and the episode is constructed with more care than the eight around it combined. The Billy reveal is handled badly and the series had nowhere to go with it once delivered. The identity is obvious from the second episode, the show behaves as though it’s withholding something, and the resolution arrives with the emotional weight of an administrative correction.

This is the one on the page I’d warn people away from. Hahn and LuPone deserved a show that trusted them, and they got a trial-of-the-week format anybody can map out by the second episode. The seventh episode proves somebody on the team knew better, and that makes the other eight harder for me to excuse. I resent a series that spends nine episodes pretending it has a secret everybody already guessed.

For WritersThe coven are a potions witch, a divination witch, a green witch and a protection witch, each introduced with one trait and never developed. Function without interiority produces a party roster instead of a cast. When you build an ensemble around specializations, the specialization is the entry point and not the character. A reader can hold six people by what they do, and they’ll stop caring by the midpoint unless each one also wants something the others can’t give them. Assign the job first and the appetite immediately afterward. A roster is a list and a cast is a set of competing appetites.

Honorable Mentions: Horror Films Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier or close to it and each is on the list.

The Void (2016)

⭐ 5.8/10

Jeremy Gillespie and Steven Kostanski built a cosmic horror film around a rural hospital and a cult in white robes, with practical creature work that’s no business looking as good as it does on the money they had.

We Are Still Here (2015)

⭐ 5.9/10

Ted Geoghegan set a haunting in a New England farmhouse that needs a family every thirty years, and the last fifteen minutes abandon restraint entirely. Barbara Crampton and Larry Fessenden lead it.

The Sacrament (2013)

⭐ 6.0/10

Ti West made a found-footage film about a journalist visiting a commune, closely modeled on Jonestown. Gene Jones plays the leader and the interview sequence is the best thing in it.

Baskin (2015)

⭐ 5.4/10

Can Evrenol sent five Turkish police into a derelict building and then into somewhere considerably worse. It’s the most upsetting thing to come out of that decade of international horror.

The Innkeepers (2011)

⭐ 5.5/10

Ti West again, with two hotel employees and a closing weekend, and almost nothing happens for an hour. Sara Paxton holds it together and the patience is the technique.

The Sentinel (1977)

⭐ 6.4/10

Michael Winner put a model in a Brooklyn brownstone that turns out to be a gate, with a cast including Ava Gardner, Christopher Walken and Jeff Goldblum. The casting of the last act caused controversy.

Rabid (1977)

⭐ 6.1/10

Cronenberg built an outbreak around a woman who develops a new organ after experimental surgery. Marilyn Chambers plays her and the Montreal material looks like a real city in a real emergency.

Scanners (1981)

⭐ 6.7/10

Cronenberg again, with telepaths, a corporate conspiracy and a head that doesn’t survive the first ten minutes. Michael Ironside is the reason the second half works as well as it does.

The Legend of Hell House (1973)

⭐ 6.7/10

Richard Matheson adapted his own novel about four people in a house with a documented history. Roddy McDowall gives the best performance and the electronic score is unsettling.

Lady in White (1988)

⭐ 6.7/10

Frank LaLoggia made a ghost story about a boy locked in a school cloakroom on Halloween, and the film is closer to a memoir than to horror for most of its length.

Sleep Tight (2011)

⭐ 7.1/10

Jaume Balaguero built a film around a concierge who lets himself into an apartment every night. Luis Tosar plays him and the film gives the audience his point of view throughout, an unbearable place to sit.

Julia’s Eyes (2010)

⭐ 6.7/10

Guillem Morales made a thriller about a woman losing her sight while investigating her sister’s death, produced by del Toro. The last act is shot so the audience shares her condition.

Dishonorable Mentions: Horror Films That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had the premise, the cast or the source material and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

The Devil Inside (2012)

⭐ 4.2/10

A found-footage exorcism film that ends mid-scene and directs the audience to a website for the resolution. Audiences booed in cinemas and the website was taken down within a year.

Dark Shadows (2012)

⭐ 6.2/10

Burton turned a gothic soap opera with a real following into a fish-out-of-water comedy about the 1970s. Depp plays Barnabas for jokes and the original series had played him for tragedy.

The Wicker Tree (2011)

⭐ 4.2/10

Robin Hardy returned to his own 1973 film with a follow-up nobody wanted, repeating the structure with American evangelists and none of the dread the first picture had built.

Fantasy Island (2020)

⭐ 4.8/10

A horror reworking of a television series, where each guest receives a wish that goes wrong, connected at the end by a revelation that ties every strand into one explanation nobody needed.

Countdown (2019)

⭐ 5.0/10

An app tells you when you’ll die and kills you if you try to avoid it, a rule with no room in it. The film supplies a demon, a loophole and a priest who explains the terms of service.

Wish Upon (2017)

⭐ 5.2/10

A music box grants seven wishes and takes a life for each, and the film gives its protagonist no reason to keep using it beyond the plot requiring seven wishes to be made.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

Every film here had something, and that’s what makes this page hard for me. Leviathan had a creature made of the dead and Renfield had codependency, and in both cases the film walked away from its best idea to chase something safer. That’s the worst failure, since the hard part was already done. Tell me which one you would have rescued and how.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

What went wrong with Prometheus?
The crew behave in ways that serve the plot instead of following from who they are. Scientists remove helmets on an unsurveyed world, a biologist approaches an unknown organism like a pet, and a geologist with mapping drones gets lost in the structure he mapped.
Why did World War Z change the novel so much?
The book is an oral history assembled from interviews across dozens of countries with no protagonist anywhere in it. The film replaces that structure with a single investigator flying between set pieces, and the structure was the argument itself.
Was The Mummy meant to start a franchise?
Yes. Universal built the Dark Universe announcement into the film itself, including a twenty-minute sequence establishing an organization with no function in the story. The shared universe was canceled immediately afterward.
Is Morbius as bad as its reputation?
The reputation came from internet jokes and a failed second release that took under three hundred thousand dollars. The actual problem is that a premise about a man who must consume blood is treated as a superpower with a side effect.
Why is The New York Ripper controversial?
The violence is sustained and aimed almost entirely at women, and the killer speaks in a duck voice throughout. The print was escorted out of Britain by customs instead of simply being refused a certificate.
What is wrong with Agatha All Along?
The coven are given a specialization each and almost no interiority, so the ensemble reads as a party roster. The seventh episode, following Lilia through her own timeline out of order, shows what the rest could have been.
Did Renfield have a good idea in it?
A strong one. An ancient servitude arrangement described in the language of a support group, where everybody in the room hears metaphor. The New Orleans crime subplot arrives in the second act and the comparison stops developing.
Why does explaining a haunting weaken it?
It converts a condition into a scheme, and schemes can be defeated by working out the rules. Ghost Ship spends a flashback explaining forty years of soul harvesting and the audience stops being frightened and starts solving.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment