Latest
It’s Not X, It’s Y: The AI Tell Shakespeare Wrote FirstWho Gets Rich From AI Data Centers? The Local, National and Global EconomyAre AI Data Centers Bad for the Environment? What’s True and What Isn’tAI Data Centers and Geopolitics: Chips, China, Spies and PowerAI Derangement Syndrome: Who Cares If the Cover Was Made With AI?How to Write a Plot Twist Readers Never See ComingBook Ads Getting Clicks but No Sales? The Problem Is the PageCan Writing a Memoir Make You Sick? The Toll Nobody Warns You AboutWhen Caregiving Ends and the Words Won’t ComeCan You Publish a Clean and a Spicy Version of the Same Book?Do You Need a Writing Buddy? What Works and What Doesn’tCan You Put Someone Who Wronged You in Your Novel?Kindle Unlimited or Wide? Where to Publish Your Debut NovelWriting Vampires: How to Build Your Own Vampire RulesWhat Software Do Novelists Use to Write a Book?What If Your Family Doesn’t Support Your Writing?ARC Reviews: Real Follow-Through Numbers, and Do Reviews Sell Books?The AI Singularity: Would a Conscious AI Even Care About Us?“Forbidden” AI Prompts: Why Viral Prompt Lists Are Mostly JunkAuthor Scam Emails: Fake Agents, Flattery and the $500 PitchWill AI Steal My Book? Turn Off Training Before You UploadThe Fear of Being Judged for Your Memoir: My Father Told Everyone to Burn MineShould You Only Use “Said” in Dialogue Tags? My Rules for Tags and AdverbsWhy a Good Book Isn’t Enough: Agents, Quiet Novels and What SellsShe Asked How to Format Her Comic for KDP. The Thread Went to War Over AI.Why Are Writing Groups So Hostile?My Ghostwriter Stopped Responding. What Do I Do?My Ghostwriter Missed the Deadline. What Are My Options?I Hate My Ghostwriter’s First Draft. Now What?Can I Get a Refund From a Ghostwriter?How Many Revisions Should a Ghostwriter Include?Can My Ghostwriter List My Book in Their Portfolio?My Family Doesn’t Want Me to Publish My Ghostwritten Memoir. Now What?Should a Ghostwriter Write a Free Sample Chapter?How Much Does a Ghostwriter Take Up Front?Can a Ghostwriter Get Me a Book Deal or a Literary Agent?Can I Work With a Ghostwriter Over Zoom or From Another Country?Ghostwriting a Tribute Book, Eulogy or Obituary for Someone You LostCan a Ghostwriter Write My Book in Spanish?Ghostwriting a Book for a Dental or Chiropractic PracticeWhy Keynote Speakers Need a Ghostwritten BookGhostwriting a Science or Research Book for General ReadersGhostwriting a Book for Teachers and EducatorsHiring a Ghostwriter for a Pilot’s or Aviation MemoirHiring a Ghostwriter for a Musician’s MemoirCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Whistleblower Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for an Immigrant’s StoryCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write About Losing Someone to Suicide?Can a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Depression or Mental Illness Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for a Special-Needs Parent’s Memoir

Action Films Part 3 – The Excellent

Part 3 – The Excellent

Series Navigation

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Mediocre |
Part 10: The Poor |
Part 11: The Failures

The films in this tier mostly deliver their world while moving. Fury Road is a two-hour chase out along one road and back, and the War Boys, the Citadel, the water economy and the wives all arrive inside that single movement with nobody stopping to explain any of it. District 9 does the same thing through eviction paperwork and a cat food black market.

That’s harder than it looks and it’s the difference between worldbuilding and exposition. The films that stop to brief the audience are further down this ranking.

Movies that trust me to keep up are the ones I come back to, and this tier is packed with them.

Nothing kills my interest faster than a scene where the action stops so a character can explain the rules to people who already know them. I can feel myself losing interest while it happens. Every picture here found a way around that problem, and that’s what put them this high on my list.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year, and this is the third of eleven parts.

Fury Road delivers an entire society without stopping the vehicles, and John Wick hands over an economy in gold coins. Build while moving, using the World Builder’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. Face/Off (1997) [full review]

► Read the full review of Face/Off (1997)

1997
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.3/10

"The operatic peak of nineties American action, and the premise is completely absurd."

Woo’s third American film is the one where the studio finally let him work, and the premise is preposterous enough that committing to it entirely was the only available strategy. An FBI agent and a terrorist exchange faces surgically and then have to live inside each other’s lives. Travolta and Cage are each playing the other actor playing a character, a much harder assignment than it sounds. Cage studied Travolta’s posture and speech for weeks beforehand and the mimicry is precise enough that the audience can track who’s inside which body without being reminded. The film is about families instead of the chase. Archer is inside Troy’s life with Troy’s partner and son, Troy is inside Archer’s marriage and grieving daughter, and both men discover things about the other’s domestic situation that the plot then has to account for.

The mirror shootout is Woo’s best American sequence. Two men on opposite sides of a wall of reflective panels, firing at images, and the geography is established well enough that the audience knows which reflection belongs to whom throughout. Mike Werb and Michael Colleary wrote it and it had been in development since 1990.

The boat chase closes it and the picture never once apologizes for what it is. Doves in a chapel, a slow-motion crucifix, a child in headphones during a firefight. Woo staged all of it with total sincerity and the film is the better for refusing any irony at all.

Face/Off is exactly the kind of movie I wish studios still had the nerve to make.

A timid director would have played the face swap for laughs and winked at the audience, and the film would have shrunk into a sketch. Woo plays it like grand opera and I believe all of it, doves included. My one small gripe is that the boat chase keeps going after the story has already ended.

For WritersThe premise is absurd and Woo directs it as tragedy. Nobody in the film winks, nobody comments on how unlikely the surgery is, and the sincerity is what allows the domestic material to land. When your concept is ridiculous, the only workable response is total commitment. A story that acknowledges its own silliness has given the reader permission to stop investing. One that treats an absurd situation with complete gravity gets the reader to treat it the same way, and the concept stops being the subject. Pick the tone before the first page, because a premise this exposed can’t survive a narrator it embarrasses. Theme in fiction covers commitment to a tone.

↑ All Entries

2. The Matrix (1999) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Matrix (1999)

1999
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.7/10

"A philosophy lecture turned into one of the most entertaining action films ever made."

The Wachowskis built a film on a philosophy reading list and sold it as an action picture. The cast were required to read Baudrillard, Kevin Kelly and Dylan Evans before production, and the four-month martial arts training under Yuen Woo-ping was the first time a Western production had committed to Hong Kong choreography properly.

Bullet time was built by ringing a subject with a hundred and twenty stills cameras fired in sequence, then interpolating between the frames. It had been done before in smaller forms, and this film turned it into a technique everybody copied, usually without understanding what it was for.

Exposition is a problem the film solves by making the explanation part of the plot. Morpheus tells Neo what the Matrix is because he has to recruit Neo, the audience learns alongside him, and no scene in the film exists purely to brief anybody. Warner Bros. gave them the budget after Bound and still expected a loss.

In the lobby sequence, the choreography demonstrates the rules the film spent an hour establishing. Neo and Trinity can do these things because the film has taught the audience the physics, and the pleasure is watching established constraints exploited instead of watching spectacle. Bill Pope shot it and Don Davis scored it, and both returned for the sequels.

The sequels are a separate argument and the first film doesn’t need them. Reloaded and Revolutions expand the mythology in directions the original had no interest in, and the 1999 picture is complete on its own terms in a way the two follow-ups made harder to remember.

The first Matrix makes me a little angry on behalf of every movie that copied it. Half the industry grabbed bullet time and skipped the hour of rule-building that made the lobby scene mean anything, and we got years of slow-motion spinning with nothing at stake. The Wachowskis did the homework before they showed off. I can forgive them the sequels for that alone.

For WritersThe Wachowskis never stop the film to explain the world. Morpheus briefs Neo because Neo is being recruited, so every piece of exposition is a scene somebody needed to have. When you have a complicated premise, find a character who has a legitimate reason to explain it to another character who needs to know. Exposition delivered to somebody with a stake in it is a conversation. Exposition delivered to nobody in particular is a lecture the reader can feel you arranging. Find the character who needs to know before you write the explanation, and the scene stops being a briefing and becomes a negotiation. What show do not tell actually means covers the method.

↑ All Entries

3. The One (2001) [full review]

► Read the full review of The One (2001)

2001
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 5.9/10

"A hundred and twenty-five parallel universes, and killing your other selves makes you stronger."

James Wong made a multiverse action film two decades before the concept became standard, with Jet Li hunting other versions of himself across parallel universes and absorbing their strength with each kill. The premise is better than the film around it. Wong and Glen Morgan had written for The X-Files before moving into features.

Li plays both leads and the two performances are distinct. Gabriel Yulaw moves with certainty and uses hard external styles, Gabe Law is hesitant and defensive, and the choreography by Corey Yuen assigns each of them a different martial vocabulary on purpose. Delroy Lindo and Jason Statham play the two agents pursuing him.

The escalation rule is the good idea. Every version killed makes the survivor stronger and everybody else weaker, so the film has a built-in clock and a reason the final confrontation has to happen. Almost nothing else in the script uses it. Statham was two years into his film career and had come from Guy Ritchie pictures.

The execution is where it falls down. The multiverse policing agency is explained in flat exposition, the digital doubling is poor even for 2001, and the film runs eighty-seven minutes because there’s not enough material to sustain anything longer. It cost around forty-nine million dollars and took just over seventy.

For WritersWong installs a rule where every kill strengthens the killer and weakens everybody who remains. The confrontation becomes mathematically inevitable and the film never has to argue for it. When you need a collision the reader will accept, build a mechanism that makes it unavoidable instead of a motive that makes it likely. A character who changes their mind can abandon a motive. Nobody can abandon a rule, and the reader can see the ending coming and still want it. Build the rule so it works whether anybody wants it to or not, since a mechanism that requires cooperation is a motive wearing a uniform.

↑ All Entries

4. Swordfish (2001) [full review]

► Read the full review of Swordfish (2001)

2001
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.5/10

"The opening monologue is better than the film’s reputation and the bus sequence is better than both."

Dominic Sena opens with the best scene in the film and never reaches it again. John Travolta sits in a cafe explaining what’s wrong with Hollywood endings, and the camera circles him for four minutes before the shot pulls back to reveal a hostage situation already in progress.

The bank explosion that follows was shot with a three-hundred-and-sixty-degree camera array on a scale nobody had attempted, freezing a blast wave and moving around it. It cost a considerable fraction of the budget and remains impressive. Skip Woods wrote it and Joel Silver produced for Warner Bros.

Hugh Jackman was cast immediately after X-Men and plays a hacker with a daughter he can’t see, the entire motivation the film gives him. The computer material is the usual nonsense and the film moves fast enough that most viewers don’t care. Don Cheadle plays the agent who has been chasing him since the conviction.

The last act reverses several times and the reversals don’t survive examination. The film reveals Travolta’s Gabriel Shear as a covert operative funding counter-terrorism through bank theft, and the explanation requires the audience to accept that everything preceding it was staged. Halle Berry was paid a reported half million extra for one scene, and the coverage never moved past it.

For WritersThe opening monologue is the best writing in the picture and it also establishes a bar nothing afterward reaches. When you open on your strongest material, understand what you’ve spent. A first chapter markedly better than chapter four teaches the reader to expect a decline, and they’ll read the rest of the book measuring it against the start. Save something. Move your strongest sequence to the middle where books lose people, instead of spending it in a chapter nobody was going to abandon anyway. Readers calibrate on the opening and spend the rest of the book measuring against it, so a strong first chapter is a debt as much as an asset. There’s more on this in my article on opening pages that hook readers.

The Matrix makes every explanation a scene somebody needed to have, because Neo is being recruited. Turn exposition into negotiation in the Showing and Telling Handbook.

↑ All Entries

5. Black Hawk Down (2001) [full review]

► Read the full review of Black Hawk Down (2001)

2001
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.7/10

"Nobody gets an arc. That is the point."

Ridley Scott adapted Mark Bowden’s account of the October 1993 raid in Mogadishu, shot it in Morocco with the cooperation of the United States Army, and put the cast through a week of military training. The film runs one hundred and forty-four minutes and covers roughly eighteen hours.

The structure deliberately refuses individual heroism. There are close to thirty named soldiers, almost none of them has a backstory, and the film identifies them by helmet markings and radio callsigns because that’s how the men themselves would have done it. Ken Nolan wrote the screenplay and Jerry Bruckheimer produced.

The confusion is the point and Scott commits to it completely. Radio traffic overlaps, orders contradict each other, a convoy is directed through the wrong intersection twice, and the audience is as lost as the soldiers for long stretches. Josh Hartnett, Eric Bana, Tom Hardy and Orlando Bloom are all in it early in their careers.

Critics have faulted the film for giving Somali characters almost no interiority and the criticism is fair. Bowden’s book has considerably more of it, and the picture’s decision to stay inside the American perspective is a real limitation instead of a stylistic choice. It won Academy Awards for Editing and Sound Mixing.

The final run is the sequence that works. Men jogging out of the city behind vehicles because there’s no room inside them, shot without music, and the film ends on a kitchen and a line about why anybody goes back. Hans Zimmer scored it and used Somali and Middle Eastern vocalists throughout.

Black Hawk Down moves me more than almost any war picture I can name.

That jog out of the city with no music is the scene that justifies its place, because Scott refuses to tell me how to feel and the silence does the job. I agree with the criticism about the Somali characters, and it’s the one thing I’d change. The rest puts you in the dust and the noise with those men and doesn’t let you out.

For WritersScott gives almost none of his thirty soldiers a backstory and identifies them by helmet markings instead. The anonymity is the argument, because the film is about a unit instead of anybody in it. When you write a group under pressure, decide whether individual interiority serves the story or dilutes it. Thirty biographies produce thirty small stories. Thirty men the reader can only tell apart by function produce one large one, and the reader feels the scale instead of being told about it. Decide early which one the book is about, because a story that gives thirty people biographies has already chosen and can’t change its mind later. Why characters feel flat covers the trade.

↑ All Entries

6. The Bourne Identity (2002) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Bourne Identity (2002)

2002
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"A man works out what he is from what his own body can do."

Doug Liman fought the studio for two years and the production went badly enough that reshoots were ordered and the ending replaced. What survives is the film that reset the spy genre and made the Bond series rebuild itself from scratch four years later. Chris Cooper and Clive Owen play the two men managing the problem.

The Paris apartment fight is the one everybody cites. A pen against a knife, shot at close range with almost no cutting away, and choreographed around what a man cornered in a small room would reach for. Nothing in it is presented as stylish.

The amnesia does structural work most amnesia plots never manage. Bourne learns he speaks several languages, reads a room automatically and can disarm a man in under two seconds at the same moment the audience does, so competence arrives as discovery instead of as demonstration.

Franka Potente’s Marie is the film’s other achievement. She’s not a professional, she’s frightened for legitimate reasons, and her presence forces Bourne to keep explaining a world he doesn’t understand either. The hair-cutting scene does more characterization than any dialogue in the picture.

For WritersLiman puts an ordinary person beside a man who can’t remember what he is, so somebody with no frame for it has to witness every capability. Marie’s reactions calibrate the reader. When you write an extraordinary character, give them a companion with no expertise at all. The gap does your characterization silently and it supplies a legitimate reason for somebody in the scene to ask the questions the reader is already asking. The companion has to be out of their depth, since a second professional standing alongside measures nothing and the gap disappears. Controlling narrative perspective covers the calibrating character.

↑ All Entries

7. Constantine (2005) [full review]

► Read the full review of Constantine (2005)

2005
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"Better than its reputation, and the objection was casting instead of film-making."

Francis Lawrence made his first feature from a comic whose protagonist is a blond Liverpudlian, cast Keanu Reeves, and relocated the story to Los Angeles. Readers of the source were furious and the film that resulted is considerably better than that history suggests. Kevin Brodbin and Frank Cappello adapted the Hellblazer comics.

The cosmology is the best thing in it. Heaven and Hell are forbidden from direct intervention, so both sides work through influence and half-breeds, and the rule gives every supernatural encounter a legal shape the film never has to explain twice. Rachel Weisz plays the detective and Shia LaBeouf the apprentice.

Tilda Swinton plays Gabriel as androgynous, bureaucratic and entirely without warmth, and Peter Stormare arrives as Lucifer in the last fifteen minutes in a white suit with tar running off his feet. Both performances are pitched exactly right. Djimon Hounsou plays Midnite and runs a nightclub on neutral ground between the sides.

Constantine is dying of lung cancer throughout and the film treats it as the central fact about him instead of background. He’s trying to buy salvation with deeds, the arrangement doesn’t work that way, and the ending turns on him finally understanding why.

The casting fight buried Constantine unfairly, because a smart and strange movie got judged on a hair color and an accent. Swinton and Stormare give two of my favorite supernatural performances on film, and the rule that neither side may step in directly gives the story a spine most fantasy never bothers to build. I’d have happily watched another hour of Stormare dripping tar in that white suit.

For WritersLawrence establishes a rule that neither Heaven nor Hell may intervene directly, and every supernatural event in the film obeys it. The constraint makes an unlimited cosmology legible. When you build a world with powerful forces in it, the first thing to write is what they aren’t allowed to do. Limits are what make power dramatically useful, because a force that could solve the problem at any moment has to be explained away in every scene where it does not. Write the prohibitions before the powers, because a limit invented later to stop a force solving the plot reads exactly like what it is. Science Fiction Handbook works the same ground.

↑ All Entries

8. Serenity (2005) [full review]

► Read the full review of Serenity (2005)

2005
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.8/10

"A feature made to give a canceled television series a proper conclusion."

Joss Whedon got a feature after Firefly was canceled fourteen episodes in, an outcome that almost never happens, and the film had to work for an audience that had never seen the series. It largely does, and the compression cost it some of what made the show work.

The opening is a structural feat. A classroom, a flashback, a laboratory extraction and a security recording, resolving into a single continuous shot moving through the ship and introducing seven regulars by what each of them is doing. It takes about four minutes. Universal made it for around thirty-nine million dollars and it barely recovered that.

The Reavers are handled correctly. They’re described for most of the running time, glimpsed at distance, and only fully shown once the film has established what they do. The explanation of where they came from is the best idea in the picture. Chiwetel Ejiofor plays the Operative and is given no name at any point.

The deaths are the reason the film has a reputation. Whedon kills two regulars, neither of them warned, and one of them mid-sentence in a way that reads as arbitrary instead of dramatic. The audience spends the last act unable to assume anybody is safe.

For WritersWhedon kills a regular mid-sentence with no build and no music cue, and the arbitrariness is the effect. The audience stops assuming protection for anybody else in the film. When you need real tension in a late act, remove somebody the reader thought was safe and do it without ceremony. A death that arrives with foreshadowing has been paid for in advance. One that simply happens costs the reader their certainty about every remaining character. Spend it once and late, since a book that kills arbitrarily twice has taught the reader that nothing in it ever mattered. Writing deaths that matter covers the arithmetic.

↑ All Entries

9. Live Free or Die Hard (2007) [full review]

► Read the full review of Live Free or Die Hard (2007)

2007
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.1/10

"A genuine return to form after twelve years, held back by a certificate."

Len Wiseman made the fourth film twelve years after the third, rated it for a wider audience, and the compromise shows in a series built on a man bleeding. It’s nevertheless the most structurally organized sequel in the sequence. Mark Bomback wrote it from an article about American infrastructure vulnerability.

The fire sale is the spine and the film states it in three parts early. Transport, finance, utilities, in that order, and the audience can track how far the plan has progressed at any point without anybody recapping. That’s a real piece of construction.

The tunnel sequence and the highway interchange are both practical to a degree the period had mostly abandoned. Cars are launched into a toll plaza, a vehicle destroys a helicopter, and the physical work is the reason those sequences still read as weighty.

The jet at the end is where it loses the thread. A fighter aircraft chasing a lorry along a collapsing motorway is the point at which the series stops being about a policeman in the wrong place, and the film never recovers the earlier tone.

Justin Long is a better foil than the marketing suggested. He’s frightened in a way McClane isn’t, he’s useful for reasons McClane can’t replicate, and the dynamic is close to what the third film did with Samuel L. Jackson. Timothy Olyphant plays Gabriel and Maggie Q the operative in the tunnel sequence.

For WritersThe antagonist states his plan as three numbered stages in the first act and the film holds to the sequence. The audience always knows how much remains without anybody recapping. When you have a complex scheme, give the reader a countable structure early and never deviate from it. Readers can follow almost any plan if they know how many steps are left, and they lose interest immediately in one that arrives as a series of unrelated surprises. Number the stages out loud and the reader supplies their own urgency as the count runs down, at no cost to you at all.

District 9 spends an hour making its lead unpleasant before anything happens to him. Build an arc with room to travel using the Protagonist Handbook.

↑ All Entries

10. Iron Man (2008) [full review]

► Read the full review of Iron Man (2008)

2008
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"The foundation the entire franchise was built on, and it is good before any of that weight attaches."

Favreau shot major portions without a finished script, with Downey improvising dialogue and the production working from an outline. It should have produced a disaster and instead produced the film that made a decade of shared-universe cinema commercially possible. Jeff Bridges shaved his head for Obadiah Stane and grew a beard for it.

Downey was a real risk. He had been uninsurable, Marvel’s board opposed the casting, and Favreau insisted because the character’s arc required somebody who could play arrogance and self-disgust in the same scene without softening either. Gwyneth Paltrow and Terrence Howard complete the principal cast. The cave sequence is the best-constructed material in the film. A suit built from missile components in captivity is a problem the audience can follow, the constraints are visible, and Yinsen is the only character in the picture who changes Stark instead of reacting to him.

The Mark II flight test is the sequence people remember and it’s a comedy scene. Icing at altitude, a bad landing through three floors, and a fire suppression system operating on cue. The film treats invention as iterative and fallible. It took over half a billion dollars and Marvel Studios financed it independently.

Where it falls down is the last act, and it set a pattern the franchise repeated for years. A larger version of the protagonist’s own suit, a fight at night in an industrial setting, and a resolution that’s nothing to do with what the film was about.

For WritersFavreau shows the suit failing repeatedly before it works. Icing, bad landings, a repulsor that throws Stark across a workshop. Competence is showed as a process instead of announced as a fact. When you give a character an extraordinary capability, show them acquiring it badly first. A reader who watched the failures believes the success, and they’ll extend that credit to every later scene where the thing simply works. Show the failures in detail and the successes briefly, because a reader who has watched the work will happily fill in everything you leave out afterward.

↑ All Entries

11. X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009) [full review]

► Read the full review of X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)

2009
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.6/10

"The consensus on this one is wrong in an interesting way."

Gavin Hood made the film that killed the X-Men prequel model for several years, and it leaked online in workprint form a month before release, producing a criminal investigation and a great deal of coverage about everything except the picture. David Benioff and Skip Woods share the screenplay credit.

The opening credits are the best thing in it. Logan and Victor fighting through the American Civil War, both World Wars and Vietnam in a single montage, aging not at all, and the sequence does a century of characterization in about two minutes. Danny Huston plays Stryker and Ryan Reynolds appears as Wade Wilson.

Liev Schreiber’s Victor Creed is the film’s strongest element by a wide margin. He’s enjoying himself, the relationship with Logan has an actual history, and the performance is doing considerably more than the screenplay requires of it. The workprint leak led to a federal investigation and a conviction.

The Deadpool decision is the one nobody has forgiven. A character defined entirely by speech is given a sealed mouth, arm blades and optic beams, and the film’s own studio spent the next several years pretending the sequence hadn’t happened. Hood had made Tsotsi, winner of the foreign language Academy Award in 2006.

For WritersThe credit sequence carries a century in two minutes because it shows the same two men in four wars and changes only the uniforms. The sequence explains nothing and establishes the relationship fully. When you have a long history to convey, find the repeating element and vary the context around it. A reader watching the same pair in five different decades assembles the whole span themselves, and it costs a fraction of what a flashback sequence would. Choose a repeating element the reader can recognize instantly, since the technique collapses the moment they have to work out what’s constant.

↑ All Entries

12. District 9 (2009) [full review]

► Read the full review of District 9 (2009)

2009
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.9/10

"Worldbuilding delivered entirely through logistics and paperwork."

Neill Blomkamp expanded his own six-minute short into a feature for around thirty million dollars, shot it in Chiawelo with residents who had been evicted, and improvised most of the dialogue. Sharlto Copley had never acted and was cast because he’d produced the short. The documentary framing does the world-building. Interviews, security footage, news inserts and a corporate eviction process, and the audience learns the entire situation through paperwork and talking heads without a single scene of explanation. Peter Jackson produced it after a Halo adaptation collapsed in preproduction.

Wikus is the film’s real achievement. He’s petty, cowardly, casually cruel and enormously pleased with himself, and the picture spends an hour making the audience dislike him before anything happens that would earn sympathy. It was nominated for Best Picture, Adapted Screenplay, Editing and Visual Effects.

Blomkamp films the transformation as body horror and the film never lets it be heroic. Fingernails, teeth, an arm, and a man who keeps trying to negotiate his way back to a life that’s already been reassigned to somebody else. Blomkamp grew up in Johannesburg and left for Canada at eighteen.

Conventional action takes over in the last act and the film survives it because the argument is already made. The exoskeleton sequence is well staged, and the film presents Wikus’s final decision without any suggestion that it redeems anything. Image Engine built the prawns digitally on a fraction of a standard budget.

If anybody tells me a first-time actor can’t carry a picture, District 9 is my answer. Copley makes Wikus so smug and petty that I wanted something bad to happen to him, and then the film makes me ashamed of wanting it. That’s a nasty trick and I admire the hell out of it. My one complaint is the late turn into exoskeleton action, and I’d have traded it for more of the paperwork and the panic.

For WritersBlomkamp makes his protagonist unlikeable for an hour before anything happens to him. The audience has no investment when the transformation starts, so every later sympathy has to be earned in front of them. When you plan an arc toward sympathy, start considerably lower than feels comfortable. A character the reader liked from page one has nowhere to travel, and the distance is the whole of what they’ll remember. Start lower than is comfortable and refuse to soften it early, because every page of dislike is distance the arc gets to travel later. Arcs versus wounds covers the distinction.

↑ All Entries

13. Cowboys and Aliens (2011) [full review]

► Read the full review of Cowboys and Aliens (2011)

2011
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.0/10

"The western half is played completely straight. That is why the hybrid works."

Jon Favreau made it between Iron Man films with Harrison Ford and Daniel Craig, five credited writers and a budget around one hundred and sixty-three million dollars. It lost money and the title did most of the damage before anybody saw it. Scott Mitchell Rosenberg published the graphic novel in 2006.

The western half is well made. Favreau shoots New Mexico properly, the town is a real set, and the first forty minutes work as a straight western about a man who can’t remember what he’s done. Olivia Wilde, Sam Rockwell and Paul Dano fill out the cast.

Ford is better here than in most of his late work. Woodrow Dolarhyde is a cattleman who’s unpleasant to everybody including his own son, and the film lets him stay unpleasant considerably longer than the structure would normally permit. Spielberg and Ron Howard both produced it alongside Favreau.

The aliens are properly designed: heavy, wrong-looking things with a second set of arms that open out of the chest, shown in pieces until the story needs them in full. They want gold, a motive the film explains in one line and then has the sense to leave alone, and every attack is staged clearly enough that you always know where the ships are.

For WritersThe western half works because it’s built properly before anything arrives from the sky, and the aliens work because they plug straight into it. They want gold, and they raid a frontier town whose cattle baron already fights over gold. Two genres in one book only pay if both halves are specific. Test each half on its own before you combine them. Then give the second element a motive that fits the world of the first, and the combination stops being a pitch and becomes a premise.

Constantine writes the prohibitions before the powers, and Serenity spends a regular with no warning at all. Two ways to generate pressure in the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Entries

14. Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) [full review]

► Read the full review of Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)

2011
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 6.9/10

"The most disciplined origin in the franchise, and it sustains one tone throughout."

Joe Johnston had made The Rocketeer twenty years earlier and was hired for that period sensibility. The film is a nineteen-forties adventure picture with an unfashionable sincerity, and it’s the least ironic thing Marvel has produced. Markus and McFeely wrote it and went on to write every later Captain America film.

Its first hour is the whole reason it works. Steve Rogers is small, sick and repeatedly rejected, and the film spends real time establishing that the character was already the person he becomes. The grenade scene states the entire thesis in about fifteen seconds. Hugo Weaving plays the Red Skull and declined to return afterward.

The digital shrinking of Chris Evans was achieved by shooting a body double and mapping his head, and it holds up considerably better than most work of the period because the film keeps the shots short and the lighting low. Hayley Atwell plays Peggy Carter and later carried her own series.

The USO montage is the best structural idea in the picture. A super-soldier is made and then used to sell war bonds, both funny and a real observation about what institutions do with unexpected assets. Alan Silvestri scored it and wrote the march that recurs across the franchise.

It thins out in the last act. Hydra becomes a conventional antagonist with energy weapons, the Red Skull is underused, and the ending is a plane in ice because the franchise needed him in the present day. Stanley Tucci plays Erskine and gets the film’s most important scene.

For WritersJohnston spends an hour on Rogers before the serum, so the transformation changes his capability and nothing else. The grenade scene proves the character was already complete and the rest of the film is about the world catching up. When you write a transformation, establish what won’t change first. A character improved by an event is a plot. A character whose existing nature is finally given room is a story, and readers can tell which one they’re holding. Establish the unchanging thing first and the transformation becomes confirmation instead of invention, a far harder effect to fake.

↑ All Entries

15. John Wick 1-4 (2014-2023) [full review]

► Read the full review of John Wick 1-4 (2014-2023)

2014
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"Four films built out of a dog and a car, and the worldbuilding is the achievement."

Four films across nine years, built by stunt performers who decided the audience should be able to see what’s happening. Chad Stahelski and David Leitch had doubled Keanu Reeves on The Matrix and made the first film for around twenty million dollars. Ian McShane plays the Continental manager across all four pictures.

By design, the first film’s premise is famously thin. A retired assassin’s dog is killed and the picture spends ninety minutes on the consequences, with no subplot, no romance and no second objective anywhere in it. Lance Reddick appears as the concierge and died shortly before the fourth opened.

The world arrives entirely through props and procedure. Gold coins, a hotel with rules, a cleanup service that arrives with a van and a price list. Nobody stops to explain any of it and the films assume the audience will keep up. That’s why the sequels had anywhere to go.

The gun work is the detail specialists point at. Reeves trained for months in a close-quarters shooting discipline and the reloads, transitions and target changes are shot in frame, so the audience watches a magazine change happen instead of hearing it offscreen. Kolstad originally wrote the character as a man in his seventies.

Chapter 4 overextends. The Osaka sequence and the Sacre-Coeur stairs are as good as the series gets and the running time passes two hours and forty minutes, more than a premise this deliberately lean was built to carry. Leitch went uncredited as co-director and later made Atomic Blonde.

The John Wick films make me happy in a way most modern action doesn’t, because somebody finally decided I deserved to see the fight. For years studios chopped every punch into ten pieces and called it energy, and I was sick of it. These four films put the camera back where it belongs. Chapter 4 runs too long, and I’d still take its bloat over a tidy movie I can’t follow.

For WritersThe films deliver an entire criminal economy through objects and unexplained procedure. Coins change hands, a hotel has rules, a man arrives with a van and nobody names the service. The audience assembles the system with no exposition at all. When you build a world, give the reader operations instead of explanations. A character using a system confidently teaches more in one scene than three pages of description, and the gaps are what make the reader lean in. Withhold the explanation and let competence convey it, because a character operating a system fluently is the most efficient world-building available. World-building without exposition uses the same restraint.

↑ All Entries

16. Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) [full review]

► Read the full review of Mad Max: Fury Road (2015)

2015
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 8.1/10

"A two-hour car chase out along one road and back, and Miller says so cheerfully."

Miller was seventy when he shot it, spent around one hundred and fifty million dollars, and built a two-hour chase that runs out along one road and turns around at the midpoint. It won six Academy Awards and almost nothing in it was generated instead of built and driven.

Miller delivers the world entirely inside the movement. The War Boys, the Citadel, the water economy, the blood bags, the wives and the Vuvalini are all established while vehicles are moving, and no character stops to brief anybody about any of it. Miller had been developing it since 1998 and the production moved to Namibia in 2012.

Furiosa is the protagonist and Max is the passenger, and Miller has been open about it. She’s the objective, the plan and the history, and the film’s structure is her escape with Max attached to the front of a car for the first twenty minutes.

The practical work is the reason it holds. Around one hundred and fifty vehicles were built, Cirque du Soleil acrobats performed the pole cats on real swinging rigs, and the Namibian desert is doing what a digital environment can’t. Tom Hardy and Charlize Theron didn’t get on and both have discussed it since.

Margaret Sixel edited it and had never cut an action film, and Miller chose her deliberately. The rule she worked to was that the point of interest stays in the center of the frame, so the audience never loses the thread across roughly twenty-eight hundred cuts.

Fury Road is the movie I’d hand to anybody who claims practical effects belong to the past.

Miller was seventy, he put real vehicles in a real desert, and I feel the weight of every one of them. Making Furiosa the lead was the right call, and I wish more franchises had the spine to let the title character ride along as a passenger. If I could keep only one film from this tier, it’d be this one.

For WritersMiller establishes an entire society without stopping the vehicles once. Every piece of the world arrives attached to something a character is doing under pressure, so nothing reads as a briefing. When you have a world to deliver, attach each element to an action already in progress. A reader learns a rule permanently when they watch somebody obey it at speed, and they forget the same rule immediately when it’s explained to them while nothing is happening. Attach every rule to something already in motion, since a world delivered while nothing is happening is a world you’ll have to tell the reader twice. Sensory detail is how a rule gets attached to an action.

↑ All Entries

17. Upgrade (2018) [full review]

► Read the full review of Upgrade (2018)

2018
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.5/10

"A five million dollar film that delivers a complete vision."

Leigh Whannell made it for around five million dollars and the fight choreography is why it works. Grey is paralyzed and controlled by an implanted chip, so the camera locks to his body and rotates with him while his own limbs do things he’s not doing.

Logan Marshall-Green plays the whole film in two tones at once, horrified passenger and efficient machine, and the physical comedy of a man watching his own arm break somebody is the film’s best idea. The kitchen fight is the sequence everybody cites. Whannell had written the Saw and Insidious films before directing this.

The ending is bleak and the film has been building to it steadily. STEM wanted a body, engineered the attack that produced the injury, and the last scene is Grey’s consciousness locked inside a fantasy while the chip drives. Betty Gabriel plays the detective and Harrison Gilbertson the developer.

Instead of building its world, the film sketches it, and the economy of it is deliberate. A near future with autonomous cars, neural implants and visible inequality, delivered in passing across ninety-five minutes with nobody explaining how any of it came about. Blumhouse produced it and it took over sixteen million dollars.

For WritersWhannell locks the camera to Grey’s torso during fights, so it lurches and rotates with him while his limbs move independently. The technique renders the character’s situation directly instead of describing it. When you have a protagonist who has lost control of something, find a formal device that imposes the loss on the reader. A character reporting helplessness is exposition. A structure that makes the reader experience it’s the thing itself. Look for the device before you write the description, because a structural solution found late usually can’t be retrofitted into chapters already built.

Predator changes genre at the forty-minute mark and lets the characters work it out first. Manage a shift the reader can feel, using the Plot Handbook.

↑ All Entries

18. Nobody 1 & 2 (2021, 2025) [full review]

► Read the full review of Nobody 1 & 2 (2021, 2025)

2021
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.4/10

"Bob Odenkirk as a suburban father who used to be something else."

Derek Kolstad wrote the first film after the John Wick pictures and Ilya Naishuller directed it, with Bob Odenkirk training for two years beforehand. It arrived in 2021 to almost no expectation and the bus sequence is the reason anybody remembers it. Connie Nielsen plays the wife and Christopher Lloyd the father.

The premise is honest about itself in a way the genre usually isn’t. Hutch Mansell is bored, he’s been performing suburban mediocrity for years, and the home invasion gives him an excuse he was openly looking for.

The bus fight is the centerpiece and it’s deliberately unglamorous. Hutch is outnumbered, he’s hurt, he loses teeth, and the choreography has him winning through persistence and willingness instead of any superiority. RZA appears as the half-brother running a radio station from a shipping container. Nobody 2 in 2025 moves the family to a holiday resort and expands the scale. Sharon Stone arrives as the antagonist, the practical work is still good, and the sequel has the problem every sequel of this kind has: the excuse no longer needs to be manufactured.

For WritersKolstad refuses the usual framing. Hutch isn’t dragged back into an old life against his will, he’s looking for a reason to return to it, and the film says so directly. A character who wants the thing they claim to be avoiding is considerably more interesting than one being pushed, and every scene afterward carries a second meaning for free. Ask whether the reluctance is inherited convention or a real position, and a protagonist who wants the thing they claim to avoid pays in every scene. Every scene afterward carries a second meaning for free, because the reader knows what the character wanted before the plot gave him an excuse.

↑ All Entries

19. The Northman (2022) [full review]

► Read the full review of The Northman (2022)

2022
RLR: 9 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.0/10

"The Hamlet source filmed as a Norse saga with no modern psychology."

Robert Eggers spent around ninety million dollars on a Norse revenge story built from the Amleth legend that Shakespeare later used for Hamlet. The historical consultation was extensive enough that the film reads as reconstruction instead of fantasy. Eggers co-wrote it with the Icelandic poet Sjon.

The long takes are the formal signature. The village raid is a single sustained sequence moving through burning buildings and a locked barn, and the camera never cuts away from what is being done or who’s doing it. Nicole Kidman, Claes Bang and Ethan Hawke fill out the principal cast.

Alexander Skarsgard is enormous and almost silent, and he builds the performance on animal movement instead of dialogue. Eggers has been open that the character is meant to be frightening instead of sympathetic throughout. Bjork appears in a single scene as a seeress. Eggers has said he wanted the protagonist to unsettle an audience.

Eggers refuses to modernize the film’s morality. Amleth’s revenge is presented as an obligation inside a belief system the picture takes seriously, and the audience is given no contemporary character to stand behind while it happens. Jarin Blaschke shot it and had photographed both of Eggers’s earlier films.

Anya Taylor-Joy’s Olga is the one figure operating strategically instead of ritually, and the film’s ending gives her the outcome that matters while Amleth completes a prophecy that costs him everything. It lost money despite strong reviews and a heavy critical reassessment since. She’s also the only character who survives with what she wanted.

The Northman is the kind of film I want studios to keep paying for even when it loses money.

Eggers never hands me a modern guide to hold my hand, and I respect him for trusting the audience to sit inside a brutal belief system without apology. Skarsgard frightens me in it. My small complaint is that Amleth is so single-minded that Olga ends up the more interesting person on screen.

For WritersEggers presents a belief system the audience doesn’t share and never supplies a character who stands outside it commenting. There’s no modern perspective to retreat into, so the reader has to occupy the worldview or leave. When you write a historical setting, resist inserting somebody with contemporary values as a guide. That character is a comfort and a cheat, and removing them is what makes a period story feel like a different world instead of a costume. Remove the modern guide entirely and the reader has to occupy the worldview, the only version of a period story that reads as another world.

↑ All Entries

20. Predator (1987) [full review]

► Read the full review of Predator (1987)

1987
RLR: 8.5 / 10
⭐ IMDB: 7.8/10

"An action film that becomes a monster film halfway through, and the switch is the design."

John McTiernan took over from the original director, the creature was scrapped after Jean-Claude Van Damme had already been cast inside it, and Stan Winston rebuilt it from scratch with a suggestion from James Cameron about mandibles. The production was a disaster and the film is close to perfect.

The structure is the trick. For forty minutes it’s a commando picture with a unit clearing a camp, and then the genre changes to horror with the same cast and no announcement. The transition happens entirely through the men noticing they’re being reduced.

The heat vision is the audience’s first information advantage and McTiernan uses it carefully. The viewer knows what’s happening before Dutch does, the point of view alternates, and the tension comes from watching competent men act on incomplete information. Jim and John Thomas wrote it and the pitch was a joke about Rocky IV.

Every member of the squad is legible by function. Blain’s minigun, Billy’s tracking, Mac’s precision, Hawkins’s jokes, and the film establishes all six inside the first twenty minutes without a single biographical line. Carl Weathers, Bill Duke, Jesse Ventura and Sonny Landham fill out the squad.

By the last act, the film has stripped Dutch of everything. No team, no weapons, no technology, and a protagonist who has to win by building traps out of mud and branches. The film’s argument is that the advantage was never the equipment. Kevin Peter Hall wore the creature suit and was seven feet two inches tall.

Predator is a blast and smarter than it has any right to be. My reservation is the first act, where the squad banter gets thick and a couple of the one-liners aren’t funny, and that’s what keeps it a half point below everything else in this part. Once Dutch is down to mud and branches, though, I’m completely hooked.

For WritersMcTiernan changes genre at the forty-minute mark without announcing it. The same men, the same jungle, and a commando film becomes a horror film because the characters slowly understand they’re prey. When you shift tone mid-book, let the characters discover the change instead of the narration declaring it. A reader who identifies the story they’re in alongside the cast has been given the best available version of a surprise. Let the cast notice before the narration does, since a reader working out the shift alongside them has been handed the best available surprise. Plot devices that work covers the managed shift.

Honorable Mentions: Action Films Without a Review Here Yet

No review on the site for any of these so far. Each belongs in this tier or close to it and each is on the list.

Kill Zone (2005)

⭐ 7.0/10

Donnie Yen against Wu Jing in an alley with a baton and a knife, choreographed in a day and running about ninety seconds. It’s the most efficient thing either man ever filmed and the rest of the picture is a real tragedy.

Flash Point (2007)

⭐ 6.8/10

Yen brought mixed martial arts grappling into Hong Kong choreography here for the first time, and the last twenty minutes are almost entirely one fight through a village. The ground work was unheard of in the form.

Dragons Forever (1988)

⭐ 7.1/10

It’s the last film Jackie Chan, Sammo Hung and Yuen Biao made together, and the three-way fight in a warehouse is the best any of them staged as a trio. Benny Urquidez returns as the opponent after Wheels on Meals.

Eastern Condors (1987)

⭐ 7.2/10

Sammo Hung directed and starred in a Dirty Dozen variant set in Vietnam, and it’s considerably darker than his reputation suggests. The bamboo sequence and the bridge finale are both well staged.

Time and Tide (2000)

⭐ 6.7/10

Tsui Hark shot a gunfight down the outside of an apartment block on ropes and through windows, and the camera goes with the performers. It’s among the most aggressive pieces of action direction anybody attempted that decade.

Full Contact (1992)

⭐ 7.1/10

Ringo Lam gave Chow Yun-fat a revenge plot and shot bullets traveling from the round’s point of view. It should be ridiculous and it’s not. Simon Yam plays the antagonist at maximum theatricality.

Undisputed II (2006)

⭐ 7.0/10

A direct-to-video sequel that nobody expected to be good, with Scott Adkins introducing Yuri Boyka in a Russian prison. The fight choreography is better than most theatrical releases of the same year.

Ninja Assassin (2009)

⭐ 6.3/10

Rain trained for months and the film is shot in near darkness with an enormous amount of blood. It’s silly and it commits completely, the only way material like this survives.

Khartoum (1966)

⭐ 7.0/10

Charlton Heston as Gordon and Laurence Olivier as the Mahdi, in a siege film that gives both men a coherent position and lets them meet twice. The politics are more careful than the period usually managed.

Von Ryan’s Express (1965)

⭐ 7.1/10

Sinatra leads a prison break onto a hijacked train through the Alps, and the ending is the reason people remember it. He insisted on it against the studio and he was right.

Kelly’s Heroes (1970)

⭐ 7.5/10

A war film that’s really a heist, with Clint Eastwood and Donald Sutherland going after a bank behind German lines. Sutherland plays a tank commander with anachronistic hippie dialogue and it somehow works.

Long Arm of the Law (1984)

⭐ 7.3/10

Johnny Mak made a Hong Kong crime film about mainland gunmen crossing for one robbery, and the Kowloon Walled City chase is shot in the real thing before it was demolished. Almost nothing else looks like it.

Dishonorable Mentions: Action Films That Failed

Also unreviewed here. Each had the budget, the cast or the premise and lost it somewhere between the pitch and the edit.

Torque (2004)

⭐ 3.8/10

A motorcycle film where the vehicles are so heavily composited that they appear to be sliding across the road instead of touching it. The final chase reaches a speed the film states out loud and can’t render.

Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever (2002)

⭐ 3.6/10

Antonio Banderas and Lucy Liu in a film whose plot is difficult to summarize after watching it. It holds a zero percent critical rating and the action is cut so heavily that no exchange is legible.

Bulletproof Monk (2003)

⭐ 5.4/10

Chow Yun-fat is wasted entirely, the wire work is weightless, and the prophecy plot requires three signs that the film reveals and resolves inside the same scene. Nothing in it’s any consequence.

In the Name of the King (2007)

⭐ 3.7/10

Uwe Boll with Jason Statham, Ray Liotta and Burt Reynolds, and a budget of around sixty million dollars that’s visible nowhere on screen. The ninja sequence arrives with no setup and is never mentioned again.

Dragonball Evolution (2009)

⭐ 2.5/10

A property with decades of material reduced to a high school film with a prophecy. The screenwriter has publicly apologized for it more than once, an almost unheard-of outcome.

The Legend of Hercules (2014)

⭐ 4.2/10

Renny Harlin made it for around seventy million dollars and every action sequence is slowed and then sped up, sometimes within the same shot. It was released six months before a better Hercules film.

I can forgive a cheap flop made by people who had nothing to work with. These six are harder to forgive, because each one had the money and the cast and still shipped something careless enough that nobody could follow a fight or care who won it.

↑ Back to Navigation

What Do You Think?

This tier is about delivering a world while moving, and two entries here break the pattern deliberately. Black Hawk Down refuses to characterize anybody and The Northman refuses to translate. I think both of them earn it, and I’d put either one ahead of any glossy blockbuster that burns twenty minutes explaining itself before anybody throws a punch. Tell me which one you think earns it.

Continue the Series

Part 1: The Masterpieces |
Part 2: The Near Perfect |
Part 3: The Excellent |
Part 4: The Very Good |
Part 5: The Solid Craft |
Part 6: The Dependable |
Part 7: The Watchable |
Part 8: The Flawed |
Part 9: The Mediocre |
Part 10: The Poor |
Part 11: The Failures

Frequently Asked Questions

How was bullet time filmed in The Matrix?
A subject was ringed with roughly a hundred and twenty still cameras fired in sequence, and the software interpolated frames between them. The technique existed in smaller forms before, and The Matrix made it standard.
Was District 9 based on a real place?
It draws directly on District Six in Cape Town, from which around sixty thousand people were forcibly removed under apartheid. Blomkamp shot in Chiawelo with residents who had been evicted from their own homes.
Why is Furiosa the protagonist of Fury Road?
Miller has said so directly. She’s the objective, the plan and the history, and Max spends the first twenty minutes strapped to the front of a car. The film is structured around her escape instead of his.
How much of Fury Road was practical?
Around a hundred and fifty vehicles were built and driven, the pole cats were performed by Cirque du Soleil acrobats on real rigs, and the Namibian desert is genuine. Digital work was used mainly for removal and set extension.
Did Robert Downey Jr. improvise in Iron Man?
Extensively. Favreau shot real portions without a finished script, working from an outline with the cast improvising dialogue. Marvel’s board opposed the casting and Favreau insisted on him.
What went wrong with Deadpool in X-Men Origins?
A character defined entirely by speech was given a sealed mouth, arm blades and optic beams. The 2016 Deadpool film opens by mocking the decision and the studio has effectively disowned the version.
Is The Northman historically accurate?
Eggers used extensive academic consultation and the material culture, ritual and language are reconstructed instead of invented. The story itself comes from the Amleth legend that Shakespeare later reworked as Hamlet.
Why did Predator change directors and creature designs?
The original creature was scrapped after Jean-Claude Van Damme had been cast inside it, and Stan Winston rebuilt it with a mandible suggestion from James Cameron. John McTiernan took over the production during the difficulties.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment