Latest
What an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionResurrection as a Narrative StructureBooks to Give a WriterThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Show Don’t Tell

The Romance Problem

TL;DR: Marvel has been trying to write love stories for fifteen years and has produced roughly two that work. The reason is structural: these films can’t give a relationship the one thing it needs, which is time in a room.

Tony and Pepper. Steve and Peggy. Bruce and Natasha. Thor and Jane. Strange and Christine. Fifteen years of romantic subplots, and almost none of them land.

It isn’t the actors. Robert Downey Jr. and Gwyneth Paltrow are good together, and Natalie Portman has done this well elsewhere. It’s the shape of the films.

What a Romance Needs

Two people, a room and time. That’s the whole recipe. The audience has to watch them talk about nothing in particular long enough to believe they’d choose each other. Every good romantic subplot in any genre, from Han and Leia to the couple in Speed, buys that time somewhere.

A Marvel film has about twelve minutes of non-plot screen time, and it spends them on jokes.

What the Structure Does Instead

The relationships get announced. We’re told these two are together, usually in a scene where one waits at home while the other saves a city. The film then treats the relationship as an asset to threaten in act three. Nothing is built, so nothing can break.

The worst version is retroactive: two characters arrive in a film already in love, having had their courtship somewhere the audience wasn’t. Bruce and Natasha in Age of Ultron is the notorious case, because the film needs a relationship it never earned and then leans hard on it.

The Availability Problem

Actors are contracted per film, so partners disappear between instalments. Jane Foster is absent from two Thor films and explained away in a line. Christine Palmer turns up in Doctor Strange films for one scene at a time. You can’t build intimacy out of cameos, and the schedule makes cameos the default.

The Two That Work

Wanda and Vision, because a television series gave them nine hours and the relationship was the subject instead of the decoration. The whole premise of WandaVision is grief for a marriage the films never showed, and the show makes you feel the absence retroactively. That’s what time buys.

Peter and MJ, because the Spider-Man films are teenage stories where the romance is the plot instead of a subplot. They talk, they’re awkward, they have scenes with no villain in them. And the trilogy is willing to end on a real cost.

Why It Matters

Romantic stakes are the cheapest emotional leverage in fiction, and this franchise keeps reaching for them without paying the setup cost. When Tony looks at Pepper in the final act, the film is asking for a feeling it hasn’t funded.

It also flattens the characters. People reveal themselves in private far more than in fights, and a film that never puts two people alone in a kitchen has given up most of its characterization.

Craft Note

Craft Note

A relationship is built in scenes where nothing else is happening. If your structure has no room for two people talking about nothing, it has no room for a romance.

Threatening a relationship in act three only works if you spent act one earning it. Otherwise you’re asking the reader to feel something on credit.

Can the MCU fix its romance problem?

Only by giving somebody a film where the relationship is the plot. WandaVision and the Spider-Man trilogy both prove it’s possible, and both did it by refusing to treat the couple as a subplot.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are MCU romances weak?
The films have very little screen time outside plot mechanics, so relationships get announced instead of built.
Which MCU romance works best?
Wanda and Vision, largely because WandaVision gave the relationship the time the films never did. Peter and MJ in the Spider-Man trilogy also work.
Why did Bruce and Natasha’s romance fail?
Age of Ultron presents them as already close without showing any of the courtship, then relies on the relationship for emotional weight.
What happened to Jane Foster in the Thor films?
She was absent for two films and written out in a line of dialogue, before returning in Love and Thunder.
What does a film romance need to work?
Scenes where the couple simply talk, with no plot happening, so the audience believes they’d choose each other.
Do other franchises handle romance better?
Yes. Star Wars, Indiana Jones and many action films buy their couples quiet scenes together.
Is the problem the actors?
No. Several of the actors involved have done romance well in other films. The structure is what fails them.

This film appears on 2 of my film lists