Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009) Review

TL;DR: X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. The origin is handled exactly right. The Deadpool material is a separate film glued to the end, and I fast forward past it.
X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)
9 / 10

Official trailer

This is a film I return to. The consensus on it is wrong in an interesting way. The received opinion is that explaining Wolverine ruined him. I think the opposite happened. The origin material in this film is the best sustained treatment the character has received on film, and it works because it refuses to make him sympathetic first.

Logan is presented as a man who has been killing for a hundred and fifty years and has developed the habits you’d expect. The film justifies his eventual refusal by showing what he’s refusing. Then, in the last stretch, it hands the ending to a character it has no idea what to do with, and that’s the part I skip.

Why Does the Origin Material Work?

Because it starts with the wrong emotion. The 1845 opening has a sick boy in a bed, a killing in the next room, and bone claws coming out of a child’s hands, and the film plays the sequence as horror instead of as awakening. Nothing about it suggests a hero is being born. A frightened boy discovers he’s dangerous and runs into the snow with the only person who will go with him.

The montage that follows is the strongest three minutes in the X-Men films.

Logan and Victor fight through the Civil War, both World Wars, and Vietnam, aging out of every uniform they wear while the world around them changes and they don’t. Most origin stories give you a single formative event. This one gives you a century of them and lets them add up. By the time the film reaches the present, you understand a man shaped by having done this too many times to count.

That montage is the stretch I’d show anyone who thinks this film is junk. It covers a century in three minutes, it’s cut so every war feels like the same war, and I love that it never stops to explain itself. The firing squad scene closes the argument. Logan and Victor stand against a wall, take a full volley, and get back up while the soldiers stare. The immortality is presented as the reason nobody can put either of them down, including themselves.

For Writers

The reason this origin lands is that it establishes the brother before it establishes the hero. Victor Creed is the version of Logan who never developed a limit, and every scene between them is an argument about whether the limit is real. That gives the backstory a present-tense function: you’re not watching history, you’re watching a man decide he’s not his brother. Compare this to origin writing that simply sequences events, childhood, trauma, training, first mission, each one explaining the next. Sequence isn’t drama. Contrast is.

If you’re writing a character’s past, find the person who took the other road from the same starting point and put them in the room. The past becomes an active pressure the moment it’s standing across from your protagonist and disagreeing with him.

Liev Schreiber Is the Reason the Film Holds

Schreiber plays Victor Creed as a man entirely at peace with what he is.

That’s far more unsettling than rage would be. He’s not a monster who has lost control. He’s someone who considered the question and decided he liked the answer. The performance carries an affection for Logan that never disappears, even in the fights, and that affection makes the relationship land.

Schreiber is my favorite thing in the film. His calm scares me more than any of the fighting, because Victor is having a fine time being what he is and he still clearly loves his brother. I’d happily have watched a whole film built around him. The two of them share a dynamic that the film understands: Victor thinks Logan is pretending, and Logan can’t entirely prove him wrong. Every confrontation runs on that unresolved question. When Victor tells him they’re the same, the film doesn’t rush to contradict it.

Hugh Jackman is doing physical work here that the ensemble films never gave him room for. The character is the center of the frame for the entire running time instead of the most interesting person in a crowded one, and Jackman fills it. The barn scene after Kayla, where he screams at the sky, is a big swing that a lesser actor would have made ridiculous.

The Adamantium Procedure and What Follows

The procedure sequence is the film’s set piece and it’s staged with real cruelty. Logan volunteers. That detail matters, and it’s the inversion the film builds toward: the thing done to him in X2 as an atrocity is, here, something he asked for to kill his brother. The tank, the bone saw whine of the machinery, the moment his heart stops on the monitors, and Stryker deciding right then to wipe his memory because a weapon that remembers is a weapon that leaves.

Danny Huston plays Stryker as an administrator, the right tone. He’s not sadistic. He’s a man managing an asset portfolio, and the coldness of that framing does more damage than menace would. Brian Cox played the same character with more conviction in X2 and Huston plays him with more paperwork, and the two versions sit together without conflict.

What follows the procedure is the film’s best action stretch. The escape from the facility, the farmhouse with the elderly couple, the helicopter, the motorcycle run through the streets. It moves, it’s legible, and Logan is recognizably the character from the first three films for the first time in the running time.

The Deadpool Problem, and the Fast Forward

Ryan Reynolds is very good in the first act. Wade Wilson talks continuously, kills with a precision that makes the sword work legitimately impressive, and treats the whole operation as material. It’s the character, and it’s the performance Reynolds would spend the next seven years fighting to do properly.

I think Reynolds is the best thing in the first act, and those scenes are exactly why the later choice is such a blunder. The film had the right actor, the right mouth and the right attitude in hand, and then it threw all three away for a mute knockoff.

Then the film takes his mouth. Weapon XI is a mute composite with retractable arm blades, optic beams, and teleportation, played in the final sequence by Scott Adkins with Reynolds’s face on it.

The film presents a character whose entire function is speech as one who can’t speak. The Three Mile Island climax that follows is disconnected from everything the film has been doing for eighty minutes, and it exists to service a franchise plan that never happened.

So I skip it. On rewatch the film ends for me around the island facility, and what I’ve watched is a complete story about two brothers, a betrayal, and a man who chose the metal. The material I fast forward past is a small fraction of the running time. That ratio is why the rating is a 9 instead of a 5.

Craft: An Origin That Commits

Craft Note

The Kayla betrayal is the structural decision most people undervalue. Logan’s motivation across the second act is grief over a woman who’s alive and working for Stryker, and the film lets the audience sit inside a false motive with him. When the reversal arrives it doesn’t cancel the grief, because the relationship was real on her side too. Reversals that invalidate everything preceding them are cheap. Reversals that recontextualize without erasing are the expensive kind, and this one is the expensive kind.

The film also understands that a character defined by regeneration needs a cost that regeneration can’t fix. Physical damage means nothing to Logan, so the story routes every real wound through memory and through Victor. The final loss is being made to forget the only thing he had. That’s the correct instinct for writing an invulnerable protagonist: locate the one thing the power doesn’t protect, and aim everything at it.

The 9 reflects a film I rewatch, with a documented skip.

The production history was ugly, the workprint leaked a month early with wire rigs visible, and both shaped the reception. None of that is in the finished frames of the first eighty minutes. The Weapon XI decision is a real failure and it’s contained enough to route around.

Is X-Men Origins: Wolverine as good as people say?

A 9. X-Men Origins: Wolverine handles the origin better than its reputation allows, because it builds the past around a brother instead of around a sequence of events. Liev Schreiber gives Victor Creed an affection that survives every fight and makes the relationship the spine of the film. Hugh Jackman finally gets the frame to himself and fills it. The adamantium procedure inverts X2 by making it something Logan volunteers for. Danny Huston plays Stryker as an administrator managing assets. That’s colder than menace. The Kayla reversal recontextualizes the second act without invalidating it.

The Weapon XI material is the film’s one real failure, and it’s a large one. Removing a talking character’s mouth is the kind of decision that gets studied. It also arrives late, occupies a contained stretch of the running time, and you can skip it without damaging the story that precedes it. I skip it. What remains is the best pure Wolverine film until Logan (2017).

Frequently Asked Questions

A 9? Most people rate this near the bottom of the franchise.
They do, and the rating here’s a rewatch scale. That measures whether I go back to a film. I go back to this one regularly. The consensus formed around the workprint leak and the Deadpool handling, and both are real, but neither is present in the first eighty minutes. The origin material, the brother relationship, and the procedure sequence are stronger than the reputation suggests.
What exactly do you fast forward past?
The Weapon XI material and the Three Mile Island climax. The film ends for me around the island facility, at which point the story of two brothers, a betrayal, and a man who chose the metal is complete. The skipped material services a franchise plan that never happened and is disconnected from everything preceding it.
Why does the origin work when prequels usually fail?
Because it’s built around Victor Creed instead of around a chronology. Victor is the version of Logan who never developed a limit, so every scene between them argues about whether Logan’s limit is real. That gives the backstory a present-tense function. Sequencing events explains a character. Putting the road-not-taken in the room with him dramatizes one.
Is the opening montage as good as people say?
It’s the strongest three minutes in the X-Men films. Logan and Victor fight through the Civil War, both World Wars, and Vietnam, aging out of every uniform while the world changes around them. Most origin stories give one formative event. This offers a century of them and lets the accumulation build the character without a line of explanation.
How does the adamantium procedure compare to X2?
They complement each other. X2 presents the facility as an atrocity Logan can’t remember. This film shows him volunteering for it to kill his brother. That inverts the meaning without contradicting the scene. Stryker’s decision to wipe his memory the moment the procedure succeeds, on the reasoning that a weapon which remembers is a weapon that leaves, is the sharpest writing in the film.
Is Liev Schreiber’s Victor Creed better than the Sabretooth in X-Men?
Considerably. The 2000 version is a henchman with a growl. Schreiber plays a man entirely at peace with what he is, carrying a real affection for his brother that never disappears even during the fights. The performance makes the relationship essential, and that lets the origin material function as drama instead of backstory delivery.
Does the leak affect how X-Men Origins: Wolverine plays now?
Not on the disc. A DVD-quality workprint appeared online on March 31, 2009, about a month before release, with unfinished visual effects and wire rigs visible in some shots. It shaped the reception badly and permanently. The finished version doesn’t contain those defects, and watching it today without that history produces a different experience than the one 2009 audiences had.
Where does it sit against The Wolverine and Logan?
This rates 9 and The Wolverine (2013) rates 8. Logan (2017) is the strongest of the three and does something different, treating Logan as a man at the end instead of at the beginning. Origins is the best account of where he came from, The Wolverine is the best account of him in exile, and Logan is the best film. All three are worth owning.

Writing in This Genre

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.