Excalibur (1981)

TL;DR: Excalibur (1981) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. John Boorman directed it. What makes the film unusual is that Boorman shoots the legend as the legend instead of as a historical drama.
Excalibur (1981)
9 / 10

Excalibur is the definitive screen adaptation of the Arthurian legend and one of the strangest mainstream studio films of the 1980s. John Boorman directed it. Nigel Terry plays Arthur. Helen Mirren plays Morgana. Nicol Williamson plays Merlin and steals every scene he is in. Nicholas Clay plays Lancelot. Cherie Lunghi plays Guinevere. Liam Neeson plays Gawain. Patrick Stewart plays Leondegrance. Gabriel Byrne plays Uther Pendragon. The film traces the entire Arthurian cycle from Uther’s conception of Arthur through the death at Avalon, compressed into two hours and twenty minutes.

What makes the film unusual is that Boorman shoots the legend as the legend instead of as a historical drama. The armor is too shiny. The forests are too green. Knights talk in archaic English. Merlin is genuinely magical and behaves like a being from outside the world. The film is closer to a Wagner opera than to a costume drama, and it succeeds because Boorman commits completely to that register.

The Visual Style

Almost every shot of Excalibur is over-lit. The armor reflects light constantly. The forests glow with mist and moss. Stone walls drip with water that catches color. The film does not look like the medieval period. It looks like a stained glass window of the medieval period. This is a deliberate aesthetic choice and it is the right one. Boorman is filming the myth, not the era.

The famous Charge of the Knights to the score of Carl Orff’s Carmina Burana is one of the most ecstatic sequences in 1980s cinema. The use of the music is so iconic that it has been parodied for decades, but the original sequence still hits because Boorman shoots it as the spiritual climax of Arthur’s reign instead of as a battle scene.

For Writers

Stylistic commitment is what separates Excalibur from the dozens of forgotten Arthurian films. Boorman chose a register and held it. The film never blinks toward realism. The over-lit armor is not a mistake. It is the worldview. The lesson is that you can take a stylistic risk if you commit to it completely. Half-commitments read as confused. Full commitments read as artistic vision.

The Cast

Nigel Terry is a strange choice for Arthur and the strangeness works. He is not the leading-man Arthur of other adaptations. He is uncertain, then certain, then exhausted. He grows old credibly. By the final act he looks like a man who has been carrying a kingdom too long.

Helen Mirren’s Morgana is the closest thing the film has to a villain, but Mirren plays her as a woman who has been wronged and is also genuinely dangerous. Nicol Williamson’s Merlin is the showpiece performance. He plays the wizard as alien, ancient, and exhausted with humanity but unable to stop intervening. Half of the great lines in the film go to him and he delivers them with a kind of weary wonder that no other Merlin performance has matched.

For Writers

An ancient, magical character is hard to write because the audience can spot a wise old man cliché within three lines. Nicol Williamson’s Merlin works because the script lets him be irritated, tired, and occasionally wrong. He is not a sage giving exposition. He is a person who has lived too long. The lesson is that supernatural characters need limits, flaws, and exhaustion if they are going to feel real. Power without weakness reads as plot device.

The Adaptation

Boorman compressed Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur into a single film. The Round Table forms and falls within ninety minutes. The Grail Quest takes one sequence. Mordred kills Arthur in the third act. Important sub-stories are missing entirely. Tristan and Isolde do not appear. Most of the Round Table knights are nameless.

This is a feature, not a bug. Boorman is treating the Arthur story as ritual instead of as plot. The audience is presumed to know the basic shape. The film’s job is not to tell you what happens. It is to make you feel the meaning of what happens. Compressed mythology benefits from speed.

For Writers

Familiar source material allows compression that original material does not. The audience for Excalibur already knew the Round Table would form and fall. Boorman did not have to explain. He could shoot the formation and the fall and skip the connective tissue. The lesson is that working with myth, legend, or canonical source material gives you permission to leave more implied than you could in an original story. Use that permission.

Craft Note

John Boorman directed and co-wrote. Nigel Terry as Arthur. Helen Mirren as Morgana. Nicol Williamson as Merlin. Cherie Lunghi as Guinevere. Nicholas Clay as Lancelot. Liam Neeson as Gawain. Patrick Stewart as Leondegrance. Gabriel Byrne as Uther. Adapted from Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur. Filmed in Ireland. Released April 1981. Carmina Burana by Carl Orff used throughout, along with Wagner. Costume design by Bob Ringwood. Approximately eleven million dollar budget.

The Verdict

9/10. The best film adaptation of the Arthurian cycle and one of the strangest large studio films of the early 1980s. Boorman’s commitment to the mythic register is the achievement. Williamson’s Merlin is one of the great supporting performances of the period. Watch it on a large screen with good speakers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it accurate to Malory?
Reasonably. Compressed and reordered, but the major events of Le Morte d’Arthur are present. Some sub-stories are cut entirely.
Who is Nicol Williamson?
A Scottish actor with major theatrical credentials and a smaller film career. His Merlin in Excalibur is his best-known screen performance. He died in 2011.
Is Liam Neeson really in it?
Yes, as Gawain. Early in his career. Patrick Stewart and Gabriel Byrne also have small roles.
Is the gore as bad as people say?
The film is bloody. Heads come off. The opening battle is brutal. It is not torture-level horror. It is medieval combat played at full intensity.
What’s with the armor?
Deliberately over-shiny. Boorman wanted the knights to look like icons, not like soldiers. It works visually. It also drove the actors crazy because the armor was real and heavy.
How does it compare to other Arthur films?
Better than First Knight, King Arthur, and most of the others. Monty Python and the Holy Grail is in its own category. Excalibur is the definitive serious adaptation.
Should I watch this?
Yes. Especially if you like Arthurian material.