Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

The MCU Phase 2 – Finding the Formula

Phase 2 – Finding the Formula

Series Navigation

Phase 1: Proving It Could Work |
Phase 2: Finding the Formula |
Phase 3: The Payoff |
Phase 4: The MCU Becomes the MSHEU |
Phase 5: The MCU Pushes the Message |
Phase 6: The Reset

Phase 1 proved the idea worked. Phase 2 had to prove it could be repeated, which is a different and harder problem, and the six films that answer it are the most uneven set in the franchise until the volume years.

This is where the machinery gets built. Sequels arrive on a schedule, a shared threat is established across films, and the studio works out which parts of the process are transferable and which depended on individual filmmakers. Two of these are among the best things the franchise has produced. One of them is the first entry that feels manufactured.

The average across the five I have seen is 6.80, down more than a point from Phase 1, with a range from 5 to 8.5. Phase 2 is where both the ceiling and the floor of the whole enterprise were established, and the gap between them opens here for the first time.

Scores in gold are mine. Scores marked IMDb are the public figure, used where I have not watched something yet. Anything showing Score to come is on the list and gets a number once I get to it.

↑ All Films

1. Iron Man 3 (2013)

► Read the full review of Iron Man 3 (2013)

2013 · Shane Black
⭐ 5/10
Robert Downey Jr.

“I’m Tony Stark. I build neat stuff, got a great girl, occasionally save the world.”

Shane Black wrote and directed a Christmas thriller about a man having panic attacks, which is a genuinely interesting film to find inside a Marvel sequel, and then attached it to a plot that undoes itself.

The Stark material works. He cannot sleep, he builds compulsively, and the film is honest that the events of The Avengers would break a person. Removing the suit for most of the running time and making him solve problems in a small town with hardware from a shop is the right instinct and produces the best hour in the film.

Then the Mandarin turns out to be an actor and the film swaps a villain for a joke. The reversal is well executed and defensible on its own terms, and it also converts a threat the audience had been taking seriously into a punchline, which leaves the last act with nothing to be about except an army of empty suits.

Ben Kingsley is superb in both halves, which is the frustrating part. The Mandarin broadcasts are genuinely menacing, the pivot to Trevor Slattery is played with total commitment, and the idea underneath, that a frightening figurehead can be manufactured and rented, is sharper than anything else in the film.

What replaces him is Aldrich Killian, a man with a grudge about a rooftop meeting in 1999 and a plan involving explosive people. Guy Pearce is doing what he can and the character has no presence, so the film’s climax is a fight against a man the audience has no reason to fear on a set of shipping containers.

The Tennessee stretch is where the 5 is earned back. Stark with no suit, a broken watch and a kid with a garage, solving problems out of a hardware store, is the version of this character that works. Every minute he spends in armor in this film is less interesting than the minutes he spends without it, and the picture knows that and cannot act on it.

For WritersA twist that removes the antagonist removes the story’s opposition. Consider what your reveal leaves behind. If the surprise means the thing your protagonist has been fighting was never real, you have to supply a replacement immediately, and a substitute villain introduced in the third act has no relationship with anybody. The general principle is that a reveal should reorganize the reader’s understanding of what they have already seen, not delete it. A good twist makes you want to reread the first half. This one makes the first half retroactively pointless, because the menace you were responding to was a performance by somebody with no stake in the plot. Test yours by asking what the reader still cares about five minutes after the surprise lands. If the honest answer is nothing, the reveal has cost more than it bought.

↑ All Films

2. Thor: The Dark World (2013)

► Read the full review of Thor: The Dark World (2013)

2013 · Alan Taylor
⭐ 6/10
Chris Hemsworth

“You must be truly desperate to come to me for help.”

The one people write off, and the reason to keep it is that it is the last Thor film to treat Asgard as a real place with a family living in it.

The Thor and Loki material is the best two-hander in the franchise to that point. They cannot trust each other, they need each other, and Hiddleston and Hemsworth play a relationship with genuine history rather than banter. The prison sequence, and what happens to Frigga, give both of them something to carry.

The Dark Elves are a weakness and the film knows what it has. Malekith is a plot requirement with no interiority, and the picture routes around him by keeping its attention on the family. What follows in Ragnarok is more entertaining and it discards all of this, and something real was lost in the trade.

Frigga’s funeral is the best sequence in the film and one of the few genuinely beautiful things in the franchise. A boat, a burning arrow, and a silent procession of lights going out over water, with no dialogue and no explanation of the ritual. The film trusts the image, which it does almost nowhere else.

Alan Taylor came from television and shot Asgard as a place with weather and mud in it, which is a real departure from the gleaming version in the first film. The nine realms feel inhabited rather than designed, and the ships and armor look like objects somebody built rather than rendered.

The 6 is right for a film with a superb middle and nothing at either end. It opens on exposition about a substance and ends with a portal fight in Greenwich, and between those two obligations there is an hour about a family that has lost somebody and cannot agree on what to do next. That hour is worth the price.

For WritersWhen your antagonist is thin, build the film on a relationship instead of on the conflict. This one survives a functional villain because the two brothers at its center want incompatible things and cannot separate. Readers forgive a weak opposition, and they do not forgive a weak center. The practical move is to identify which pairing in your cast generates scenes without effort, and then route the plot through it. If two characters can carry a conversation that is interesting regardless of what the story needs from them, that is your spine, and the external threat becomes a device for putting them in rooms together. Note also what this film does with a death. Frigga dies to give both brothers something they cannot argue about, and the funeral is placed where a battle would normally go.

↑ All Films

3. Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014)

► Read the full review of Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014)

2014 · The Russo Brothers
⭐ 8.5/10
Chris Evans

“The price of freedom is high. It always has been. And it’s a price I’m willing to pay.”

The best film in the franchise and the one that proved these could be something other than superhero films. The Russo brothers made a 1970s paranoid conspiracy thriller, cast Robert Redford in it deliberately, and built the plot on an institution that has been compromised from inside for decades.

Everything is legible. The fights are close, physical and short, the lift sequence is staged with real geography, and Rogers spends the film unable to work out who he can tell. The reveal is not that a villain has infiltrated an agency, it is that the agency was built to be infiltrated and the distinction is the whole point.

It also does the hardest thing the franchise has attempted, which is to permanently change the world of the other films. S.H.I.E.L.D. is dismantled, and the consequence propagates outward into everything that follows. Almost nothing after Phase 2 was willing to break its own furniture like this.

The politics are more specific than the franchise usually permits. Zola’s plan is not conquest, it is an algorithm that identifies people who will become threats and removes them before they act, sold to the public as security. That is an argument about preemption made in 2014 by a film that is otherwise about a man with a shield, and it has not dated at all.

The action design is a deliberate rejection of what came before. No portals, no armies, no third-act sky beam. The largest set piece is three flying aircraft, and the film’s most memorable fight is two men on a motorway with knives. Restraint at that scale is a choice somebody had to defend in a meeting.

The 8.5 is the highest score on this site for any Marvel film and the number is defensible on any viewing. What keeps it from being higher is the last twenty minutes, which resolve into three aircraft and a countdown, and the Bucky material, which is doing more heavy lifting than the film has established.

For WritersA thriller works when the protagonist’s problem is that he cannot trust the people who would normally help him. Isolation is the engine. Give your character an institution, make it the wrong institution, and every scene where he considers asking for help becomes a scene with tension in it. The second thing this film does that is worth stealing: the conspiracy is not a small group inside a good organization, it is the organization, which means there is no clean version to restore at the end. That is why dismantling S.H.I.E.L.D. is the only available resolution and why it costs something. When you build a corrupted institution, decide early whether it can be saved, because a story that reveals rot and then repairs it in a chapter has told the reader the rot was decorative.

↑ All Films

4. Guardians of the Galaxy (2014)

► Read the full review of Guardians of the Galaxy (2014)

2014 · James Gunn
⭐ 6.5/10
Chris Pratt

“I am Groot.”

James Gunn took characters almost nobody had heard of and made the highest-risk film of the run, and the thing that makes it work is that the comedy is built on damage rather than on quips.

Every one of the five is grieving something. Quill has a cassette from a dead mother he ran from, Drax has a family he could not protect, Rocket was made, Gamora was taken, Groot is the only one with nothing to prove. That is why the jokes land, because the audience is watching people deflect.

The bar scene where Rocket explains what was done to him, drunk and furious, is the moment the film shows what it is. Gunn kept finding that note for a decade, and the third film is built almost entirely on it.

The needle drops are the most copied element and the least interesting one. What makes the soundtrack work is that it is diegetic and it belongs to a specific person, a cassette made by a dying woman for a child, which means every song carries the same fact whether or not the scene mentions it.

Ronan is the weakness and the film is honest about it. He is a zealot with a hammer, established in dialogue rather than in behavior, and the picture defeats him with a dance-off because it has correctly worked out that nobody in the audience is invested in him as a threat.

The 6.5 is a fair reading of a film that is enormously likeable and structurally ordinary. It is a heist, a prison break, a chase and a sky battle over an orb, arranged competently, carried entirely by five people whose damage is more interesting than the plot moving them around.

For WritersComedy and grief run on the same fuel. A character who deflects with jokes tells the reader exactly what they are avoiding, and the pattern becomes characterization without a word of explanation. The rule is that the joke has to cost something to make. Watch which of these five is funny and when. Quill is funniest when he is most frightened, Rocket is funniest when he is closest to saying something true, and Drax is funny because he cannot deflect at all, which makes him the one who says the unbearable thing out loud. That is four distinct comic registers derived from four distinct wounds, and none of them required a joke writer. Build the damage first and the humor allocates itself.

↑ All Films

5. Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)

► Read the full review of Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)

2015 · Joss Whedon
⭐ 8/10
Robert Downey Jr.

“Everyone creates the thing they dread.”

The most argued-about film in the franchise and the one that has aged best, because its subject turned out to be the correct one. Stark builds an intelligence to protect the world, it examines the world, and it concludes that the problem is the people in it.

Ultron is not a malfunction. He is working correctly, he has read everything, and he has drawn a conclusion the film cannot refute on the evidence. James Spader plays him as somebody delighted by his own reasoning, which is far more disturbing than a machine that hates.

The evacuation is the answer the film gives, and it is the best thing in it. The Avengers spend the entire third act moving civilians rather than winning, and Rogers states the position plainly: they do not trade lives. A blockbuster whose climax is an evacuation is making an argument, and the argument holds up considerably better than the ones that followed it.

For WritersGive your antagonist a conclusion the story cannot easily refute and you have a real opposition instead of an obstacle. Ultron is correct about the diagnosis and wrong about the treatment, which forces the protagonists to argue rather than simply to fight.

↑ All Films

6. Ant-Man (2015)

► Read the full review of Ant-Man (2015)

2015 · Peyton Reed
Score to come
Paul Rudd

“Pick on somebody your own size.”

Unscored for now, because I have not seen it. The score will be added here once I have, and the entry stands as the sixth film of the phase in the meantime.

What is on the record is a troubled development. Edgar Wright had been attached for close to a decade, wrote it with Joe Cornish, and left over creative differences shortly before production, with Peyton Reed taking over an existing schedule.

It is also the phase’s deliberate scale correction, arriving directly after a film about an artificial intelligence dropping a city, and choosing instead a heist in a house. Whether that lands is somebody else’s judgment.

What is worth noting from outside is the shape of the compromise. Wright and Cornish retain a story credit, so the bones are theirs, and the film that reached cinemas is a different director executing an existing plan. The franchise repeated that arrangement several times and the results are consistently competent and rarely distinctive.

It also completes the phase’s pattern. Every Phase 2 film has a filmmaker with a recognizable sensibility attached to it, and this is the one where the sensibility was removed late and the schedule was kept. That is the version of the process that Phase 4 industrialized.

The heist structure is also the smallest thing the franchise had attempted since the first Iron Man, arriving directly after a film in which a city is lifted into the sky, and the deliberate contraction is a decision worth respecting whatever the execution.

For WritersA departing director this late is one of the clearest signals in production. The schedule, sets and cast are fixed, which means the replacement is executing somebody else’s preparation. When you inherit a project, the honest question is which decisions are already load-bearing and which you are still permitted to make. The writing equivalent is taking over a manuscript, or returning to your own abandoned draft after years. The temptation is to rewrite the voice and keep the structure, and it is almost always the wrong way round. Structure is where a previous version’s assumptions are buried, and a story built to arrive at a conclusion you no longer believe in will fight you on every page while the sentences read perfectly well.

↑ Back to Film Navigation

Phase 2 averages 6.80 across the five films scored, with a range from 5 to 8.5. Two entries, The Winter Soldier at 8.5 and Age of Ultron at 8, are as good as anything the franchise has produced. One, Iron Man 3 at 5, is the first film in the run that trades a working antagonist for a joke.

The formula the phase found is the one everything afterward used: a distinctive filmmaker, a genre other than superhero, and a shared threat established at the edges. It worked twice here at the highest level. Phase 3 is where the shared threat stops being at the edges and starts driving, and the average falls again to 5.40.

The Essays Behind These Ratings

The ratings on this page come out of a longer argument about what the franchise did to itself. These essays set it out.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MCU Phase 2?
The six films from 2013 to 2015: Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Guardians of the Galaxy, Avengers: Age of Ultron and Ant-Man.
Which is the best Phase 2 film?
Captain America: The Winter Soldier at 8.5, which is the highest score any Marvel film carries on this site. The Russo brothers made a 1970s paranoid conspiracy thriller and cast Robert Redford in it deliberately.
Why is Age of Ultron underrated?
Because its climax is an evacuation. The Avengers spend the third act moving civilians instead of winning, and Ultron’s diagnosis of humanity is one the film cannot easily refute, which makes him an argument instead of an obstacle.
What went wrong with Iron Man 3?
The Mandarin reversal removes the antagonist the audience had been taking seriously and replaces him with a joke, which leaves the last act with nothing to be about except an army of empty suits.
What did Phase 2 establish?
The formula everything afterward used: a distinctive filmmaker, a genre other than superhero, and a shared threat kept at the edges. It worked twice here at the highest level.
What can writers learn from Phase 2?
Build on the relationship that generates scenes without effort, give your antagonist a conclusion the story cannot easily refute, and remember that a twist removing your villain also removes your opposition.



GenresSuperhero

🏷︎ Film List🏷︎ MCU🏷︎ Superhero Films