Latest
“People Who Use AI Deserve to Be Castrated”: When the Sentence Outruns the CrimeHow Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe College ScamTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsThe Sage of SagittariusPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction Authors

M*A*S*H (1970)

TL;DR: M*A*S*H (1970) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Robert Altman’s 1970 Korean War satire. Sutherland and Gould as wartime surgeons.
M*A*S*H (1970)
9 / 10

Official trailer

M*A*S*H is Robert Altman’s 1970 American black comedy adapting Richard Hooker’s 1968 novel of the same name.

The film depicts surgeons at a Mobile Army Surgical Hospital during the Korean War, focusing on captains Hawkeye Pierce, Trapper John McIntyre, and Duke Forrest. The unit works close enough to combat that wounded soldiers arrive constantly. The surgeons cope with the slaughter through black humor, sexual misadventures, sabotage of military hierarchy, and explicit insubordination toward incompetent officers. Donald Sutherland plays Hawkeye Pierce. Elliott Gould plays Trapper John McIntyre.

Tom Skerritt plays Duke Forrest. Sally Kellerman plays Major Margaret Houlihan. Robert Duvall plays Major Frank Burns. Roger Bowen plays Colonel Henry Blake. Gary Burghoff plays Corporal Walter Radar O’Reilly. Jo Ann Pflug plays Lieutenant Maria Schneider. Ring Lardner Jr. wrote the screenplay. Twentieth Century Fox produced the film on a budget of approximately 3.5 million dollars, and it grossed approximately 81 million dollars worldwide. The work won the Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay.

I love the anger in this film. It’s chaotic on purpose, funnier than a film about an operating tent has any right to be, and it makes its antiwar case without ever stopping to lecture. The cruelty toward Houlihan is the one thing that keeps it off a 10 for me.

The film is one of the principal American antiwar productions and the foundation of the American black comedy tradition.

Released during active American military operations in Vietnam, the Korean War setting allowed direct critique of American military culture without engaging the contested politics of the actual ongoing conflict. The film established Robert Altman as a major American director after years of television and minor film work. Sutherland and Gould both achieved leading-actor status through this work.

The film spawned the long-running television series M*A*S*H (1972-1983). That extended the franchise across eleven years and ranked among the most-watched American television productions ever made. The film’s success depends considerably on its refusal to soften the violence of war or the cruelty of its protagonists toward those they consider inadequate.

The Vietnam Context

Hooker’s novel was set during the Korean War, and the film adapts it without explicitly addressing Vietnam. American audiences in 1970 understood the Korean setting as protective cover for a critique of the war still being fought in Southeast Asia. That let the film show American military incompetence, casual brutality toward enemy soldiers and contempt for institutional military culture without stepping into the polarized politics of Vietnam coverage. I think that’s the smartest decision in the picture, a disguise thin enough that it fooled nobody.

The result succeeded. The film made the antiwar argument that direct Vietnam content would have made impossible. Viewers across political positions could accept critique of Korean War conditions while still recognizing that the same critique applied to current events. Later Vietnam films including The Deer Hunter (1978), Apocalypse Now (1979), and Platoon (1986) worked with more direct engagement once cultural conditions had shifted. M*A*S*H showed that historical settings could deliver contemporary arguments that direct contemporary engagement would have prevented.

For Writers

Historical settings can carry contemporary arguments that direct contemporary engagement would prevent. The same logic works in fiction. The recent past provides cover for criticism that the immediate present wouldn’t allow.

The Cruelty Problem

Hawkeye and Trapper John torment Major Frank Burns and Major Margaret Houlihan throughout the film. The harassment includes broadcasting their sexual encounter to the entire camp through a hidden microphone. The protagonists exhibit cruelty toward those they consider religious hypocrites or military careerists. The film treats this cruelty as suitable response to military incompetence. Later viewing has produced significant critical reconsideration about whether the harassment campaign reflects suitable moral position or simply different cruelty than the cruelty the protagonists oppose.

The Academy nominated Sally Kellerman as Houlihan for Best Supporting Actress for a performance that includes the famous shower scene, where the camp pulls down the tent walls to expose her to the entire unit.

The scene was filmed as comedy, and it’s the one stretch of this film I’d cut. I wince at it. The cruelty problem doesn’t invalidate the antiwar argument, and it complicates the film’s moral position in ways 1970 audiences mostly didn’t register.

For Writers

Comic treatment of cruelty can age into problems the original production didn’t anticipate. The same applies to fiction. What plays as comedy in one period can read as sexual harassment in another. Material should be evaluated against multiple possible reception conditions.

The Altman Ensemble Method

Robert Altman developed his ensemble method during M*A*S*H production. Multiple actors speak at the same time, and the overlapping dialogue forces viewers to choose which conversation to follow. The camera catches the chaos of operating rooms and mess halls instead of steering your attention the conventional way. That mess is my favorite thing about the film. The operating-room scenes feel overheard to me, gore and wisecracks piled on top of each other, and they’re what I’d point to first if anybody asked why this picture still works.

Altman’s later career extended the ensemble method across Nashville (1975), Short Cuts (1993), and Gosford Park (2001).

Each film built on the M*A*S*H foundation. The method requires particular casting. Each ensemble member must be capable of inventing dialogue, listening to surrounding conversations, and contributing to scenes without dominating them. The casting requirement limits which actors can work in Altman’s productions. The actors who succeed in his ensembles produce material that conventional production couldn’t generate.

For Writers

Method shapes possibility. The same applies to creative work. Choosing how to work determines what can emerge. The ensemble method requires different contributors than the single-protagonist method allows.

Craft Note

Ring Lardner Jr. wrote the M*A*S*H screenplay during the period when he was emerging from the Hollywood blacklist that had ended his career for two decades. Lardner had been one of the Hollywood Ten who refused to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1947. His Oscar for M*A*S*H represented professional rehabilitation after years of blacklisted work. The screenplay’s anti-authoritarian content reflects Lardner’s own experience with American institutional power. The film therefore carries political weight that pure entertainment-driven production wouldn’t have produced.

Does M*A*S*H still hold up?

M*A*S*H is a 9 for me, and it would be a 10 if the film knew where to aim its cruelty. The Korean War cover let it say what nobody could say directly about Vietnam, the Altman ensemble method changed how an American film could sound, and Sutherland and Gould make a pair of wise guys I’d follow anywhere. The treatment of Houlihan costs it that last point. Watch it if you care about American antiwar cinema, about Altman, or about films whose moral positions have aged into complicated standing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I watch M*A*S*H or the television series first?
Either order works. The two differ considerably in tone. The film is more sexually explicit and morally complicated. The series became more sympathetic to military characters across its eleven years.
Is the cruelty problem a serious objection?
Critics disagree. Some find the cruelty inappropriate and dating. Others argue the cruelty was the point and that softening it would have damaged the antiwar argument.
How does M*A*S*H compare to the Hooker novel?
The film follows the novel’s structure with real modifications. It’s more explicitly antiwar than the source. Lardner’s screenplay carries more political content than Hooker provided.
How long is M*A*S*H (1970)?
The film runs approximately one hour fifty-six minutes. The runtime accommodates the ensemble cast and episodic structure without compression.
What is the cultural impact of M*A*S*H?
Real sustained impact through American antiwar cinema, the Altman ensemble method, and the long-running television series that extended the franchise across eleven years.
Is M*A*S*H right for younger viewers?
The film contains considerable sexual content, profanity, and surgical gore. Older teenagers can engage the material with discretion. Younger viewers shouldn’t.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.