Latest
It’s Not X, It’s Y: The AI Tell Shakespeare Wrote FirstWho Gets Rich From AI Data Centers? The Local, National and Global EconomyAre AI Data Centers Bad for the Environment? What’s True and What Isn’tAI Data Centers and Geopolitics: Chips, China, Spies and PowerAI Derangement Syndrome: Who Cares If the Cover Was Made With AI?How to Write a Plot Twist Readers Never See ComingBook Ads Getting Clicks but No Sales? The Problem Is the PageCan Writing a Memoir Make You Sick? The Toll Nobody Warns You AboutWhen Caregiving Ends and the Words Won’t ComeCan You Publish a Clean and a Spicy Version of the Same Book?Do You Need a Writing Buddy? What Works and What Doesn’tCan You Put Someone Who Wronged You in Your Novel?Kindle Unlimited or Wide? Where to Publish Your Debut NovelWriting Vampires: How to Build Your Own Vampire RulesWhat Software Do Novelists Use to Write a Book?What If Your Family Doesn’t Support Your Writing?ARC Reviews: Real Follow-Through Numbers, and Do Reviews Sell Books?The AI Singularity: Would a Conscious AI Even Care About Us?“Forbidden” AI Prompts: Why Viral Prompt Lists Are Mostly JunkAuthor Scam Emails: Fake Agents, Flattery and the $500 PitchWill AI Steal My Book? Turn Off Training Before You UploadThe Fear of Being Judged for Your Memoir: My Father Told Everyone to Burn MineShould You Only Use “Said” in Dialogue Tags? My Rules for Tags and AdverbsWhy a Good Book Isn’t Enough: Agents, Quiet Novels and What SellsShe Asked How to Format Her Comic for KDP. The Thread Went to War Over AI.Why Are Writing Groups So Hostile?My Ghostwriter Stopped Responding. What Do I Do?My Ghostwriter Missed the Deadline. What Are My Options?I Hate My Ghostwriter’s First Draft. Now What?Can I Get a Refund From a Ghostwriter?How Many Revisions Should a Ghostwriter Include?Can My Ghostwriter List My Book in Their Portfolio?My Family Doesn’t Want Me to Publish My Ghostwritten Memoir. Now What?Should a Ghostwriter Write a Free Sample Chapter?How Much Does a Ghostwriter Take Up Front?Can a Ghostwriter Get Me a Book Deal or a Literary Agent?Can I Work With a Ghostwriter Over Zoom or From Another Country?Ghostwriting a Tribute Book, Eulogy or Obituary for Someone You LostCan a Ghostwriter Write My Book in Spanish?Ghostwriting a Book for a Dental or Chiropractic PracticeWhy Keynote Speakers Need a Ghostwritten BookGhostwriting a Science or Research Book for General ReadersGhostwriting a Book for Teachers and EducatorsHiring a Ghostwriter for a Pilot’s or Aviation MemoirHiring a Ghostwriter for a Musician’s MemoirCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Whistleblower Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for an Immigrant’s StoryCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write About Losing Someone to Suicide?Can a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Depression or Mental Illness Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for a Special-Needs Parent’s Memoir

Horror Films Part 8 – The Flawed

Part 8 – The Flawed

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Failures

Most of this tier is the vampire film working through its own variations. Hammer takes Carmilla at face value, Morrissey makes Dracula an invalid who can’t keep anything down, Blacula gives the count an African prince with a legitimate grievance, and Vampire’s Kiss removes the vampire entirely and leaves a man who has decided he’s one.

The strongest entries build a rule with a victim attached. The Hunger keeps its discarded companions conscious in coffins for centuries, and Underworld gets more from elders sleeping in rotation than any amount of chronicle would have given it.

I’m fond of this tier, and it also frustrates me.

Every film here had somebody with a real idea, and nearly all of them let it leak away somewhere between the first act and the last. That leak is why they sit in Part 8. I’ll still take a vampire picture that swings at something odd and misses over a polished one that never swings at all, and this batch is full of odd swings worth your evening.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the eighth of nine parts.

Count Yorga gives a centuries-old vampire a lease and a telephone, and Underworld builds its politics on elders who sleep in rotation. Do the paperwork in the World Builder’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. The Transfiguration (2016) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Transfiguration (2016)

2016
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.9/10

"Both readings stay open from the first frame to the last."

Michael O’Shea made his first and so far only feature for almost no money in Queens, and the premise is a boy who may or may not be a vampire and who has certainly watched every vampire film ever made. He keeps a notebook of them, he ranks them by realism, and he’s strong opinions about which ones are lying to their audiences.

The film never settles what Milo is and that refusal is the whole design. He drinks blood on a schedule he’s worked out, he avoids sunlight because he’s decided to, and every supernatural element in the picture has a mundane explanation available alongside it that the film declines to rule out or confirm at any stage.

Eric Ruffin plays him with almost no affect at all and the performance is the reason the ambiguity survives. He’s a bereaved child living with a brother who has stopped functioning, he’s bullied by a local crew, and the vampirism reads equally well as pathology, as fantasy, or as a genuine condition he’s learned to manage alone.

The film’s argument is about how the genre lies. Milo criticizes Twilight for sentiment and praises Let the Right One In for honesty, and O’Shea uses a boy’s film criticism as a running commentary on the picture the audience is currently watching, a trick that should be unbearable and somehow isn’t.

Chloe Levine plays the girl who moves into the building and the relationship carries the second half. She has her own damage, she’s not a rescue, and the film is clear that two isolated children finding each other in a housing project doesn’t fix either of them or change anything about where they both live.

I liked this one a great deal. A kid ranking vampire movies by realism could have turned smug in a hurry, and O’Shea keeps it sad instead. My reservation is the same refusal that makes it work. By the end I wanted one scene that leaned harder in either direction, and the film won’t give it to me, so it left me admiring the discipline more than feeling the ending.

For WritersO’Shea gives every supernatural element a mundane explanation available alongside it and never rules either out. Milo drinks blood on a schedule he devised and avoids sunlight because he decided to. When you want ambiguity, the discipline is that both readings have to stay equally supported from the first page to the last. One detail favoring either side settles the question permanently, and readers will take the settlement and stop holding the alternative. The cost is that you can never write the scene that would confirm it, including the one your ending will ask for. Subtext in fiction covers the balance.

↑ All Entries

2. Abigail (2024) [full review]

► Read the full review of Abigail (2024)

2024
RLR: 7 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.5/10

"Professions instead of personalities, and then they are taken apart."

Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett made a kidnapping film that turns into something else, and the marketing gave away the turn in every trailer. A crew of criminals take a twelve-year-old ballerina for ransom, lock her in a house for twenty-four hours, and discover the arrangement is considerably less favorable than the fee suggested.

Alisha Weir was fourteen during production and carries the entire film once the premise arrives. She’s small, she’s delighted by the situation, and the film uses the ballet training throughout as choreography for the killing instead of as a decorative detail somebody added to the character during development.

The crew are the reason the first half works and each is given a profession instead of a personality. A hacker, a driver, a sniper, a muscle and a medic, all under assumed names taken from the Rat Pack, and the film establishes their competence before dismantling every bit of it methodically.

Melissa Barrera plays the medic and the film gives her a reason to protect the child. She has a son she’s not allowed to see, she talks to Abigail as a person instead of as cargo, and the picture treats the resulting bond as something the vampire is actively exploiting.

Dan Stevens is enjoying himself enormously as the crew’s least trustworthy member, and Giancarlo Esposito appears at both ends of the film as the man who set the job up. The gore is practical, extensive and closer to comedy than to horror once the situation has been fully established.

For WritersThe crew are given professions instead of personalities. A hacker, a driver, a sniper, a medic and a muscle, all under assumed names, and the film establishes what each can do before taking it away from them one at a time. When you need a group the reader can track quickly, assign function before character. A reader who knows what somebody is for can follow six people through a dark house without confusion, and the personality can arrive later through how each one fails. Most ensembles fail because the writer introduces interiority before utility, and the reader has nothing to hang the names on.

↑ All Entries

3. The Fearless Vampire Killers (1967) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Fearless Vampire Killers (1967)

1967
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"The rescuers carry the infection out of the mountains."

Polanski made a vampire comedy in the Carpathians that MGM recut, redubbed and released with a cartoon prologue he had nothing to do with, and he disowned the American version entirely. The European cut is the film he made and it’s considerably stranger than the one most audiences saw at the time.

The comedy is built on incompetence and the film commits to it fully. Professor Abronsius and his assistant are the worst vampire hunters ever put on screen, they arrive late to everything, and the professor spends the climax frozen in a bath while the situation resolves itself badly around him without his participation.

Ferdy Mayne plays Count von Krolock as aristocratic and a shade bored, and the castle ball is the sequence everybody remembers. A room full of the dead dancing, a mirror on the wall, and three living reflections moving through a crowd that casts none at all while the music continues.

Sharon Tate plays the innkeeper’s daughter and the film is difficult to watch now for reasons that have nothing to do with what is on screen. She’s funny in it, the bath sequence is played entirely for comedy, and Polanski married her the year after it was released.

The ending is the joke the whole film has been building toward. The hunters escape with the girl, congratulating themselves, and the last shot reveals they’ve carried the infection out of the mountains and into the world, spread by the people who came to eliminate it.

For WritersThe hunters escape, congratulate themselves, and the last shot reveals they’ve carried the infection out of the mountains themselves. The people who came to stop it are the delivery mechanism. When you write a rescue, ask what the rescuers are bringing with them on the way out. An ending where competent action produces the disaster is harder to construct than a defeat and considerably more durable, because the reader can’t locate the mistake anywhere. Nobody was careless. The plan worked exactly as designed and the result is worse than failure would have been. Plot devices that work covers the reversal.

↑ All Entries

4. The Vampire Lovers (1970) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Vampire Lovers (1970)

1970
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.3/10

"She means it, and the film is worse for that."

Roy Ward Baker adapted Sheridan Le Fanu’s Carmilla for Hammer, and the film is the most faithful screen version of a novella that predates Dracula by twenty-six years. The studio made it once the British censors had relaxed enough to permit what the source material had always been about.

Ingrid Pitt plays Carmilla and the casting is what the film survives on. She’s thirty-two, she’s entirely in command of every scene, and the performance treats the seduction as genuine affection instead of as predation, considerably more unsettling than the alternative would have been.

Hammer’s film is explicit about the relationships in a way the genre had avoided for fifty years, and Hammer was accused of exploitation on release. The accusation has some weight and the source material had the same content in 1872, the argument the studio made at the time.

Peter Cushing appears as the General and does what he always did and takes the material completely seriously. His daughter dies in the first act, his grief is played straight, and the film gains a register from him that nothing else in it quite reaches on its own.

Two further Karnstein films followed and neither has this one’s discipline. Lust for a Vampire and Twins of Evil both push harder on the content and lose the melancholy, and the trilogy is the clearest example of a studio discovering what sells and then selling only that.

Pitt is the reason I’d put this on, and Cushing’s grief is the reason I’d take it seriously.

I think the exploitation charge has some merit, though, and it sits awkwardly next to a film this good at melancholy. The sequels really irritate me. Hammer found out what sold and kept selling it until the sadness drained away, and I can’t think of a clearer case of a studio eating its own best idea.

For WritersPitt plays the seduction as genuine affection instead of as predation, and the film is considerably more unsettling for it. Carmilla means what she says to the people she’s killing. When you write a predator, ask whether the feeling has to be fake. A character who is pretending gives the reader a clean position to take. One who loves the person they’re destroying offers no such exit, because affection and harm are running through the same scenes and nothing separates them. It’s harder to write and it survives a second reading, and the manipulative version never does.

Carmilla means what she says to the people she’s killing, and Morrissey makes Dracula too weak to stand. Two subtractions that work, in the Antagonist Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. Count Yorga, Vampire (1970) [full review]

► Read the full review of Count Yorga, Vampire (1970)

1970
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.1/10

"A centuries-old vampire with a lease and a telephone."

Bob Kelljan wrote and directed a vampire film set in contemporary Los Angeles, and almost nobody was doing in 1970, and the picture was originally shot as softcore before Robert Quarry persuaded everybody involved to make it straight. The change is the reason it survives at all.

Quarry plays Yorga as a working occultist running seances in the Hollywood Hills, and the modern setting pays off. He’s an assistant, he’s a lease, he conducts business by telephone, and the film treats a centuries-old vampire as somebody who has adapted to a city with parking and a property market.

The best sequence is the one nobody expects. A woman is found in her apartment eating a kitten, in daylight, and the film holds on it without music or comment, and nothing before or after suggests the picture was capable of producing an image with that much unpleasantness in it.

The vampire brides are handled with unusual restraint for the period. They’re silent, they’re kept in a cellar, and Kelljan shoots them in fragments so the audience never gets a clean look at how many there are or what condition any of them have been left in.

For WritersKelljan puts a centuries-old vampire in contemporary Los Angeles and gives him a lease, an assistant and a telephone. The film treats adaptation as the interesting question instead of treating the modern setting as a joke. When you move an old creature into the present day, work out the paperwork. Property, employment, identity documents and utilities are where an immortal either becomes plausible or collapses into costume, and readers notice the absence long before they can name it. The mundane arrangements are what convince, and they cost you a paragraph each. World Builder’s Handbook covers the method.

↑ All Entries

6. Blacula (1972) [full review]

► Read the full review of Blacula (1972)

1972
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.9/10

"Marshall rewrote the part and gave the film a subject."

William Crain made the first major Black horror film and the premise is considerably better than the title suggests. An African prince visits Dracula in 1780 to petition against the slave trade, is turned and sealed in a coffin for his trouble, and wakes in Los Angeles in 1972 to find the city unrecognizable.

William Marshall was a classically trained Shakespearean actor and he rewrote the character himself. The original screenplay had a plantation background and Marshall insisted on the African prince and the anti-slavery petition, and the film therefore has a subject underneath the marketing at all. AIP financed and released it.

The performance is dignified and out of all proportion to the production around it. Marshall plays Mamuwalde as a man who has lost a civilization, a wife and two centuries, and the grief in it is played completely straight while everything else in the film isn’t. The Los Angeles material is the weaker half and the budget shows in most of it. The vampire makeup is minimal, the supporting cast are uneven, and the film moves between tragedy and blaxploitation convention without ever settling on which register it wants to finish in. The ending is the strongest thing in the film. Mamuwalde walks into sunlight instead of continue without the woman he believes is his wife returned, and Crain holds the decomposition long enough that it stops being an effect and becomes something considerably sadder than the film had earned.

Marshall is the reason I’d send anybody to this film. He took a cash-in and forced a real tragedy into it through sheer stubbornness, and that moves me more than anything the script does. The rest of the picture lets him down. Once the budget and the blaxploitation furniture take over, you can watch him carrying scenes that should be carrying him.

For WritersMarshall rewrote his own character, replacing a plantation background with an African prince petitioning Dracula against the slave trade. The change gave the film a subject underneath the marketing. When a performer or an editor pushes back on a character, the instinct is to defend what you wrote, and the more useful move is to ask what they can see that you cannot. Somebody who has to inhabit a part knows where it rings false in a way the person who invented it cannot, because you’ve been looking at your own reasons for writing it instead of at what is on the page.

↑ All Entries

7. Blood for Dracula (1974) [full review]

► Read the full review of Blood for Dracula (1974)

1974
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.0/10

"A Dracula too weak to keep anything down."

Paul Morrissey made it back to back with Flesh for Frankenstein using the same crew, the same locations and much of the same cast, and Andy Warhol’s name went on both. The result is the strangest Dracula adaptation anybody has committed to film. Both films were shot in Italy over a matter of weeks.

The premise is funny and entirely sustained. Dracula can only drink the blood of virgins, Romania has run out of them, and he travels to Catholic Italy with his servant looking for a family with daughters, where he’s repeatedly made violently ill by finding out he’s been misinformed.

Udo Kier plays him as a dying invalid instead of as a predator, the decision that makes the comedy work. He’s weak, he’s wheeled around, he vomits at length, and nothing about the performance asks an audience to find him frightening at any point.

Joe Dallesandro plays the estate handyman as an American Marxist with a Brooklyn accent and no attempt at anything else, and the class argument underneath the film is delivered entirely through him. The aristocracy is dying, he says so repeatedly, and the film agrees with him about it.

The last act is the most extreme thing in any Dracula film and the tone never breaks. Limbs are removed with an axe in a single location, the effects are crude, and Morrissey plays the whole sequence at the same deadpan pitch as everything preceding it.

For WritersMorrissey makes his Dracula an invalid. Kier is weak, wheeled around, repeatedly sick, and nothing in the performance asks an audience to find him frightening. The comedy comes from removing the power the character is famous for. When you take on a figure with a fixed reputation, the available move is to strip the attribute everybody arrives expecting. A weak Dracula, a cowardly detective or a clumsy assassin generates material immediately, because every scene is now about managing an absence the reader keeps noticing. The joke and the pathos come from the same subtraction. The reader spends the book watching an absence being managed.

↑ All Entries

8. The Hunger (1983) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Hunger (1983)

1983
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.6/10

"They do not die. They stay conscious in the attic."

Tony Scott made his first feature and it looks like nothing else in the genre, both the reason it was dismissed in 1983 and the reason it’s lasted. Smoke, backlight, slow dissolves and doves in interiors, with a Bauhaus performance over the opening credits.

The best idea in the film is the premise, and it’s cruel. Miriam’s companions don’t die, they age catastrophically over a matter of days while remaining conscious, and she keeps every one of them in coffins in the attic where they stay awake and aware indefinitely.

David Bowie plays the decline and it’s the best acting he did. John ages several decades across a single afternoon in a waiting room, the prosthetics by Dick Smith are extraordinary, and the sequence where he’s left waiting by a receptionist is the cruellest thing in the picture. Catherine Deneuve plays Miriam as somebody who has done this many times and grieves each time anyway, the note that stops the film being merely beautiful. She’s not lying to her companions about what will happen, she simply doesn’t tell them when it’s beginning.

Susan Sarandon plays the gerontologist and the film’s second half belongs to her. The research material is thin, the seduction is the sequence everybody discusses, and the ending was reshot against Scott’s wishes into something that resolves considerably less than the original cut did. Scott didn’t direct another horror film.

Bowie in that waiting room is the scene I’d hand anybody who claims horror can’t be sad. The film around him is gorgeous and a little hollow, and I think Scott cared more about the smoke and the doves than about Sarandon’s half. The reshot ending was a mistake. Scott didn’t want it, and a picture built on a cruel, permanent idea deserved the finish its director chose.

For WritersMiriam’s companions don’t die. They age catastrophically over days while staying conscious, and she keeps them in coffins in the attic where they remain aware indefinitely. The immortality has a permanent victim. When you design a supernatural arrangement, work out who it’s worst for and build the story around that person instead of the one who benefits. The powerful figure is the obvious protagonist and almost always the less interesting one, because they have options. The person the rules trap in a condition they can’t leave is where the actual material is, and most writers leave them offstage. Arcs versus wounds covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

9. Vampire’s Kiss (1988) [full review]

► Read the full review of Vampire’s Kiss (1988)

1988
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.3/10

"He buys the fangs from a shop. There is no vampire."

Robert Bierman made a film that was buried on release and has become the single most circulated source of Nicolas Cage footage on the internet. The alphabet scene, the cockroach and the sunglasses have all outlived any awareness of what the film around them is doing.

Peter isn’t a vampire and never becomes one, and that’s the premise. He’s a literary agent having a psychotic break, he buys plastic fangs from a shop, he sleeps under an upturned sofa, and every supernatural element in the picture is something the audience watches him invent for himself.

Cage’s performance is extraordinary and the reputation has done it real damage. He’s doing something deliberate and controlled about a man performing a breakdown he’s read about, and the physical work is closer to silent comedy than to anything the period was producing.

The treatment of Alva is the film’s actual subject and it’s considerably harder to watch than the comedy. Maria Conchita Alonso plays a secretary systematically terrorized by her employer over a misfiled contract, and the film is clear that this is the real violence in the picture.

He did eat a live cockroach and has discussed it for thirty-five years since. Bierman offered alternatives, Cage insisted, and the take used is the second of two because something going wrong with the camera interrupted the first during the only part nobody wanted to repeat.

For WritersPeter never becomes a vampire. He buys plastic fangs from a shop and the audience watches him assemble a supernatural explanation for his own collapse. The horror is that nothing supernatural is happening. When you write a character coming apart, the strongest version gives them a framework they choose instead of a condition imposed on them. A possession is something that happened to somebody. A man deciding he’s a vampire is somebody reaching for the only story that makes his behavior bearable to himself, and a reader recognizes that reaching from their own life. Why characters feel flat covers the distinction.

The Demeter is fixed before the first scene and The Fearless Vampire Killers has the rescuers carry the plague out. Build toward a known end in the Plot Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. Nadja (1994) [full review]

► Read the full review of Nadja (1994)

1994
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.9/10

"Shot on a toy camera because nothing else was affordable."

Michael Almereyda shot it in black and white on a mixture of film stock and a Fisher-Price PXL-2000 toy camera, and David Lynch executive produced and appears briefly as a morgue attendant. The result is a Dracula sequel set in downtown Manhattan among people who are mostly bored.

The toy camera footage is the film’s signature and it was a budget decision that became a style. Pixelvision produces a grainy, smeared, low-resolution image, Almereyda uses it for the vampire point of view sequences, and the effect is closer to memory than to anything the genre had tried.

Elina Lowensohn plays Nadja as exhausted by her own condition and by her family, and the narration is delivered in a flat affectless register throughout. She’s Dracula’s daughter, she’s tired of it, and the film treats the inheritance as a burden nobody consulted her about. Peter Fonda plays Van Helsing as a burnt-out eccentric who has been at this for decades and is clearly enjoying none of it. The performance is loose, the character is unreliable, and he’s the only person in the film with any energy about the situation at all.

For WritersAlmereyda shoots the vampire point of view on a Fisher-Price toy camera because he couldn’t afford anything else, and the smeared low-resolution image reads as memory instead of as vision. The limitation became the signature. When a constraint forces a technique on you, the useful question is what that technique is good at beyond saving money. Every restriction has a side effect, and the side effect is usually more interesting than the thing you were trying to do with a full budget. Writers who work around their constraints produce competent work. Writers who work with them produce something identifiable.

↑ All Entries

11. Underworld Series (2003-2016) [full review]

► Read the full review of Underworld Series (2003-2016)

2003
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.6/10

"Elders who sleep in rotation, doing the work a chronicle would."

Five films across thirteen years built on a war between vampires and lycans that predates the first picture by centuries. Len Wiseman directed two, Kate Beckinsale appears in four, and the visual signature of blue filters, leather and rain is consistent enough across all five to be the series’ actual identity.

The most coherent mythology and the best structure belong to the 2003 film. A hereditary conflict, a bloodline nobody has exploited, and a political arrangement among the vampires where elders sleep in rotation for centuries at a time and wake into a world their subordinates have been running without them.

Rise of the Lycans in 2009 is the best of the five and nobody saw it. It’s a prequel with Michael Sheen and Bill Nighy, it removes Beckinsale almost entirely, and it’s an argument about a slave revolt sitting underneath the genre material it’s obliged to deliver. The escalation problem is the same one Resident Evil has. Selene acquires abilities across the sequence, each film requires a larger threat to justify itself, and by Blood Wars the mythology has accumulated more rules than any of the plots have room to use or explain properly. The production design is the reason the series held an audience for thirteen years. The coven house, the lycan dens and the elder chambers are all built practically, and the films look considerably more expensive than the budgets they were made on suggest they should.

I enjoy these films more than I can defend.

The sleeping elders are a smart piece of design, and Rise of the Lycans deserved the audience it never found. My problem is the escalation. By Blood Wars the series was inventing rules faster than it could use them, and a franchise whose real identity was a mood shouldn’t have let its mythology bury it.

For WritersThe elders sleeping in rotation for centuries is a single structural invention that generates political conflict, exposition and mystery at once. One rule about how the society is organized does more work than any amount of chronicle. When you build a world, look for the arrangement that produces friction on its own without anybody having to decide anything. A custom that forces characters into conflict by existing is worth more than a thousand years of backstory nobody witnessed, and it keeps producing scenes for as long as the series runs. Design the custom before you write the history.

↑ All Entries

12. The Last Voyage of the Demeter (2023) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Last Voyage of the Demeter (2023)

2023
RLR: 6.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.8/10

"Everybody knows the ship arrives empty."

Andre Ovredal adapted the ship’s log chapter from Dracula, roughly eight pages of the novel, into a full feature. The project had been in development for close to twenty years with several directors attached, and it arrived in 2023 to almost no audience at all.

In this closed-room horror, everybody in the room already knows the ending. The ship reaches Whitby with nobody aboard, the novel says so, and the film opens on the wreck before going back four weeks to establish a crew the audience has already been told doesn’t survive.

Javier Botet plays Dracula as a creature instead of as a count, and the design is the best thing in the picture. He’s emaciated, batlike and entirely without speech or aristocracy, and the film refuses every piece of the character’s accumulated glamour from the previous century of adaptations.

Corey Hawkins plays a Cambridge-trained doctor who can’t get work because of his race, and the material is better than the film needs it to be. He’s the most competent person aboard, he’s repeatedly overruled, and the ship’s hierarchy is the second problem the crew can’t solve.

The film’s failure is pacing instead of concept. The crew are picked off in an order the audience can predict, the middle hour repeats the same night three times with different victims, and a premise built on inevitability needs considerably more invention than this one supplies.

For WritersEverybody already knows the ship reaches Whitby with nobody alive aboard, because the novel says so and the film opens on the wreck. The ending is fixed before the first scene. When you write toward a known outcome, the interest has to come from order, method and cost instead of from result. Readers will follow a foregone conclusion if each step surprises them, and this film loses them because the middle hour repeats the same night three times. A fixed destination demands more invention on the route, not less, and most writers assume the opposite.

↑ All Entries

13. Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978) [full review]

► Read the full review of Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)

1978
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"A city makes blending in unnecessary."

Philip Kaufman remade the 1956 film and moved it to San Francisco, the decision that makes it work. Paranoia functions in a city because anonymity was already normal there, and nobody notices a person behaving strangely among several hundred thousand others doing the same. W. D. Richter wrote the screenplay.

Donald Sutherland plays a health inspector and the casting of the whole film is against type. Brooke Adams, Jeff Goldblum and Veronica Cartwright are all doing quiet, naturalistic work, and Leonard Nimoy plays a self-help author whose entire profession is explaining away exactly the symptom being reported.

The pod effects are the best practical work of the decade and unpleasant to watch. The forming bodies, the filaments, the flower stage and the partially completed duplicate in the greenhouse are all mechanical, built at full scale, and shot in unflattering light without any concealment.

The sound design is where the horror comes from. The scream the duplicates use to identify humans was constructed from a pig recording, it arrives without warning, and Kaufman withholds it for most of the running time so nobody in the audience knows it’s coming when it does.

The last shot is the bleakest ending in American science fiction. Sutherland walking through a plaza, recognized by somebody who survived, and a sound coming out of him that settles everything the film has been carefully declining to settle for the previous two hours. Kaufman refused to soften it for the studio.

I admire this film more than I enjoy it. The pods are horrible in exactly the right way, and I can’t forget that final scream.

It stays at a six for me because it’s so cold on the way there. I respect every choice Kaufman made, and I still find the long stretch before the ending hard to like.

For WritersKaufman moves the story to a city because anonymity was already normal there. Nobody notices a person behaving strangely among several hundred thousand others, so the infiltration needs no concealment at all. When you relocate an existing premise, the question is what the new setting does to the mechanism instead of what it looks like. A small town makes the duplicates work to blend in. A city makes blending in unnecessary, worse and free. Changing where something happens should change how it happens, and a relocation that only changes the scenery wasn’t worth making. Imagery that builds a usable space covers the ground.

Amityville traps a family with a second mortgage, and The Purge spends a country-sized premise inside one house. Get the confinement right in the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. The Amityville Horror (1979) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Amityville Horror (1979)

1979
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.2/10

"They cannot leave because the mortgage is already stretched."

Stuart Rosenberg adapted Jay Anson’s book about the Lutz family, who lasted twenty-eight days in a Long Island house where a mass murder had happened the previous year. The film took over eighty-six million dollars on a budget near four and a half. Rod Steiger plays the priest who tries to bless it.

The financial horror works, and nobody discusses it. The Lutzes can’t leave because the house was the only one they could afford, the mortgage is stretched, and George is watching a business fail while the heating bill climbs for reasons nobody can account for. James Brolin plays the deterioration well and the film gives him an arc. He stops washing, he can’t get warm, he’s chopping wood at three in the morning, and the performance works equally well as possession or as a man having a breakdown in front of his family.

The material strands Margot Kidder, and she does what she can with it. Kathy is frightened, she’s ignored, and the screenplay has her react to events instead of driving any part of the story, the film’s clearest structural weakness across two hours. Rosenberg had made Cool Hand Luke.

The claims have been thoroughly disputed since and the lawyer for the previous killer has stated publicly that the haunting was invented over several bottles of wine. The film presents itself as a true story throughout and nothing in it’s survived any subsequent examination.

For WritersThe Lutzes can’t leave because the house was the only one they could afford and the mortgage is already stretched. Every supernatural event lands on a family with no financial room to respond to it. When you need characters trapped, the money answer is always available and almost never used. A haunting that prevents escape is a rule the reader has to accept, and a second mortgage is a fact they recognize. The heating bill climbing for no reason is more frightening than a voice in the wall, because one of those has happened to them. Conflict that drives story covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

15. Silent Night, Deadly Night (1984) [full review]

► Read the full review of Silent Night, Deadly Night (1984)

1984
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.9/10

"Forty minutes of institution before anybody dies."

Charles E. Sellier Jr. made a Christmas slasher that was pulled from cinemas after two weeks following protests from parents, and Siskel and Ebert read the crew’s names aloud on television and said shame after each one. It’s become the most famous thing about the film by a considerable distance.

The first act is better than the reputation allows and takes its time. A boy watches his parents murdered by a man in a Santa suit, is raised in an orphanage by a Mother Superior who punishes him for everything, and the film spends forty minutes on the construction before anything happens.

Robert Brian Wilson plays Billy as damaged instead of as a monster, and the film’s position is that an institution built him. Every adult who could have intervened chose punishment, and the picture is clear that the violence is the outcome of a traceable process. The killings are the part that caused the trouble and they’re considerably less extensive than the protest suggested. The sled decapitation and the antler sequence are the two anybody remembers, and both were cut for the original release before being restored on video years afterward. Four sequels followed and the second is almost entirely footage from the first. Part 2 runs roughly forty minutes of recap before its own story starts, and it’s made it a durable joke and is the only reason anybody has seen any of the later entries.

For WritersThe film spends forty minutes building Billy before anything violent happens. Parents murdered, an orphanage, a Mother Superior who punishes every response he has, and the picture is clear that an institution produced the outcome. When you write a killer, the choice is between a monster and a product. A monster is simpler and lets the reader off, because nothing is anybody’s fault. A product implicates every adult who chose punishment over attention, a considerably harder book to write and the only version that says anything. Decide which one you’re writing before the first killing, because the two need different first acts and you can’t retrofit either. Why villain motivations fall apart covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

16. Innocent Blood (1992) [full review]

► Read the full review of Innocent Blood (1992)

1992
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.1/10

"A crime family that works out immortality is good for business."

John Landis made a vampire gangster film eleven years after American Werewolf and the combination almost works. A French vampire feeds only on criminals in Pittsburgh, interrupts a meal, and accidentally turns a mafia boss who understands immediately what has been handed to him. Warner Bros. released it in September 1992.

Robert Loggia is the reason to watch it and he’s having a wonderful time. Sallie Macelli works out the rules fast, starts turning his own organization, and the film’s best idea is a crime family that becomes functionally immortal and considerably better at the business as a result.

Anne Parillaud plays Marie and the film can’t decide what to do with her. She’s the protagonist, the morality and the exposition, and Landis keeps interrupting her material for gangster comedy that’s funnier but has nothing to do with what she’s in the picture for.

The practical effects are excellent and the morgue sequence is the standout. A turned corpse waking during an autopsy, staged with prosthetics and a sense of a room full of people who have no procedure for what is happening in front of them. Rick Baker supervised the makeup work.

The tonal problem is the same one American Werewolf solved and this film doesn’t. The comedy and the horror sit beside each other instead of inside each other, and Landis never finds the register that let the earlier picture run both at once without either undercutting the other.

For WritersThe film’s best idea is a crime family that becomes functionally immortal and improves at the business because of it. Loggia works out the rules faster than anybody and starts turning his own organization. When you hand a supernatural advantage to somebody, ask who in your world would use it most efficiently. The protagonist rarely wins that comparison. An existing organization with structure, discipline and a use for immortality will outperform a lone figure every time, and the moment a reader works that out, the book has a new engine you didn’t have to invent.

↑ All Entries

17. I Am Legend (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of I Am Legend (2007)

2007
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.2/10

"The title means the opposite of what the film delivers."

Francis Lawrence adapted Richard Matheson’s 1954 novel and produced the most expensive of four attempts at it. Will Smith carries close to an hour alone with a dog, the empty Manhattan work is impressive, and the film cost around one hundred and fifty million dollars. The first half is the best material and almost nothing happens in it. Neville’s routine, the mannequins he’s arranged and speaks to, the video store conversations, and a man maintaining a schedule that exists entirely to keep him from noticing how long he’s been alone. Sam is the film’s real subject and the sequence with the dog is the most affecting thing Smith has done. The infection, the decision and the grip on the collar are staged without music, at length, and the picture never returns to the emotional register afterward. The Darkseekers are the failure and the digital work has aged badly. They were built as computer-generated figures after practical makeup tests were abandoned, they move in a way nothing physical could, and the film loses every piece of the credibility the empty city had established.

The title means the opposite of what the film delivers. Matheson’s novel ends with Neville realizing he’s the monster in the new society’s mythology, and the theatrical version replaces that with a sacrifice and a cure while an alternate ending closer to the book exists on the disc.

I found that dog sequence devastating, and I’d put the first hour up against almost anything in the genre.

Then the Darkseekers show up looking like a video game and I lose interest. The ending is the worst part. Matheson wrote a final page that turns the whole book inside out. The theatrical cut swaps it for a cure and keeps his title anyway. That kind of vandalism is indefensible.

For WritersMatheson’s novel ends with Neville understanding that he’s the monster in somebody else’s mythology, and the theatrical cut replaces that with a sacrifice and a cure. When you adapt something, check whether the ending is the argument or just the finish. A book whose last page reverses everything preceding it can’t have that page swapped for a conventional one without becoming a different work with the same name. The test is simple. If the title stops making sense, you have cut the wrong thing. Work out which page the argument lives on before you start cutting, because it’s rarely the one with the most plot in it. Science Fiction Handbook covers the ground.

Vampire’s Kiss has no vampire in it and Silent Night builds its killer out of an institution. Two ways to write damage, in the Deep Character Handbook.

↑ All Entries

18. The Purge (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Purge (2013)

2013
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.7/10

"A country-sized premise spent inside one gated house."

James DeMonaco built a premise that was considerably bigger than the film he made with it. One night a year all crime is legal, emergency services are suspended, and the country has solved unemployment and poverty as a result of the arrangement. Universal released it in June 2013. It’s a home invasion picture, and the scale is the disappointment. Everything interesting about the concept happens outside a single wealthy house in a gated community, and the audience is given a security system, a family and a siege instead of the country the premise describes.

Ethan Hawke plays a man who sells the security systems and the film’s sharpest idea is that his neighbors resent him for it. The wealth came from the arrangement, the community knows it, and the resentment turns out to be the actual threat instead of anybody outside the gates.

The class argument comes out plainly, and then the film drops it. The purge exists to remove the poor and the uninsured, several characters say so directly, and the film has no interest in following the observation anywhere once it’s been placed in the dialogue. Nobody in the film disputes the claim.

The sequels understood what this film didn’t. Anarchy moves to the street and shows the city, Election Year follows a political campaign, and the series improved by abandoning the house the first picture never managed to leave for more than a few minutes. DeMonaco wrote all three.

This one frustrates me. DeMonaco had a premise big enough to carry a whole country and parked it in a single living room, and I spent the film wishing the camera would walk out the front door. Hawke’s resentful neighbors are the best idea in it. The sequels proved the bigger film was possible, and that makes the first one harder for me to forgive.

For WritersDeMonaco has a country-sized premise and spends the film in one gated house. Everything interesting about the concept is happening somewhere the audience never goes. When your idea implies a scale, you have to either deliver it or pick a story that fits inside what you can show. A reader who has been told the world has changed will keep looking past your characters at the change, and the smaller story loses by comparison to the one they’re imagining. The sequels fixed it by going outside, the same repair available in a second draft. Plot devices that work covers the ground.

↑ All Entries

19. All Cheerleaders Die (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of All Cheerleaders Die (2013)

2013
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.2/10

"A stone rule that keeps producing scenes."

Lucky McKee and Chris Sivertson remade their own 2001 shot-on-video film with a budget, and the result is a high school revenge picture that changes genre twice inside ninety minutes. It went almost entirely unseen and has a small following that found it later. It premiered at Toronto in 2013.

About thirty minutes in, the premise arrives, and nothing before it prepares the audience. Four cheerleaders die in a car accident and a classmate resurrects them using stones, and the film is about a supernatural revenge scheme that was originally an ordinary social one.

The stone mechanism is the best idea in it. Each girl is linked to a stone, they can swap bodies when the stones touch, and the film builds several sequences on a rule it establishes early and then obeys exactly, including one where the wrong pair end up in each other.

The tone is the problem and the film never settles. Satire, body horror, teen comedy and cruelty arrive in rotation, and McKee has done considerably better work elsewhere at holding a register while the content underneath it shifts. McKee had made May and The Woman before it.

Caitlin Stasey owns it and the performance is the reason anybody found the film. Maddy is running a scheme from the opening scene, she’s not sympathetic, and the picture treats her plan as understandable without ever asking an audience to approve of any part of it.

For WritersEach girl is linked to a stone, they swap bodies when the stones touch, and the film builds several sequences on a rule it states early and then obeys exactly. The mechanism generates the plot. When you invent a supernatural rule, the test is whether it produces situations you wouldn’t otherwise have written. A rule that only explains something is exposition. A rule that forces two characters into the wrong bodies at the worst moment is a scene, and the difference is whether you designed it to answer a question or to cause a problem.

↑ All Entries

20. Warm Bodies (2013) [full review]

► Read the full review of Warm Bodies (2013)

2013
RLR: 6 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.8/10

"He narrates in a voice nobody in the film can hear."

Jonathan Levine adapted Isaac Marion’s novel and made a zombie romantic comedy that’s considerably better than that description suggests. R narrates his own condition in a voice he can’t speak aloud, the structural joke the whole film is built on and sustains for ninety minutes. The narration device does real work. R is articulate, self-aware and funny inside his own head while producing nothing but groans externally, and the gap between what he thinks and what anybody hears is both the comedy and the loneliness the film is about.

Nicholas Hoult plays it almost entirely physically and the performance is careful. The gradual return of color to his face, the first heartbeat, the shift in how he walks, all of it is staged in small increments across the film instead of arriving as a single transformation.

The bonies are the weakest element and the design is generic. They’re fully digital, they have no personality beyond hunger, and the film needs a threat that can’t be reasoned with so that the reasoning with R can be the point, a functional decision executed without imagination.

Romeo and Juliet is the structure, stated openly, and the film is unembarrassed about it. R and Julie, a balcony, a Mercutio, and the argument underneath is that the cure for the condition is being looked at by somebody who doesn’t immediately decide what you are.

I expected to roll my eyes at a zombie romantic comedy, and it charmed me more than I wanted it to. Hoult and that trapped inner voice do real work, and the idea that being seen properly can bring you back is a sweet one. The bonies weaken it for me. A lazy digital monster in a film this careful about its hero feels like somebody ran out of time or interest.

For WritersR narrates in a voice nobody in the film can hear. He’s articulate and funny inside his own head and produces nothing but groans aloud, and the gap between the two is both the comedy and the loneliness. When you have a character who can’t communicate, narration stops being a convenience and becomes the subject. The reader knows what they mean and every other character does not. That generates sympathy on every page at no cost. Look for the protagonist whose interior voice is unavailable to everybody around them, because that gap does work no amount of dialogue can. Controlling narrative perspective covers the ground.

Honorable Mentions: Horror Films Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier or close to it and each is on the list.

The Addiction (1995)

⭐ 6.5/10

Abel Ferrara made a vampire film about a philosophy doctoral student in black and white, where the condition is addiction and the dialogue is quotations from Nietzsche and Sartre. Lili Taylor carries all of it.

Habit (1995)

⭐ 6.5/10

Larry Fessenden wrote, directed and starred as a man drinking heavily in New York who may or may not be involved with a vampire. The film never confirms it and the ambiguity is the whole design.

Ganja & Hess (1973)

⭐ 6.2/10

Bill Gunn was hired to make a Blacula follow-up and delivered an experimental film about addiction, faith and class that the producers recut entirely. The original version was restored decades later.

A Bay of Blood (1971)

⭐ 6.7/10

Bava built a body-count structure around an inheritance dispute and thirteen killings with no detective anywhere in it. Friday the 13th Part 2 copied two of the murders shot for shot a decade later.

Kiss of the Damned (2012)

⭐ 5.4/10

Xan Cassavetes made a deliberately retro vampire film with the look of seventies European horror, about a household who have agreed on rules and a sister who refuses to follow any of them.

Deathdream (1974)

⭐ 6.8/10

Bob Clark adapted The Monkey’s Paw into a Vietnam film where a dead soldier comes home and his family won’t admit what he is. It’s the bleakest thing he made before Black Christmas.

Shivers (1975)

⭐ 6.4/10

Cronenberg’s first feature, set in a single Montreal apartment tower where a parasite spreads through the building. The Canadian parliament debated whether it should have received public funding.

The Brood (1979)

⭐ 6.8/10

Cronenberg wrote it during a custody battle and has described it as his version of Kramer vs. Kramer. Samantha Eggar and Oliver Reed are both extraordinary and the final reveal is upsetting.

Burnt Offerings (1976)

⭐ 6.4/10

Dan Curtis put a family in a summer rental that repairs itself when somebody in it is harmed. Karen Black, Oliver Reed and Bette Davis are all in it and the ending is unusually cruel.

The Changeling (1980)

⭐ 7.2/10

George C. Scott in a Seattle mansion with a wheelchair on a staircase and a seance sequence that runs long and quiet. It’s the most restrained haunted house film of its decade.

The Orphanage (2007)

⭐ 7.4/10

J. A. Bayona built a ghost story around a woman returning to the institution where she grew up, produced by del Toro. The game sequence with the wall is the best thing in it.

The House of the Devil (2009)

⭐ 6.3/10

Ti West made a film that looks and moves exactly like 1983, with a babysitting job in a remote house and almost nothing happening for an hour. The patience is the entire technique.

Dishonorable Mentions: Horror Films That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had the premise, the cast or the source material and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

The Lost Boys: The Tribe (2008)

⭐ 4.1/10

A direct-to-video sequel twenty-one years later with a surfing gang, a new pair of siblings and Corey Feldman returning. It repeats the original beat for beat without any of the design.

Dracula: Dead and Loving It (1995)

⭐ 5.7/10

Mel Brooks parodying a property that Polanski and Morrissey had already parodied, twenty years after both. Leslie Nielsen is game and the film has no jokes the genre hadn’t already made.

Once Bitten (1985)

⭐ 5.2/10

Lauren Hutton as a countess who needs the blood of virgins and a young Jim Carrey as the target. The premise is a single joke and the film runs ninety-four minutes on it.

Cirque du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant (2009)

⭐ 5.8/10

An adaptation of twelve novels compressed into one film, intended to launch a series and canceled immediately. John C. Reilly is well cast and the mythology arrives faster than anybody can hold it.

30 Days of Night: Dark Days (2010)

⭐ 4.2/10

A direct-to-video sequel that moves to Los Angeles, recasts the survivor and gives the vampires English dialogue. Every element that made the first film distinctive is removed in the opening reel.

The Moth Diaries (2011)

⭐ 4.8/10

Mary Harron adapted a boarding school novel about an obsessive friendship and a possible vampire, and the film explains the ambiguity away in narration. The novel leaves it open throughout.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

I’d defend almost every film in this tier to a friend with a caveat attached, and the caveats make me grumpy. Too many came from outside the picture. MGM recut Polanski and Tony Scott lost his ending to a reshoot he didn’t want, and in both cases the people who made the film lost the argument to people who didn’t. That stings more than a weak script does. Tell me which of these vampire variations you think worked best, and which one you’d send back for another draft.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the boy in The Transfiguration a vampire?
The film never settles it. He drinks blood on a schedule he devised, avoids sunlight because he decided to, and every supernatural element has a mundane explanation available alongside it that the picture declines to rule out.
Did William Marshall rewrite Blacula?
Substantially. The original screenplay had a plantation background and Marshall insisted on an African prince petitioning Dracula against the slave trade, and the film therefore has a subject underneath the marketing.
Is there a vampire in Vampire’s Kiss?
No. Peter buys plastic fangs from a shop and the audience watches him assemble a supernatural explanation for his own psychotic break. Nothing supernatural happens at any point in the film.
What happens to the discarded companions in The Hunger?
They don’t die. They age catastrophically over days while remaining conscious, and Miriam keeps every one of them in coffins in the attic where they stay aware indefinitely.
Why was Nadja shot on a toy camera?
Budget. Almereyda used a Fisher-Price PXL-2000 for the vampire point of view sequences because he couldn’t afford anything else, and the smeared low-resolution image reads as memory instead of vision.
How faithful is I Am Legend to the novel?
Not at all at the end. Matheson’s novel closes with Neville realizing he’s the monster in the new society’s mythology. The theatrical cut replaces that with a sacrifice and a cure. An alternate ending closer to the book exists.
Which Underworld film is the best?
Rise of the Lycans from 2009, and almost nobody saw it. It removes Kate Beckinsale almost entirely, stars Michael Sheen and Bill Nighy, and makes a serious argument about a slave revolt underneath the genre material.
Was The Amityville Horror a true story?
The claims have been disputed thoroughly since. The lawyer for the previous killer has stated publicly that the haunting was invented over several bottles of wine, and nothing in the account has survived examination.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment