Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

In Bruges (2008)

TL;DR: In Bruges (2008) rates 10 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. In Bruges is Martin McDonagh’s first feature and one of the great films of its decade. Colin Farrell plays Ray, an Irish hitman who has just botched his.
In Bruges (2008)
10 / 10

Official trailer

In Bruges is Martin McDonagh’s first feature and one of the great films of its decade.

Colin Farrell plays Ray, an Irish hitman who has just botched his first job and accidentally killed a child. Brendan Gleeson plays Ken, the older hitman ordered to take Ray to Bruges and wait there until further orders. Ralph Fiennes plays Harry, their boss, who eventually shows up to deal with the situation. The plot can be described in two sentences. The film can’t.

The script was nominated for the Best Original Screenplay Oscar.

It should have won. The dialogue does in two hours what most dialogue doesn’t do in twenty. McDonagh had been a successful playwright before this film, and you can hear the theatrical pedigree in the rhythm of the lines, but he’d also learned what stage dialogue couldn’t do and used film to do it.

I think this is as close to a perfect film as anything from the 2000s. It’s the funniest movie I know about guilt, and it breaks my heart in the same scenes where it makes me laugh hardest. I don’t have a single complaint worth raising, and I’d hand it to anyone who wants to learn how to write dialogue.

The Setup

Ray hates Bruges. The film opens with him sulking through medieval canals, watching tourists, taking the boat tour, and generally being miserable about being alive. Ken loves Bruges. He sees the architecture, the canals, the bell tower, the museums. The contrast is the whole first act. The script never explains it. The audience learns who these two men are by watching them fail to enjoy the same vacation.

This is patient filmmaking. The major dramatic question of what they’re doing in Bruges and why they can’t leave isn’t answered until well into the second act. The film trusts the audience to stay engaged with two men sitting in a medieval city talking about it. McDonagh lets Ray sulk like a teenager through a city built for postcards, and I find it funnier every minute it goes on. Gleeson’s delight right beside him makes me fond of both men before I learn what they’ve done.

For Writers

Character is revealed faster through contrast than through exposition. In Bruges opens with two characters who react oppositely to the same environment. The audience learns more about Ray from his reaction to a church than from any backstory the film could have provided. Ken’s pleasure in the same church teaches the audience equal amounts about him. The lesson is that putting characters in a neutral situation and watching them react is faster than telling the reader who they are. Contrast accomplishes what exposition would have to grind out.

The Tone

In Bruges is a comedy. It’s also a tragedy and a study of guilt and atonement. McDonagh shifts tones within scenes, sometimes within single lines, and never loses his hold on the audience. The swan boat scene, where Ray and Ken talk about the dead child, is the one I’d point to if someone asked me what tonal control looks like. I laughed at the boat and then couldn’t breathe at the conversation.

The supporting characters are weird in productive ways. The dwarf actor (Jordan Prentice) hired for a Dutch art film. The Belgian drug dealer. The pregnant hotel owner who won’t leave her hotel.

None of them feel like quirky additions. They feel like the kind of people you’d meet in Bruges if you were hiding there.

For Writers

Tonal control is the hardest skill in dialogue-driven writing. Most writers commit to one tone and stay there. McDonagh moves between comedy and tragedy within paragraphs without losing the reader. The trick is that the characters don’t know they’re in a comedy or a tragedy. They’re just people responding to what is happening to them. The lesson is that tonal range comes from character honesty. Real people are funny when they’re devastated and devastated when they’re being funny. Honor that and the tone takes care of itself.

The Code

Harry’s code is the film’s moral spine. He believes children shouldn’t be killed under any circumstances. Ray killed a child. The code requires Ray to be killed. Harry comes to Bruges to do it himself because he won’t ask Ken to do it, and Ken refuses anyway. The third act unfolds according to Harry’s rules, and Harry is willing to follow them all the way, including against himself, when his own actions in the film accidentally fall under the same prohibition.

The film neither endorses the code nor parodies it. It treats Harry as a man whose worldview has internal coherence and who will follow it to the worst conclusion. Ralph Fiennes plays him as a tightly wound English working-class man committed to his manners, and I think it’s the best work of his career. Whenever Harry opens his mouth I’m laughing and frightened in equal measure.

For Writers

An antagonist with a coherent code is harder to defeat and more interesting to follow than an antagonist with mere appetites. Harry in In Bruges has rules. He follows them. He pays for them. The cost of his code is the third act of the film. The lesson is that giving an antagonist a clear moral principle that they won’t violate makes them more dangerous. The reader knows what they’ll do because they’re predictable. The predictability makes the threat real.

Craft Note

Martin McDonagh wrote and directed his feature debut. Colin Farrell as Ray. Brendan Gleeson as Ken. Ralph Fiennes as Harry. Clémence Poésy as Chloé. Jordan Prentice as Jimmy. Carter Burwell composed the score. Filmed on location in Bruges. Released February 2008. Roughly thirty-three million dollar worldwide gross on a fifteen million dollar budget. Nominated for Best Original Screenplay Oscar. McDonagh went on to direct Seven Psychopaths, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri, and The Banshees of Inisherin.

Is In Bruges as good as people say?

A 10, and In Bruges deserves every point of it. The script is the best original screenplay of its year by some distance, and it should have won the Oscar. Farrell, Gleeson and Fiennes are all doing some of their best work. It’s funny, devastating, profane and humane in proportions that shouldn’t coexist, and I can’t find a flaw in it. Watch it, then watch it again with subtitles to catch the dialogue you missed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it in Bruges?
Yes. Filmed entirely on location. The Bruges Bell Tower, the canals, the medieval squares, the Memling paintings in the Groeningemuseum. All of it is real and accessible.
Who is Martin McDonagh?
Anglo-Irish playwright and filmmaker. Made his name with the Leenane Trilogy and other plays in the 1990s. In Bruges was his first feature. He’s since made Seven Psychopaths, Three Billboards, and The Banshees of Inisherin, the last of which reunited Farrell and Gleeson.
Is the violence as bad as people say?
Yes. The film is violent at times and the violence is treated seriously instead of glamorously. The dead child is shown.
Is In Bruges really a comedy?
It’s funnier than most comedies. It’s also more devastating than most dramas. Both descriptions are correct.
Who else is in In Bruges?
Clémence Poésy as the local woman Ray falls for. Jordan Prentice as the dwarf actor. Thekla Reuten as the hotel owner. Eric Godon as a Bruges criminal.
How does In Bruges compare to McDonagh’s other films?
It’s his best feature. Three Billboards is a close second. Seven Psychopaths is the lesser of the four. Banshees is the most artistically ambitious but In Bruges is the most complete.
Is In Bruges worth watching?
Yes. Possibly one of the best ten or fifteen films of the 2000s.

The Craft Behind It

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.