Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

Men in Black: International (2019)

TL;DR: Men in Black: International (2019) rates 4 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Men in Black: International is the franchise reboot that replaced Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones with Chris Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson. Art Marcum and Matt Holloway wrote.
Men in Black: International (2019)
4 / 10

Official trailer

Men in Black: International is the franchise reboot that replaced Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones with Chris Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson.

F. Gary Gray directed. Art Marcum and Matt Holloway wrote. Tessa Thompson plays Agent M, a young woman who has spent decades searching for the MIB after encountering them as a child. Chris Hemsworth plays Agent H, a senior London MIB operative whose past success against an alien invasion hasn’t aged well. Liam Neeson plays High T, the London branch head.

Rebecca Ferguson plays Riza Stavros, an arms dealer. Kumail Nanjiani voices Pawny, a chess-piece-sized alien sidekick. The plot involves a stolen alien weapon, a mole inside MIB, and the eventual reveal that High T is the antagonist.

A long sigh is about all I can muster for this one. I liked the 1997 original a great deal, and this reboot kept the name and lost the personality. Hemsworth and Thompson are likable performers stuck in a script that never figured out why it was being made, and I spent most of the running time waiting for the film to give them something to do.

The film made approximately two hundred and fifty-three million dollars worldwide on a one hundred and ten million dollar budget. The commercial performance was disappointing for Sony Pictures. The reviews were largely negative. The studio considered the franchise dormant after release. Later MIB content has been limited. The film is one of the clearer examples of a franchise reboot that prioritized demographic recasting over the property’s actual creative DNA.

What Made It a Woke Disaster

The film’s central commitment is replacing the Smith-Jones pairing with a woman and an attractive male partner. The replacement is the production’s main creative choice. The script doesn’t develop a new reason for an MIB film to exist.

The film exists because Sony wanted a diverse MIB cast and built a film around the wanting. Agent M’s introduction sequence positions her as the underestimated woman who has been smarter than the men around her since childhood.

Her first scene at MIB headquarters has her recruited because she doesn’t fit the agency’s traditional profile. The framing is that the agency needed the diverse hire to function properly.

The High T reveal is the film’s clearest ideological statement.

Neeson’s character is set up as Agent H’s mentor and the moral center of the London branch, and the third act reveals that the alien Hive has corrupted him. The structural argument is that the older, white, male authority figure can’t be trusted, and the diverse young team has to overcome him to save the world. I saw the twist coming the moment Neeson walked on as the kindly boss, and a reveal that surprises nobody isn’t worth much.

Agent M’s outsider perspective makes her able to see what the establishment can’t. The film argues that traditional MIB authority is the problem the new MIB has to fix.

Agent H, played by Hemsworth, is the film’s secondary ideological structure. H is set up as the legacy hero who needs to learn his glory days were overblown, and the film systematically dismantles his confidence. The audience learns that High T was the one who stopped the invasion and that H has been coasting on credit he didn’t earn. The waste hurts most. Hemsworth can be very funny, and the film spends his whole performance making him the punchline.

The new female lead has to teach him that his self-image is wrong.

For Writers

When a film exists to replace its predecessor’s protagonists with demographically different versions, the film inherits the burden of being interesting on its own terms. MIB International cast Hemsworth and Thompson, framed both characters in opposition to the previous male leads’ implicit politics, and didn’t give the new film its own reason for being. The lesson is that replacement narratives need to do more than replace. They need to make a case for the new characters as people worth following. Casting alone can’t make that case.

The London Waste

The decision to relocate the franchise to London is interesting and undeveloped. The 1997 MIB was about New York’s relationship with strange visitors. The London branch concept could have produced a film about how a different city handles the same situations. British MIB could have had different procedures, different cultural assumptions, different relationships with the alien populations living there.

The film doesn’t develop the London identity. The setting is mostly decorative. The London office looks like the New York office, and the British operatives behave like the American ones. The film could have been set anywhere. That’s nearly as disappointing, because a British MIB with its own procedures and its own aliens is a movie I’d have loved to see, and this one just parks the old formula in a new city.

For Writers

A setting change in a franchise should produce content specific to the new setting. International moved MIB to London without using London. The setting is decoration instead of substance. The lesson is that location matters in fiction. If your story moves to a new place, the new place should affect the story. Different cities have different cultures, vocabularies, and dynamics. Use them.

The Pawny Problem

Kumail Nanjiani’s Pawny is the film’s attempt at a memorable sidekick character. Pawny is a chess-piece-sized alien who attaches himself to Agent M as her loyal servant.

The character is intended to fill the role Frank the Pug filled in the original. Nanjiani is a skilled comedic performer. The Pawny character doesn’t work because the script gives him generic loyal-sidekick material instead of specific characterization.

The original Frank the Pug worked because he was a distinct character, an alien who had become a New York pug in his behavior, and the contrast between his appearance and his identity produced real comedy.

Pawny is just a small alien with a sword. The audience never learns what kind of person he is. He’s a function instead of a character. I like Nanjiani a lot, and it’s painful to watch a comedian that sharp handed nothing but loyal-servant lines.

For Writers

A comedic sidekick needs characterization beyond their structural function. International’s Pawny is a sidekick without a personality. The character delivers lines but doesn’t have a distinct voice. The lesson is that supporting characters need their own interiors even when their narrative purpose is small. Give the character quirks, opinions, and inconsistencies. A character is a person instead of a job description.

Craft Note

The Marrakech market chase is the film’s strongest individual action passage. Agent H and Agent M pursue alien arms-deal participants through a North African souk while attempting to maintain civilian-population cover. The sequence stages comedy and action together with specific spatial coherence. The Marrakech passage shows that F. Gary Gray (Friday 1995, The Italian Job 2003, Straight Outta Compton 2015) had craft to spare for action geography. The sequence is what an MIB International film built around specific international settings could have delivered consistently.

The rest of the film doesn’t match the Marrakech passage’s confidence.

Should you skip Men in Black: International?

4/10. The demographic recasting didn’t generate the brand revival the production hoped for, and I don’t think it could have, because casting was the only idea anyone brought. The Marrakech chase is the one stretch where I was having a good time, and it shows what this film might have been with a script behind it. The High T reveal and the Agent H dismantling are its ideological commitments, and neither one is any fun to watch. Watch the 1997 original instead.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tessa Thompson good?
Yes. Thompson’s performance is committed. The script doesn’t always give her the strongest material.
How is Chris Hemsworth?
Competent. The role doesn’t use the himbo comedy strength his Thor: Ragnarok performance showed. The casting was correct. The role wasn’t optimized for what he does best.
Will there be another MIB film?
Sony hasn’t announced future MIB projects since International. The franchise is currently dormant.
How does Men in Black: International compare to the 1997 original?
Significantly weaker. The 1997 MIB is one of the better science fiction comedies of its decade.
What about MIB 3?
Men in Black 3 (2012) was the strongest of the sequels. The franchise probably should have continued the Smith and Jones continuity instead of rebooting with new leads.
Who is F. Gary Gray?
American director. His earlier films were generally more successful than MIB International.
Is Men in Black: International worth watching?
For the Marrakech sequence, yes. As a complete film, lower priority than the 1997 original.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.