Latest
He Banned AI From His Writing Group. His Own Cover Got Called AI Slop.Who Writes the Fake Fan Mail Authors Get? Inside the Scam CompoundsSMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookFree BooksHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeI Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.AI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a Fee

Thunderbolts (2025) Review

TL;DR: Thunderbolts (2025) rates 1 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Florence Pugh’s Yelena carries another film that fails. Mental health as decorative content.
Thunderbolts (2025)
1 / 10

Official trailer

I’ve watched Thunderbolts once. The 1 is for one of the Phase Five entries that confirmed the franchise crisis state extends across the wider MCU regardless of specific property changes. The film attempts to assemble a team of antiheroes and morally compromised characters into something resembling the Suicide Squad structure that DC had explored. The attempt fails. The characters don’t cohere as ensemble. The film deploys the mental-health themes as decorative content instead of essential plot. The Sentry / Void antagonist mechanic is structurally confused.

Florence Pugh’s Yelena Belova holds up the film through individual performance quality without the surrounding production supporting her work. The 1 is for a film whose individual elements work at varying quality levels embedded in a production that doesn’t function as unified narrative.

I wanted Pugh to finally get a film worthy of her, and this one irritated me from the vault onward. Yelena is the best new character Marvel has built in years, and here she’s stuck minding a roster of leftovers while the script talks about depression without doing anything with it.

Whenever she’s on screen I sit up. Whenever the film cuts away from her, I can feel the air go out of it.

The Setup

Valentina Allegra de Fontaine has been recruiting morally compromised operatives across multiple Disney+ series and MCU productions. The roster includes Yelena Belova (Black Widow), Ghost (Ant-Man and the Wasp), John Walker (the failed Captain America replacement from The Falcon and the Winter Soldier), and Taskmaster. The operatives are sent to a remote vault for missions and discover that Valentina has been arranging for them to kill each other as part of her broader plan to eliminate compromising witnesses to her covert programs. Bucky Barnes, now a congressman, and Red Guardian (Yelena’s surrogate father from Black Widow) join the survivors later.

The team members survive the initial vault situation and discover Robert Reynolds, a Project Sentry test subject whose unstable mental state and reality-warping capabilities threaten broader destruction.

Reynolds is the Sentry, a Superman-analogue with a parallel personality, the Void, that emerges during mental health crises. The middle act involves the team working through their broken trust while attempting to manage the Reynolds situation. The third act features the Sentry/Void’s near-destruction of New York and the team’s eventual stabilization of Reynolds through emotional acceptance instead of through physical combat.

Florence Pugh’s Performance

Florence Pugh continues as Yelena Belova in her largest MCU appearance since Black Widow.

The performance is strong and represents the film’s most consistent craft achievement. Pugh brings specific physical capability, emotional accessibility, and comedic timing to the role. The Yelena character has been the franchise’s most successful new lead introduction of the Phase Four-Five period.

The performance is operating in a different tone than the surrounding film supports. Pugh commits to real dramatic engagement with Yelena’s depression, professional disillusionment, and grief over her sister Natasha. The surrounding production doesn’t match the performance level. Other team members work at considerably lower commitment levels. The dialogue serving Pugh’s specific dramatic moments is uneven. The cumulative effect is that Pugh’s individual achievement exists within a production that can’t fully support what she’s doing.

Pugh is the one thing I’d save from this film. She plays Yelena’s grief for Natasha like it hurts, and I believed her. What made me grind my teeth is how little the people around her are asked to match it.

The pattern matches the wider Phase Four-Five issue of strong individual performances trapped within structurally compromised productions. Pugh’s Yelena in Black Widow (rated 0) had been the film’s only successful element. Pugh’s Yelena in Thunderbolts is similarly the film’s central asset. The franchise has consistently used Pugh’s commitment to raise material that doesn’t deserve her work. The pattern is unsustainable. Pugh’s individual career commitment can’t continue rescuing productions that fail through systematic problems beyond any individual actor’s ability to address.

For Writers

Thunderbolts shows the limits of individual performance rescue. Florence Pugh delivers strong work that works at higher craft level than the surrounding production supports. The performance can’t save the wider film because films fail through accumulated structural problems instead of through individual element weakness. Even exceptional performances can only rescue productions whose underlying structure is sound. The lesson for writers and production developers is that performance quality is necessary but not sufficient for film success.

If your screenplay doesn’t support your lead performer, the lead performer can’t save the screenplay through commitment alone. Pugh’s Yelena in this film delivers what the character requires. The film around the character doesn’t deliver what the ensemble structure requires. The performance survives the failure as individual achievement. The film doesn’t survive as production. Audiences experience both elements but the structural failure dominates the wider response.

The Mental Health Decoration

The film extensively positions itself as engagement with mental health themes. Yelena’s depression. Walker’s PTSD from his Captain America failure. Ghost’s continuing isolation. Reynolds’s psychotic dissociation. The team’s collective trauma and emotional dysregulation. The marketing emphasized these elements as evidence of the film’s real thematic engagement.

The mental health content annoyed me most, because it’s decorative signaling and none of it drives the plot. Remove the framing and the story proceeds with minor changes. Yelena’s depression gets verbal references and doesn’t shape the team’s mission. Walker’s PTSD is mentioned and never drives a decision some other trait couldn’t have driven. Reynolds’s dissociation is a villain mechanic the script could have built from ordinary motives. I think the film wanted credit for the subject without the substance.

The pattern is the wider Phase Four-Five issue of decorative thematic signaling combined with weak storytelling.

Mental health themes are positioned as evidence of the production’s real ambition. The themes themselves don’t generate plot or character development beyond their immediate scene references. The audience receives the signaling as marketing emphasis instead of as essential dramatic foundation. The signaling generates audience resistance that the franchise has consistently underestimated.

The Reynolds / Void resolution works through emotional acceptance instead of through physical combat.

The team eventually stabilizes Reynolds by engaging with his mental health instead of by fighting him. The resolution is presented as triumph of compassion over violence. The execution feels procedural instead of earned. The audience receives the emotional resolution as plot requirement instead of as developed character growth.

The Sentry / Void Mechanic

Lewis Pullman plays Robert Reynolds as the Sentry / Void character. The character is a Superman-analogue with parallel personality that emerges during mental health crises. The Sentry possesses effectively unlimited power. The Void represents Reynolds’s depression and self-loathing manifested as destructive force. The character’s mental state determines which version works at any given moment.

The mechanic is structurally confused. The film can’t establish clear rules for when Reynolds is Sentry versus Void. The transitions appear to happen for plot convenience instead of through consistent internal logic. The character’s near-unlimited power requires the script to invent specific weaknesses on demand to allow the resolution. The pattern matches the wider MCU issue of expanding character capabilities to meet plot needs at the cost of system constraints that drama requires.

I gave up on tracking the Sentry and the Void fairly early, because I don’t think the script was tracking them either. A villain who can do anything the plot needs is a villain I stop worrying about.

Pullman’s performance is professionally committed within the limits of the material. The character receives sufficient screen time to establish basic identity without receiving the development that would make Reynolds function as vivid antagonist with interior life. The mental health framing requires audience investment that the script doesn’t adequately earn through depicted character development.

The Team That Cannot Cohere

The Thunderbolts ensemble includes Yelena Belova, Bucky Barnes, Red Guardian, Ghost, John Walker, and Taskmaster. The characters have appeared across multiple previous MCU productions with varying levels of development. The film attempts to assemble them into functional ensemble despite their disparate backgrounds and incompatible personality dynamics.

The ensemble doesn’t cohere. The characters are a collection of individuals instead of a functional team. The relationships between team members are referenced instead of developed.

The dialogue rotates through the characters without finding the interactions that would establish the team as ensemble. The film attempts ensemble character moments without providing the foundation work that would make them connect.

Sebastian Stan’s Bucky gets professional commitment and almost no new development. David Harbour’s Red Guardian repeats his Black Widow comedy without growing past it. Hannah John-Kamen’s Ghost barely gets screen time for a speaking role. Wyatt Russell’s John Walker replays his Falcon and the Winter Soldier material. The film kills off Olga Kurylenko’s Taskmaster early, one more sign the franchise keeps recycling the character without committing to her. That Taskmaster death made me laugh out loud, and I don’t think the film wanted that reaction.

The Suicide Squad structure that the production was apparently attempting requires major character development time that the runtime doesn’t provide.

DC’s Suicide Squad films had faced similar challenges. The ensemble-of-antiheroes structure has been consistently difficult to execute successfully across multiple franchise attempts. Thunderbolts doesn’t solve the problem. The film continues the pattern of failed ensemble-antihero attempts that the wider genre has shown.

Craft: The Phase Five Pattern Continues

Craft Note

Thunderbolts is the Phase Five entry that confirmed the franchise crisis state extends across the wider MCU regardless of specific property changes or ensemble experiments. The film works through the same decorative thematic signaling, weak storytelling, and structural mismanagement that characterized previous Phase Four-Five productions. Florence Pugh’s continued performance commitment can’t rescue productions whose underlying problems exceed any individual actor’s ability to address.

The mental health themes are decoration instead of essential plot foundation. The Sentry / Void mechanic is structurally confused. The team ensemble doesn’t cohere despite the established characters’ previous appearances.

The Suicide Squad structure that the production was attempting requires character development that the runtime didn’t provide. The cumulative effect is a film that fails through accumulated structural problems instead of through individual element weakness.

The lesson for franchise filmmaking is that the pattern of decorative thematic signaling combined with weak storytelling can’t be sustained indefinitely. Audiences have been responding to the pattern across multiple Phase Four-Five productions through reduced attendance and negative critical response. Thunderbolts continued the pattern despite the documented commercial damage that similar approaches had caused. The franchise hasn’t yet adjusted its underlying creative approach in ways that would address the wider audience confidence collapse.

The 1 rating is for the structural failures despite Pugh’s individual performance achievement. The film has moments that work, but as a whole it doesn’t. The Yelena Belova character continues to work at higher craft level than the surrounding productions support. The pattern is unsustainable for the franchise long-term. The MCU’s Phase Five problems persist through this release.

For analysis of the wider Phase Five crisis state, see How The Multiverse Destroyed The MCU.

Should you skip Thunderbolts?

A 1. Thunderbolts is one of the Phase Five entries that confirmed the franchise crisis state extends across the wider MCU regardless of specific property changes. Florence Pugh’s Yelena Belova continues to work at higher craft level than the surrounding productions support. The mental health themes are decorative signaling instead of essential plot. The Sentry / Void antagonist mechanic is structurally confused. The team ensemble doesn’t cohere despite the established characters’ previous appearances. The Suicide Squad structure that the production was apparently attempting fails through inadequate character development time.

I’ve watched it once and I don’t plan to watch it again.

The 1 is what it earns: a cast of leftovers that never becomes a team, a villain with no rules, and a mental health theme used as a marketing badge. Pugh is the only reason I’d hesitate before calling it a total waste, and she deserved a film that knew what to do with her. Some viewers will score it a little higher for her, and I get that, but watching Marvel spend her like this is a depressing sight.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Florence Pugh the best part of Thunderbolts (2025)?
Yes. Pugh has been the most consistent strong performer across her MCU appearances from Black Widow (2021) through Hawkeye (Disney+ 2021) through Thunderbolts. The character has been the franchise’s most successful new lead introduction of the Phase Four-Five period. Pugh’s continued professional commitment raises material that doesn’t deserve her work. The pattern is unsustainable. The franchise can’t continue relying on her individual performance rescue without providing scripts that match her commitment level.
Are the mental health themes in Thunderbolts decorative?
By the structural-versus-decorative test, yes. Remove the mental health framing and the basic plot proceeds with minor modifications. Yelena’s depression is referenced but doesn’t generate the team’s mission dynamics. Walker’s PTSD is mentioned but doesn’t drive decision-making. Reynolds’s psychotic dissociation is antagonist mechanic. The themes are layered on top of standard team-of-antiheroes plot instead of emerging from it. The signaling generates audience resistance similar to other Phase Four-Five productions.
How does Thunderbolts compare to The Suicide Squad?
Thunderbolts attempts the Suicide Squad structure that DC has explored across multiple films (Suicide Squad 2016, The Suicide Squad 2021). The ensemble-of-antiheroes structure has been consistently difficult to execute successfully. James Gunn’s The Suicide Squad in 2021 was the most successful version of the structure. Thunderbolts doesn’t approach Gunn’s achievement. The Suicide Squad structure remains genre-difficult and Thunderbolts continues the pattern of failed attempts.
Is the Sentry in Thunderbolts worth caring about?
Limited. Lewis Pullman’s performance is professionally committed. The character mechanic is structurally confused. The transitions between Sentry and Void appear to happen for plot convenience instead of through consistent internal logic. The character has potential that future appearances might develop further. The Thunderbolts introduction doesn’t establish the character sufficiently to predict whether later appearances will deliver on the potential.
Does the Thunderbolts ensemble work?
No. The characters are a collection of individuals instead of a functional team. The relationships between team members are referenced instead of developed. The dialogue rotates through the characters without finding the interactions that would establish the ensemble dynamic. Florence Pugh’s Yelena holds individual scenes together. The team scenes don’t cohere into ensemble function.
Do I need to watch Thunderbolts (2025) to follow the MCU?
Reluctantly. The film establishes the Thunderbolts team that later productions may build on. The Sentry character introduction may have broader franchise implications. The Florence Pugh material continues her arc that’s been the most consistent Phase Four-Five element. Completists can watch once. Most viewers can safely skip without missing essential franchise context.
How does Thunderbolts (2025) fit into MCU Phase Five?
Thunderbolts is one of the Phase Five entries that showed the franchise’s continued crisis state. The phase contains Quantumania (-100), Deadpool & Wolverine (1), Brave New World (1), and Thunderbolts (1). It hasn’t produced clear creative success. The commercial performance has been mixed with only Deadpool & Wolverine generating heavy revenue through nostalgia use. Thunderbolts continued the pattern of weak commercial and critical reception.
How much did Thunderbolts (2025) make at the box office?
The film grossed approximately three hundred and eighty-two million dollars worldwide on a production budget of approximately one hundred and eighty million. The performance was below MCU expectations and was below what Deadpool & Wolverine had generated through legacy character returns. The commercial decline reflects the wider Phase Five audience confidence problems that persist despite individual property variations.
Will the MCU recover from Phase Five?
The franchise’s response to the Phase Five problems has included production schedule reductions, the casting of Robert Downey Jr. as Doctor Doom for upcoming Avengers films, and reduced Disney+ series production. Whether these adjustments will produce sustained audience recovery remains an open question. The patterns that defined Phase Four-Five have generated audience resistance that may not be reversible through marketing adjustments alone. The Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars productions currently in development may use the multiverse premise to reset the continuity back to something more manageable. The execution will determine whether the franchise can recover or whether the decline will continue.

Sources

Writing in This Genre

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.