Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

The MCU Phase 1 – Proving It Could Work

Phase 1 – Proving It Could Work

Series Navigation

Phase 1: Proving It Could Work |
Phase 2: Finding the Formula |
Phase 3: The Payoff |
Phase 4: The MCU Becomes the MSHEU |
Phase 5: The MCU Pushes the Message |
Phase 6: The Reset

In 2008 Marvel Studios had no studio, no top-tier characters and no evidence that any of this would work. The rights to Spider-Man and the X-Men were elsewhere. What remained was a second tier of the catalog, financed against the characters themselves as collateral, directed by a man best known for comedies and starring an actor most of the industry considered uninsurable.

Six films later they had built something nobody had attempted, which was a set of separate stories that pay off together. What makes Phase 1 the strongest run in the whole franchise is that none of the films knew they would be permitted a sequel. Each one had to work alone, because each one might have been the last.

That constraint produced the highest average of any phase on this site, at 8.00 across six films, with a median of 8.5 and nothing below a 5. Nothing after this comes close, and the reason is visible in how these were made rather than in who was making them.

Scores in gold are mine. Scores marked IMDb are the public figure, used where I have not watched something yet. Anything showing Score to come is on the list and gets a number once I get to it.

↑ All Films

1. Iron Man (2008)

► Read the full review of Iron Man (2008)

2008 · Jon Favreau
⭐ 9/10
Robert Downey Jr.

“I am Iron Man.”

Everything the franchise became is present in the first twenty minutes and none of it looks like a plan. A weapons manufacturer is captured by people using his own products, builds an escape in a cave, and comes home understanding what he has been doing for a living. That is a complete film about a specific man and it needs no universe behind it.

Robert Downey Jr. was a risk the studio had to be argued into, and the casting is the single most consequential decision in modern blockbuster filmmaking. He improvised heavily, Jon Favreau let him, and the result is a superhero who talks like a person rather than a poster. The final press conference works because Downey plays the admission as impulse instead of resolve.

What separates it from what came later is scale. The threat is one man in a larger suit, the stakes are a single arms deal, and the film never suggests that the world is ending. A story about a person changing his mind is enough, and Phase 1 believed that for six films.

The cave sequence is the reason the whole thing works and it is almost entirely procedural. Two men build something out of salvage across weeks, with a deadline neither controls, and the film shows the work. Yinsen is a real character with his own reason for being there, and his death is the only thing in the picture that changes Stark permanently.

Jeff Bridges gets less credit than he deserves. Obadiah Stane is not a rival genius, he is the man who has been running the business while Stark got the credit, and his resentment is entirely legible. The scene where he takes the arc reactor out of Stark’s chest is the most frightening moment in Phase 1, because it is quiet and personal and involves no powers at all.

Watching it now, the strangest quality is how little it points anywhere. There is no post-credits obligation baked into the story, no character introduced for a later slot, and no dialogue explaining a larger plan. It was made by people who wanted this film to be good, on the assumption that nothing else might follow.

For WritersThe origin story works here because the change is specific and costly. Stark does not become good, he stops making a particular product for a particular reason he witnessed personally. When you write a transformation, resist the abstraction. A character who decides to be better is a summary. A character who cancels one contract because he watched his own missile kill somebody is a scene. The general rule is that conversions should be narrow. A protagonist who changes his mind about everything has been rewritten, and readers feel the authorial hand. A protagonist who changes his mind about one thing, and then has to live with what that costs him professionally and personally, has undergone something. Note also that the film gives him a witness. Yinsen exists so that the decision has a face attached to it, and if you are writing a turn of this kind, supply the person who makes it unavoidable.

↑ All Films

2. The Incredible Hulk (2008)

► Read the full review of The Incredible Hulk (2008)

2008 · Louis Leterrier
⭐ 8.5/10
Edward Norton

“Don’t make me hungry. You wouldn’t like me when I’m hungry.”

The forgotten one, and the reassessment is overdue. Louis Leterrier made a fugitive thriller rather than a superhero film, opening with Banner already in hiding in Brazil, already fluent in the discipline of not being found, with the origin delivered in the credits because the audience already knows it.

Edward Norton plays Banner as a man managing a medical condition, and that reading is more frightening than the anger metaphor the character usually gets. He counts breaths, he watches a heart monitor, and the horror is procedural. The later recasting removed that entirely in favor of a man who has made peace with it, which is a smaller idea.

Tim Roth’s Blonsky is the other thing it gets right. He is a soldier who wants what Banner has and cannot understand why anybody would refuse it, which makes the final fight an argument between two attitudes to the same power rather than a collision of two effects.

For WritersSkipping the origin is almost always the right call when the audience already knows it. The credits sequence here delivers the entire backstory in under three minutes of imagery and lets the film open on a man who has already been living with the consequences for years. The interesting part of any transformation story is rarely the transformation, it is the ordinary Tuesday afterward. The test for whether you can skip it: does the reader need the origin to understand a decision the character makes later, or do they simply need to know it happened? If it is the second, a paragraph will do the work of a chapter. The corollary is that the time you save has to be spent on something. This film spends it on procedure, on what a fugitive actually does with his days, and procedure is what makes a passive stretch readable.

↑ All Films

3. Iron Man 2 (2010)

► Read the full review of Iron Man 2 (2010)

2010 · Jon Favreau
⭐ 5/10
Robert Downey Jr.

“I have successfully privatized world peace.”

The first film in the run with visible homework in it, and the point where the machinery starts to show. Nick Fury, Black Widow, a briefcase full of setup, and a plot that pauses regularly to establish something a later film will need.

What holds it up is Stark himself. He is dying, he is drinking, he is behaving appallingly, and the film is genuinely interested in a man who has decided that being admired is a substitute for saying goodbye. The party sequence is unpleasant in a way the franchise stopped permitting itself.

Sam Rockwell is the underrated element. Justin Hammer is not a dark reflection or an evil genius, he is a mediocre competitor who wants to be Stark and lacks the ability, and playing the antagonist as professionally jealous is a far more useful idea than most of the villains that followed.

Mickey Rourke’s Vanko is the structural problem. He has a genuine grievance, a father who died poor while somebody else’s father took the credit, and the film gives him about four scenes to establish it before parking him in a workshop for an hour. Two antagonists in one picture and neither gets enough room, which is a pattern the franchise repeated for fifteen years.

The Senate hearing is the best sequence and shows what the film could have been. A man who has privatized world peace, in front of a committee that cannot make him do anything, being right and insufferable simultaneously. That is a whole movie, and the picture keeps leaving it to service a briefcase.

The 5 is fair and it is a specific 5. This is the first entry where you can feel the enterprise being managed, where scenes exist to place objects in other films, and where the protagonist’s arc competes for room with administration. Everything that eventually went wrong is visible here in small.

For WritersWatch how much this film loses whenever it stops being about Stark and starts being about the Avengers. Setup is a cost, not a feature. Every minute spent establishing something for a later story is a minute the current story is not using, and readers feel the drag even when they cannot name the cause. If you are writing a series, the discipline is to make the setup do double duty. A scene that establishes a future character has to also advance the present plot or reveal something about the protagonist, or it is an advertisement. The second lesson here is about antagonist arithmetic. Two villains in one book means each gets half the room, and half the room is rarely enough for a grievance to become a threat.

↑ All Films

4. Thor (2011)

► Read the full review of Thor (2011)

2011 · Kenneth Branagh
⭐ 8/10
Chris Hemsworth

“This drink, I like it. Another!”

Kenneth Branagh was an eccentric hire and the correct one. He treats Asgard as a court, the succession as a dynastic problem, and the family as a Shakespearean arrangement of a father, two sons and a secret, and the register holds because he never signals that any of it is silly.

The exile structure is what makes it work. Thor loses everything in the first act and spends the film as a man with no power in a small New Mexico town, which forces the character to be interesting before he is allowed to be impressive.

Tom Hiddleston’s Loki is the discovery. He is not a villain who wants power, he is a son who finds out what he is and cannot survive the information, and the film gives him a genuine grievance that the audience can follow. Almost every good thing the franchise did with him afterward is drawn from this performance.

Branagh shoots Asgard with canted angles throughout, which was mocked at the time and is the correct instinct. A realm that is meant to feel like a different order of thing should not be filmed like a boardroom, and the tilted frames make the palace scenes read as unstable, which is exactly what the succession plot requires.

The New Mexico material is where the film earns its 8. A god of thunder walking into a pet shop and demanding a horse is funny, and the humor comes from the character being entirely sincere rather than from anybody making a joke. Thor never once acknowledges that his situation is absurd, and that commitment is what makes it land.

Anthony Hopkins is doing more than the part needed. Odin is a man who lied to a child for a thousand years for reasons he believed were sound, and the throne room confrontation is played as a father who has run out of explanations. The films after this reduced him to a plot device and the reduction cost them something.

For WritersRemoving your protagonist’s power in the first act is the oldest reliable move in this genre and it keeps working. What it buys is a character who has to be resourceful, humble or clever, none of which are available to somebody who can simply win. The powers come back at the end and mean something because the audience has spent ninety minutes watching him earn them. The version of this that fails is when the loss is temporary and nothing is learned, so the return is a reset rather than a payoff. Ask what the character can do at the end that he could not do at the start, and if the answer is only that he has his abilities back, the removal was a delay. Here the answer is that he is willing to die to stop something he started, which is a different man from the one in the opening scene.

↑ All Films

5. Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)

► Read the full review of Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)

2011 · Joe Johnston
⭐ 9/10
Chris Evans

“I don’t like bullies. I don’t care where they’re from.”

The best film in Phase 1 and one of the two or three best in the entire franchise. Joe Johnston made a 1940s adventure serial in earnest, with the period design, the propaganda tour, the Howling Commandos montage and a hero whose defining quality is established before he has any physical ability at all.

The grenade scene is the whole film. A small man throws himself onto a live grenade to protect people he has known for a week, and Erskine has already told us the point: the serum amplifies what is there. Everything afterward is a consequence of a character established in about ninety seconds.

What gives it weight is the ending. He wins, and it costs him everything and everybody, and the last scene is a man waking up seventy years later having lost his entire world. A superhero film that concludes on grief was not obvious in 2011 and almost nothing since has been willing to do it.

The propaganda tour is the sequence that separates this from every other origin. He gets the serum, and the government makes him sell bonds in a costume on a stage with dancers, because a man who can lift a motorcycle is more useful as a poster than as a soldier. It is a genuinely cynical idea sitting inside an earnest film, and the picture is smart enough not to comment on it.

Peggy Carter is written as a professional rather than as a prize. Hayley Atwell plays somebody with her own authority who is better at her job than most of the men around her, and the relationship works because it is built on competence recognized in both directions. Almost nothing in the franchise has managed that since.

Johnston had made The Rocketeer twenty years earlier and this is the same film with a larger budget and a better script. The 1940s serial register is sustained without irony for two hours, the Hydra design is genuinely sinister, and the montage of the Commandos taking bases is the only part of the film that plays like a comic book, which is a deliberate contrast with everything around it.

For WritersEstablish the moral core before the capability, always. A hero who is good because he is powerful is uninteresting. A hero who was already good when he was powerless, and is then handed power, lets the audience trust every decision he makes afterward without the story having to argue for it. The mechanism is that you are buying credit early and spending it late. Every scene of Rogers before the serum is a deposit, and by the time he is making command decisions under fire the reader has no questions about his judgment. The practical version for a novel: give your protagonist one costly choice in the first fifty pages, made without any advantage, and you will not have to defend his character again for the rest of the book.

↑ All Films

6. The Avengers (2012)

► Read the full review of The Avengers (2012)

2012 · Joss Whedon
⭐ 8.5/10
Robert Downey Jr.

“If we can’t protect the Earth, you can be damn well sure we’ll avenge it.”

The film that proved the whole idea, and the achievement is structural rather than spectacular. Six protagonists arrive from five separate films with established personalities, and none of them is diminished to make room for the others.

Joss Whedon’s solution is to spend the middle hour on conflict rather than teamwork. The helicarrier sequence is an hour of people who do not like each other arguing in rooms, and by the time they finally cooperate the audience has been made to want it. The team-up is a payoff, not a premise.

The New York battle still works because the geography is legible throughout. You always know where each character is, what they are doing and why, and the single tracking shot connecting all six is the clearest statement of what the film had accomplished. Every subsequent third act in this franchise is trying to be this and most of them forgot that clarity was the point.

Loki is the right antagonist for this specific story because he is not a threat to any of them individually. He is a manipulator, his weapon is division, and his plan works for most of the running time. The scene where he explains what he is doing to Black Widow, and she turns it around on him, is the best written exchange in Phase 1.

The death that turns the film is engineered and it is engineered well. Coulson had appeared across four films doing small administrative things, which made him the one character the audience knew without ever having thought about him, and Whedon spends that carefully constructed indifference at exactly the right moment.

The 8.5 is honest about what it is. This is an assembly job of enormous skill, it resolves in a hole in the sky with an army pouring out of it, and the template for that third act became the default for a decade. What holds up is the middle hour, which is people in rooms, and the discipline of never letting a joke undercut something the film needs.

For WritersA team story needs friction before cooperation or the cooperation means nothing. The reader should spend most of the running time doubting that these people can work together. Deliver the alliance too early and you have removed the only real question the structure offers you. The friction also has to come from character rather than from a misunderstanding. These six disagree about authority, method and whether any of this should be happening, and none of those disagreements can be cleared up with an explanation. A conflict that a single conversation would resolve is not a conflict, it is a delay, and readers can tell the difference within a page.

↑ Back to Film Navigation

Phase 1 averages 8.00 across six films, the highest of any phase, with a median of 8.5. Five of the six sit at 8 or above and the only soft entry is Iron Man 2 at 5, which is also the only one built around setting up something else.

That correlation holds across the whole franchise. The films that score highest are the ones with no obligation to anything outside themselves, and the films that score lowest are the ones whose job is to deliver somebody to a later project. Phase 2 drops to 6.80 and the decline runs from there.

The Essays Behind These Ratings

The ratings on this page come out of a longer argument about what the franchise did to itself. These essays set it out.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MCU Phase 1?
The six films released between 2008 and 2012: Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger and The Avengers. They built the shared universe from a second tier of characters nobody expected to carry a franchise.
Which Phase 1 film is the best?
Captain America: The First Avenger and The Avengers both score 9 and 8.5 here, and Iron Man matches the first at 9. The First Avenger is the one that establishes its hero’s moral core before he has any physical ability at all.
Do I need to watch them in order?
No. Every Phase 1 film was made without a guarantee of a sequel, so each one works alone. That constraint is why the phase scores higher than anything that followed.
Why does Phase 1 score so well?
Because none of these films could rely on a later entry to finish their story. Each had to be complete, which removed the setup problem that weakens almost everything after Phase 3.
Is The Incredible Hulk worth watching?
Yes, and it is the forgotten one. Louis Leterrier made a fugitive thriller instead of a superhero film, and Edward Norton plays Banner as a man managing a medical condition, which is more frightening than the anger metaphor the character usually gets.
What can writers learn from Phase 1?
Establish the moral core before the capability, remove your protagonist’s power in the first act, and build a team story on friction so that the cooperation is a payoff instead of a premise.



GenresSuperhero

🏷︎ Film List🏷︎ MCU🏷︎ Superhero Films