Latest
SMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableFree BooksJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends On

Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave (1995)

TL;DR: Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave (1995) rates 10 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. A Close Shave is the third Wallace and Gromit short and one of the finest pieces of stop-motion animation ever produced. The short runs approximately thirty minutes.
Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave (1995)
10 / 10

Official trailer

Nick Park directed A Close Shave, the third Wallace and Gromit short. Wallace and Gromit have started a window-washing service while sheep disappear from local farms, and Wallace has fallen for Wendolene Ramsbottom, the owner of a wool shop.

The plot involves a corrupt cyber-dog named Preston, mechanized sheep-rustling, and a chase across the countryside that culminates in Gromit flying the detached sidecar as an airplane while Wallace is trapped in Preston’s truck. The film won the Academy Award for Best Animated Short Film at the 68th Academy Awards in 1996, the second consecutive Wallace and Gromit short to win the award after The Wrong Trousers in 1993.

Aardman Animations produced. The production team had grown by the third short but Park remained the central creative force. Every aspect of the production reflects his sensibility, including the introduction of Shaun the sheep, who would later spin off into his own franchise.

Thirty minutes has never felt this full to me. Every frame is packed with jokes, Gromit acts more with nothing but his brow than most live-action stars manage with their whole faces, and I’m grinning from start to finish.

The Sheep

The film introduces Shaun the sheep, who has been a Wallace and Gromit auxiliary character ever since. Shaun is the sheep Wallace rescues from Preston’s mechanized truck and accidentally adopts.

His name is a pun. Wallace shears him and tells Gromit he’s a “shaun sheep.” Gromit’s face in response is among the best individual reactions in stop-motion history. The character has been popular enough to support his own television series and two feature films across the later thirty years.

Gromit’s deadpan look at that pun is my favorite single gag in the short, and it shows how much Park trusts silence to sell the joke.

The decision to introduce a character who would become this significant in a thirty-minute short is the kind of long-term thinking most franchise builders don’t attempt.

Park and Aardman didn’t know Shaun would matter. They built him into the story because the story needed a sheep. The character’s later prominence is a happy accident of the original design being durable enough to support expansion.

For Writers

Strong supporting characters can outgrow their original purpose. Shaun was a supporting character in A Close Shave. He’s now the protagonist of multiple feature films and a long-running television series. The transition was possible because the character was realized in detail instead of generically functional. The lesson is to invest in supporting characters as if they might become protagonists. The ones with distinct traits, reactions, and points of view are the ones that can carry their own work later.

Preston

Preston ranks among the great villains in animation history despite appearing for under thirty minutes.

He’s a black robotic dog who has been disguising himself as a real dog working for Wendolene. The reveal that Preston is mechanical instead of biological happens when he’s sucked into his own Knit-o-Matic. Underneath is a chrome skeleton with red eyes. The Wallace and Gromit canon has few more memorable images.

The character works because the script lets him be both menacing and slightly pathetic.

Wendolene’s late father built Preston. He’s gone rogue. He can’t help his nature any more than Gromit can. The third-act sequence in which his own meat-processing machine destroys Preston is properly gruesome for a children’s film. Park doesn’t soften the consequences for the audience or for Preston.

Park earns credit for letting Preston’s end be this grim. A timid children’s film would’ve let him slink off into the hills, and the short is braver and funnier because it doesn’t.

For Writers

A villain whose nature isn’t entirely his fault is more interesting than a villain who chose his evil. Preston is a machine doing what he was built to do. He can’t stop. The pathos of his destruction is part of why the climax works. The lesson is that antagonists who are products of their construction or circumstances can be sympathetic even while being dangerous. The two qualities aren’t in tension. They reinforce each other.

The Chase

The motorcycle and sidecar chase sequence is among the most-quoted action sequences in any animation. Wallace and Gromit give chase on the motorcycle. The sidecar detaches and turns into an airplane, and Gromit takes the chase into the air. The sheep ride in a sheep-shaped vehicle.

Preston pursues in his automated truck. The geography of the chase is clear. Park paces the escalation carefully. He stages the climactic confrontation with Preston’s truck and Wallace’s spinning-blade contraption with the kind of structural clarity that most live-action action films don’t achieve.

The technical labor required to animate this much movement in stop-motion is approximately what animating a full feature film would require in CGI. The sequence is the longest sustained chase in any Wallace and Gromit short.

That chase is the section I’d show anyone who thinks stop-motion is quaint. It’s faster and clearer than most live-action action, and it’s funny the whole way through.

For Writers

Action sequences in animation can be choreographed with a precision that live-action sequences can’t match because the animator controls every frame. Aardman uses this control to make the geography of the chase legible at every moment. The audience always knows where each vehicle is, what each driver wants, and what the obstacles are. The lesson is that complex action in any medium benefits from absolute clarity of position and intent. Confusion in an action sequence is a writer’s failure.

Craft Note

Nick Park directed and wrote, with Bob Baker. Peter Sallis voiced Wallace. Anne Reid voiced Wendolene. Aardman Animations produced. Originally broadcast on BBC December 1995. Won the Academy Award for Best Animated Short Film at the 68th Academy Awards in 1996. Approximately thirty-minute runtime. Introduced Shaun the sheep, who later spun off into his own franchise.

Is Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave as good as people say?

10/10. A Close Shave is thirty minutes of Aardman and Nick Park at the top of their game, and I can’t find a thing I’d change. The chase is a small miracle of stop-motion labor, Preston is a villain I’d put up against anything in animation, and Shaun’s introduction launched a franchise almost by accident. Watch it, then watch the rest of the Wallace and Gromit shorts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is A Close Shave the first appearance of Shaun the Sheep?
Yes. Shaun debuts in A Close Shave and was named in this film. The Shaun the Sheep television series began in 2007 and the feature films in 2015.
How long is Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave?
Approximately thirty minutes. The standard Wallace and Gromit short runtime.
Did Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave win an Oscar?
Yes. Best Animated Short Film at the 68th Academy Awards in 1996.
How does Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave compare to the other Wallace and Gromit shorts?
Comparable to The Wrong Trousers (1993). That also won the Best Short Oscar. A Grand Day Out (1989) is also excellent but slightly less polished. A Matter of Loaf and Death (2008) and Vengeance Most Fowl (2024) are also strong.
Is Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave right for very young children?
Yes. The villain’s destruction is intense but not traumatic. Children of any age can handle the film.
Who voiced Wendolene in Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave?
Anne Reid. British actress with extensive television credits. Her voice work in the short is one of the best things in it.
Is Wallace & Gromit: A Close Shave worth watching?
Yes. Foundational viewing for anyone interested in animation.

On my film lists

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.