Behind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin Tattoo

This entry is part 63 of 74 in the series Behind the Book
TL;DR: A friend of mine has a beautiful violin tattooed across her back. That is the entire origin of this novel and the story has nothing whatever to do with her. I saw the tattoo, kept thinking about it, and eventually wanted to know who would choose that image and what it would mean to them. Annabelle is the answer, and none of her is my friend.

A friend has a violin inked across her back. It is a beautiful piece of work and I could not stop thinking about it.

The story has nothing to do with her. I want to be clear about that, because a novel that grows out of a real image invites the assumption that it grew out of a real person, and it did not.

What I wanted was the answer to a question. Who chooses that image, out of everything available, and holds still for four hours face down in a chair to have it made permanent?

The answer I arrived at was Annabelle, whose father was a violinist. His instrument is what she put on her back, and she was nineteen when she did it.

What she noticed while it was happening turned out to be the whole book. That you can choose to hold pain, that the choosing changes it, and that the frame around a thing determines what the thing is. She had no vocabulary for any of that at nineteen. She spends a year acquiring it.

Where does the novel start?

At 10:47 on a Tuesday morning, in an office lobby.

Annabelle is twenty-two and works reception at an oil company in Dallas, watching a clock that will not move. Then two strangers come through the revolving door and kiss in front of her.

Nothing happens. They leave. She goes back to validating parking.

And something she has been managing quietly for years stops being manageable, which is the only kind of beginning this story could have. Nobody arrives to change her life. She sees two people who are not performing and recognises the difference.

The book on this: The Blonde With a Violin Tattoo follows a year in which Annabelle stops managing everything and learns to say what she wants. Adult readers only.

Why does the book open with a failure?

Because the prologue is not a promise of what the book will deliver. It is the problem the book exists to solve.

Annabelle is somewhere she chose to be, having said yes to it clearly, and partway through she needs to stop and cannot. She had been told about a signal. Three taps. She does not know what she is meant to tap, whether it needs to be the frame or something held, or whether there is a step nobody mentioned.

She taps and waits and nothing changes, and she does not know whether she did it wrong.

Her own summary of it is four words. She had no information.

That is not a scene about desire and it is not a scene about regret. It is about somebody who was not equipped, in a situation that required equipment, and it is placed first so that everything afterward is read against it.

What is Annabelle’s actual problem?

That she manages things, and always has.

That sentence appears in the first pages and it is the character in five words. She handles the room. She anticipates what is needed. She builds a version of herself for whoever is present and operates it competently.

The cost is that she never asks for anything, because asking would require having decided what she wants, and deciding what she wants would mean it could be refused.

So the year the book covers is not a year of experiences. It is a year of learning to say a sentence out loud, and the novel is honest about how long that takes for somebody who has spent twenty-two years not doing it.

What is the book about?

Information, and asking for things.

That sounds like a strange description of a novel with this content warning on it, and it is the accurate one. Almost every difficulty Annabelle encounters is a failure of information. Something she was not told, something she did not know to ask, or something she knew and could not say.

The chapter that closes the arc is called You Could Have Asked, and that is not a rebuke from somebody else. It is what she works out.

The novel carries a content warning for explicit sexual content and mature themes and it is for adult readers only. Underneath that, it is a book about a woman acquiring the vocabulary to describe her own life.

What did the tattoo teach her?

Three things she had no words for at nineteen.

That you can choose to hold pain. That the choosing changes it. And that the frame around a thing determines what the thing is.

She works that out face down in a chair for four hours while her father’s instrument is being pressed permanently into her skin, and what she feels when it is finished is not grief exactly, though grief is in it. Something closer to having been carrying something loose and having it finally anchored.

A reader meets those three ideas in a tattoo parlour, before the novel has revealed what it is about, and every one of them returns later carrying considerably more weight.

That is the structural reason the tattoo is not decoration. It is the thesis, delivered early and in a context nobody reads as a thesis.

How does Annabelle change?

Slowly, and the book measures it in small physical facts.

More than a year in, she goes to an annual checkup, fitting it between a Tuesday lunch and a conference call she is not attending but whose participants will need parking validated. Blood work. The things you do when you are a person with a body.

Then the line underneath it, which she puts almost in passing. She has been a person with a body, in the fuller sense, for over a year now.

That is how the change gets reported. Not as a revelation and not as a speech. As a woman noticing on the way to a routine appointment that a phrase she would once have used carelessly has become true.

What does the book do with other people?

Uses them as evidence and not as instruction.

At one point Annabelle spends an evening with a couple who know each other well, and what she takes from it is not the encounter. It is the ceiling she looks at afterward, and something she sees in it that she cannot name yet. Something about what two people can build if they keep at it long enough and carefully enough, and how that construction produces a warmth that reaches past the two of them.

She does not have the vocabulary. She notes that she does not have it, which is the habit she has been developing all year.

That is the difference between this book and the version of it that would be easier to write. Nobody explains anything to Annabelle. She watches, and she gets slightly better at knowing what she is looking at.

What holds the year together?

A job that is quietly falling apart while she is busy elsewhere.

The front desk is a good vantage point and the book uses it properly. When something is wrong at a company, the person at reception knows before anybody tells them, because nobody tells them anything. What happens instead is small deviations from the building’s normal rhythm. Her manager suddenly having closed-door meetings when he has never had a closed-door meeting in his life.

That thread runs underneath the personal one and eventually collides with it, which keeps the novel from being a sequence of encounters.

It also does something for the character. She reads a workplace with complete accuracy and reads her own wanting not at all, and the gap between those two competences is the person.

The Guides That Get Your Book Written, Published, and Sold

Four short, practical guides on writing, publishing, and selling your book, plus the occasional note when there's something worth your time. No fluff, no daily inbox clutter. Drop your email and they're yours.

We use MailerLite to manage our list and send these emails. Your address is used only to send you what you signed up for. We will not sell it, share it, or use it for anything else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Blonde With a Violin Tattoo about?
A year in the life of Annabelle, twenty-two and working reception at a Dallas oil company, who watches two strangers kiss in the lobby and finds that something she has been quietly managing stops being manageable.
What inspired the novel?
A friend of the author’s has a violin tattooed across her back. That image is the entire origin, and the story has nothing to do with her. The question the book answers is who would choose that image and what it would mean to them.
Why does Annabelle have a violin on her back?
Her father was a violinist and it is his instrument. She had it done at nineteen, four hours face down in a chair, and what she noticed during it becomes the idea the whole novel runs on.
Why does the book open the way it does?
Because the prologue is the problem, not a promise. Annabelle is somewhere she chose to be, needs to stop, and discovers she was never given the information required to do so.
Is the novel explicit?
Yes. It carries a content warning for explicit sexual content and mature themes and is for adult readers only. Underneath that it is a book about information and about learning to ask for things.
What does Annabelle learn from getting the tattoo?
That you can choose to hold pain, that the choosing changes it, and that the frame around a thing determines what the thing is. She has no vocabulary for any of it at nineteen and spends a year acquiring it.
Does anybody guide Annabelle through the year?
No. Nothing is explained to her. She watches other people, notices what she cannot name yet, and gradually gets better at knowing what she is looking at, which is the habit the whole book is built on.
Is Annabelle based on a real person?
No. Only the tattoo comes from life, and the author is explicit that the story has nothing to do with the friend who has one.

📁︎ Behind the Book📁︎ Fiction

🏷︎ Contemporary Fiction

📝 Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment