Latest
SMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableFree BooksJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends On

Excalibur (1981)

TL;DR: Excalibur (1981) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. John Boorman directed it. What makes the film unusual is that Boorman shoots the legend as the legend instead of as a historical drama.
Excalibur (1981)
9 / 10

Official trailer

Excalibur is the definitive screen adaptation of the Arthurian legend and one of the strangest mainstream studio films of the 1980s.

John Boorman directed it. Nigel Terry plays Arthur. Helen Mirren plays Morgana. Nicol Williamson plays Merlin and steals every scene he’s in. Nicholas Clay plays Lancelot. Cherie Lunghi plays Guinevere. Liam Neeson plays Gawain. Patrick Stewart plays Leondegrance. Gabriel Byrne plays Uther Pendragon. The film traces the entire Arthurian cycle from Uther’s conception of Arthur through the death at Avalon, compressed into two hours and twenty minutes. (See also my tribute to Sir Patrick Stewart, who played Leondegrance)

What makes the film unusual is that Boorman shoots the legend as the legend instead of as a historical drama. The armor is too shiny. The forests are too green. Knights talk in archaic English.

Merlin is magical and behaves like a being from outside the world. The film is closer to a Wagner opera than to a costume drama, and it succeeds because Boorman commits completely to that tone.

Excalibur is gloriously overcooked, and I adore it for that. Every knight shines like a polished teapot, everybody talks like a Victorian poem read aloud, and Nicol Williamson wanders through it all like a cranky god on loan from another picture. Plenty of films have tried to be this sincere about Arthur, and none of the ones I know commit this hard.

The Visual Style

Almost every shot of Excalibur is over-lit. The armor reflects light constantly, the forests glow with mist and moss, and stone walls drip with water that catches color. The film looks like a stained glass window of the medieval period, and I think that’s exactly right, because Boorman is filming the myth and has no interest in the era. I’d frame half these shots and hang them on a wall.

The famous Charge of the Knights to the score of Carl Orff’s Carmina Burana is among the most ecstatic sequences in 1980s cinema. The use of the music is so iconic that it’s been parodied for decades, but the original sequence still hits because Boorman shoots it as the spiritual climax of Arthur’s reign instead of as a battle scene.

That charge is pure exhilaration for me. Decades of parodies haven’t dented it, because Boorman means every frame, and when the chorus comes in I’m grinning from ear to ear.

For Writers

Stylistic commitment separates Excalibur from the dozens of forgotten Arthurian films. Boorman chose a tone and held it. The film never blinks toward realism. The over-lit armor is the worldview. The lesson is that you can take a stylistic risk if you commit to it completely. Half-commitments read as confused. Full commitments read as artistic vision.

The Cast

Nigel Terry is a strange choice for Arthur and the strangeness works. He’s not the leading-man Arthur of other adaptations. He’s uncertain, then certain, then exhausted. He grows old credibly. By the final act he looks like a man who has been carrying a kingdom too long.

Helen Mirren’s Morgana is the closest thing the film has to a villain, but Mirren plays her as a woman who has been wronged and is also dangerous.

Nicol Williamson’s Merlin is the showpiece performance. He plays the wizard as alien, ancient, and exhausted with humanity but unable to stop intervening. Half of the great lines in the film go to him and he delivers them with a kind of weary wonder that no other Merlin performance has matched.

Williamson is my favorite Merlin by a mile. He’s funny, cranky and a little frightening, and the film sags a little whenever he’s offscreen. That sag is the one thing keeping it from a 10 for me.

For Writers

An ancient, magical character is hard to write because the audience can spot a wise old man cliché within three lines. Nicol Williamson’s Merlin works because the script lets him be irritated, tired, and occasionally wrong. He’s not a sage giving exposition. He’s a person who has lived too long. The lesson is that supernatural characters need limits, flaws, and exhaustion if they’re going to feel real. Power without weakness reads as plot device.

The Adaptation

Boorman compressed Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur into a single film. The Round Table forms and falls within ninety minutes. The Grail Quest takes one sequence. Mordred kills Arthur in the third act. Important sub-stories are missing entirely. Tristan and Isolde don’t appear. Most of the Round Table knights are nameless.

I think the compression is a strength. Boorman treats the Arthur story as ritual instead of plot. The audience is presumed to know the basic shape, and the film’s job is to make you feel the meaning of what happens. Losing Tristan and Isolde doesn’t bother me at all, because the speed gives the whole rise and fall the feel of a fever dream.

For Writers

Familiar source material allows compression that original material doesn’t. The audience for Excalibur already knew the Round Table would form and fall. Boorman didn’t have to explain. He could shoot the formation and the fall and skip the connective tissue. The lesson is that working with myth, legend, or canonical source material gives you permission to leave more implied than you could in an original story. Use that permission.

Craft Note

John Boorman directed and co-wrote. Nigel Terry as Arthur. Helen Mirren as Morgana. Nicol Williamson as Merlin. Cherie Lunghi as Guinevere. Nicholas Clay as Lancelot. Liam Neeson as Gawain. Patrick Stewart as Leondegrance. Gabriel Byrne as Uther. Adapted from Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur. Filmed in Ireland. Released April 1981. Carmina Burana by Carl Orff used throughout, along with Wagner. Costume design by Bob Ringwood. Approximately eleven million dollar budget.

Does Excalibur still hold up?

9/10. It’s the best film adaptation of the Arthurian cycle and the strangest big studio picture of the early 1980s, and I wouldn’t trade a single overlit frame of it. Boorman’s commitment to the mythic tone is the achievement, and Williamson’s Merlin is the performance I remember first. The point it drops comes from those stretches without him. Watch it on a large screen with good speakers.

Frequently Asked Questions

How faithful is Excalibur to Le Morte d’Arthur?
Reasonably. Compressed and reordered, but the major events of Le Morte d’Arthur are present. Some sub-stories are cut entirely.
Who is Nicol Williamson?
A Scottish actor with major theatrical credentials and a smaller film career. His Merlin in Excalibur is his best-known screen performance. He died in 2011.
Is Liam Neeson really in Excalibur?
Yes, as Gawain. Early in his career. Patrick Stewart and Gabriel Byrne also have small roles.
How violent is Excalibur (1981)?
The film is bloody. Heads come off. The opening battle is brutal. It’s medieval combat played at full intensity, and it stops short of torture-level horror.
Why is the armor so shiny in Excalibur?
Deliberately over-shiny. Boorman wanted the knights to look like icons. It works visually. It also drove the actors crazy because the armor was real and heavy.
How does Excalibur compare to other Arthur films?
Better than First Knight, King Arthur, and most of the others. Monty Python and the Holy Grail is in its own category. Excalibur is the definitive serious adaptation.
Is Excalibur (1981) worth watching?
Yes. Especially if you like Arthurian material.

Sources

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.