Films Only Men Seem to Love
Films that women watch once and men watch seventeen times
A word on the category: “films only men seem to love” isn’t a precise statement.
Women watch and enjoy every film on this list. The category describes something more specific: films that men watch repeatedly, quote at each other, reference in conversation as shared cultural touchstones, and feel an ownership of in ways that women generally don’t. The films that become part of the male conversational vocabulary in the same way that certain other films become part of the female one.
The reasons deserve examination for each film. Sometimes it’s the subject matter. Sometimes it’s the pleasures on offer. Sometimes it’s the absence of female characters that makes women feel the film isn’t speaking to them. And sometimes it’s simply the cultural moment in which the film was embraced and who was doing the embracing. Each entry says which explanation applies.
I’m a man, and most of these twenty films are movies I’d go to war for. Anyone who treats this category as a joke is wrong, and anyone who treats it as an accusation misses just as badly. The films are great. They also share a blind spot about women, and the people who adore them should be the first to look at it squarely. I count myself among those people.
1. Goodfellas (1990)
► Read the full review of Goodfellas (1990)
⭐ 8.7/10
“As far back as I can remember, I always wanted to be a gangster.”
Why men love it: Goodfellas is the fantasy of male belonging taken to its logical and criminal extreme. Henry Hill’s narration is the narration of a man who found a world where the rules are different, where competence is rewarded immediately, where money and respect arrive together. The film makes the mob life look appealing for its first hour (the money, the restaurants, the pleasure of being somebody) and most men watching it feel the pull before they feel the cost.
Why women are more ambivalent: Karen Hill. The film’s treatment of Karen, Henry’s wife who narrates her own section of the film, is one of cinema’s best female supporting performances and one of the clearest portraits of what the life costs the people adjacent to it. Women watching Goodfellas often find themselves in Karen’s perspective in a way the film doesn’t seem to expect them to. The film’s glamour is explicitly male glamour. Karen is inside it and outside it at the same time, and that’s where many women find themselves watching the film.
Goodfellas is as close to a perfect movie as I know, and Karen is a big reason for that. Scorsese seduces you with the money and the restaurants, then hands her the narration and makes you look at what all that glamour costs the people at home. The money is the half everyone quotes. Karen is the half that keeps the film from turning into a recruitment poster, and I’d rank her section among the smartest choices Scorsese ever made.
2. The Big Lebowski (1998)
► Read the full review of The Big Lebowski (1998)
⭐ 8.1/10
“The Dude abides.”
Why men love it: The Dude is the patron saint of men who have decided that the world’s urgency is mostly manufactured.
He bowls, drinks White Russians, and refuses to let anyone rush him, and the film endorses this refusal with such complete conviction that it’s generated an actual religion. Men who feel the pressure of performing ambition and productivity find in the Dude a figure who validates the desire to simply not. The quote density is extraordinary, men who love Lebowski deploy it as a conversational vocabulary.
Why women are more ambivalent: The female characters exist primarily as catalysts for the male characters’ situations. Maude Lebowski is the most interesting woman in the film and she arrives with an agenda that uses the Dude as a biological instrument. The film is simply not especially interested in them. That’s its own form of exclusion. The Dude’s philosophy of non-striving also maps less cleanly onto female experience, where non-striving has historically produced different and less comfortable outcomes.
3. Fight Club (1999)
► Read the full review of Fight Club (1999)
⭐ 8.8/10
“The things you own end up owning you.”
Why men love it: Fight Club speaks directly to a male experience of dissatisfaction, the sense that modern life has removed the contexts in which men historically understood themselves, that consumerism has replaced something more essential, that the performance of masculine competence has no outlet in contemporary office life. Tyler Durden articulates this dissatisfaction with maximum charisma and no functional solution, and that’s how dissatisfaction feels from the inside.
Why women are more ambivalent: Male viewers who take Tyler’s philosophy at face value frequently miss the film’s satirical intent (Tyler is a delusion, the ideology is the problem not the solution), which the film warned would happen and which happened anyway. Women watching Fight Club more often read it as satire from the outside. That produces a different and less invested experience. The film is also almost entirely male in its world. Marla Singer is present but peripheral to the film’s central preoccupations.
Fight Club gets a ten from me, and the misreading still infuriates me. Fincher builds Tyler as a delusion with all the charisma in the world and no plan worth following, and the whole last stretch exists to show you where that plan leads. The film is funny and furious, and it knows exactly what it’s mocking. When the Tyler speeches get quoted as life advice, the joke has landed on the wrong target, and that’s a loss for everybody who missed the satire.
4. Heat (1995)
► Read the full review of Heat (1995)
⭐ 8.3/10
“Don’t let yourself get attached to anything you are not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat.”
Why men love it: Heat is the definitive film about professional masculine identity: two men who are mirror images of each other across the law, who respect each other completely, who can’t both survive their collision. Neil McCauley’s code, be ready to walk away from everything in thirty seconds, is admirable and devastating, and men watch the film repeatedly to inhabit the total professional commitment that both McCauley and Hanna embody. The coffee shop scene, in which they finally meet and talk, is endlessly rewatched and quoted.
Why women are more ambivalent: The film’s women exist primarily as casualties of the men’s professional commitments. His obsession destroys Hanna’s marriage. McCauley’s romantic relationship is the one thing his code can’t survive. The film is about what professional commitment costs relationships, but Mann tells it entirely from inside the professional commitment instead of from the perspective of what is being lost. The women in the film watch their partners subordinate their lives to their codes and don’t have a great deal of say in the matter.
5. Blade Runner (1982)
► Read the full review of Blade Runner (1982)
⭐ 8.1/10
“All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.”
Why men love it: Blade Runner offers the pleasures of a world completely imagined (its rain-soaked Los Angeles, its philosophy of what it means to be human, its moral ambiguity about who the real monsters are) combined with the kind of atmosphere that rewards repeated viewing with new detail. Men who love Blade Runner often love it obsessively, arguing about the Director’s Cut versus the Final Cut, debating whether Deckard is a replicant, returning to Roy Batty’s monologue. The film generates exactly the kind of interpretive argument that men find satisfying.
Why women are more ambivalent: Rachel’s arc (a replicant who doesn’t know she’s a replicant, who’s implanted with false memories, whose response to discovering her own constructed identity is to fall in love with the man who told her) isn’t a story that maps comfortably onto female experience. The film’s romantic conclusion (Deckard and Rachel escaping together) asks the audience to find satisfaction in a relationship built on a power imbalance that the film doesn’t fully examine.
I give Blade Runner a seven, and I know that’ll annoy some readers. The world is gorgeous, and I’d happily spend hours wandering that rain-soaked Los Angeles. My problem is the romance. Deckard and Rachel is the weak part of the film, and the film’s refusal to look hard at that power imbalance keeps it off my top shelf. The city gets all the care, and the people living in it get less than they deserve.
6. Office Space (1999)
► Read the full review of Office Space (1999)
⭐ 7.8/10
“I have eight bosses, Bob.”
Why men love it: Office Space is the most accurate portrait of the alienation of corporate cubicle work in American cinema, and men who work in offices have been quoting it at each other since 1999 as a form of mutual recognition. The TPS reports, the eight bosses, Milton and his stapler, the printer destruction, every element maps directly onto a recognizable corporate reality that the film refuses to romanticize or resolve. Peter’s hypnotherapy-induced indifference to the company’s opinion is the fantasy of every man who has sat in a performance review.
Why women are more ambivalent: The film’s world is almost entirely male. Joanna is present as Peter’s love interest and is given a storyline about her flair, but she’s not the film’s subject. The corporate alienation the film depicts is a male experience of a certain era, the 1990s technology sector cubicle farm populated primarily by men who expected their engineering degrees to produce meaningful work and found TPS reports instead. Women in those environments often had a different and sometimes more hostile experience that the film doesn’t address.
7. Road House (1989)
► Read the full review of Road House (1989)
⭐ 6.2/10
“Pain don’t hurt.”
Why men love it: The philosopher-warrior archetype, a man who quotes Nietzsche and tears throats out with his bare hands, is the male fantasy of combining intellectual and physical authority in a single person. Dalton’s code, his calm, his absolute competence in every situation, his willingness to be outnumbered and win anyway: these are the qualities men fantasize about possessing. The film delivers this fantasy without apology or irony, and that’s why it works as a guilty pleasure and as a serious object of male affection.
Why women are more ambivalent: Road House is a film about men fighting for control of a bar in Missouri. The romantic subplot exists but is subsidiary to the core interest. That’s whether Dalton will defeat the people trying to run the Double Deuce. Women who find the Double Deuce’s management less absorbing than the film expects aren’t wrong to find it less believable. It’s a very specific interest that the film assumes the audience shares.
Road House is a seven for me, and I enjoy every ridiculous minute of it. Dalton is a cartoon, and the film plays him with such calm conviction that I buy the cartoon anyway. My reservation is the story around him. The fight for the Double Deuce is thin, the romance is an afterthought, and the movie works only as long as you don’t ask it to be more than a fantasy. I call it a guilty pleasure, and I feel about half guilty.
8. Apocalypse Now (1979)
► Read the full review of Apocalypse Now (1979)
⭐ 8.5/10
“The horror. The horror.”
Why men love it: Apocalypse Now works at the level of myth: the journey into darkness, the confrontation with the self’s capacity for violence, the male fear and attraction to what war makes of men. Kilgore’s “I love the smell of napalm in the morning” is one of cinema’s great lines because it captures something true about a certain kind of male psychology at the extreme, the aestheticization of violence, the finding of beauty in destruction. Men are drawn to this truth about themselves even when it disturbs them.
Why women are more ambivalent: There are no significant female characters in Apocalypse Now. The Playboy bunnies are present as male fantasy objects in a single scene. The film is a male story from beginning to end, about male psychology, made by men, for an implied male audience. Women can and do engage with it seriously, but they’re engaging with something that doesn’t presuppose their presence.
9. Full Metal Jacket (1987)
► Read the full review of Full Metal Jacket (1987)
⭐ 8.3/10
“This is my rifle. There are many like it, but this one is mine.”
Why men love it: Hartman’s drill instructor monologues, which R. Lee Ermey improvised from real Marine training material, have become the most quoted military content in popular culture, deployed by men in ironic contexts that preserve the original’s energy while acknowledging its absurdity. The film captures the male experience of institutional pressure to perform a particular kind of masculinity and the range of outcomes that pressure produces. Men who have been through any institutional process of this kind recognize something true in it.
Why women are more ambivalent: Full Metal Jacket is an all-male world about an all-male process producing all-male outcomes. The experience of military training, the psychology of men in combat, the dynamics of male institutional belonging and exclusion. These aren’t universal experiences. Women can observe them with interest from the outside; they’re not being asked to recognize themselves.
10. Caddyshack (1980)
► Read the full review of Caddyshack (1980)
⭐ 7.3/10
“So I’ve got that going for me, which is nice.”
Why men love it: Caddyshack is a golf film in the same way that Animal House is a college film. The setting is the excuse for a sequence of comic performances, and the performances are the thing. Bill Murray’s groundskeeper Carl, Chevy Chase’s Ty Webb, Rodney Dangerfield’s Al Czervik, Ted Knight’s Judge Smails. Each is a complete comic universe operating at full power within the same film. Men who love Caddyshack can quote it scene by scene and have done so at each other for forty years.
Why women are more ambivalent: Golf. The film’s milieu (a country club in the early 1980s, the social dynamics of wealthy men competing and undermining each other on a golf course) maps onto a world that was and largely remains male-coded. The comedy isn’t hostile to women, but it’s not speaking to them either. The pleasures on offer are the pleasures of men watching other men be absurd at each other, in a setting organized around male competition.
Caddyshack deserves every point of the eight and a half I give it. The four comic leads are each running their own movie, and the collisions between them are where I laugh hardest. The reservation is structural. The plot is a clothesline, and a few stretches sag when none of the big four are on screen. I’d take that trade any day of the week, because the high points are that high.
11. Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior (1981)
⭐ 7.6/10
“Two days ago, I saw a vehicle that would haul that tanker.”
Why men love it: The Road Warrior is pure action cinema operating at maximum efficiency, a post-apocalyptic world stripped to its essentials, a protagonist with no name and no past who helps people he’s no investment in helping because it’s the right thing and because he’s nothing else to do. The film’s action sequences, especially the final tanker chase, are still the benchmark for practical vehicular action filmmaking.
Men who love it love it with the affection reserved for things that do their one job better than anything else has ever done it.
Why women are more ambivalent: The world of The Road Warrior is a male world at its most extreme: resources, violence, survival, the ethics of the wasteland. The few female characters are present only as people to be protected. The film’s appeal is the appeal of the stripped-down male fantasy of survival competence in a world where survival competence is the only currency. Women engaging with this find themselves watching a fantasy that doesn’t include them as participants.
12. Scarface (1983)
⭐ 8.3/10
“Say hello to my little friend!”
Why men love it: Tony Montana’s energy (the absolute refusal to accept the position he was given, the drive to accumulate everything the world told him he couldn’t have, the charisma of a man who has no ceiling on his ambition) connects with men who feel circumstances or institutions are constraining their own ambitions. The film’s tragedy (Tony’s destruction is total and complete) is often secondary in male reception to the fantasy (Tony’s rise is spectacular and he answers to nobody).
The poster ends up on dorm room walls because of the rise, and the fall doesn’t enter into it.
Why women are more ambivalent: De Palma tells Elvira’s arc (a woman treated as property, married as a trophy, discarded when Tony no longer needs her) from Tony’s perspective. The film doesn’t give Elvira sufficient interiority for the audience to understand her experience independently of Tony’s use of her. Women watching Scarface often find themselves watching a film about a man treating women as objects while the film invites them to find the man gripping.
Scarface is a ten for me, and I’ll defend the dorm posters up to a point. The rise is thrilling on purpose, and De Palma wants you to feel it. I part company with the poster crowd on the fall. The last act, where everything Tony grabbed turns on him, is the reason the film matters, and treating it as an unfortunate ending misses the movie entirely. My one quarrel is Elvira, who deserved far more of the film’s attention.
13. Predator (1987)
► Read the full review of Predator (1987)
⭐ 7.8/10
“Get to the chopper!”
Why men love it: Predator is the fantasy of male competence meeting its absolute limit, the most capable military unit available, against a threat that’s simply better at every military skill. The pleasure is watching men who are the best at what they do be systematically outclassed, and then watching the survivor win not through superior force but through intelligence and improvisation. The film’s cast (Schwarzenegger, Carl Weathers, Jesse Ventura, Bill Duke) is the pleasure of watching very large men acknowledge that something is stronger than they are.
Why women are more ambivalent: There are no female characters in Predator. The film is a male ensemble survival horror set in a jungle. Women can enjoy it as genre cinema, and many do, but there’s no version of “finding yourself in this film” available to female viewers. The film doesn’t exclude women. It simply doesn’t include them in any meaningful way.
14. Das Boot (1981)
► Read the full review of Das Boot (1981)
⭐ 8.3/10
“We are the hunters. And what are we hunting? We are hunting death.”
Why men love it: Das Boot is the definitive claustrophobic survival film, men in a steel tube under the ocean with forces they can’t see hunting them, managing fear and waiting and the psychology of a crew living in each other’s presence continuously under conditions of absolute danger. The film’s technical achievement is the recreation of that claustrophobia on screen, and men who love it return to it for the sustained dread it produces more effectively than any comparable film.
Why women are more ambivalent: Das Boot is an entirely male world (submarine warfare in WWII was male by definition) and the film’s pleasures are the pleasures of male group psychology under extreme pressure. The film isn’t inaccessible to women, but it’s speaking to a world that didn’t include them and a psychological experience that was male in its historical context.
15. The Thing (1982)
► Read the full review of The Thing (1982)
⭐ 8.2/10
“I dunno what the hell’s in there, but it’s weird and pissed off whatever it is.”
Why men love it: The Thing is the paranoia film at its most intense, an all-male Antarctic research station where anyone could be the alien, where trust is the one resource that can’t survive the situation, where the rational response to the threat makes the threat worse. Men who love it return for the practical effects (still extraordinary), the sustained paranoia, and the refusal to offer resolution. The ending is ambiguous in a way that’s generated forty years of argument.
Why women are more ambivalent: There are no female characters in The Thing. The film is set in an all-male environment and is entirely about the psychology of male trust and betrayal under extreme pressure. It’s one of the finest horror films ever made and women who love horror engage with it seriously, but the world it depicts is one they’re observing from the outside.
The Thing sits near the top of my personal horror list, and I rate it a nine and a half. Those practical effects still make a lot of modern CGI look lazy, and the ending is exactly right. Carpenter refuses to tell you who’s human, and I’d have been furious if he had. The film trusts you to handle the dread after the credits, and very few horror directors have that kind of nerve.
16. Tombstone (1993)
► Read the full review of Tombstone (1993)
⭐ 7.8/10
“I’m your huckleberry.”
Why men love it: Val Kilmer’s Doc Holliday is the most quoted performance in Western cinema for men of a certain age, a dying man who’s also the most dangerous person in any room he enters, who helps his friend from loyalty, not from any investment in the outcome, who delivers every line with the pleasure of a man who has nothing left to lose. “I’m your huckleberry” has entered the conversational vocabulary in a way that no other Western line has achieved since the 1990s.
Why women are more ambivalent: Tombstone is primarily a film about male friendship and male codes of loyalty. Wyatt and Doc’s relationship is its emotional center, and the women in the film exist in supporting positions relative to that relationship. The film isn’t hostile to women, but its deepest emotional investment is in the bond between its male protagonists, a structure common enough in Westerns that it barely needs comment.
17. Ronin (1998)
► Read the full review of Ronin (1998)
⭐ 7.4/10
“Whenever there is any doubt, there is no doubt.”
Why men love it: Ronin is the professional thriller at its most stripped down: former intelligence operatives hired to retrieve a case, the contents of which are never revealed, in a series of car chases through France that remain the best practical vehicular chase sequences in film history. The film’s appeal to men is the appeal of competence without backstory. These men have skills, they apply those skills, and the film trusts the audience to find competence inherently interesting without requiring explanatory scenes about why each person is good at what they do.
Why women are more ambivalent: Ronin is a film about professionals doing professional things in a professional way, with minimal emotional content. The pleasures it offers (the chases, the tactical dialogue, watching skilled people do skilled things) are pleasures that map across gender lines, but the film’s deliberate emotional restraint produces an experience that many women find less engaging than the action cinema that makes room for emotional content alongside its set pieces.
Ronin gets an eight from me. Those car chases through France are reason enough to watch it, and I like a thriller that never stops to explain why its people are good at their jobs. My reservation is the chill. When a member of the crew dies, I shrug more than I should, and a thriller this well made ought to make me care about the people in the car as much as the car.
18. Aliens (1986)
► Read the full review of Aliens (1986)
⭐ 8.4/10
“Game over, man! Game over!”
Why men love it: Aliens is the action sequel that exceeds its predecessor’s scope while delivering everything the original promised and then some. Cameron’s Marines (each with their own name, personality, and role) are the genre’s best military ensemble, and men who love Aliens love the pleasure of watching a competent unit be systematically overwhelmed and watching Ripley compensate for the institutional failures around her with improvised competence. The power loader climax is one of cinema’s great payoffs.
Why women are more ambivalent: Aliens is one of the films on this list that women engage with more equally. Ripley’s character arc is one of cinema’s best female protagonist arcs, and the Ripley-Newt relationship gives the film emotional stakes that extend beyond the action. The film belongs here because its pleasures (the military ensemble, the tactical sequences, the weaponry and tactics) are pleasures that skew male in their fan devotion, even if the film itself is more accessible than most entries on this list.
19. Once Upon a Time in the West (1968)
► Read the full review of Once Upon a Time in the West (1968)
⭐ 8.5/10
“You brought two too many.”
Why men love it: Leone’s masterwork is the Western at its most operatic: the long silences, the extreme close-ups, Ennio Morricone’s score, Henry Fonda cast against type as a psychopathic killer. The film works at a pace that requires patience and rewards it enormously, and men who love it have often had the experience of watching it with women who found the patience required more than they wanted to give.
The opening sequence, twelve minutes of almost no dialogue before a single act of violence, is either the greatest opening in Western cinema or an endurance test depending on your tolerance for silence.
Why women are more ambivalent: Claudia Cardinale’s Jill is the film’s most interesting character in some readings (the woman who survives by her wits in a male world that’s used and discarded her) but she’s surrounded by men whose confrontations are the film’s main subject. The film’s pace, its pleasures of silence and composition, and its total immersion in the mythology of the male Western make it one that requires a particular kind of investment to give back what it has to offer.
Once Upon a Time in the West is a ten, and as far as I’m concerned that opening is the greatest in Western cinema. Morricone’s score does half the storytelling, and casting Fonda as a psychopath took the kind of nerve I wish more studios had. If the pace feels slow, stick with it past the first act, because the showdown at the end makes sense of every long stare that came before it.
20. The Deer Hunter (1978)
► Read the full review of The Deer Hunter (1978)
⭐ 8.1/10
“One shot.”
Why men love it: The Deer Hunter is the film about male friendship under impossible pressure: three men from the same steel town, the same community, the same circle of friends, who go to Vietnam and return as different versions of themselves. Michael’s code (“one shot,” the hunting philosophy that requires you to be certain before you act) is the film’s moral center and the quality that defines his character across every situation.
Men who love The Deer Hunter love it for its male friendship, the depth of the bonds, the devastation of watching those bonds break under pressure.
Why women are more ambivalent: The film spends its first hour establishing a world in which the men’s friendships and rituals (the hunting, the bar, the bowling, the wedding) are the central relationships, and the women are present only as part of the world. Linda is significant and Meryl Streep plays her beautifully, but she’s defined by her relationships to Michael and Nick. The film’s emotional center is the male friendship, and women watching it find themselves outside the circle that the film is primarily about.
What These Films Share
Looking across the twenty entries, the patterns are consistent. Most of these films are about male codes: professional, ethical, or philosophical systems that define who the characters are and how they behave under pressure. Most of them depict male friendship or male rivalry as their emotional center. Most of them exist in worlds where female characters are present but peripheral to the film’s central preoccupations.
None of this makes the films lesser works. Goodfellas, Heat, Blade Runner, and Once Upon a Time in the West are among the greatest films ever made. The observation is simply that these films speak with a distinct voice to a particular experience, and that the experience they speak to most directly is male. Women who love these films love them from a position of engaged observation. Men who love them love them from inside.
I’ll go to bat for every film on this list, and the blind spot still stings. Goodfellas proves a man’s movie can hand a woman her own section and come out stronger, and most of these films never even try. When a woman watches Heat or Das Boot once and never feels the pull to go back, I don’t blame her taste. The filmmakers left her out, and that’s on them.
Which of these films do women love?
A man built the list. Women who love these films or who think I’ve misread something, drop it in the comments. The category is more interesting with pushback than without it.
