Latest
What an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionResurrection as a Narrative StructureBooks to Give a WriterThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Show Don’t Tell

Alice in Wonderland (1951) Review

TL;DR: Alice in Wonderland (1951) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Disney’s Lewis Carroll adaptation: a string of brilliant, strange encounters with no real story holding them together. It flopped in 1951, Walt thought it had no heart, and college students rediscovered it in the sixties. It’s wonderful.
Alice in Wonderland (1951)
9 / 10

Alice in Wonderland is the strangest Disney film of its era, and I love it. It’s all episodes, one mad encounter after another, and it looks like nothing else the studio made.

Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson and Hamilton Luske directed it, and it came out in 1951. It lost money, and Walt Disney himself said it had no heart. It’s a 9.

The Source

Disney had wanted to make Alice since the thirties. It took Lewis Carroll’s two books, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass, and stitched their best scenes together. It keeps the nonsense and loses the logic puzzles, and it doesn’t try to be faithful.

The Premise

Alice is bored at a lesson, follows a rabbit down a hole and spends the rest of the film trying to find her way out of a place where nothing makes sense. There’s no villain until the Queen of Hearts, and no plan except getting home.

The Cast

Kathryn Beaumont voices Alice, polite and increasingly cross. Ed Wynn is the Mad Hatter and Jerry Colonna is the March Hare, and the tea party is one of the funniest scenes Disney ever made. Sterling Holloway is the Cheshire Cat, Richard Haydn the Caterpillar, and Verna Felton the Queen of Hearts, who wants everyone’s head off.

The Animation Approach

Mary Blair’s color designs give it a flat, bright, modern look, and the animators let the strangeness show. The Walrus and the Carpenter, the flowers who sing and sneer and the Tulgey Wood full of odd creatures are as imaginative as anything the studio did.

The Initial Commercial Disappointment

It flopped in 1951, and Walt didn’t like it, because Alice has no emotional journey. That’s true, and it doesn’t matter. The film is a dream, and dreams don’t have arcs.

The Counterculture Reception

In the sixties, college students rediscovered it, and the hookah-smoking caterpillar and the melting colors made it a favorite for reasons Disney didn’t care to discuss. It’s been a classic ever since. Tim Burton’s 2010 remake made a fortune and lost almost everything that made this one special.

Craft Note

Craft Note

Alice in Wonderland holds together with no plot at all. Each scene is a self-contained comedy, and the only thread is Alice’s growing wish to go home.

If your story is episodic, make every episode strong enough to stand alone, and give the reader one simple thread to follow through them.

Is Alice in Wonderland (1951) worth watching?

Yes. It’s a 9, one of Disney’s most inventive films and far better than its reputation at the time. Watch it for the tea party and the Cheshire Cat.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who directed Alice in Wonderland (1951)?
Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson and Hamilton Luske.
Is Disney’s Alice in Wonderland faithful to the books?
Loosely. It combines scenes from Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass.
Who voices Alice?
Kathryn Beaumont, who also voiced Wendy in Peter Pan.
Was Alice in Wonderland a success when it came out?
No. It lost money in 1951, and Walt Disney felt it lacked heart. It became popular after its rediscovery in the sixties.
Who plays the Mad Hatter in the 1951 film?
Ed Wynn.
What is the Walrus and the Carpenter in Alice in Wonderland?
A story told by Tweedledum and Tweedledee about a walrus who tricks young oysters into being eaten.
Is Alice in Wonderland (1951) better than the 2010 remake?
Yes. Tim Burton’s version was a huge hit, but the 1951 film is the more original and inventive work.

This film appears on 2 of my film lists